自然层流飞行测试翼套的仿真和试验

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2022.26785

论文

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

自然层流飞行测试翼套的仿真和试验

王浩¹, 钟敏¹, 华俊¹, 钟海², 杨体浩³, 王猛⁴, 雷国东¹

1. 中国航空研究院技术研究二部, 北京 100012;
2. 中国飞行试验研究院中航工业飞行仿真航空科技重点实验室, 西安 710089;
3. 西北工业大学航空学院, 西安 710072;
4. 航空工业空气动力研究院高速高雷诺数航空科技重点实验室, 沈阳 110034

收稿日期:2021-12-08 修回日期:2022-02-21 出版日期:2022-11-15 发布日期:2022-04-12
通讯作者: 王浩,E-mail:wanghao@cae.ac.cn E-mail:wanghao@cae.ac.cn

Simulation and experiment of natural laminar flow flight test wing glove

WANG Hao¹, ZHONG Min¹, HUA Jun¹, ZHONG Hai², YANG Tihao³, WANG Meng⁴, LEI Guodong¹

1. Department of Technology Ⅱ, Chinese Aeronautical Establishment, Beijing 100012, China;
2. AVIC Aeronautical Science and Technology Key Laboratory of Flight Simulation, CETE, Xi'an 710089, China;
3. School of Aeronautics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China;
4. Aero Science Key Lab of High Reynolds Aerodynamics Force of High Speed, AVIC Aerodynamics Research Institute, Shenyang 110034, China

Received:2021-12-08 Revised:2022-02-21 Online:2022-11-15 Published:2022-04-12

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 绿色航空的发展逐步受到重视，通过扩大层流区域进行减阻是实现节能减排的一个重要途径。采用考虑转捩判定的数值模拟方法对某自然层流翼套的风洞和飞行试验进行了仿真分析。数值仿真与风洞试验的压力系数分布一致性较好，在常压时仿真和风洞试验中转捩位置随攻角的变化规律基本一致。相较于机头处静压和机身最大截面处静压，采用大气数据系统测量的飞行高度换算的静压作为参考压力时，飞行试验获得的压力系数分布与仿真结果一致性更好；在设计状态和典型非设计状态数值仿真得到的翼套转捩位置与飞行试验结果十分吻合；采用动量法计算翼套截面阻力系数，数值仿真和飞行试验得到的自然层流减阻量差距在0.0002以内。

关键词: 自然层流, 机翼翼套, 数值仿真, 风洞试验, 飞行试验

Abstract: The development of green aviation has drawn increasing attention, while drag reduction by laminar flow region expansion is an important means to achieve energy conservation and emission reduction. This study simulates the wind tunnel and flight tests of a natural laminar flow wing glove by the numerical simulation method considering transition judgement. The pressure coefficient distribution of numerical simulation is consistent with that of the wind tunnel test, and the change in the transition location with angle of attack in numerical simulation is basically consistent with that in the wind tunnel test at atmospheric pressure. When the static pressure calculated from the flight height measured by the air data system, instead of that at the nose and the maximum cross section of the fuselage, is used as the reference pressure, the pressure coefficient distribution obtained from the flight test is more consistent with the simulation results. The transition positions of the wing glove obtained by numerical simulation in the design state and typical non-design state are in good agreement with that of the flight test. The momentum method is used to calculate the drag coefficient of the wing glove section, and the difference in drag coefficient reduction from the natural laminar flow between the numerical simulation and the flight test is smaller than 0.000 2.

Key words: natural laminar flow, wing glove, numerical simulation, wind tunnel test, flight test

中图分类号:

V211.4

王浩, 钟敏, 华俊, 钟海, 杨体浩, 王猛, 雷国东. 自然层流飞行测试翼套的仿真和试验[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(11): 526785-526785.

WANG Hao, ZHONG Min, HUA Jun, ZHONG Hai, YANG Tihao, WANG Meng, LEI Guodong. Simulation and experiment of natural laminar flow flight test wing glove[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 526785-526785.

参考文献

[1] IATA. Aircraft technology roadmap to 2050[EB/OL]. (2019.12.11)[2021.4.1]. https://www.iata.org/contentassets/8d19e716636a47c184e7221c77563c93/Technology-roadmap-2050.pdf.
[2] SCHRAUF G. Status and perspectives of laminar flow[J]. The Aeronautical Journal, 2005, 109(1102):639-644.
[3] 朱自强, 吴宗成, 丁举春. 层流流动控制技术及应用[J]. 航空学报, 2011, 32(5):765-784. ZHU Z Q, WU Z C, DING J C. Laminar flow control technology and application[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2011, 32(5):765-784(in Chinese).
[4] 朱自强, 鞠胜军, 吴宗成. 层流流动主/被动控制技术[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(7):2065-2090. ZHU Z Q, JU S J, WU Z C. Laminar flow active/passive control technology[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37(7):2065-2090(in Chinese).
[5] SMITH A M O, GAMBERONI N. Transition, pressure gradient and stability theory[M]. Long Beach:Douglas, 1956.
[6] 杨体浩, 白俊强, 史亚云, 等. 考虑吸气分布影响的HLFC机翼优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(12):121158. YANG T H, BAI J Q, SHI Y Y, et al. Optimization design for HLFC wings considering influence of suction distribution[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2017, 38(12):121158(in Chinese).
[7] 魏闯, 张铁军, 钱战森. 基于e^N转捩预测方法的增升装置失速特性数值模拟研究[J]. 航空科学技术, 2019, 30(9):33-39. WEI C, ZHANG T J, QIAN Z S. Number simulation on stall characteristic for high-lift configuration based on e^N transition method[J]. Aeronautical Science & Technology, 2019, 30(9):33-39(in Chinese).
[8] ABU-GHANNAM B J, SHAW R. Natural transition of boundary layers-The effects of turbulence, pressure gradient, and flow history[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 1980, 22(5):213-228.
[9] WILCOX D C. Simulation of transition with a two-equation turbulence model[J]. AIAA Journal, 1994, 32(2):247-255.
[10] MENTER F R, LANGTRY R B, LIKKI S R, et al. A correlation-based transition model using local variables-Part Ⅰ:Model formulation[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2006, 128(3):413-422.
[11] LANGTRY R B, MENTER F R, LIKKI S R, et al. A correlation-based transition model using local variables-Part Ⅱ:Test cases and industrial applications[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2006, 128(3):423-434.
[12] 史亚云, 白俊强, 华俊, 等. 基于当地变量的横流转捩预测模型的研究与改进[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(3):780-789. SHI Y Y, BAI J Q, HUA J, et al. Study and modification of cross-flow induced transition model based on local variables[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37(3):780-789(in Chinese).
[13] RIVERS M B, LYNDE M N, CAMPBELL R L, et al. Experimental investigation of the NASA common research model with a natural laminar flow wing in the NASA Langley National Transonic Facility[C]//AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum, 2019:2189.
[14] LYNDE M N, CAMPBELL R L, RIVERS M B, et al. Preliminary results from an experimental assessment of a natural laminar flow design method[C]//AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum, 2019:2298.
[15] 王妙香, 王元元. 民用飞机总体技术研究进展[M]//孙侠生. 绿色航空技术研究与进展. 北京:航空工业出版社, 2020:27-44. WANG M X, WANG Y Y. Research progress of civil aircraft general technology[M]//SUN X S. Research and Progress of Green Aviation Technology. Beijing:Aviation Industry Press, 2020:27-44(in Chinese).
[16] MADDALON D V. Hybrid laminar-flow control flight research:NASA TM-4331:47[R]. Washington, D.C.:NASA, 1991.
[17] BELISLE M J, ROBERTS M W, WILLIAMS T C, et al. A transonic laminar-flow wing glove flight experiment:Overview and design optimization[C]//30th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, 2012:2667.
[18] ROBERTS M W, REED H L, SARIC W S. A transonic laminar-flow wing glove flight experiment:Computational evaluation and linear stability[C]//30th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, 2012:2668.
[19] YOUNG T, MAHONY B, HUMPHREYS B, et al. Durability of hybrid laminar flow control (HLFC) surfaces[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2003, 7(3):181-190.
[20] FUJION M. Design and development of the HondaJet[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2005, 42(3):755-764.
[21] FUJION M, YOSHIZAKI Y, KAWAMURA Y. Natural-laminar-flow airfoil development for a lightweight business jet[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2003, 40(4):609-615.
[22] 张彦军, 段卓毅, 雷武涛, 等. 超临界自然层流机翼设计及基于TSP技术的边界层转捩风洞试验[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(4):122429. ZHANG Y J, DUAN Z Y, LEI W T, et al. Design of supercritical natural laminar flow wing and its boundary layer transition wind tunnel test based on TSP technique[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2019, 40(4):122429(in Chinese).
[23] 艾梦琪, 段卓毅, 张健, 等. 高亚声速层流翼型转捩数值模拟及试验研究[J]. 飞行力学, 2020, 38(6):77-81, 94. AI M Q, DUAN Z Y, ZHANG J, et al. Numerical simulation and test on transition of a high subsonic laminar airfoil[J]. Flight Dynamics, 2020, 38(6):77-81, 94(in Chinese).
[24] 王猛, 钟海, 衷洪杰, 等. 红外热像边界层转捩探测的飞行试验应用研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2019, 37(1):160-167. WANG M, ZHONG H, ZHONG H J, et al. Flight test applications of boundary transition detection method using IR technique[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2019, 37(1):160-167(in Chinese).
[25] 钟海, 王猛, 王启. 边界层转捩红外探测试飞技术研究[J]. 红外技术, 2019, 41(8):712-718. ZHONG H, WANG M, WANG Q. IR technique investigation of boundary layer transition measurement in flight tests[J]. Infrared Technology, 2019, 41(8):712-718(in Chinese).
[26] 钟海. 层流飞行试验迎角精确控制技术研究[J]. 飞行力学, 2020, 38(3):82-86. ZHONG H. Investigation for precise angle-of-attack control technique of laminar flow flight test[J]. Flight Dynamics, 2020, 38(3):82-86(in Chinese).
[27] SHI Y Y, MADER C A., HE S C, et al. Natural laminar-flow airfoil optimization design using a discrete adjoint approach[J]. AIAA Journal, 2020, 58(11):4702-4722.
[28] 周伟, 张正科, 屈科, 等. 翼型阻力计算方法的数值模拟研究[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2011, 11(33):8229-8237. ZHOU W, ZHANG Z K, QU K, et al. Numerical simulation study of the airfoil drag prediction methods[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2011, 11(33):8229-8237(in Chinese).

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

自然层流飞行测试翼套的仿真和试验

Simulation and experiment of natural laminar flow flight test wing glove

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	徐善劼, 吕宏强, 刘中臣, 冷岩, 刘学军. 基于概率模型的声爆试验数据分析[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(2): 626269-626269.
[2]	刘中臣, 钱战森, 李雪飞, 冷岩, 郭大鹏. 发动机喷管羽流对近场声爆特性影响的风洞试验技术[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(2): 626952-626952.
[3]	宋亚辉, 樊高宇, 瞿丽霞, 张跃林, 徐悦, 韩硕. 航空器声爆飞行试验测量技术研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(2): 626186-626186.
[4]	束珺, 徐东光, 韩志熔, 李斯, 黄雄. 结冰风洞过冷大水滴试验中混合翼设计[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(1): 627182-627182.
[5]	罗凯, 王永海, 汪球, 栗继伟, 李峥, 聂春生, 李铮. 高焓风洞中等离子体激励流动控制试验[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(S2): 89-96.
[6]	杜海, 杨乐杰, 李铮, 徐悦, 孙京阳, 王宇航. 多级环量控制技术增升机理及能效分析[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(S2): 54-66.
[7]	刘传振, 孟旭飞, 刘荣健, 白鹏. 双后掠乘波体高超声速试验与数值分析[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 126015-126015.
[8]	岑飞, 刘志涛, 蒋永, 郭天豪, 张磊, 孔轶男. 民机极限飞行状态非定常气动力建模[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 125582-125582.
[9]	赵鲲, 梁俊彪, Ivan BELYAEV, Victor KOPIEV, Gareth BENNETT. 民用飞机起落架噪声及其控制技术研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 26996-026996.
[10]	刘俊, 罗新福, 王显圣. 前缘形状对空腔模型气动特性影响试验[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(7): 125235-125235.
[11]	周宜涛, 杨阳, 吴志刚, 杨超. 大展弦比无人机平台的阵风减缓飞行试验[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(6): 526126-526126.
[12]	陈广强, 豆国辉, 魏昊功, 邹昕, 李齐, 刘周, 周伟江. 火星探测器大气数据测量方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(3): 626619-626619.
[13]	张桢锴, 贾思嘉, 宋晨, 杨超. 柔性变弯度后缘机翼的风洞试验模型优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(3): 226071-226071.
[14]	侯英昱, 李齐, 季辰, 刘子强. 超声速低频大抖振气动弹性载荷试验[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(3): 626454-626454.
[15]	曾开春, 寇西平, 杨兴华, 余立, 查俊. 跨声速风洞试验模型主动减振结构优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(2): 224944-224944.