前缘形状对空腔模型气动特性影响试验

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2021.25235

流体力学与飞行力学

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

前缘形状对空腔模型气动特性影响试验

刘俊^1,2, 罗新福², 王显圣²

1. 西北工业大学航空学院, 西安 710072;
2. 中国空气动力研究与发展中心高速空气动力研究所, 绵阳 621000

收稿日期:2021-01-08 修回日期:2021-04-22 发布日期:2021-04-21
通讯作者: 罗新福,E-mail:lxfrong@hotmail.com E-mail:lxfrong@hotmail.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(11602287)

Experiment on influence of leading-edge shape on aerodynamic characteristics of cavity model

LIU Jun^1,2, LUO Xinfu², WANG Xiansheng²

1. School of Aeronautics, Northnestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China;
2. High Speed Aerodynamics Institute, China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center, Mianyang 621000, China

Received:2021-01-08 Revised:2021-04-22 Published:2021-04-21
Supported by:
(]National Natrud Science Foundation of China (11602287)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 与安装在风洞侧壁的空腔模型相比,位于风洞核心流中的空腔模型在模拟边界层厚度方面具有明显优势。然而,核心流空腔模型在试验中却暴露出入口边界层厚度显著高于理论估计值、腔内声压级明显小于数值计算结果等问题,严重影响了试验结果的准确性。以C201空腔模型为研究对象,通过更换不同形状的模型前缘,综合采用边界层测量、脉动压力测量和表面荧光油流等试验方法,系统评估了亚、超声速下前缘形状对空腔风洞试验的影响。试验结果表明:亚声速条件下,椭圆形前缘有助于消除前缘流动分离,获得与计算结果相一致的入口边界层厚度和腔内声压级分布;超声速条件下,小角度尖劈前缘有利于避免形成脱体激波。研究结果可为空腔模型外形设计提供指导,避免前缘流动分离和脱体激波对空腔流动试验带来的不利影响。

关键词: 空腔模型, 风洞试验, 前缘形状, 油流, 边界层, 脉动压力

Abstract: Compared with the cavity model installed into the side wall of the wind tunnel, the cavity model located in the core-flow of the wind-tunnel has obvious advantages in simulating the thickness of the boundary layer. However, the core-flow cavity model suffers from the problems that the thickness of the approaching boundary layer is significantly higher than the theoretical estimate and the sound pressure level in the cavity is significantly lower than the numerical result, which seriously affects the accuracy of the test results. In the present study, effects of leading-edge shapes on cavity flow tests at the subsonic and supersonic speeds are comprehensively evaluated, using the technologies including boundary layer measurement, pressure fluctuation measurement and surface fluorescent oil flow. The C201 cavity model is investigated, whose leading-edge shape can be changed during the tests. The test results show that at the subsonic speed, the elliptical leading-edge helps to eliminate flow separation. The obtained approaching boundary layer thickness and sound pressure level distribution in the cavity is consistent with the calculated results. At the supersonic speed, the leading-edge of the small-angle wedge shape helps to avoid formation of detached shock waves. The research results could provide guidance for the design of cavity model shape, so that the adverse effects of leading-edge flow separations and detached shock waves on cavity flow tests can be avoided.

Key words: cavity model, wind tunnel test, leading-edge shape, oil-flow, boundary layer, pressure fluctuationhttp

中图分类号:

V211

刘俊, 罗新福, 王显圣. 前缘形状对空腔模型气动特性影响试验[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(7): 125235-125235.

LIU Jun, LUO Xinfu, WANG Xiansheng. Experiment on influence of leading-edge shape on aerodynamic characteristics of cavity model[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(7): 125235-125235.

参考文献

[1] LEE B H K. Effect of captive stores on internal weapons bay floor pressure distributions[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2010, 47(2):732-736.
[2] 刘俊,蔡晋生,杨党国,等.超声速空腔流动波系演化及噪声控制研究进展[J].航空学报, 2018, 39(11):022366. LIU J, CAI J S, YANG D G, et al. Research progress in wave evolution and noise control for supersonic cavity flows[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2018, 39(11):022366(in Chinese).
[3] ZILBERTER I A, EDWARDS J R, WITTICH D J. Numerical simulation of aero-optical effects in a supersonic cavity flow[J]. AIAA Journal, 2017, 55(9):3095-3108.
[4] 贾真.超声速燃烧室中壁面凹腔结构的稳焰机理[J].航空动力学报, 2013, 28(6):1392-1401. JIA Z. Flame-holding mechanism of cavity structure in super-sonic combustor[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2013, 28(6):1392-1401(in Chinese).
[5] ZHUANG N. Experimental investigation of supersonic cavityflows and their control[D]. Tallahassee:Florida State Uni-versity, 2007:15-145.
[6] ZHANG X, RONA A, EDWARDS J A. An observation of pressure waves around a shallow cavity[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1998, 214(4):771-778.
[7] HELLER H, DELFS J. Cavity pressure oscillations:the generating mechanism visualized[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1996, 196(2):248-252.
[8] WANG H B, SUN M B, QIN N, et al. Characteristics of oscillations in supersonic open cavity flows[J]. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 2013, 90(1):121-142.
[9] LI W P, NONOMURA T, FUJII K. On the feedback mechanism in supersonic cavity flows[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2013, 25(5):056101.
[10] ROKITA T, ELIMELECH Y, ARIELI R, et al. Experimental characterization of turbulent subsonic transitional-open cavity flow[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2016, 57(4):1-16.
[11] SCHMIT R F, GROVE J E, SEMMELMAYER F, et al. Nonlinear feedback mechanisms inside a rectangular cavity[J]. AIAA Journal, 2014, 52(10):2127-2142.
[12] 杨党国,罗新福,李建强,等.来流边界层厚度对开式空腔气动声学特性的影响分析[J].空气动力学学报, 2011, 29(4):486-490. YANG D G, LUO X F, LI J Q, et al. Analysis ofaeroacoustic characteristics in open cavities influenced by boundary-layer thickness[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2011, 29(4):486-490(in Chinese).
[13] HENSHAW M J. M219 Cavity Case:ADP010729[R]. East Riding of Yorkshire:British Aerospace Ltd, 2000.
[14] HAASE W, BRAZA M, REVELL A. DESider-A European effort on hybrid RANS-LES modelling:Results of the European-union funded project, 2004-2007[M]. Berlin, Heidelberg:Springer, 2009:105-308.
[15] LAWSON S J, BARAKOS G N. Review of numerical simulations for high-speed, turbulent cavity flows[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2011, 47(3):186-216.
[16] DELFS J. DLR Cavity Pressure Oscillations, Experimental:ADP010730[R]. Braunschweig:DLR German Aerospace Center, 2000.
[17] SCHMIT R, MCGAHA C, TEKELL J, et al. Performanceresults for the optical turbulence reduction cavity:AIAA-2009-0702[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2009.
[18] RADHAKRISHNAN S. An experimental and numerical study of open cavity flows[D].Knoxville:The University of Tennessee, 2002:34.
[19] 赵小见,赵磊,冯峰,等.某空腔低速流动噪声风洞试验[J].航空学报, 2015, 36(7):2145-2154. ZHAO X J, ZHAO L, FENG F, et al. Wind tunnel test into noise induced by low-speed cavity flow[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(7):2145-2154(in Chinese).
[20] 宋文成,李玉军,冯强.武器舱气动噪声主动流动控制技术风洞试验研究[J].空气动力学学报, 2016, 34(1):33-39. SONG W C, LI Y J, FENG Q. Wind tunnel test research on weapon bay cavity active flow control for acoustic[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2016, 34(1):33-39(in Chinese).
[21] 刘俊,蔡晋生,周方奇.空腔噪声的马赫数敏感性研究[J].实验流体力学, 2020, 34(3):104-110. LIU J, CAI J S, ZHOU F Q. Mach number sensitivity analysis of cavity noise[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2020, 34(3):104-110(in Chinese).
[22] 周方奇,杨党国,王显圣,等.前缘直板扰流对高速空腔的降噪效果分析[J].航空学报, 2018, 39(4):121812. ZHOU F Q, YANG D G, WANG X S, et al. Effect of leading edge plate on high speed cavity noise control[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2018, 39(4):121812(in Chinese).
[23] 杨党国,刘俊,王显圣,等.典型构型空腔模型设计与流动/噪声特性研究[J].空气动力学学报, 2018, 36(3):432-439, 448. YANG D G, LIU J, WANG X S, et al. Analysis of design method and aeroacoustics characteristics inside typical cavity[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2018, 36(3):432-439, 448(in Chinese).
[24] 姜薇婉.空腔复杂湍流结构数值模拟与流动机理分析[D].西安:西北工业大学, 2016:41. JIANG W W. Numerical simulation and flow mechanism analysis of complex turbulent structure in cavity flows[D]. Xi'an:Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2016:41(in Chinese).
[25] 刘俊,杨党国,王显圣,等.湍流边界层厚度对三维空腔流动的影响[J].航空学报, 2016, 37(2):475-483. LIU J, YANG D G, WANG X S, et al. Effect of turbulent boundary layer thickness on a three-dimensional cavity flow[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37(2):475-483(in Chinese).
[26] ANDERSON J D. Fundamentals of aerodynamics[M]. 5th ed. New York:McGraw-Hill Education, 2010:612.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

前缘形状对空腔模型气动特性影响试验

Experiment on influence of leading-edge shape on aerodynamic characteristics of cavity model

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	孙朋朋, 刘平安, 樊枫, 曾伟. 悬停状态共轴刚性旋翼机身气动干扰特性[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 529284-529284.
[2]	王畅, 何龙, 徐栋霞, 唐敏, 马率, 吴希明. 共轴刚性旋翼桨毂流动控制减阻研究[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 529084-529084.
[3]	张卫国, 唐敏, 武杰, 彭先敏, 章贵川, 聂博文, 王亮权, 李超群. 倾转旋翼机风洞试验综述[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 530114-530114.
[4]	聂博文, 王亮权, 黄志银, 何龙, 杨仕鹏, 颜鸿涛, 章贵川. 复合式高速无人直升机飞行动力学建模与控制策略设计[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 529848-529848.
[5]	刘柳, 向先宏, 张宇飞, 陈海昕, 魏闯, 朱剑, 杨普. 一种高升阻比非常规翼身融合燕尾气动布局[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(6): 629630-629630.
[6]	赖江, 范召林, 王乾, 董思卫, 童福林, 袁先旭. 高超声速有攻角锥裙直接数值模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(2): 128610-128610.
[7]	李海星, 周峰, 颜巍, 白峰, 赵克良. 砂纸冰对民机平尾气动特性的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(2): 128657-128657.
[8]	李学良, 李创创, 苏伟, 吴杰. 分布式粗糙元对高超声速边界层不稳定性的影响试验[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(2): 128627-128627.
[9]	刘宇, 秦梦婕, 王强, 易贤. 含盐海水飞沫的结冰风洞试验相似准则[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(S2): 729297-729297.
[10]	杨秋明, 朱永峰, 陈华伟, 刘晓林. 镂空图案化电加热组件防冰性能试验研究[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(S2): 729334-729334.
[11]	曾繁宇, 邱云龙, 曹占伟, 张伦, 陈伟芳. 超声速湍流边界层阵列式微吹气流动控制与减阻特性[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(S2): 729396-729396.
[12]	高世琦, 丁博, 解旭祯, 李铮, 陈林, 钱首元, 焦子涵, 白光辉. 等离子体激励在高速流动中的减阻机制[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(S2): 729373-729373.
[13]	许岭松, 吴渊, 朱东宇, 张付昆, 刘昱. FL⁃61结冰风洞翼型俯仰振荡机构研制[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(S2): 729296-729296.
[14]	金毅, 孙姝, 郭赟杰, 谭慧俊, 张悦. 超声速可调进气道内流双解现象及其节流特性[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(7): 127134-127134.
[15]	刘为佳, 李映坤, 陈雄, 李春雷. 基于流固耦合的激波/边界层干扰作用下壁板颤振特性[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(6): 127085-127085.