基于Kriging模型的风洞应变天平静态校准方法

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2016.0069

流体力学与飞行力学

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

基于Kriging模型的风洞应变天平静态校准方法

刘志勇^1,2, 苗磊², 陶洋², 张诣², 王树民²

1. 中国科学技术大学工程科学学院, 合肥 230000;
2. 中国空气动力研究与发展中心高速空气动力研究所, 绵阳 621000

收稿日期:2016-01-15 修回日期:2016-03-09 出版日期:2016-12-15 发布日期:2016-03-18
通讯作者: 陶洋,Tel.:0816-2462105,E-mail:50323222@qq.com E-mail:50323222@qq.com
作者简介:刘志勇,男,硕士研究生,工程师。主要研究方向:空气动力学与风洞试验技术。Tel.:0816-2462105,E-mail:153469680@qq.com;苗磊,男,学士,工程师。主要研究方向:风洞天平设计与试验技术。Tel.:0816-2462356,E-mail:miaogangsir@sina.com;陶洋,男,博士,副研究员。主要研究方向:非定常空气动力学。Tel.:0816-2462105,E-mail:50323222@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（11372337）

A static calibration method of wind tunnel strain-gage balance based on Kriging model

LIU Zhiyong^1,2, MIAO Lei², TAO Yang², ZHANG Yi², WANG Shumin²

1. School of Engineering Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230000, China;
2. High Speed Aerodynamics Institute, China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center, Mianyang 621000, China

Received:2016-01-15 Revised:2016-03-09 Online:2016-12-15 Published:2016-03-18
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (11372337)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本文提出了一种基于Kriging代理模型的风洞应变天平静态校准方法。采用拉丁超立方设计的试验设计（DOE）方法选取校准加载点，以六分量组合加载技术为支撑，采用一阶回归基函数和EXP关联函数对校准数据构建Kriging模型，以电压信号增量和其他条件变量为自变量，通过Kriging模型对天平所受载荷进行预测。校准结果表明，与传统的OFAT（One Factor at A Time）校准方法相比，该方法具有相同的准度，加载点数量极大减少。将该方法应用于某矢量喷管推力测量天平的校准工作中，以通气流量和天平电压信号增量作为自变量，较好预测了喷管产生的推力，解决了传统校准方法难以克服的通气影响问题。

关键词: Kriging模型, 试验设计, 应变天平, 校准, 风洞

Abstract:

A new static calibration method for strain-gage balance used in wind tunnel test is introduced here. A design of experiments (DOE) method, Latin hypercube design, is used to choose samples. Kriging surrogate models constructed by using first order regression base function and EXP correlation function are mathematical models which predict loads by taking measured voltage increments and other factors as parameters, and six-component combining load calibration technique is used too. Compared with the traditional one factor at a time (OFAT) method, the new method not only has equivalent accuracy, but also remarkably reduces the number of samples. The new method is used in the calibration of some balance which is used to measure the thrust of a vector nozzle, and predicted thrust forces well. It figures out the interference of gas inflow which is hardly handled by traditional calibration method.

Key words: Kriging model, design of experiments, strain-gage balance, calibration, wind tunnel

中图分类号:

V216

刘志勇, 苗磊, 陶洋, 张诣, 王树民. 基于Kriging模型的风洞应变天平静态校准方法[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(12): 3685-3691.

LIU Zhiyong, MIAO Lei, TAO Yang, ZHANG Yi, WANG Shumin. A static calibration method of wind tunnel strain-gage balance based on Kriging model[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2016, 37(12): 3685-3691.

参考文献

[1] 王发祥. 高速风洞试验[M]. 北京:国防工业出版社, 2003. WANG F X. High speed wind tunnel test[M]. Beijing:National Defense Industry Press, 2003(in Chinese).
[2] PARKER P A. A single-vector force calibration method featuring the modern design of experiments:AIAA-2001-0170[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2001.
[3] DELOACH R, PHILIPSEN I. Stepwise regression analysis of MDOE balance calibration data acquired at DNW[C]//45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston:AIAA, 2007.
[4] ULBRICH N, VOLDEN T. A new approach to strain-gage balance calibration analysis[C]//5th International Symposium on Strain-Gauge Balances, 2006.
[5] DELOACH R. Applications of modern experiment design to wind tunnel testing at NASA Langley Research Center[C]//36th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston:AIAA,1998.
[6] BERGMANN R. An experimental comparison of different load tables for balance calibration:AIAA-2010-4544[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2010.
[7] HUFNAGEL K. The 2nd generation balance calibration machine of Darmstadt University of Technology:AIAA-2007-0148[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2007.
[8] ULBRICH N. Combined load diagram for a wind tunnel strain-gage balance:AIAA-2010-4203[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2010.
[9] KEITH C L, SEAN A C, THOMAS H J, et al. Thermal and pressure characterization of a wind tunnel force balance using the single vector system[C]//49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting. Reston:AIAA,2011.
[10] ULBRICH N. Iterative strain-gage balance calibration data analysis for extended independent variable sets:AIAA-2011-0011[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2011.
[11] LANDMAN D, YODER D. Wind-tunnel balance calibration with temperature using design of experiments[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2014, 51(3):841-848.
[12] ULBRICH N, VOLDEN T. Development of a new software tool for balance calibration:AIAA-2006-3434[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2006.
[13] 湛华海, 张旭, 吕治国, 等. 一种单矢量风洞天平校准系统设计[J]. 实验流体力学, 2014, 28(1):70-74. ZHAN H H, ZHANG X, LU Z G, et al. Design of single vector wind tunnel balance calibration system[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2014, 28(1):70-74(in Chinese).
[14] 罗华云, 赖传兴, 王月贵, 等. 喷管模型试验器六分量天平校准技术[J]. 航空动力学报, 2013, 28(1):67-73. LUO H Y, LAI C X, WANG Y G, et al. Six-component balance calibration technology for nozzle model testing facility[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2013, 28(1):67-73(in Chinese).
[15] 王晓锋, 席光, 王尚锦. Kriging与响应面方法在气动优化设计中的应用[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2005, 26(3):423-425. WANG X F, XI G, WANG S J. Application of Kriging and response surface method in aerodynamics optimization design[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2005, 26(3):423-425(in Chinese).
[16] SACKS J, WELCH W J, MITCHELL T J, et al. Design and analysis of computer experiments[J]. Statistical Science, 1989, 4(4):409-435.
[17] NOEL C. Spatial prediction and ordinary Kriging[J]. Mathematical Geology, 1988, 20(4):405-421.
[18] 邹林君. 基于Kriging模型的全局优化方法研究[D]. 武汉:华中科技大学, 2011. ZOU L J. Research on global optimization algorithm based on Kriging model[D]. Wuhan:Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2011(in Chinese).
[19] TIMOTHY W S, JANET K A, FARROKH M. Spatial correlation metamodels for global approximation in structural design optimization[C]//Proceedings of ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, 1998:1-12.
[20] ART B O. Orthogonal arrays for computer experiments, integration and visualization[J]. Statistical Science, 1992, 2(2):439-452.
[21] VIANA F A C. Surrogates toolbox user's guide[M]. (2010)[2016-01-15]. http://sites.google.com/site/fchegury.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

基于Kriging模型的风洞应变天平静态校准方法

A static calibration method of wind tunnel strain-gage balance based on Kriging model

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	孙朋朋, 刘平安, 樊枫, 曾伟. 悬停状态共轴刚性旋翼机身气动干扰特性[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 529284-529284.
[2]	王畅, 何龙, 徐栋霞, 唐敏, 马率, 吴希明. 共轴刚性旋翼桨毂流动控制减阻研究[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 529084-529084.
[3]	张卫国, 唐敏, 武杰, 彭先敏, 章贵川, 聂博文, 王亮权, 李超群. 倾转旋翼机风洞试验综述[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 530114-530114.
[4]	王梓旭, 李攀, 鲁可, 朱振华, 陈仁良. 共轴刚性旋翼高速直升机配平策略优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 529069-529069.
[5]	聂博文, 王亮权, 黄志银, 何龙, 杨仕鹏, 颜鸿涛, 章贵川. 复合式高速无人直升机飞行动力学建模与控制策略设计[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 529848-529848.
[6]	陈其昌, 史志伟, 张维源, 姚灵珑, 童晟翔. 展开式变体垂直起降飞行器气动布局与控制策略设计及飞行验证[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(6): 629583-629583.
[7]	刘柳, 向先宏, 张宇飞, 陈海昕, 魏闯, 朱剑, 杨普. 一种高升阻比非常规翼身融合燕尾气动布局[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(6): 629630-629630.
[8]	李海星, 周峰, 颜巍, 白峰, 赵克良. 砂纸冰对民机平尾气动特性的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(2): 128657-128657.
[9]	李学良, 李创创, 苏伟, 吴杰. 分布式粗糙元对高超声速边界层不稳定性的影响试验[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(2): 128627-128627.
[10]	熊有德, 李创创, 张振辉, 吴杰. 高超声速风洞自由来流扰动热线测量技术[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(10): 129042-129042.
[11]	李文龙, 吴波, 谢帅. 有起落架布置的翼身整体结构机翼载荷测量技术[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(1): 229525-229525.
[12]	刘宇, 秦梦婕, 王强, 易贤. 含盐海水飞沫的结冰风洞试验相似准则[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(S2): 729297-729297.
[13]	杨秋明, 朱永峰, 陈华伟, 刘晓林. 镂空图案化电加热组件防冰性能试验研究[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(S2): 729334-729334.
[14]	高世琦, 丁博, 解旭祯, 李铮, 陈林, 钱首元, 焦子涵, 白光辉. 等离子体激励在高速流动中的减阻机制[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(S2): 729373-729373.
[15]	许岭松, 吴渊, 朱东宇, 张付昆, 刘昱. FL⁃61结冰风洞翼型俯仰振荡机构研制[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(S2): 729296-729296.