自然层流减阻验证方法及验证翼段布局设计

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2022.26751

论文

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

自然层流减阻验证方法及验证翼段布局设计

周桢尧¹, 吕飞¹, 周斌², 杨钊³

1. 航空工业第一飞机设计研究院, 西安 710089;
2. 陕西飞机工业有限责任公司, 汉中 723213;
3. 西北工业大学航空学院, 西安 710072

收稿日期:2021-12-06 修回日期:2022-01-13 出版日期:2022-11-15 发布日期:2022-02-28
通讯作者: 周桢尧,E-mail:zhouzhenyao1993@163.com E-mail:zhouzhenyao1993@163.com

Verification method for natural laminar flow drag reduction and layout design of test section

ZHOU Zhenyao¹, LYU Fei¹, ZHOU Bin², YANG Zhao³

1. AVIC The First Aircraft Institute, Xi'an 710089, China;
2. China Aviation Industry Shanxi Aircraft Industry (Group) Co. Ltd, Hanzhong 723213, China;
3. School of Aeronautics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China

Received:2021-12-06 Revised:2022-01-13 Online:2022-11-15 Published:2022-02-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 飞行试验是评估层流设计技术效能的有效手段，验证翼段布局参数是无人验证机气动力设计的出发点。澄清了"相同设计升力系数法"的工程实用价值，创新性设计了涵盖数值模拟、风洞试验、飞行试验的自然层流翼型减阻效果综合验证试验体系，在此基础上完善了1 t级双机身布局无人验证机初步方案。基于CFD手段详细分析了验证翼段弦长、展长、安装位置、安装角等关键布局参数对飞行试验效能及验证机本体气动特性的影响。风洞试验结果验证表明：验证翼段布局参数选择合理，纵向静稳定性适中，能够保持大范围稳定二维区域，满足飞行试验验证要求。

关键词: 自然层流, 气动布局设计, 层流翼型, 飞行试验, 风洞试验

Abstract: Flight tests are effective in efficiency evaluation for the laminar flow design technology, while the layout parameters of the test wing section are the starting point for the aerodynamic design of unmanned demonstrators. This paper confirms the engineering value of "the same design lift coefficient method", and innovatively designs a comprehensive verification test system for drag reduction effect of natural laminar airfoils, including numerical simulation, wind tunnel tests and flight tests. On this basis, the preliminary scheme of the unmanned verification aircraft with 1 t twin-fuselage configuration is improved. The influence of crucial layout parameters such as chord length, span length, installation position and installation angle on the performance of flight tests and the aerodynamic characteristics of the test wing section are analyzed based on CFD. The wind tunnel test results show that the layout parameters of the demonstrator test wing section are reasonable, the longitudinal static stability of the demonstrator is moderate, and the test section can maintain a large range of stable two-dimensional flow area, thereby satisfying the flight test verification requirements.

Key words: natural laminar flow, aerodynamic layout design, laminar airfoil, flight test, wind tunnel test

中图分类号:

周桢尧, 吕飞, 周斌, 杨钊. 自然层流减阻验证方法及验证翼段布局设计[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(11): 526751-526751.

ZHOU Zhenyao, LYU Fei, ZHOU Bin, YANG Zhao. Verification method for natural laminar flow drag reduction and layout design of test section[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 526751-526751.

参考文献

[1] 李凤蔚. 空气与气体动力学引论[M]. 西安:西北工业大学出版社, 2007. LI F W. Introduction to aerodynamics[M]. Xi'an:Northwestern Polytechnical University Press, 2007(in Chinese).
[2] SCHRAUF G. Status and perspectives of laminar flow[J]. The Aeronautical Journal, 2005, 109(1102):639-644.
[3] THIBERT J J, RENEAUX J, SCHMITT R V. Onera activities on drag reduction[C]//Proceedings of the 14th Congress of ICAS. Bonn:ICAS, 1990:1053-1064.
[4] HOLMES B, OBARA C J, MARTIN G L, et al. Manufacturing tolerances for natural laminar flow airframe surfaces:850863[S]. Warrendale:SAE, 1985.
[5] 朱自强, 鞠胜军, 吴宗成. 层流流动主/被动控制技术[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(7):2065-2090. ZHU Z Q, JU S J, WU Z C. Laminar flow active/passive control technology[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37(7):2065-2090(in Chinese).
[6] 张彦军, 段卓毅, 雷武涛, 等. 超临界自然层流机翼设计及基于TSP技术的边界层转捩风洞试验[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(4):122429. ZHANG Y J, DUAN Z Y, LEI W T, et al. Design of supercritical natural laminar flow wing and its boundary layer transition wind tunnel test based on TSP technique[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2019, 40(4):122429(in Chinese).
[7] URBIN G, KNIGHT D. Large-eddy simulation of a supersonic boundary layer using an unstructured grid[J]. AIAA Journal, 2001, 39(7):1288-1295.
[8] SCHLATTER P, ÖRLV R. Assessment of direct numerical simulation data of turbulent boundary layers[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2010, 659:116-126.
[9] KRUMBEIN A, KRIMMELBEIN N, GRABE C. Streamline-based transition prediction techniques in an unstructured computational fluid dynamics code[J]. AIAA Journal, 2017, 55(5):1548-1564.
[10] MENTER F R, LANGTRY R B, LIKKI S R, et al. A correlation-based transition model using local variables-part I:Model formulation[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2006, 128(3):413.
[11] FUJINO M, YOSHIZAKI Y, KAWAMURA Y. Natural-laminar-flow airfoil development for a lightweight business jet[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2003, 40(4):609-615.
[12] FUJINO M. Design and development of the HondaJet[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2005, 42(3):755-764.
[13] 乔志德. 翼型的选择与设计[M]//方宝瑞. 飞机气动布局设计. 北京:航空工业出版社, 1997:499-540. QIAO Z D. Design and chosen of the airfoils[M]//FANG B R. Aircraft aerodynamic configuration design. Beijing:Aviation Industry Press, 1997:499-540(in Chinese).
[14] 乔志德, 赵文华, 李育斌, 等. 超临界自然层流翼型NPU-L72513的风洞试验研究[J]. 气动实验与测量控制, 1993, 7(2):40-45. QIAO Z D, ZHAO W H, LI Y B, et al. The transonic wind tunnel test research for the supercritical natural laminar airfoil NPU-L72513[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 1993, 7(2):40-45(in Chinese).
[15] 陈静, 宋文萍, 朱震, 等. 跨声速层流翼型的混合反设计/优化设计方法[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(12):122219. CHEN J, SONG W P, ZHU Z, et al. A hybrid inverse/direct optimization design method for transonic laminar flow airfoil[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2018, 39(12):122219(in Chinese).
[16] 杨体浩, 白俊强, 史亚云, 等. 考虑吸气分布影响的HLFC机翼优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(12):121158. YANG T H, BAI J Q, SHI Y Y, et al. Optimization design for HLFC wings considering influence of suction distribution[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2017, 38(12):121158(in Chinese).
[17] 邢宇, 罗东明, 余雄庆. 超临界层流翼型优化设计策略[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2017, 43(8):1616-1624. XING Y, LUO D M, YU X Q. Optimization strategy of supercritical laminar flow airfoil design[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2017, 43(8):1616-1624(in Chinese).
[18] 史亚云, 郭斌, 刘倩, 等. 基于能量观点的混合层流优化设计[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2019, 45(6):1162-1174. SHI Y Y, GUO B, LIU Q, et al. Hybrid laminar flow optimization design from energy view[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2019, 45(6):1162-1174(in Chinese).
[19] 李静, 刘艳萍, 高正红, 等. 跨音速自然层流翼型反设计研究[J]. 郑州大学学报(理学版), 2019, 51(1):95-100. LI J, LIU Y P, GAO Z H, et al. Inverse design of the transonic natural laminar flow airfoil[J]. Journal of Zhengzhou University (Natural Science Edition), 2019, 51(1):95-100(in Chinese).
[20] 陈永彬, 唐智礼, 盛建达. 跨音速自然层流翼型多目标优化设计[J]. 计算物理, 2016, 33(3):283-296. CHEN Y B, TANG Z L, SHENG J D. Multi-objective optimization for natural laminar flow airfoil in transonic flow[J]. Chinese Journal of Computational Physics, 2016, 33(3):283-296(in Chinese).
[21] 武宁, 唐鑫, 段卓毅, 等. 基于TSP方法的自然层流机翼转捩位置测量[J]. 实验流体力学, 2020, 34(6):66-70. WU N, TANG X, DUAN Z Y, et al. Transition measurement for the nature-laminar wing based on TSP technique[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2020, 34(6):66-70(in Chinese).
[22] 乔志德. 自然层流超临界翼型的设计研究[J]. 流体力学实验与测量, 1998, 12(4):23-30. QIAO Z D. Design of supercritical airfoils with natural laminar flow[J]. Experiments and Measurements in Fluid Mechanics, 1998, 12(4):23-30(in Chinese).
[23] VAVRA A, SOLOMON W, DRAKE A. Comparison of boundary layer transition measurement techniques on a laminar flow wing[C]//43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston:AIAA, 2005:1030.
[24] 胡成行, 黄叙辉, 李红梅, 等. 应用脉动压力测试技术探测边界层转捩[J]. 流体力学实验与测量, 2002, 16(2):67-71. HU C H, HUANG X H, LI H M, et al. The location of boundary-layer transition detected by pressure fluctuation measurements[J]. Experiments and Measurements in Fluid Mechanics, 2002, 16(2):67-71(in Chinese).
[25] 董昊, 耿玺, 陆纪椿, 等. 翼型边界层转捩热/油膜及红外测量技术的对比[J]. 南京航空航天大学学报, 2013, 45(6):792-796. DONG H, GENG X, LU J C, et al. Comparative investigation on hot film, oil film and infrared measurement techniques of airfoil boundary layer transition[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics, 2013, 45(6):792-796(in Chinese).
[26] RICHTER K, SCHVLEIN E. Boundary-layer transition measurements on hovering helicopter rotors by infrared thermography[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2014, 55(7):1755.
[27] RAFFEL M, MERZ C B. Differential infrared thermography for unsteady boundary-layer transition measurements[J]. AIAA Journal, 2014, 52(9):2090-2093.
[28] 黄辉, 熊健, 刘祥, 等. 基于温敏漆的边界层转捩测量技术研究[J]. 实验流体力学, 2019, 33(2):79-84. HUANG H, XIONG J, LIU X, et al. Study of the boundary layer transition detection technique based on TSP[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2019, 33(2):79-84(in Chinese).

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

自然层流减阻验证方法及验证翼段布局设计

Verification method for natural laminar flow drag reduction and layout design of test section

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	徐善劼, 吕宏强, 刘中臣, 冷岩, 刘学军. 基于概率模型的声爆试验数据分析[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(2): 626269-626269.
[2]	刘中臣, 钱战森, 李雪飞, 冷岩, 郭大鹏. 发动机喷管羽流对近场声爆特性影响的风洞试验技术[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(2): 626952-626952.
[3]	宋亚辉, 樊高宇, 瞿丽霞, 张跃林, 徐悦, 韩硕. 航空器声爆飞行试验测量技术研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(2): 626186-626186.
[4]	束珺, 徐东光, 韩志熔, 李斯, 黄雄. 结冰风洞过冷大水滴试验中混合翼设计[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(1): 627182-627182.
[5]	罗凯, 王永海, 汪球, 栗继伟, 李峥, 聂春生, 李铮. 高焓风洞中等离子体激励流动控制试验[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(S2): 89-96.
[6]	杜海, 杨乐杰, 李铮, 徐悦, 孙京阳, 王宇航. 多级环量控制技术增升机理及能效分析[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(S2): 54-66.
[7]	刘传振, 孟旭飞, 刘荣健, 白鹏. 双后掠乘波体高超声速试验与数值分析[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 126015-126015.
[8]	赵鲲, 梁俊彪, Ivan BELYAEV, Victor KOPIEV, Gareth BENNETT. 民用飞机起落架噪声及其控制技术研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 26996-026996.
[9]	岑飞, 刘志涛, 蒋永, 郭天豪, 张磊, 孔轶男. 民机极限飞行状态非定常气动力建模[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 125582-125582.
[10]	刘俊, 罗新福, 王显圣. 前缘形状对空腔模型气动特性影响试验[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(7): 125235-125235.
[11]	周宜涛, 杨阳, 吴志刚, 杨超. 大展弦比无人机平台的阵风减缓飞行试验[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(6): 526126-526126.
[12]	张桢锴, 贾思嘉, 宋晨, 杨超. 柔性变弯度后缘机翼的风洞试验模型优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(3): 226071-226071.
[13]	侯英昱, 李齐, 季辰, 刘子强. 超声速低频大抖振气动弹性载荷试验[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(3): 626454-626454.
[14]	陈广强, 豆国辉, 魏昊功, 邹昕, 李齐, 刘周, 周伟江. 火星探测器大气数据测量方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(3): 626619-626619.
[15]	曾开春, 寇西平, 杨兴华, 余立, 查俊. 跨声速风洞试验模型主动减振结构优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(2): 224944-224944.