受轮缘密封结构影响的1.5级涡轮封严流与主流的相互作用以及轮缘密封间流动干扰

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2020.24549

流体力学与飞行力学

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

受轮缘密封结构影响的1.5级涡轮封严流与主流的相互作用以及轮缘密封间流动干扰

黄镜玮¹, 付维亮¹, 马国骏¹, 王国杰¹, 高杰^1,2,3

1. 哈尔滨工程大学动力与能源工程学院, 哈尔滨 150001;
2. 重庆大学动力工程及工程热物理博士后科研流动站, 重庆 401120;
3. 重庆江增船舶重工有限公司博士后科研工作站, 重庆 402263

收稿日期:2020-07-17 修回日期:2020-08-10 发布日期:2020-09-14
通讯作者: 高杰 E-mail:gaojie_d@hrbeu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（51779051，51979052）；航空动力基金（6141B09050392）；国家科技重大专项（2017-III-0010-0036，J2019-Ⅱ-0009-0029）

Interaction between 1.5-stage turbine rim seal purge flow and mainstream and flow interference between rim seals affected by rim seal structure

HUANG Jingwei¹, FU Weiliang¹, MA Guojun¹, WANG Guojie¹, GAO Jie^1,2,3

1. College of Power and Energy Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China;
2. Postdoctoral Research Station of Power Engineering and Engineering Thermophysics, Chongqing University, Chongqing 401120, China;
3. Center for Post-Doctoral Research, Chongqing Jiangjin Shipbuilding Industry Co., LTD, Chongqing 402263, China

Received:2020-07-17 Revised:2020-08-10 Published:2020-09-14
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (51779051, 51979052); Aeronautics Power Foundation of China(6141B09050392); National Science and Technology Major Project (2017-III-0010-0036,J2019-Ⅱ-0009-0029)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探究动叶上游不同轮缘密封结构封严出流对1.5级涡轮端区流场及轮缘密封间流动干扰的影响区别，通过Shear Stress Transport （SST）湍流模型对无密封腔室，上游密封结构分别为简单斜向、简单径向，下游密封腔室为简单轴向的1.5级涡轮进行了非定常数值模拟。结果表明：轮缘密封间干扰使带径向密封结构模型的下游轮缘腔室内封严效率偏低，并增强了固有的非定常不稳定特性。上游密封结构变化对动叶和第2级静叶流动的影响差异分别位于35%、65%叶高范围内；径向密封结构增加了上游静叶的堵塞效应、动叶入口气流的欠偏转程度、叶根吸力面负荷与14%叶高以上的轮毂通道涡强度，并在第2级静叶入口处产生更多低频压力波动，使其尾缘脱落涡尺度增大但13%叶高以上的轮毂通道涡强度较弱。与无密封腔室相比，通入封严气体总量为主流流量的0.8%时，带斜向密封结构的1.5级涡轮气动效率降低了0.94%，且带径向密封结构的1.5级涡轮气动损失额外增加了0.17%。

关键词: 1.5级涡轮, 轮缘密封结构, 端区流动, 涡系交互, 轮缘密封间干扰

Abstract: To investigate the difference in the effects of different rim seal structures upstream of the rotor on the flow interference between the 1.5-stage turbine mainstream and the rim seal, we conduct unsteady numerical simulation for a 1.5-stage turbine with the endwall, the simple chute and simple radial sealing structures at the upstream and simple axial sealing cavity at the downstream with the Shear Stress Transport (SST) turbulence model. The results show that the interference between the rim seals reduces the sealing efficiency of the downstream rim cavity with the radial sealing structure model, enhancing the inherent unsteady characteristics. The influence of the seal structure change on the rotor and the second stator is within the range of 35% and 65% span, respectively. The radial sealing structure increases the blocking effect of the upstream stator blades, the under deflection of rotor inlet flow, the suction surface load at the blade root, and the hub passage vortex strength above 14% span. In addition, more low-frequency pressure fluctuations are generated at the entrance of the second stator, the trailing edge shedding vortex scale increases, while the hub passage vortex strength above 13% span is weaker. Compared with the endwall structure, the aerodynamic efficiency of the 1.5-stage turbine with the chute sealing structure decreases by 0.94% when the total amount of the purge flow is 0.8% of the mainstream flow, and the aerodynamic loss of the 1.5-stage turbine with the radial sealing structure increases by an additional 0.17%.

Key words: 1.5-stage turbine, rim seal structure, end-zone flow, vortex system interaction, interference between rim seals

中图分类号:

黄镜玮, 付维亮, 马国骏, 王国杰, 高杰. 受轮缘密封结构影响的1.5级涡轮封严流与主流的相互作用以及轮缘密封间流动干扰[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(7): 124549-124549.

HUANG Jingwei, FU Weiliang, MA Guojun, WANG Guojie, GAO Jie. Interaction between 1.5-stage turbine rim seal purge flow and mainstream and flow interference between rim seals affected by rim seal structure[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(7): 124549-124549.

参考文献

[1] JENNY P. Interaction mechanisms between rim seal purge flow and profiled end walls in a low-pressure turbine[D]. Switzerland:ETH Zürich, 2012.
[2] LIU H X, AN Y G, ZOU Z P. Aerothermal analysis of a turbine with rim seal cavity:GT2014-25276[R]. New York:ASME, 2014.
[3] OWEN J M. Prediction of ingestion through turbine rim seals-Part I:Rotationally induced ingress[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2011, 133(3):031005.
[4] OWEN J M. Prediction of ingestion through turbine rim seals-Part Ⅱ:Externally induced and combined ingress[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2011, 133(3):031006.
[5] PATINIOS M, SCOBIE J A, SANGAN C M, et al. Measurements and modeling of ingress in a new 1.5-stage turbine research facility[J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2017, 139(1):012603.
[6] SANGAN C M, SCOBIE J A, OWEN J M, et al. Experimental measurements of ingestion through turbine rim seals:Part 3-Single and double seals:GT2012-68493[R]. New York:ASME, 2012.
[7] 马宏伟, BOHN D E, DECKER A, 等. 涡轮级轮缘封严内非定常流场的准三维LDV测量[J]. 航空动力学报, 2004, 19(4):455-458. MA H W, BOHN D E, DECKER A, et al. Qusi-3D LDV measurements of unsteady flow field in a rim sealing of a turbine stage[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2004, 19(4):455-458(in Chinese).
[8] 张灵俊, 罗翔, 余鸿鹏, 等. 1.5级涡轮实验台前腔燃气入侵实验[J]. 航空动力学报, 2013, 28(12):2746-2751. ZHANG L J, LUO X, YU H P, et al. Experiment on gas ingestion on forward disk cavity of 1.5 stage turbine rig[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2013, 28(12):2746-2751(in Chinese).
[9] EASTWOOD D, COREN D D, LONG C A, et al. Experimental investigation of turbine stator well rim seal, Re-ingestion and interstage seal flows using gas concentration techniques and displacement measurements[J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2012, 134(8):082501.
[10] HORWOOD J T M, HUALCA F P, SCOBIE J A, et al. Experimental and computational investigation of flow instabilities in turbine rim seals[J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2019, 141(1):011028.
[11] GAO F, CHEW J W, BEARD P F, et al. Large-eddy simulation of unsteady turbine rim sealing flows[J]. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2018, 70:160-170.
[12] GAO F, POUJOL N, CHEW J W, et al. Advanced numerical simulation of turbine rim seal flows and consideration for RANS turbulence modelling:GT2018-75116[R]. New York:ASME, 2018.
[13] GAO F, CHEW J W, MARXEN O. Inertial waves in turbine rim seal flows[J]. Physical Review Fluids, 2020, 5(2):024802.
[14] 高杰, 曹福堃, 褚召丰, 等. 旋转诱导轮缘密封不稳定流动特性及结构优化[J]. 中国科学:技术科学, 2019, 49(7):753-766. GAO J, CAO F K, CHU Z F, et al. Rotationally-induced unstable flow characteristics and structural optimization of rim seals[J]. Scientia Sinica (Technologica), 2019, 49(7):753-766(in Chinese).
[15] SCOBIE J A, HUALCA F P, PATINIOS M, et al. Re-ingestion of upstream egress in a 1.5-stage gas turbine rig[J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2018, 140(7):072507.
[16] PATINIOS M, ONG I L, SCOBIE J A, et al. Influence of leakage flows on hot gas ingress[J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2019, 141(2):021010.
[17] REGINA K, KALFAS A I, ABHARI R S. Experimental investigation of purge flow effects on a high pressure turbine stage[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2015, 137(4):041006.
[18] 贾惟. 轮毂封严对涡轮端区流动影响的数值研究[J]. 热能动力工程, 2018, 33(8):20-29. JIA W. Numerical investigation of influence of rim seal purge flow on turbine endwall flows[J]. Journal of Engineering for Thermal Energy and Power, 2018, 33(8):20-29(in Chinese).
[19] 贾惟. 轮毂封严与高负荷涡轮端区流动的非定常相互作用[J]. 推进技术, 2017, 38(12):2674-2685. JIA W. Unsteady interaction between purge flow and endwall flow in highly-loaded turbines[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2017, 38(12):2674-2685(in Chinese).
[20] JIA W, LIU H X. Numerical investigation of the interaction between upstream purge flow and mainstream in a highly-loaded turbine:GT2014-25501[R]. New York:ASME, 2014.
[21] SCHÄDLER R, KALFAS A I, ABHARI R S, et al. Modulation and radial migration of turbine hub cavity modes by the rim seal purge flow:GT2016-56661[R]. New York:ASME, 2016.
[22] SCHREWE S, WERSCHNIK H, SCHIFFER H P. Experimental analysis of the interaction between rim seal and main annulus flow in a low pressure two stage axial turbine:GT2012-68192[R]. New York:ASME, 2012.
[23] 杨帆, 周莉, 王占学. 轮缘封严气流与转子干涉损失机理的数值研究[J]. 推进技术, 2018, 39(11):2481-2489. YANG F, ZHOU L, WANG Z X. Numerical investigation for interaction and loss mechanisms between rim seal flow and rotor[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2018, 39(11):2481-2489(in Chinese).
[24] 杨帆, 周莉, 王占学. 轮缘封严气流与上游导向器非定常干涉数值研究[J]. 西北工业大学学报, 2019, 37(1):129-136. YANG F, ZHOU L, WANG Z X. Numerical investigation of unsteady interaction between rim seal flow and upstream vane[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2019, 37(1):129-136(in Chinese).
[25] 杨帆, 周莉, 王占学. 轮缘封严气流与主流涡系交互作用的非定常数值研究[J]. 推进技术, 2019, 40(2):315-323. YANG F, ZHOU L, WANG Z X. Unsteady numerical investigation on vortex interaction between rim seal flow and mainstream[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2019, 40(2):315-323(in Chinese).
[26] 杨帆, 周莉, 王占学. 轮缘封严气流与主流干涉的损失机理研究[J]. 推进技术, 2020, 41(2):285-293. YANG F, ZHOU L, WANG Z X. Investigation on interaction loss mechanism between rim seal flow and mainstream[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2020, 41(2):285-293(in Chinese).
[27] FIORE M, GOURDAIN N, BOUSSUGE J F, et al. Delineating loss sources within a linear cascade with upstream cavity and purge flow[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2019, 141(9):091008.
[28] BEHR T. Control of rotor tip leakage and secondary flow by casing air injection in unshrouded axial turbine[D]. Dresden:Dresden University of Technology, 2007.
[29] 孔祥林, 陶加银, 冯增国, 等. 结构参数对轮缘密封封严特性影响的数值研究[J]. 动力工程学报, 2014, 34(4):280-285,291. KONG X L, TAO J Y, FENG Z G, et al. Effects of geometrical parameters on sealing performance of turbine rim seals[J]. Journal of Chinese Society of Power Engineering, 2014, 34(4):280-285,291(in Chinese).
[30] 陶加银, 高庆, 宋立明, 等. 基于附加示踪变量法的涡轮轮缘密封非定常封严特性研究[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2014, 35(11):2154-2158. TAO J Y, GAO Q, SONG L M, et al. Numerical investigations on the unsteady mainstream ingestion characteristics of turbine rim seals with additional passive tracer method[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2014, 35(11):2154-2158(in Chinese).
[31] ZLATINOV M B, TAN C S, MONTGOMERY M, et al. Turbine hub and shroud sealing flow loss mechanisms:GT2011-46718[R]. New York:ASME, 2011.
[32] SCHUEPBACH P, ABHARI R S, ROSE M G, et al. Effects of suction and injection purge-flow on the secondary flow structures of a high-work turbine[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2010, 132(2):021021.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

受轮缘密封结构影响的1.5级涡轮封严流与主流的相互作用以及轮缘密封间流动干扰

Interaction between 1.5-stage turbine rim seal purge flow and mainstream and flow interference between rim seals affected by rim seal structure

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	姜峰, 李华聪, 符江锋, 洪林雄. 基于RBF和主动学习的非概率可靠度求解方法[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(2): 226667-226667.
[2]	薛远亮, 金国栋, 谭力宁, 许剑锟. 基于多尺度融合的自适应无人机目标跟踪算法[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(1): 326107-326107.
[3]	牛俊杰, 桑为民, 李栋, 郝莲, 王泽林. 一种基于水滴收集量代理模型的结冰试飞空域确定方法[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(1): 627697-627697.
[4]	罗凯, 王永海, 汪球, 栗继伟, 李峥, 聂春生, 李铮. 高焓风洞中等离子体激励流动控制试验[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(S2): 89-96.
[5]	牛戈钊, 刘彦明, 高澜, 张廷焜, 白博文. 等离子鞘套包覆钝锥的双站极化散射特性[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(S2): 97-105.
[6]	孙志坤, 史志伟, 张伟麟, 李铮, 孙琪杰. 等离子体激励器对高速翼型升阻特性的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(S2): 23-39.
[7]	刘艳婷欧吉辉韩宇峰陈杰. 壁面矩形微尺度结构对高速稀薄剪切流的影响[J]. 航空学报, 0, (): 0-0.
[8]	刘汉儒陈南树刘宇胡之颉. 多孔介质流动控制及气动降噪研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 0, (): 0-0.
[9]	宋玉存葛泉波朱军龙陆振宇. 基于梯度差自适应学习率优化的改进YOLOX目标检测算法(重投 22-27580)[J]. 航空学报, 0, (): 0-0.
[10]	李西宁叶园园李卫平王守川. 面向形状控制的传感器和作动器布局综合优化研究[J]. 航空学报, 0, (): 0-0.
[11]	陈志远, 李璐祎. 参数不确定性下高效的可靠性灵敏度分析方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 325881-325881.
[12]	罗圣峰, 王光健, 马小斌, 郑丽丽, 汪瑞军. 钛液滴作用下钛合金薄片火蔓延的数值模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 425652-425652.
[13]	曹明, 王鹏, 左洪福, 曾海军, 孙见忠, 杨卫东, 魏芳, 陈雪峰. 民用航空发动机故障诊断与健康管理现状、挑战与机遇Ⅱ: 地面综合诊断、寿命管理和智能维护维修决策[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 625574-625574.
[14]	孙晓哲侯东杨建忠. 双余度机电作动器力纷争机理及敏感性研究（ICGNC2022推荐优秀论文）[J]. 航空学报, 0, (): 0-0.
[15]	张晟斐, 李天梅, 胡昌华, 杜党波, 司小胜. 基于深度卷积生成对抗网络的缺失数据生成方法及其在剩余寿命预测中的应用[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 225708-225708.