基于POD和DMD方法的跨声速抖振模态分析

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2016.0003

流体力学与飞行力学

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

基于POD和DMD方法的跨声速抖振模态分析

寇家庆, 张伟伟, 高传强

西北工业大学航空学院, 西安 710072

收稿日期:2015-11-02 修回日期:2015-11-26 出版日期:2016-09-15 发布日期:2016-01-11
通讯作者: 张伟伟男,博士,教授,博士生导师。主要研究方向:气动弹性力学,非定常空气动力学。 Tel.: 029-88491342 E-mail: aeroelastic@nwpu.edu.cn E-mail:aeroelastic@nwpu.edu.cn
作者简介:寇家庆男,硕士研究生。主要研究方向:气动力降阶模型,非定常空气动力学。 Tel.: 029-88491342 E-mail: koujiaqing93@163.com;高传强男,博士研究生。主要研究方向:流固耦合力学,跨声速气动弹性力学。 Tel.: 029-88491342 E-mail: gao_800866@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（11572252）；新世纪优秀人才支持计划（NCET-13-0478）

Modal analysis of transonic buffet based on POD and DMD method

KOU Jiaqing, ZHANG Weiwei, GAO Chuanqiang

School of Aeronautics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China

Received:2015-11-02 Revised:2015-11-26 Online:2016-09-15 Published:2016-01-11
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (11572252); Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (NCET-13-0478)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

跨声速抖振现象是由于非定常跨声速流动中激波的自激振荡而引起的结构强迫振荡，这种现象在跨声速飞行器中普遍存在，对飞机的结构强度和疲劳寿命有不利影响。基于模态分解的分析方法是进一步发展抖振控制手段的有效工具。本文通过两类典型模态分析方法（本征正交分解（POD）和动态模态分解（DMD））对OAT15A翼型的跨声速抖振现象进行分析，通过对模态频率、翼面压力分布、流场重构误差等方面的研究，将两种模态分解方法进行对比。发现基于频率特征的DMD方法能够准确捕捉抖振的临界稳定特征和抖振主频的典型模态，同时能够更准确反映流场变量在激波间断附近随时间的变化过程；而POD方法尽管在流场重构时具有较小的总体误差，但对激波附近压强随时间的变化历程拟合较差。

关键词: 抖振, 跨声速流动, 动态模态分解, 本征正交分解, 激波

Abstract:

Transonic buffet is due to the self-sustained oscillations of shock wave in the unsteady transonic flow, which induces the forced periodically motion of the structure. For aircraft in transonic flow, this phenomenon exists commonly, leading to negative effects on the structural strength and fatigue life. Analysis based on mode decomposition is an effective tool for developing buffet control design. In this paper, two typical mode analysis methods, i.e., proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) and dynamic mode decomposition (DMD), are utilized for analyzing the transonic buffet of the OAT15A airfoil. Two techniques are compared by studying the frequency of dominant modes, pressure distributions on the surface and the errors of flow construction. Results indicate that because of the consideration of frequency characteristics in DMD, the critical stable characteristics and dominant frequency of transonic buffet are well captured. Besides, DMD method accurately mimic the time evolutions of flow variables near the shock wave. Although POD method provides relatively small errors for flow reconstruction, it performs worse than DMD near the shock wave region, because of the poorer approximation of pressure evolution in time.

Key words: buffet, transonic flow, dynamic mode decomposition, proper orthogonal decomposition, shock wave

中图分类号:

V211.1⁺5

寇家庆, 张伟伟, 高传强. 基于POD和DMD方法的跨声速抖振模态分析[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(9): 2679-2689.

KOU Jiaqing, ZHANG Weiwei, GAO Chuanqiang. Modal analysis of transonic buffet based on POD and DMD method[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2016, 37(9): 2679-2689.

参考文献

[1] 张伟伟,高传强,叶正寅. 机翼跨声速抖振研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(4): 1056-1075. ZHANG W W, GAO C Q, YE Z Y. Research advances of wing/airfoil transonic buffet[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(4): 1056-1075 (in Chinese).
[2] LEE B H K. Oscillatory shock motion caused by transonic shock boundary-layer interaction[J]. AIAA Journal, 1990, 28(5): 942-944.
[3] MCDEVITT J B, OKUNO A F. Static and dynamic pressure measurements on a NACA 0012 airfoil in the Ames High Reynolds Number Facility: NASA TP-2485[R]. Washington, D.C.: NASA, 1985.
[4] JACQUIN L, MOLTON P, DECK S, et al. Experimental study of shock oscillation over a transonic supercritical profile[J]. AIAA Journal, 2009, 47(9): 1985-1994.
[5] GAO C Q, ZHANG W W, LIU Y L, et al. Numerical study on the correlation of transonic single-degree-of-freedom flutter and buffet[J]. Science China Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy, 2015, 58(8): 084701-1-084701-12.
[6] DECK S. Numerical simulation of transonic buffet over a supercritical airfoil[J]. AIAA Journal, 2005, 43(7): 1556-1566.
[7] CHEN L W, XU C Y, LU X Y. Numerical investigation of the compressible flow past an aerofoil[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2010, 643(1): 97-126.
[8] LEE B H K. Self-sustained shock oscillations on airfoils at transonic speeds[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2001, 37(2): 147-196.
[9] 张伟伟, 叶正寅. 基于CFD的气动力建模及其在气动弹性中的应用[J]. 力学进展, 2008, 38(1): 77-86. ZHANG W W, YE Z Y. On unsteady aerodynamic modeling based on CFD technique and its applications on aeroelastic analysis[J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2008, 38(1): 77-86 (in Chinese).
[10] ZHANG W W, YE Z Y. Effect of control surface on airfoil flutter in transonic flow[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2010, 66(7-8): 999-1007.
[11] ZHANG W W, LI X T, YE Z Y, et al. Mechanism of frequency lock-in in vortex-induced vibrations at low Reynolds numbers[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2015, 783(1): 72-102.
[12] 寇家庆, 张伟伟, 叶正寅. 基于分层思路的动态非线性气动力建模方法[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(12): 3785-3797. KOU J Q, ZHANG W W, YE Z Y. Dynamic nonlinear aerodynamics modeling method based on layered model[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(12): 3785-3797 (in Chinese).
[13] ZHANG W W, WANG B B, YE Z Y, et al. Efficient method for limit cycle flutter analysis by nonlinear aerodynamic reduced-order models[J]. AIAA Journal, 2012, 50(5): 1019-1028.
[14] KOU J Q, ZHANG W W. An approach to enhance the generalization capability of nonlinear aerodynamic reduced-order models[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2016, 49(1): 197-208.
[15] NOACK B R, AFANASIEV K, MORZYNSKI M, et al. A hierarchy of low-dimensional models for the transient and post-transient cylinder wake[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2003, 497(1): 335-363.
[16] ROWLEY C W. Model reduction for fluids, using balanced proper orthogonal decomposition[J]. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 2005, 15(3): 997-1013.
[17] ROWLEY C W, MEZI? I, BAGHERI S, et al. Spectral analysis of nonlinear flows[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2009, 641(1): 115-127.
[18] SCHMID P J. Dynamic mode decomposition of numerical and experimental data[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2010, 656(1): 5-128.
[19] 李静, 张伟伟, 李新涛. 失稳初期的低雷诺数圆柱绕流POD-Galerkin建模方法研究[J]. 西北工业大学学报, 2015, 33(4): 596-602. LI J, ZHANG W W, LI X T. Researching method of building flow field of initial development stage of low Reynolds number flow past a circular cylinder[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2015, 33(4): 596-602 (in Chinese).
[20] WAN Z H, ZHOU L, WANG B F, et al. Dynamic mode decomposition of forced spatially developed transitional jets[J]. European Journal of Mechanics B/Fluids, 2015, 51(1): 16-26
[21] 潘翀, 陈皇, 王晋军. 复杂流场的动力学模态分解[C]//第八届全国实验流体力学学术会议论文集. 广州: 中国科学院南海海洋研究所, 2010: 77-82. PAN C, CHEN H, WANG J J. Dynamical mode decomposition of complex flow field[C]//8th National Conference on Experimental Fluid Mechanics. Guangzhou: South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, 2010: 77-82 (in Chinese).
[22] MARIAPPAN S, GARDNER A D, RICHTER K, et al. Analysis of dynamic stall using dynamic mode decomposition technique[J]. AIAA Journal, 2014, 52(11): 2427-2439.
[23] MOHAN A T, GAITONDE D V, VISBAL M R. Model reduction and analysis of deep dynamic stall on a plunging airfoil using dynamic mode decomposition: AIAA-2015-1058[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2015.
[24] CHEN K K, TU J H, ROWLEY C W. Variants of dynamic mode decomposition: Boundary condition, Koopman, and Fourier analyses[J]. Journal of Nonlinear Science, 2012, 22(6): 887-915.
[25] WYNN A, PEARSON D, GANAPATHISUBRAMANI B, et al. Optimal mode decomposition for unsteady flows[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2013, 733(1): 473-503.
[26] JOVANOVI? M R, SCHMID P J, NICHOLS J W. Sparsity-promoting dynamic mode decomposition[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2014, 26(2): 024103-1-024103-22.
[27] TU J H, ROWLEY C W, LUCHTENBERG D M, et al. On dynamic mode decomposition: Theory and applications [J]. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 2014, 1(2): 391-421.
[28] BRUNET V. Computational study of buffet phenomenon with unsteady RANS equations: AIAA-2003-3679[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2003.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

基于POD和DMD方法的跨声速抖振模态分析

Modal analysis of transonic buffet based on POD and DMD method

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	谢玮, 罗振兵, 周岩, 刘强, 吴建军, 董昊. 高超声速双楔激波干扰定常射流控制试验研究[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(7): 128813-128813.
[2]	汪洪波, 曾宇, 熊大鹏, 杨揖心, 孙明波. SST湍流模型的激波与可压缩效应改进[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(3): 128694-128694.
[3]	赖江, 范召林, 王乾, 董思卫, 童福林, 袁先旭. 高超声速有攻角锥裙直接数值模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(2): 128610-128610.
[4]	余婧, 蒋安林, 刘亮, 吴晓军, 桂业伟, 刘深深. 基于PCA降维的气动外形参数化方法[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(10): 129125-129125.
[5]	马平, 张宁, 石安华, 于哲峰, 梁世昌, 黄洁. 典型微波波段信号在模拟等离子体中的传输特性[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(S2): 729476-729476.
[6]	曾宇, 汪洪波, 孙明波, 王超, 刘旭. SST湍流模型改进研究综述[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(9): 27411-027411.
[7]	金毅, 孙姝, 郭赟杰, 谭慧俊, 张悦. 超声速可调进气道内流双解现象及其节流特性[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(7): 127134-127134.
[8]	马印锴, 李祝飞, 黄琪, 杨基明. 宽速域翼尖涡及其与斜激波相互作用[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(7): 38-50.
[9]	刘为佳, 李映坤, 陈雄, 李春雷. 基于流固耦合的激波/边界层干扰作用下壁板颤振特性[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(6): 127085-127085.
[10]	魏皇生, 黄柱, 席光. 一种基于幅值和波数的耗散控制方法[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(4): 126589-126589.
[11]	王文杰, 赵旭, 杨龙, 李濠君, 向粤. 跨速域强地效水平助推滑跑气动机理[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(21): 528247-528247.
[12]	孙士珺, 李晓龙, 刘艳明, 王建华, 王松涛. 宽速域来流对超声通流风扇叶型气动性能的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(21): 528523-528523.
[13]	宋家辉, 许爱国, 苗龙, 廖煜淦, 梁福文, 田丰, 聂明卿, 王宁飞. 激波/平板层流边界层干扰熵增特性[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(21): 528520-528520.
[14]	王梦格, 何小明, 王娟娟, 张悦, 汪昆, 谭慧俊, 李留刚. 基于振荡式涡流发生器的激波/边界层干扰控制方法[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(20): 128503-128503.
[15]	宋亚辉, 樊高宇, 瞿丽霞, 张跃林, 徐悦, 韩硕. 航空器声爆飞行试验测量技术研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(2): 626186-626186.