考虑测试性设计缺陷修正延时的测试性增长模型建模与评价方法

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2019.23079

电子电气工程与控制

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

考虑测试性设计缺陷修正延时的测试性增长模型建模与评价方法

李天梅¹, 司小胜¹, 杨宗浩², 徐从启³, 张琪¹

1. 火箭军工程大学导弹工程学院, 西安 710025;
2. 火箭军士官学校, 青州 262500;
3. 中国人民解放军32181部队, 西安 710032

收稿日期:2019-04-11 修回日期:2019-04-22 出版日期:2019-09-15 发布日期:2019-06-24
通讯作者: 徐从启 E-mail:xcqnudt@126.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（61304103）

Foundation and assessment of testability growth model considering testability design limitation rectifying delay function

LI Tianmei¹, SI Xiaosheng¹, YANG Zonghao², XU Congqi³, ZHANG Qi¹

1. College of Missile Engineering, Rocket Force University of Engineering, Xi'an 710025, China;
2. The PLA Rocket Force Academy, Qingzhou 262500, China;
3. 32181 Force of PLA, Xi'an 710032, China

Received:2019-04-11 Revised:2019-04-22 Online:2019-09-15 Published:2019-06-24
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (61304103)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对现有测试性增长模型忽略了测试性设计缺陷的修正延时过程，进而导致测试性增长模型（TGM）跟踪与预计精度低的问题，提出了一种考虑测试性设计缺陷修正延时的测试性增长模型建模理论与方法。首先分析测试性设计缺陷识别与修正之间的延时机理，得到剩余测试性设计缺陷（TDL）具有先增后减的铃形变化趋势；在此基础上，分别以Gamma、Raleigh和Delay-S 3种曲线拟合剩余测试性设计缺陷（RTDL）变化趋势，研究建立基于以上3种曲线考虑修正延时的测试性增长模型；最后，以某机载稳定跟踪平台测试性增长试验数据验证测试性增长模型拟合、跟踪及预计效能。研究结果表明：基于该测试性增长试验数据，Gamma曲线可以精确地拟合剩余测试性设计缺陷变化规律，测试性增长模型跟踪和预计精度可达到10^-2数量级。

关键词: 测试性增长模型, 测试性设计缺陷, 修正延时, Gamma曲线, Rayleigh曲线, Delay-S曲线

Abstract: For existing testability growth models ignores the rectifying process of testability design limitations, causes the testability growth process describes incompletely, and the tracking and projecting imprecise, a Testability Growth Model (TGM) which considers the rectifying delay based on Bell-shaped curve are proposed. Firstly, the mechanism relation between the discovering process of Testability Design Limitation (TDL) and the rectifying process of TDL is analyzed. And on the basis, three bell-shaped curves are used to describe the variation tendency of remaining testability design limitations, the three bell-shaped curves are Rayleigh curve and Delay-S curve, then, TGMs which consider bell-shaped TDL rectifying delay process are founded. Finally, a data set is used to verify the fitting, estimation and prediction of TGM. Result shows that:Gamma curve is more accurate to fit the number of Remaining Testability Design Limitation (RTDL) and that TGM considering the rectifying delay can give good result in fitting, estimation and prediction, and the accuracy of estimation can reach 10^-2 order of magnitude.

Key words: testability growth model, testability design limitation, rectifying delay, Gamma curve, Rayleigh curve, Delay-S curve

中图分类号:

李天梅, 司小胜, 杨宗浩, 徐从启, 张琪. 考虑测试性设计缺陷修正延时的测试性增长模型建模与评价方法[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(9): 323079-323079.

LI Tianmei, SI Xiaosheng, YANG Zonghao, XU Congqi, ZHANG Qi. Foundation and assessment of testability growth model considering testability design limitation rectifying delay function[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2019, 40(9): 323079-323079.

参考文献 15

[1]	全国量和单位标准化技术委员会.装备测试大纲:GJB2547-1995[S].北京:中国标准出版社, 1995:68-108. National Technical Committee on Quantity and Unit Standardization. Testability program for materiel:GJB2547-1995[S]. Beijing:Standards Press of China, 1995:68-108(in Chinese).
[2]	田仲, 石君友.系统测试性设计分析与验证[M].北京:北京航空航天大学出版社,2003:361-396. TIAN Z, SHI J Y. Design,analysis and demonstration of system testability[M]. Beijing:Beihang University Press, 2003:361-396(in Chinese).
[3]	LI T M, XU C Q, QIU J, et al. The assessment and foundation of bell-shaped testability growth effort functions dependent system testability growth models based on NHPP[J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2015,27(1):1-18.
[4]	ZHAO C X, QIU J, LIU G J, et al. A testability growth model and its application[C]//IEEE Autotestcon. Piscataway, NJ:IEEE Press, 2014:121-128.
[5]	ZHAO C X, KRISHINA P, LIU G J, et al. A Markov Chain-based testability growth model with a cost-benefit function[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics:Systems, 2016, 46(4):524-534.
[6]	SCHNEIDEWIND N. Modeling the fault correction process[C]//Proceddings of the 12th International Conference on Software Reliability Engineering, 2001:185-190.
[7]	PHAM H, ZHANG X M. NHPP software reliability and cost models with testing coverage[J].European Journal of Operational Research, 2003, 145(6):443-454.
[8]	舒艳君. 故障检测与修正过程的NHPP类软件可靠性增长模型研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学, 2009:50-102. SHU Y J. Research on NHPP software reliability growth models of fault detection and correction processes[D]. Harbin:Harbin Institute of Technology, 2009:50-102(in Chinese).
[9]	PHAM H, NORDMANN L, ZHANG X M. A general imperfect software debugging model with s-shaped fault-detection rate[J]. IEEE Transaction on Power Systems, 1999, 48(2):169-176.
[10]	LI Q Y, LI H F, LU M Y, et al. Software reliability growth model with s-shaped testing effort function[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2011,37(2):149-160.
[11]	PHAM H, ZHANG X M. NHPP software reliability and cost models with testing coverage[J].European Journal of Operational Research, 2003, 145(8):443-454.
[12]	PHAM H. Software reliability and cost models:Perspectives, comparison and practice[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2003,149(6):475-489.
[13]	PENG R, LI Y F, ZHANG W J, et al. Testing effort dependent software reliability model for imperfect debugging considering both detection and correction[J].Reliability Engineering and System Safety,2014, 126(4):37-43.
[14]	KAPUR P K, PHAM H, GUPTA A, et al. Software reliability assessment with applications[M]. London:Springer-Verlag, 2011:315-386.
[15]	HUANG C, LIN C. Software reliability analysis by considering fault dependency and debugging time lag[J]. IEEE Transaction on Reliability, 2006, 55(3):436-450.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

考虑测试性设计缺陷修正延时的测试性增长模型建模与评价方法

Foundation and assessment of testability growth model considering testability design limitation rectifying delay function

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 15

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	于哲峰, 梁世昌, 石卫波, 田得阳, 石安华, 廖东骏, 杨鹰. 类HTV⁃2飞行器光电特性的分析评估技术[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(S2): 729465-729465.
[2]	安凯黄伟王振国徐小平孟玉珊. AI驱动高速飞行器多学科发展知识图谱分析[J]. 航空学报, 0, (): 0-0.
[3]	吕定翀, 赵守军, 曾思, 付剑, 胡心童, 刘会祥, 苗克非, 付永领. 高性能伺服电机泵关键技术及挑战[J]. 航空学报, 0, (): 0-0.
[4]	李少毅卫孟杰杨俊彦程岳杨曦孟中杰. 红外多波段成像末制导技术研究现状与展望[J]. 航空学报, 0, (): 0-0.
[5]	叶熠彬, 滕锡超, 于起峰, 李璋. 基于MatchNet和多点匹配约束的可见光-SAR图像匹配[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(10): 329162-329162.
[6]	李鹏丁明松陈坚强刘庆宗傅杨奥骁江涛梅杰许勇. 一种新型的热力学两温度模型数值计算方法[J]. 航空学报, 0, (): 0-0.
[7]	赵其昌, 吴一全, 苑玉彬. 光学遥感图像舰船目标检测与识别方法研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(8): 29025-029025.
[8]	李宗凌龙腾赵保军王天宇伍国华. 面向预警场景的大规模星座协同调度标准建模与求解方法[J]. 航空学报, 0, (): 0-0.
[9]	艾诗迪李军伟田忠亮韩磊王宁飞. 横向复合过载下固体火箭发动机压强振荡研究[J]. 航空学报, 0, (): 0-0.
[10]	李斌张泽南贾飞孙健刘彦菊冷劲松. 变翼尖机翼技术的研究现状与发展趋势[J]. 航空学报, 0, (): 0-0.
[11]	卜飞飞董兆鹏张得礼黄文新徐振缘孙鹏宇. 空间柔性系绳用永磁直驱伺服系统高性能控制关键技术（24-30216）[J]. 航空学报, 0, (): 0-0.
[12]	陈立, 曾孝云, 黄文, 张建飞. 简谐基础加速度激励下的点阵结构优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(5): 529704-529704.
[13]	张卫红, 唐长红. 航空航天装备的轻量化：挑战与未来[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(5): 529965-529965.
[14]	郭伟石文泽卢超胡博刘远. 金属薄板厚度激光电磁超声谐振评价方法研究[J]. 航空学报, 0, (): 0-0.
[15]	束静廖文和郑侃董松孙连军. 旋转超声加工碳纤维复合材料研究现状与展望[J]. 航空学报, 0, (): 0-0.