飞行控制律对体自由度颤振特性影响试验

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2020.24378

流体力学与飞行力学

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

飞行控制律对体自由度颤振特性影响试验

雷鹏轩¹, 余立², 陈德华², 吕彬彬²

1. 中国空气动力研究与发展中心空天技术研究所, 绵阳 621000;
2. 中国空气动力研究与发展中心高速空气动力研究所, 绵阳 621000

收稿日期:2020-06-08 修回日期:2020-07-02 出版日期:2021-06-15 发布日期:1900-01-01
通讯作者: 吕彬彬 E-mail:lbin@cardc.cc

Influence of flight control law on body freedom flutter characteristics: Experimental study

LEI Pengxuan¹, YU Li², CHEN Dehua², LYU Binbin²

1. Aerospace Technology Institute, China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center, Mianyang 621000, China;
2. High Speed Aerodynamics Institute, China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center, Mianyang 621000, China

Received:2020-06-08 Revised:2020-07-02 Online:2021-06-15 Published:1900-01-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 飞翼飞机易发生刚体短周期模态与机翼低阶弯曲模态耦合所致的体自由度颤振。飞行控制系统对飞机的短周期模态特性影响很大，因此考虑飞行控制系统的闭环体自由度颤振特性值得进一步研究。针对自主设计的颤振模型开发了相应的俯仰姿态保持控制律，综合运用风洞试验和仿真计算开展了相关研究，获得了不同刚体自由边界条件下的开环/闭环体自由度颤振特性，研究了闭环增益对体自由度颤振特性的影响规律，简要分析了影响机理。试验和仿真计算结果共同表明：俯仰姿态保持控制律明显地改变了俯仰模态阻尼的原有走势，闭环后的体自由度颤振特性变化明显。以开环颤振速度为基准，采用较小的比例回路增益K_P或较大的微分回路增益K_D，飞行控制律能增加飞行器俯仰阻尼，提高体自由度颤振速度，反之飞行控制律将导致颤振速度降低。就本文控制律而言，当K_P<0.07或K_D>0.2时俯仰姿态保持控制律能起到抑制体自由度颤振的作用。

关键词: 飞翼飞机, 体自由度颤振, 风洞试验, 飞行控制律, 气动伺服弹性

Abstract: Body freedom flutter, caused by coupling of the short period mode of the rigid body and the low order bending mode of the wing, easily occurs on flying wing aircraft. Since the flight control system has a significant influence on the short period modal characteristics of the aircraft, the closed-loop body freedom flutter characteristics considering the flight control system needs further study. In this paper, a pitching pose holding control law was developed for the self-designed flutter test model. The wind tunnel test and simulation calculation were used to conduct the research. The open-loop/closed-loop body freedom flutter characteristics under different free-free boundary conditions were obtained. The closed-loop gain on the flutter characteristics was studied, and the influence mechanism analyzed briefly. The results showed that the pitching pose holding control law obviously changed the original trend of modal damping, and the body freedom flutter characteristic of the closed-loop changed obviously. Based on the open-loop flutter velocity, using a smaller proportional loop gain K_P or a larger differential loop gain K_D, the flight control law can increase the pitch damping of the aircraft and the body freedom flutter velocity. Otherwise, the flight control law would reduce the flutter velocity. For the control law in this paper, when K_P<0.07 or K_D>0.2, the pitching pose holding control law can suppress the body freedom flutter.

Key words: flying wing aircraft, body freedom flutter, wind tunnel test, flight control law, aeroservoelasticity

中图分类号:

V211.47

雷鹏轩, 余立, 陈德华, 吕彬彬. 飞行控制律对体自由度颤振特性影响试验[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(6): 124378-124378.

LEI Pengxuan, YU Li, CHEN Dehua, LYU Binbin. Influence of flight control law on body freedom flutter characteristics: Experimental study[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(6): 124378-124378.

参考文献

[1] 杨超, 黄超, 吴志刚, 等. 气动伺服弹性研究的进展与挑战[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(4):1011-1033. YANG C, HUANG C, WU Z G, et al. Progress and challenges for aeroservoelasticity research[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(4):1011-1033(in Chinese).
[2] 李秋彦, 李刚, 魏洋天, 等. 先进战斗机气动弹性设计综述[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(6):523430. LI Q Y, LI G, WEI Y T, et al. Review of aeroelasticity design for advanced fighter[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2020, 41(6):523430(in Chinese).
[3] TILMANN C P, FLICK P M, MARTIN C A, et al. High-altitude long endurance technologies for sensorcraft[C]//Symposium on Novel and Emerging Vehicle and Vehicle Technology Concepts, 2003:7-11.
[4] LOVE M, ZINK P, WIESELMANN P, et al. Body freedom flutter of high aspect ratio flying wings[C]//46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference. Reston:AIAA, 2005.
[5] SCOTT R, VETTER T, PENNING K, et al. Aeroservoelastic testing of a sidewall mounted free flying wind-tunnel model[C]//26th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. Reston:AIAA, 2008.
[6] NICOLAI L, HUNTEN K, ZINK P S, et al. System benefits of active flutter suppression for a sensorcraft-type vehicle[C]//13th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis Optimization Conference. Reston:AIAA, 2010.
[7] BURNETT E, ATKINSON C, BERANEK J, et al. Ndof simulation model for flight control development with flight test correlation[C]//AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference. Reston:AIAA, 2010.
[8] BERANEK J, NICOLAI L, BUONANNO M, et al. Conceptual design of a multi-utility aeroelastic demonstrator[C]//13th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis Optimization Conference. Reston:AIAA, 2010.
[9] REGAN C D, TAYLOR B R. mAEWing1:Design, build, test-invited[C]//AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference. Reston:AIAA, 2016.
[10] GUPTA A, SEILER P J, DANOWSKY B P. Ground vibration tests on a flexible flying wing aircraft-invited[C]//AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference. Reston:AIAA, 2016.
[11] KOTIKALPUDI A, PFIFER H, BALAS G J. Unsteady aerodynamics modeling for a flexible unmanned air vehicle[C]//AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference. Reston:AIAA, 2015.
[12] SCHMIDT D K, ZHAO W, KAPANIA R K. Flight-dynamics and flutter modeling and analyses of a flexible flying-wing drone-invited[C]//AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference. Reston:AIAA, 2016.
[13] DANOWSKY B P, KOTIKALPUDI A, SCHMIDT D K. Flight testing flutter suppression on a small flexible flying-wing aircraft:AIAA-2018-3427[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2018.
[14] GU Y S, YANG Z C, MARZOCCA P, et al. Body freedom flutter of a flexible blended wing body like plate-an experimental study[C]//17th International Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics, 2017.
[15] 黄超. 柔性飞翼机颤振主动抑制系统建模、设计与验证[D]. 北京:北京航空航天大学,2018. HUANG C. Modeling, design, and verification of active flutter suppression system acting on flexible flying-wing aircraft[D]. Beijing:Beihang University, 2018(in Chinese).
[16] HUANG C, WU Z, YANG C, et al. Flutter boundary prediction for a flying-wing model exhibiting body freedom flutter[C]//58th AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference. Reston:AIAA, 2017.
[17] GU Y S, YANG Z C, HE S. Body freedom flutter of a blended wing body model coupled with flight control system[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2015, 99:46-50.
[18] 郭洪涛, 陈德华, 吕彬彬, 等. 大展弦比机翼跨声速静气动弹性风洞试验[J].空气动力学学报, 2017,35(6):841-845. GUO H T, CHEN D H, LV B B, et al. Wind tunnel test on transonic static areoelasticity of high-aspect-ratio wing[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2017,35(6):841-845(in Chinese).
[19] PEETERS B, VAN DER AUWERAER H, GUILLAUME P, et al. The PolyMAX frequency-domain method:a new standard for modal parameter estimation[J]. Shock and Vibration, 2004, 11(3, 4):395-409.
[20] 章卫国, 李爱军, 李广文, 等. 现代飞行控制系统设计[M]. 西安:西北工业大学出版社, 2009. ZHANG W G, LI A J, LI G W, et al. Modern flight control system design[M]. Xi'an:Northwestern Polytechnical University Press, 2009(in Chinese).

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

飞行控制律对体自由度颤振特性影响试验

Influence of flight control law on body freedom flutter characteristics: Experimental study

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	徐善劼, 吕宏强, 刘中臣, 冷岩, 刘学军. 基于概率模型的声爆试验数据分析[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(2): 626269-626269.
[2]	刘中臣, 钱战森, 李雪飞, 冷岩, 郭大鹏. 发动机喷管羽流对近场声爆特性影响的风洞试验技术[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(2): 626952-626952.
[3]	束珺, 徐东光, 韩志熔, 李斯, 黄雄. 结冰风洞过冷大水滴试验中混合翼设计[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(1): 627182-627182.
[4]	罗凯, 王永海, 汪球, 栗继伟, 李峥, 聂春生, 李铮. 高焓风洞中等离子体激励流动控制试验[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(S2): 89-96.
[5]	杜海, 杨乐杰, 李铮, 徐悦, 孙京阳, 王宇航. 多级环量控制技术增升机理及能效分析[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(S2): 54-66.
[6]	刘传振, 孟旭飞, 刘荣健, 白鹏. 双后掠乘波体高超声速试验与数值分析[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 126015-126015.
[7]	刘俊, 罗新福, 王显圣. 前缘形状对空腔模型气动特性影响试验[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(7): 125235-125235.
[8]	侯英昱, 李齐, 季辰, 刘子强. 超声速低频大抖振气动弹性载荷试验[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(3): 626454-626454.
[9]	张桢锴, 贾思嘉, 宋晨, 杨超. 柔性变弯度后缘机翼的风洞试验模型优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(3): 226071-226071.
[10]	曾开春, 寇西平, 杨兴华, 余立, 查俊. 跨声速风洞试验模型主动减振结构优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(2): 224944-224944.
[11]	衣秉立, 刘博宇, 王争取, 张铁军, 鲁丹, 赵彦. 1.2 m高速风洞双天平支撑试验技术[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(11): 526794-526794.
[12]	王浩, 钟敏, 华俊, 钟海, 杨体浩, 王猛, 雷国东. 自然层流飞行测试翼套的仿真和试验[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(11): 526785-526785.
[13]	陈艺夫, 王一雯, 邓一菊, 王波, 白俊强, 卢磊. 自然层流机翼的翼套试验及数值方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(11): 526793-526793.
[14]	杨钊, 李杰, 牛笑天. 层流机翼飞行验证平台雷诺数效应分析及修正[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(11): 527287-527287.
[15]	耿延升, 艾梦琪, 王伟, 耿建中, 赵彦. 高效层流翼型设计及试验验证[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(11): 526798-526798.