后缘连续变弯度对跨声速翼型气动特性的影响

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2015.0161

流体力学与飞行力学

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

后缘连续变弯度对跨声速翼型气动特性的影响

郭同彪, 白俊强, 杨体浩

西北工业大学航空学院, 西安 710072

收稿日期:2015-03-09 修回日期:2015-05-23 出版日期:2016-02-15 发布日期:2015-06-24
通讯作者: 白俊强,男,博士,教授,博士生导师。主要研究方向:飞行器总体气动布局设计、部件气动力设计、多学科优化设计、计算流体力学理论和应用。Tel:029-88492174,E-mail:junqiang@nwpu.edu.cn E-mail:junqiang@nwpu.edu.cn
作者简介:郭同彪,男,硕士研究生。主要研究方向:飞行器气动优化设计。Tel:15809270907,E-mail:812558997@qq.com
基金资助:
国家"973"计划(2014CB744800)

Influence of continuous trailing-edge variable camber on aerodynamic characteristics of transonic airfoils

GUO Tongbiao, BAI Junqiang, YANG Tihao

School of Aeronautics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China

Received:2015-03-09 Revised:2015-05-23 Online:2016-02-15 Published:2015-06-24
Supported by:
National Basic Research Program of China(2014CB744800)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对后缘连续变弯度对跨声速翼型气动特性的影响进行了研究。首先不考虑翼型后缘连续变弯度,基于搭建的优化设计系统对跨声速翼型进行气动减阻优化设计,通过添加不同的约束优化得到两种跨声速翼型:无激波翼型和超临界翼型。然后在这两种翼型的基础上,以后缘偏转角度为设计变量、以阻力系数最小为目标,针对不同的升力系数分别进行优化设计,并根据优化结果深入分析后缘连续变弯度对这两种翼型极曲线特性的影响机理。优化结果表明:无激波翼型与超临界翼型相比,其设计点处的气动特性较好,但鲁棒性较差;升力系数小于设计升力系数时,应用后缘连续变弯度后,无激波翼型的极曲线特性明显提高,减阻最高达到3.9%,而超临界翼型的极曲线特性提高不明显;升力系数大于设计升力系数时,应用后缘连续变弯度后,无激波翼型和超临界翼型的极曲线特性都明显提高,减阻分别达到2.4%~18.1%和1.7%~13.2%。

关键词: 后缘连续变弯度, 无激波翼型, 超临界翼型, 优化设计, 鲁棒性, 极曲线

Abstract:

The influence of continuous trailing-edge variable camber on the aerodynamic characteristics of transonic airfoils is investigated. Before the continuous trailing-edge variable camber is considered, the aerodynamic drag reduction optimization design of the transonic airfoil is carried out based on the optimization design system constructed in this paper. With different constraints added, two kinds of transonic airfoils are obtained, namely the shock-free airfoil and the supercritical airfoil. Then the optimization design is conducted based on the two airfoils at different lift coefficients, by taking the deflection angle of the trailing-edge as the design variable and the minimum drag coefficient as the objective. And the effect of the continuous trailing-edge variable camber on the drag polar of these two kinds of transonic airfoils is investigated and analyzed according to the optimization results. The results of the optimization design show that the aerodynamic characteristics of the shock-free airfoil are better than those of the supercritical airfoil at the design point, but the robustness is worse. Besides, when the lift coefficient is lower than the design lift coefficient, the drag polar characteristic of the shock-free airfoil can be improved greatly with the continuous trailing-edge variable camber applied, thus the drag coefficient is reduced by up to 3.9%. However, the situation of supercritical airfoil is different. The results also demonstrate that when the lift coefficient exceeds the design lift coefficient, the continuous trailing-edge variable camber method can significantly improve the drag polar performance of both airfoils with the drag coefficients of them being reduced by 2.4%-18.1% and 1.7%-13.2% respectively.

Key words: continuous trailing-edge variable camber, shock-free airfoil, supercritical airfoil, optimization design, robustness, polar

中图分类号:

V211.41⁺2

郭同彪, 白俊强, 杨体浩. 后缘连续变弯度对跨声速翼型气动特性的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(2): 513-521.

GUO Tongbiao, BAI Junqiang, YANG Tihao. Influence of continuous trailing-edge variable camber on aerodynamic characteristics of transonic airfoils[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2016, 37(2): 513-521.

参考文献

[1] URNES J, NGUYEN N, IPPOLITO C, et al. A mission adaptive variable camber flap control system to optimize high lift and cruise lift-to-drag ratios of future n+3 transport aircraft[C]//51th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting. Reston:AIAA, 2013:1-7.
[2] JAMES M, URNES J, CHARLES M. Control system design for a variable camber continuous trailing edge flap system on an elastic wing[C]//55th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/SC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference. Reston:AIAA, 2014:1-13.
[3] RENEAUX J. Overview on drag reduction technologies for civil transport aircraft[C]//European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering. Jyväskylä:ECCOMAS, 2004:7-24.
[4] KOTA S. Shape control of adaptive structures using compliant mechanisms:AFRLSR-BL-TR-00-0125[R]. Ann Arbor:Department of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics, 2000.
[5] KERR-JIA L, KOTA S. Design of compliant mechanisms for morphing stricture shapes[J]. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 2003, 14(6):379-391.
[6] DI-MATTEO N, GUO S, AHMED S, et al. Design and analysis of a morphing flap structure for high lift wing[C]//51th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/-ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Material Conference. Reston:AIAA, 2010:4-12.
[7] YOKOZEKI T, SUGIURA A. Development of variable camber morphing airfoil using corrugated structure[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2014, 51(3):1023-1029.
[8] YOKOZEKI T, SUGIURA A. Development and wind tunnel test of variable camber morphing wing[C]//22nd AIAA/ASME/AHS Adaptive Structures Conference. Reston:AIAA, 2014:1-13.
[9] KAUL K, NGUYEN N. Drag optimization study of variable camber continuous trailing tdge flap using overflow[C]//32nd AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. Reston:AIAA, 2014:6-16.
[10] 杨智春, 解江. 柔性后缘自适应机翼的概念设计[J]. 航空学报, 2009, 30(6):1028-1034. YANG Z C, XIE J. Concept design of adaptive wing with flexible trailing edge[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2009, 30(6):1028-1034(in Chinese).
[11] 杨智春, 党会学, 解江. 基于动网格技术的柔性后缘自适应机翼气动特性分析[J]. 应用力学学报, 2009, 26(3):548-554. YANG Z C, DANG H X, XIE J. Aerodynamic characteristics of flexible trailing edge adaptive wing by unstructured dynamic meshes[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2009, 26(3):548-554(in Chinese).
[12] 陈钱, 白鹏, 尹维龙, 等. 可连续光滑偏转后缘的变弯度翼型气动特性分析[J]. 空气动力学报. 2010, 28(1):46-53. CHEN Q, BAI P, YIN W L, et al. Analysis on the aerodynamic characteristics of variable camber airfoils with continuous smooth morphing trailing edge[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2010, 28(1):46-53(in Chinese).
[13] 孔博, 王福新, 周涛. 基于环量控制无缝变弯度翼型的气动设计[J]. 空气动力学报, 2013, 31(5):583-586. KONG B, WANG F X, ZHOU T. The aerodynamic design of seamlessly camber-variable airfoil based on circulation control[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2013, 31(5):583-586(in Chinese).
[14] 黄杰, 葛文杰, 杨方. 实现机翼前缘形状连续变化柔性机构的拓扑优化[J]. 航空学报, 2007, 28(4):988-992. HUANG J, GE W J, YANG F. Topology optimization of the compliant mechanism for shape change of airfoil leading edge[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2007, 28(4):988-992(in Chinese).
[15] 赵飞, 葛文杰, 张龙. 某无人机柔性机翼后缘变形机构的拓扑优化[J]. 机械设计, 2009, 26(8):19-22. ZHAO F, GE W J, ZHANG L. Topological optimization on the deformation mechanism of flexible trailing edge of certain pilot-less aircraft[J]. Journal of Machine Design, 2009, 26(8):19-22(in Chinese).
[16] 王婷, 王帮峰, 芦吉云, 等. 一种拓扑优化方法在机翼可变后缘中的研究[J]. 机械科学与技术, 2011, 30(1):1660-1663. WANG T, WANG B F, LU J Y, et al. The study of a topological optimization method on the adaptive wing's trailing edge[J]. Mechanical Science and Technology for Aerospace Engineering, 2011, 30(1):1660-1663(in Chinese).
[17] 尹维龙, 石庆华, 田冬奎. 变体后缘的索网传动机构设计与分析[J]. 航空学报, 2013, 34(8):1824-1831. YIN W L, SHI Q H, TIAN D K. Design and analysis of transmission mechanism with cable networks for morphing trailing edge[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2013, 34(8):1824-1831(in Chinese).
[18] 刘卫东, 丁倩, 朱华, 等. 基于超声电机的变弯度翼的驱动与集成[J]. 振动、测试与诊断. 2013, 33(5):856-861. LIU W D, DING Q, ZHU H, et al. Drive and integration techniques of variable camber wing based on ultrasonic motors[J]. Journal of Vibration, Measurement and Diagnosis, 2013, 33(5):856-861(in Chinese).
[19] SANTINI G M. Wing variable camber trailing edge tip:USA. US8844879[P]. 2014-09-30.
[20] 何小龙, 白俊强, 夏露, 等. 基于EFFD方法的自然层流短舱优化设计[J]. 航空动力学报, 2014, 29(10):2311-2320. HE X L, BAI J Q, XIA L, et al. Natural laminar flow nacelle optimization design based on EFFD method[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2014, 29(10):2311-2320(in Chinese).
[21] COOK P H, MCDONALD M A, FIRMIN M C P. Aerofoil RAE 2822-pressure distributions, and boundary layer and wake measurements:AGARD AR-138[R]. Neuilly Sur Seine, France:AGARD, 1979.
[22] PAINCHAUD-OUELLET S, TRIBES C, TREPANIER J Y, et al. Airfoil shape optimization using a nonuniform rational B-splines parameterization under thickness constraint[J]. AIAA Journal, 2006, 44(10):2170-2178.
[23] 张宇飞. 基于先进CFD方法的民用客机气动优化设计[D]. 北京:清华大学, 2010. ZHANG Y F. Aerodynamic optimization of civil aircraft design based on advanced computational fluid dynamics[D]. Beijing:Tsinghua University, 2010(in Chinese).
[24] 杨昆淼, 张卫民, 王斌. 基于机翼气动设计准则的超临界机翼气动优化研究[J]. 航空学报, 2013, 34(2):263-272. YANG K M, ZHANG W M, WANG B. Research of super-critical wing optimization based on aerodynamic design principle of wing[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2013, 34(2):263-272(in Chinese).

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

后缘连续变弯度对跨声速翼型气动特性的影响

Influence of continuous trailing-edge variable camber on aerodynamic characteristics of transonic airfoils

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王晨, 杨洋, 沈星, 夏育颖. 用于变体飞行器的波纹板等效强度模型及其优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(6): 526146-526146.
[2]	张冬辉, 张泰华, 崔燕香, 陈臣, 王生. 平流层系留气球气动参数敏感性分析[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(5): 125083-125083.
[3]	张桢锴, 贾思嘉, 宋晨, 杨超. 柔性变弯度后缘机翼的风洞试验模型优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(3): 226071-226071.
[4]	万兵, 苏析超, 郭放, 韩维, 梁勇. 不确定性工时下甲板作业的前摄性鲁棒调度[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(12): 325971-325971.
[5]	昌敏, 孙杨, 白俊强, 孟晓轩. 平角旋转机构约束的管射无人机二次折叠翼气动优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(11): 526331-526331.
[6]	杨体浩, 白俊强, 段卓毅, 史亚云, 邓一菊, 周铸. 喷气式客机层流翼气动设计综述[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(11): 527016-527016.
[7]	姜丽红, 饶寒月, 兰夏毓, 杨体浩, 耿建中, 白俊强. 混合层流机翼气动设计与综合收益影响[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(11): 526791-526791.
[8]	章胜华, 邓枫, 覃宁, 刘学强. 激波控制鼓包对跨声速抖振影响的数值研究[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(11): 526806-526806.
[9]	张志刚, 赵金山, 王成鹏, 罗万清, 廖军好, 肖雨, 陈挺, 粟斯尧. 展向宽度对激波入射平板反射类型的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(1): 625927-625927.
[10]	周文硕, 夏露, 王培君, 周琳. 类C-HGB布局锐边化气动隐身优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(S1): 726375-726375.
[11]	颜黎明, 赵冬冬, 焦宁飞. 基于鲁棒模型的航空交流感应电机预测转矩控制[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(9): 324700-324700.
[12]	彭一明, 张钊, 魏小辉, 聂宏, 谢朋朋. 结构参数对拦阻钩碰撞反弹动力学影响分析[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(7): 224406-224406.
[13]	曹立飞, 曹红松, 刘鹏飞, 刘恒著, 肖艳文. 固定鸭舵二维修正弹比例导引律参数优化[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(6): 324751-324751.
[14]	常楠, 徐荣欣, 陈先民, 杨军, 李毅. 静强度/耐久性初步结构优化设计方法[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(5): 524389-524389.
[15]	刘深深, 陈江涛, 桂业伟, 唐伟, 王安龄, 韩青华. 基于数据挖掘的飞行器气动布局设计知识提取[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(4): 524708-524708.