翼型加装格尼襟翼的高亚声速气动特性研究

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2013.0169

流体力学与飞行力学

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

翼型加装格尼襟翼的高亚声速气动特性研究

崔钊, 韩东, 李建波

南京航空航天大学航空宇航学院, 江苏南京 210016

收稿日期:2012-11-19 修回日期:2013-03-14 出版日期:2013-10-25 发布日期:2013-04-08
通讯作者: 李建波,Tel.: 025-84895188 E-mail: ljb101@nuaa.edu.cn E-mail:ljb101@nuaa.edu.cn
作者简介:崔钊男, 博士研究生。主要研究方向: 直升机总体设计、旋翼空气动力学、直升机飞行力学。 Tel: 025-84895188 E-mail: hawkcz@nuaa.edu.cn;韩东男, 博士, 副教授。主要研究方向: 旋翼动力学设计、直升机结构及载荷分析。 Tel: 025-84895188 E-mail: donghan@nuaa.edu.cn;李建波男, 博士, 研究员, 博士生导师。主要研究方向: 旋翼类飞行器总体设计研究、直升机气动及飞行动力学研究、旋翼结构及动力学设计。 Tel: 025-84895188 E-mail:ljb101@nuaa.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家"863"计划(2011AA7052002);江苏省研究生培养创新工程(CX10B_104Z);江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目

Study on Aerodynamic Characteristics of Airfoil with Gurney Flaps Under High Subsonic Flow

CUI Zhao, HAN Dong, LI Jianbo

College of Aerospace Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China

Received:2012-11-19 Revised:2013-03-14 Online:2013-10-25 Published:2013-04-08
Supported by:
National High-tech Research and Development Program of China (2011AA7052002);Funding of Jiangsu Innovation Program for Graduate Education (CX10B_104Z);A Project Funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为研究高亚声速下格尼襟翼(GF)对翼型气动性能的影响,采用数值计算方法研究了NACA 8-H-12翼型加装不同高度格尼襟翼后的气动特性。数值计算以雷诺平均Navier-Stokes(RANS)方程作为控制方程,采用有限体积法进行离散,通量计算采用Roe通量差分分裂格式,湍流模型为剪切应力输运(SST) k-ω两方程模型。格尼襟翼高度分别为1%、2%和5%弦长高度,垂直于翼型弦线安装,安装位置分别位于后缘和距后缘5%弦长处。计算结果表明:在马赫数Ma=0.8时,格尼襟翼后方形成了双涡结构,该结构对翼型绕流的加速作用增大了翼型的环量,从而使翼型升力系数显著增大;小迎角下襟翼对上表面激波位置的后移作用也有利于翼型增升。关于不同襟翼安装位置的研究表明,襟翼安装于后缘能够带来更大的升阻比增量。在0°~12°迎角范围内,1%、2%和5%弦长高度的格尼襟翼均能够提高翼型在相同升力系数下的升阻比,但较高的格尼襟翼使翼型力矩系数显著增大,因此对于实际工程应用,需选择适当的襟翼高度以避免由于翼型低头力矩过大造成不利影响。

关键词: 格尼襟翼, 数值计算, 激波, 气动特性, 升阻比

Abstract:

In order to investigate the performance of airfoils equipped with Gurney flaps (GF) under high subsonic flow, the aerodynamic characteristics of airfoil NACA 8-H-12 with Gurney flaps of different heights are calculated by means of a numerical method. The Reynolds average Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations are chosen as the governing equations in numerical calculation, with the application of the finite volume method for discretization. The Roe flux difference splitting scheme is employed to calculate the flux. Turbulence model is shear stress transition (SST) k-ω two equations model. The heights of the Gurney flaps are 1%, 2% and 5% chord length respectively, mounted perpendicular to the chordline of the airfoil at the trailing edge and 5% chord ahead of the trailing edge. The results show that a double vortex structure is formed behind the Gurney flap when the Mach number is 0.8. Because of the acceleration of the flow around the airfoil, the airfoil circulation is increased by this structure, and therefore the lift coefficient increases significantly. The shock wave position is postponed at a lower angle of attack, and this phenomenon is beneficial to lift enhancement. An equipment location comparison shows that the Gurney flap equipped at the airfoil trailing edge improves the lift-drag ratio most significantly. Gurney flaps of 1%, 2% and 5% chord height are all able to improve the lift-drag ratio at the same given lift coefficient, but higher Gurney flap makes the airfoil moment coefficient increase significantly. So for practical application, the height of the Gurney flaps must be limited to avoid the adverse effects caused by excessive nose-down moment.

Key words: Gurney flap, numerical calculation, shock wave, aerodynamic characteristic, lift-drag ratio

中图分类号:

V211.41

崔钊, 韩东, 李建波. 翼型加装格尼襟翼的高亚声速气动特性研究[J]. 航空学报, 2013, 34(10): 2277-2286.

CUI Zhao, HAN Dong, LI Jianbo. Study on Aerodynamic Characteristics of Airfoil with Gurney Flaps Under High Subsonic Flow[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2013, 34(10): 2277-2286.

参考文献

[1] Liebeck R H. Design of subsonic airfoils for high lift. Journal of Aircraft, 1978, 15(9): 547-561.

[2] Neuhart D H, Pendergraft O C. A water tunnel study of Gurney flaps. NASA TM 4071, 1988.

[3] Storms B L, Jang C S. Lift enhancement of an airfoil using a Gurney flap and vortex generators. Journal of Aircraft, 1994, 31(3): 542-547.

[4] Jang C S, Ross J C, Cummings R M. Computational evaluation of an airfoil with a Gurney flap. AIAA-1992-2708, 1992.

[5] Myose R, Heron I, Papadakis M. The effect of Gurney flaps on a NACA 0011 airfoil. AIAA-1996-59, 1996.

[6] Myose R, Heron I, Papadakis M. The post-stall effect of Gurney flaps on a NACA 0011 airfoil. SAE Technical Paper 961316, 1996.

[7] Lee H T, Kroo I M. Computational investigation of wings with miniature trailing edge control surfaces. AIAA-2004-2693, 2004.

[8] Li Y C, Wang J J. Experimental investigation of Gurney flaps on the lift enhancement of a delta wing. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2002, 20(4): 388-393. (in Chinese) 李亚臣, 王晋军. 三角翼Gurney襟翼增升实验研究. 空气动力学报, 2002, 20(4): 388-393.

[9] Gao Y W. Method using Gurney flap to increase flux of an axial fan. Fluid Machinery, 2004, 32(1): 18-20. (in Chinese) 高永卫. Gurney襟翼在车辆冷却风扇设计中的应用研究. 流体机械, 2004, 32(1): 18-20.

[10] Shen Z H, Yu G L. Experimental investigation of effect of Gurney flap on performance of horizontal-axis wind turbine. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2007, 28(2): 196-199. (in Chinese) 申振华, 于国亮. Gurney襟翼对水平轴风力机性能影响的实验研究. 太阳能学报, 2007, 28(2): 196-199.

[11] Min B Y, Sankar L N, Rajmohan N. Computational investigation of the effects of Gurney flap on forward flight characteristics of helicopter rotors. Journal of Aircraft, 2009, 46(6): 1957-1964.

[12] Yeo H. Assessment of active controls for rotor performance enhancement. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 2008, 53(2): 152-163.

[13] Bae S, Gandhi F, Maughmer M. Optimally scheduled deployment of Gurney flaps for rotorcraft power reduction. Proceedings of the 65th Annual Forum of the American Helicopter Society, 2009: 187-211.

[14] Kinzel M, Maughmer M, Lesieutre G. Miniature trailing-edge effectors for rotorcraft performance enhancements. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 2007, 52(2):146-158.

[15] Thiel M. Actuation of an active Gurney flap for rotorcraft applications. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University, 2006.

[16] Li Y C, Wang J J, Fan J C, et al. Experiment investigation into effects of Gurney flaps on supercritical airfoil. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2003, 29(6): 471-474. (in Chinese) 李亚臣, 王晋军, 樊建超, 等. 超临界翼型Gurney襟翼增升试验研究. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2003, 29(6): 471-474.

[17] Zhou H. Numerical analysis of effect of mini-TED on aerodynamic characteristics of airfoils in transonic flow. Acta Aeronautica et Astronuatica Sinica, 2009, 30(8): 1367-1373. (in Chinese) 周华. Mini-TED改变翼型跨声速性能的数值分析. 航空学报, 2009, 30(8): 1367-1373.

[18] Stivers L S, Rice F J. Aerodynamic characteristics of four NACA airfoil sections designed for helicopter rotor blades.NACA RB No.l5k02, 1946.

[19] Schaefer R, Smith H. Aerodynamic characteristics of the NACA 8-H-12 airfoil section at six Reynolds numbers from 1.8×10⁶ to 11.0×10⁶. NACA TN 1998, 1998.

[20] Menter F. Two-equation eddy viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA Journal, 1994, 32(8): 1598-1605.

[21] Cook P H, McDonald M A, Firmin M C P. Aerofoil RAE 2822-pressure distributions and boundary layer and wake measurements. AGARD Report AR 138, 1979: A6.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

翼型加装格尼襟翼的高亚声速气动特性研究

Study on Aerodynamic Characteristics of Airfoil with Gurney Flaps Under High Subsonic Flow

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	孙大智, 陈希, 鲍为成, 卞威, 招启军. 高速直升机机身干扰对推力桨气动与噪声源特性的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 529142-529142.
[2]	曾怡兰, 韩东, 刘壮壮, 周鑫. 高速飞行复合式直升机旋翼受上洗时的驱转特性[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 529061-529061.
[3]	谢玮, 罗振兵, 周岩, 刘强, 吴建军, 董昊. 高超声速双楔激波干扰定常射流控制试验研究[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(7): 128813-128813.
[4]	戴今钊, 陈海昕. 流场波系引导的三维消波翼优化设计方法[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(6): 628942-628942.
[5]	汪洪波, 曾宇, 熊大鹏, 杨揖心, 孙明波. SST湍流模型的激波与可压缩效应改进[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(3): 128694-128694.
[6]	赖江, 范召林, 王乾, 董思卫, 童福林, 袁先旭. 高超声速有攻角锥裙直接数值模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(2): 128610-128610.
[7]	李海星, 周峰, 颜巍, 白峰, 赵克良. 砂纸冰对民机平尾气动特性的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(2): 128657-128657.
[8]	马平, 张宁, 石安华, 于哲峰, 梁世昌, 黄洁. 典型微波波段信号在模拟等离子体中的传输特性[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(S2): 729476-729476.
[9]	曾宇, 汪洪波, 孙明波, 王超, 刘旭. SST湍流模型改进研究综述[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(9): 27411-027411.
[10]	常思源, 肖尧, 李广利, 田中伟, 张凯凯, 崔凯. 翼反角对高压捕获翼构型高超气动特性的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(8): 127349-127349.
[11]	马印锴, 李祝飞, 黄琪, 杨基明. 宽速域翼尖涡及其与斜激波相互作用[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(7): 38-50.
[12]	金毅, 孙姝, 郭赟杰, 谭慧俊, 张悦. 超声速可调进气道内流双解现象及其节流特性[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(7): 127134-127134.
[13]	刘为佳, 李映坤, 陈雄, 李春雷. 基于流固耦合的激波/边界层干扰作用下壁板颤振特性[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(6): 127085-127085.
[14]	包文龙, 贾贺, 薛晓鹏, 黄雪姣, 高树义, 荣伟, 王奇, 吴壮志. 开“窗”结构对环帆伞开伞过程影响[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(5): 226936-226936.
[15]	何磊, 钱炜祺, 董康生, 易贤, 柴聪聪. 基于卷积神经网络的结冰翼型气动特性建模[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(5): 126434-126434.