利用上游槽道对角区马蹄涡的控制

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2016.0304

流体力学与飞行力学

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

利用上游槽道对角区马蹄涡的控制

李健, 张华, 吴星钢

北京航空航天大学航空科学与工程学院, 北京 100083

收稿日期:2016-09-18 修回日期:2016-11-21 出版日期:2017-06-15 发布日期:2016-11-30
通讯作者: 张华,E-mail:ltszhh@buaa.edu.cn E-mail:ltszhh@buaa.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（11372027）

Junction flow horseshoe vortex control based on upstream cavity

LI Jian, ZHANG Hua, WU Xinggang

School of Aeronautic Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100083, China

Received:2016-09-18 Revised:2016-11-21 Online:2017-06-15 Published:2016-11-30
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (11372027)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在平板上放置圆柱形成角区流动，利用布置在圆柱上游平板上的二维和三维槽道来控制或削弱角区马蹄涡，采用风洞试验和数值模拟开展研究。结果表明，二维和三维槽道均能推迟边界层的分离，使圆柱根部马蹄涡的强度减弱、尺度减小；同时槽道上游压力和逆压梯度均有所下降，槽道下游压力显著升高而逆压梯度总体降低。二维槽道对马蹄涡强度的削弱为61.15%~66.51%，而三维槽道对其削弱为66.65%~80.93%。讨论了三维槽道参数（包括槽道宽度、深度以及其中心线与圆柱中心距离）对控制效果的影响。槽道与圆柱的距离在对马蹄涡的控制中起主导作用。槽道控制的机理是，由于槽道的抽吸效应使得其上游靠近壁面的边界层中涡量较高的流体被卷吸入槽道形成槽道涡，槽道涡由三维槽道输运到下游。同时，随着槽道与圆柱的距离减小，更多的边界层流体流入槽道内。正是上述"槽道效应"使得槽道下游的逆压梯度降低，马蹄涡强度减弱，分离区范围减小。

关键词: 角区流动, 马蹄涡, 流动控制, 上游槽道, PIV试验

Abstract:

Two and three dimensional cavities have been studied by experimental and numerical simulation to control horseshoe vortex formed when the flow passes a cylinder-flat plate junction. The cavity is located on the flat plate upstream of the cylinder. The results indicate that both two and three dimensional cavities can delay boundary layer separation and weaken the horseshoe vortex. At the same time, the upstream surface pressure and adverse pressure gradient of cavity are both reduced, and at the downstream the pressure is increased while the global adverse pressure gradient is reduced. The study also indicates that the two dimensional cavity can reduce about 61.15%-66.51%, while the three dimensional cavity can reduce 66.65%-80.93%, of the horseshoe vortex strength. The effect of cavity geometry parameters, including distance, width and depth, is discussed. It is shown that the cavity distance plays major role in weakening the horseshoe vortex. The mechanism for controlling the horseshoe vortex by cavity is discussed. It is shown that the sub-layer of the incoming boundary layer which contains high vorticity is swallowed into the cavity to form the cavity vortex. The cavity vortex is transported to the downstream of the junction. As the cavity gets closer to the cylinder, more sub-layer of boundary layer will be swallowed into cavity. It is this cavity-effect that reduces the surface adverse pressure gradient upstream of the cylinder and diminishes the horseshoe vortex and separation region.

Key words: junction flow, horseshoe vortex, flow control, upstream cavity, particle image velocimetry test

中图分类号:

V211

李健, 张华, 吴星钢. 利用上游槽道对角区马蹄涡的控制[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(6): 120796-120796.

LI Jian, ZHANG Hua, WU Xinggang. Junction flow horseshoe vortex control based on upstream cavity[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2017, 38(6): 120796-120796.

参考文献

[1] DEVENPORT W J, SIMPSON R L. Turbulence structure near the nose of a wing-body junction[C]//19th AIAA, Fluid Dynamics, Plasma Dynamics, and Lasers Conference. Reston: AIAA, 1987.
[2] DEVENPORT W J, SIMPSON R L. Time-dependent and time-averaged turbulence structure near the nose of a wing-body junction[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1990, 210(2): 23-55.
[3] DEVENPORT W J, SIMPSON R L. LDV measurements in the flow past a wing-body junction[C]//4th International Symposium on Applications of Laser Anemometry to Fluid Mechanics. Lisbon: Instituto Superior Tecnico, 1988: 2-3.
[4] GRAZIANI R A, BLAIR M F, TAYLOR J R, et al. An experimental study of endwall and airfoil surface heat transfer in a large scale turbine blade cascade[J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 1980, 102(2): 257-267.
[5] BLAIR M F. Heat transfer in the vicinity of a large-scale obstruction in a turbulent boundary layer[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 1985, 1(2): 158-160.
[6] DEVENPORT W J, SIMPSON R L. Time-dependent structure in wing-body junction flows[M]. Turbulent Shear Flows 6. Berlin Heidelberg:Springer, 1989: 232-248.
[7] LIU Z H, XIONG Y, TU C X. Numerical simulation and control of horseshoe vortex around an appendage-body junction[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2011, 27(1): 23-42.
[8] LIU Z H, XIONG Y. Numerical simulation on the horseshoe vortex formation around the hull-sail junction of submarine[C]//2010 International Conference on Optoelectronics and Image Processing (ICOIP). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press, 2010, 2: 51-54.
[9] SEAL C V, SMITH C R, ROCKWELL D. Dynamics of the vorticity distribution in endwall junctions[J]. AIAA Journal, 1997, 35(6): 1041-1047.
[10] KHAN M J, AHMED A. Topological model of flow regime in the plane of symmetry of a surface-mounted obstacle[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2005, 17(4): 1089-1109.
[11] GRECO J J. The flow structure in the vicinity of a cylinder-flat plate junction: Flow regimes, periodicity, and vortex interactions[D]. Bethlehem: Lehigh University, 1990.
[12] PHILIPS D B, CIMBALA J M, TREASTER A L. Suppression of the wing-body junction vortex by body surface suction[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1992, 29(1): 118-123.
[13] JOHNSON M J, RAVINDRA K, ANERS R. Comparative study of the elimination of the wing fuselage junction vortex by boundary layer suction and blowing[C]//32nd Aerosapce Sciences Meeting & Exhibit. Reston: AIAA, 1994: 10-13.
[14] 徐向南, 张华, 胡波. DBD涡流发生器及其在角区流动控制中的数值研究[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(6):1743-1752. XU X N, ZHANG H, HU B. Numerical study of DBD vortex generator and application in junction flow control[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37(6): 1743-1752 (in Chinese).
[15] DEVENPORT W J, DEWITZ M B, AGARWAL N K, et al. Effects of a fillet on the flow past a wing body junction[J]. AIAA Journal, 1990, 28(12): 2017-2024.
[16] DEVENPORT W J, SIMPSON R L, DEWITZ M B, et al. Effects of a leading-edge fillets on the flow past an appendage-body junction[J]. AIAA Journal, 1991, 30(9): 2177-2183.
[17] NELSON R, GEORGE E, HAMID R. Effects of an upstream ribbed surface on the flow past a cylinder-flat plate junction[C]//AIAA 41st Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston: AIAA, 2003.
[18] KAIROUZ K A, RAHAI H R. Turbulent junction flow with an upstream ribbed surface[J]. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2005, 26(5): 771-779.
[19] HORSTEN B, VELDHUIS L. Experimental and numerical results on cavity effects in juncture flow[C]//AIAA 38th Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit. Reston: AIAA, 2008.
[20] KANG K J, KIM T, SONG S J. Strengths of horseshoe vortices around a circular cylinder with an upstream cavity[J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2009, 23(7): 1773-1778.
[21] ZAW ZAW O O. The investigation and control of 3D separated structures in juncture flow[D]. Beijing: Beihang University, 2011.
[22] ANSYS Inc. ANSYS FLUENT user's guide[M]. 2012.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

利用上游槽道对角区马蹄涡的控制

Junction flow horseshoe vortex control based on upstream cavity

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王畅, 何龙, 徐栋霞, 唐敏, 马率, 吴希明. 共轴刚性旋翼桨毂流动控制减阻研究[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 529084-529084.
[2]	谢玮, 罗振兵, 周岩, 刘强, 吴建军, 董昊. 高超声速双楔激波干扰定常射流控制试验研究[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(7): 128813-128813.
[3]	李广佳, 王红波, 张凯, 仪志胜. 临近空间太阳能无人机增升减阻技术综述[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(5): 529644-529644.
[4]	高世琦, 丁博, 解旭祯, 李铮, 陈林, 钱首元, 焦子涵, 白光辉. 等离子体激励在高速流动中的减阻机制[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(S2): 729373-729373.
[5]	王旺, 饶彩燕, 徐聪, 李思怡, 段毅, 张健. 激光能量沉积对超声速进气道流动的控制效果[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(S2): 729424-729424.
[6]	张健, 张敏, 杜娟, 黄伟亮, 聂超群. 自适应康达喷气控制在高负荷压气机中的试验研究[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(22): 128883-128883.
[7]	王梦格, 何小明, 王娟娟, 张悦, 汪昆, 谭慧俊, 李留刚. 基于振荡式涡流发生器的激波/边界层干扰控制方法[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(20): 128503-128503.
[8]	康伟, 胡仕林, 王彦清. 介电弹性薄膜翼型的增升效应机理[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(18): 128318-128318.
[9]	张刘, 黄勇, 陈辅政, 朱正龙, 郭天豪, 姜裕标, 周铸. 基于环量控制的无尾飞翼俯仰和滚转两轴无舵面姿态控制飞行试验[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(18): 128224-128224.
[10]	田珊珊, 金亮, 杜兆波, 钟翔宇, 黄伟, 刘远洋. 基于鼓包的激波/边界层干扰控制研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(18): 28411-028411.
[11]	刘汉儒, 陈南树, 刘宇, 胡之颉. 多孔介质流动控制及气动降噪研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(16): 27923-027923.
[12]	李灿民, 黄河峡, 梁钢, 吕靖昊, 蔡佳, 谭慧俊. 基于后掠唇罩的入射激波/边界层干扰流动控制方法[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(16): 128091-128091.
[13]	朱广生, 姚世勇, 段毅. 高速飞行器减阻降热流动控制技术研究进展及工程应用[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(15): 529049-529049.
[14]	罗振兵, 谢玮, 解旭祯, 周岩, 刘强. 激波及其干扰主动流动控制研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(15): 529002-529002.
[15]	王万波, 姜裕标, 黄勇, 张鑫, 魏然. 大型飞机襟翼吹气增升风洞试验[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(13): 0-127870-.