仿生全翼式太阳能无人机分层协同设计及分析

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2015.0081

方案设计与多学科分析

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

仿生全翼式太阳能无人机分层协同设计及分析

甘文彪¹, 周洲², 许晓平²

1. 北京航空航天大学无人驾驶飞行器设计研究所, 北京 100191;
2. 西北工业大学航空学院, 西安 710072

收稿日期:2014-10-30 修回日期:2015-03-23 出版日期:2016-01-25 发布日期:2015-04-02
通讯作者: 甘文彪,Tel.:010-82317395,E-mail:ganhope@buaa.edu.cn E-mail:ganhope@buaa.edu.cn
作者简介:甘文彪男,博士,讲师。主要研究方向:飞行器总体气动设计与计算流体力学。Tel:010-82317395,E-mail:ganhope@buaa.edu.cn;周洲女,博士,教授,博士生导师。主要研究方向:飞行器总体、气动设计。Tel:029-88453368,E-mail:zhouzhou@nwpu.edu.cn
基金资助:
中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(YWF-15-GJSYS-031);国家自然科学基金(11302178)

Multilevel collaboration design and analysis of bionic full-wing typical solar-powered unmanned aerial vehicle

GAN Wenbiao¹, ZHOU Zhou², XU Xiaoping²

1. Research Institute of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China;
2. School of Aeronautics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China

Received:2014-10-30 Revised:2015-03-23 Online:2016-01-25 Published:2015-04-02
Supported by:
The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(YWF-15-GJSYS-031);National Natural Science Foundation of China(11302178)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

结合"太阳神"无人机(UAV)和高山兀鹫提出了太阳能UAV的某仿生全翼式构型,针对该构型开展了气动分层协同设计及分析。在设计和分析过程中,自下而上将设计分为三个层次,基于纵向配平需要以低雷诺数反弯内翼翼型设计为第一设计层次,基于高升力需求以外翼设计为第二设计层次,以UAV全机性能设计为第三设计层次;与此同时,每个层次均采用基于代理模型的基本优化流程,三个层次的设计自上而下来相互协同,最终得到满足指标的设计结果。研究结果表明:分层协同设计提高了设计效率,获得了高效的仿生全翼式太阳能UAV构型;证明了设计方法的可行性和设计结果的有效性。

关键词: 仿生全翼式, 太阳能无人机, 分层协同优化, 气动设计, 性能分析

Abstract:

Based on "Helios" unmanned aerial vehicle(UAV) and Himalayan Vulture,a bionic full-wing typical solar-powered UAV configuration is determined.Aerodynamic multilevel collaboration design and analysis is carried out for the configuration.In the process of design and analysis,design is divided into three levels with bottom-up ideas.The first level is anti-camber low Reynolds airfoil design of inner wing to meet pitching-moment balance.The second level is outboard wing design to gain high lift.Full UAV performance design is used as the third design level.At the same time,each level uses basic optimization press based on surrogate model.Three design levels collaborate by top-down to gain design result which satisfies design index.The results show that aerodynamic multilevel collaboration design improves the design efficiency to get the excellent configuration of bionic full-wing typical solar-powered UAV and proves the feasibility of design method and the effectiveness of design result.

Key words: bionic full-wing type, solar-powered unmanned aerial vehicle, multilevel collaboration optimization, aerodynamic design, performance analysis

中图分类号:

V221⁺.3

甘文彪, 周洲, 许晓平. 仿生全翼式太阳能无人机分层协同设计及分析[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(1): 163-178.

GAN Wenbiao, ZHOU Zhou, XU Xiaoping. Multilevel collaboration design and analysis of bionic full-wing typical solar-powered unmanned aerial vehicle[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2016, 37(1): 163-178.

参考文献

[1] BRANDT S A,GILLIAM F T.Design analysis methodology for solar-powered aircraft[J].Journal of Aircraft,1995,32(4):703-709.
[2] SELIG M S,JAMES J G,NINHAM C,et al.Summary of low-speed airfoil data:Vol.1[M].Virginia Beach,VA:SoarTech Publications,1995:1-117.
[3] LIAN Y S,SHYY W.Laminar-turbulent transition of a low Reynolds number rigid or flexible airfoil[J].AIAA Journal,2007,44(7):1501-1513.
[4] SWANSON T,ISAAC K M.Platform and camber effects on the aerodynamics of low-Reynolds-number wings[J].Journal of Aircraft,2010,47(2):613-621.
[5] ZHANG W,HAIN R,KäHLER C J.Scanning PIV investigation of the laminar separation bubble on a SD7003 airfoil[J].Experiments in Fluids,2008,45(4):725-743.
[6] CCUNSIL J N N,GONI B K.Low Reynolds number aerodynamic performances of the NACA 0012 and Selig-Donovan 7003 airfoils[J].Journal of Aircraft,2013,50(1):204-216.
[7] GENC S M,Vnver K,HVSEYIN Y.Performance of transition model for predicting low Re aerofoil flows without/with single and simultaneous[J].European Journal of Mechanics B/Fluids,2011,30(2):218-235.
[8] MARCHMAN J F,ABTAHI A A.Aerodynamics of an aspect ratio 8 wing at low Reynolds number[J].Journal of Aircraft,1985,22(7):628-634.
[9] LIU H T.Unsteady aerodynamics of a Wortmann wing at low Reynolds numbers[J].Journal of Aircraft,1992,29(3):532-539.
[10] MULLER T J,DELAURIER J D.Aerodynamics of small vehicles[J].Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics,2003,35:89-110.
[11] LIAN Y S,SHYY W,VⅡERU D,et al.Membrane wing aerodynamics for micro air vehicles[J].Progress in Aerospace Science,2003,39(6):425-465.
[12] 白鹏.微型飞行器低雷诺数若干空气动力学问题研究[D].北京:航天空气动力技术研究院,2005:1-25.BAI P.Research on some aerodynamic problems of micro air vehicles[D].Beijing:China Academy of Aerospace Aerodynamics,2005:1-25(in Chinese).
[13] 肖天航.低雷诺数非定常流场的数值方法及其在微型飞行器上的应用[D].南京:南京航空航天大学,2009:1-81.XIAO T H.A Numerical method for unsteady low Reynolds number flows and application to micro air vehicles[D].Nanjing:Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2009:1-81(in Chinese).
[14] ESMAEEL E,MEHRAN T,SAMAN N.Aerodynamic performance of Parastoo UAV[J].Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology:An International Journal,2013,85(2):97-103.
[15] 甘文彪.近空间低雷诺数无人机气动数值模拟及设计研究[D].西安:西北工业大学,2014:65-177.GAN W B.Research on aerodynamic numerical simulation and design of near space low-Reynolds unmanned aerial vehicles [D].Xi'an:Northwestern Polytechnical University,2014:65-177(in Chinese).
[16] 李沛峰,张彬乾,陈迎春.基于工程的跨声速机翼两步优化设计方法[J].航空学报,2011,32(12):2153-2162.LI P F,ZHANG B Q,CHEN Y C.A Two-step optimization method of transonic wing design for engineering application[J].Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica,2011,32(12):2153-2162(in Chinese).
[17] 李焦赞,高正红.多变量气动设计问题分层协同优化[J].航空学报,2013,34(1):58-65.LI J Z,GAO Z H.Multivariable aerodynamic design based on multilevel collaborative optimization[J].Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica,2013,34(1):58-65(in Chinese).
[18] CHEN Z J,QIN N,NOWAKOWSKI A F.Three-dimensional laminar-separation bubble on a cambered thin wing at low Reynolds numbers[J].Journal of Aircraft,2013,50(1):152-163.
[19] GIULIO R,GIACOMO F,ENRICO C,et al.HELIPLAT:design,aerodynamic,structural analysis of long-endurance solar-powered stratospheric platform[J].Journal of Aircraft,2004,41(6):1505-1520.
[20] NOTH A.Design of solar-powered airplanes for continuous flight[D].Zurich:Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich,2008.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

仿生全翼式太阳能无人机分层协同设计及分析

Multilevel collaboration design and analysis of bionic full-wing typical solar-powered unmanned aerial vehicle

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王海峰, 刘坤澎, 江泓鑫, 杜晨曦. 螺旋桨多设计点气动优化方法和变桨距角策略[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 528831-528831.
[2]	李广佳, 王红波, 张凯, 仪志胜. 临近空间太阳能无人机增升减阻技术综述[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(5): 529644-529644.
[3]	杨晓飞, 孙太璐, 孟德君, 尹海宝, 王咏梅. 兼顾多模式的核心机驱动风扇级气动设计方法[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(2): 128625-128625.
[4]	王鼎, 尹洁昕, 张欣光, 郑娜娥. 一种基于加权多维标度分析的多个非相关源TDOA/FDOA协同定位方法[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(7): 327105-327105.
[5]	李春鹏, 钱战森, 孙侠生. 远程民机变弯度机翼后缘外形变形矩阵气动设计[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(7): 127335-127335.
[6]	张旭辉, 解春雷, 刘思佳, 闫溟, 邢思远. 智能变形飞行器发展需求及难点分析[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(21): 529302-529302.
[7]	王晓峰, 屈峰, 付俊杰, 王泽宇, 刘超宇, 白俊强. 基于离散伴随的高超内转式进气道气动优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(19): 128352-128352.
[8]	王鼎, 高卫港, 聂福全, 吴志东. 校正源存在下抑制部分同步时钟偏差和传感器位置误差的时差定位闭式解[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(16): 328057-328057.
[9]	李昊歌, 杨华, 杨雨欣, 陈伟芳. 高超声速升力体迎风面精细化降热优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(S2): 124-137.
[10]	王一雯, 兰夏毓, 史亚云, 华俊, 白俊强, 周铸. 考虑吸气影响的层流翼型梯度优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(11): 527323-527323.
[11]	杜楠楠, 陈建, 马奔, 王术波, 张自超. 多太阳能无人机覆盖路径优化方法[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(6): 324476-324476.
[12]	左光, 艾邦成. 先进空间运输系统气动设计综述[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(2): 624077-624077.
[13]	孙俊峰, 周铸, 黄勇, 庞宇飞, 卢风顺, 许勇. 通用飞行器气动优化设计数字化集成平台——DIPasda[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(5): 623348-623348.
[14]	罗佳奇, 杨婧. 基于伴随方法的单级低速压气机气动设计优化[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(5): 623368-623368.
[15]	李润泽, 张宇飞, 陈海昕. 超临界机翼多目标气动优化设计的策略与方法[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(5): 623409-623409.