基于伴随方法的单级低速压气机气动设计优化

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2019.23368

飞行器气动外形数值优化与设计专栏

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

基于伴随方法的单级低速压气机气动设计优化

罗佳奇¹, 杨婧²

1. 浙江大学航空航天学院, 杭州 310027;
2. 德州农工大学机械工程系, College Station TX 77843

收稿日期:2019-08-12 修回日期:2019-09-17 出版日期:2020-05-15 发布日期:2019-10-10
通讯作者: 罗佳奇 E-mail:jiaqil@zju.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（51676003，51976183）；中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金（2019QNA4058）

Aerodynamic design optimization of a single low-speed compressor stage by an adjoint method

LUO Jiaqi¹, YANG Jing²

1. School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China;
2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843, United States

Received:2019-08-12 Revised:2019-09-17 Online:2020-05-15 Published:2019-10-10
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (51676003, 51976183); the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (2019QNA4058)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用梯度方法对某型4.5级压气机最后级进行气动设计优化研究，梯度由连续伴随方法计算确定，多排伴随方程采用伴随掺混面模型进行数值求解。首先，采用基于经验修正的初步设计方法设计带进口导叶的4.5级低速、低压缩比压气机的原始气动外形。之后，在压气机近失速工况对最后级静子叶片进行伴随气动设计优化，通过优化叶型和安装角降低流动损失，目标函数定义为加权求和形式的熵增和流量偏差，优化中对流量进行约束。最后，开展基于伴随方法的多工况气动设计优化研究，改善两个不同转速条件下最后级的气动性能。优化结果表明，基于伴随方法的多排气动设计优化可以通过改变叶片气动外形提升多排全工况气动性能。

关键词: 气动设计优化, 伴随方法, 多排, 多工况, 掺混面, 流动分离, 压气机

Abstract: The paper presents an aerodynamic shape optimization of the last stage of a 4.5-stage com-pressor by a gradient-based optimization method that adopts the continuous adjoint approach. An adjoint mixing-plane formulation is used to compute the adjoint solutions for multi-stage turbomachines. Firstly, a conventional preliminary design method with empirical correlations are used to produce a base design of a 4.5-stage low-speed and low compression ratio compressor with an inlet guide vane. Then the last stage is redesigned by the adjoint method to reduce the flow losses at the operation condition near stall through modifying the aerodynamic shape and stagger angle of the stator blade. The cost function is defined as a weighted sum of entropy production and the deviation from a given mass flow rate, enforcing the constraint on mass flow rate. Finally, a multi-point design optimization approach by using the adjoint method is employed to improve the performance of the last stage at two different operation conditions. The optimization show that the adjoint-based multi-stage design can improve the aerodynamic performance of a multi-stage compressor by profile modifications.

Key words: aerodynamic design optimization, adjoint method, multi-stage, multi-point, mixing-plane, flow separation, compressor

中图分类号:

V231.3
O354

罗佳奇, 杨婧. 基于伴随方法的单级低速压气机气动设计优化[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(5): 623368-623368.

LUO Jiaqi, YANG Jing. Aerodynamic design optimization of a single low-speed compressor stage by an adjoint method[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(5): 623368-623368.

参考文献 31

[1]	OYAMA A, LIOU M, OBAYASHI S. Transonic axial-flow blade shape optimization using evolutionary algorithm and three-dimensional Navier-Stokes solver[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2004, 20(4):302-310.
[2]	BENINI E. Three-dimensional multi-objective design optimization of a transonic compressor rotor[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2004, 20(3):559-565.
[3]	LIAN Y, LIOU M. Multi-objective optimization of transonic compressor blade using evolutionary algorithm[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2005, 21(6):979-987.
[4]	SAMAD A, KIM K, GOEL T, et al. Multi-objective optimization of transonic compressor blade using evolutionary algorithm[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2008, 24(2):302-310.
[5]	JAMESON A. Aerodynamic design via control theory[J]. Journal of Scientific Computing, 1988, 3(3):233-260.
[6]	JAMESON A. Optimum aerodynamic design using CFD and control theory:AIAA-1995-1729[R]. Reston:AIAA, 1995.
[7]	REUTHER J, JAMESON A. Aerodynamic shape optimization of wing and wing-body configurations using control theory:AIAA-1995-0123[R]. Reston:AIAA, 1995.
[8]	KIM S, ALONSO J J, JAMESON A. Two-dimensional high-lift aerodynamic optimization using the continuous adjoint method:AIAA-2000-4741[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2000.
[9]	KIM S, ALONSO J J, JAMESON A. Multi-element high-lift configuration design optimization using viscous continuous adjoint method[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2004, 41(5):1082-1098.
[10]	YANG S, WU H Y, LIU F, et al. Aerodynamic design of cascades by using an adjoint equation method:AIAA-2003-1068[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2000.
[11]	WU H Y, LIU F, TSAI H. Aerodynamic design of turbine blades using an adjoint equation method:AIAA-2005-1006[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2005.
[12]	LI H, SONG L, LI Y, et al. 2D viscous aerodynamic shape design optimization for turbine blades based on adjoint method[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2011, 133(1):031014.
[13]	WANG D, HE L. Adjoint aerodynamic design optimization for blades in multistage turbomachines Part I:Methodology and verification[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2010, 132(2):021011.
[14]	WANG D, HE L. Adjoint aerodynamic design optimization for blades in multistage turbomachines-Part II:Validation and applications[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2010, 132(2):021012.
[15]	LUO J, XIONG J, LIU F, et al. Three-dimensional aerodynamic design optimization of a turbine blades by using an adjoint method[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2011, 133(1):011026.
[16]	WALTHER B, NADARAJAH S. Constrained adjoint-based aerodynamic shape optimization of a single-stage transonic compressor[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2013, 135(3):021017.
[17]	LUO J, ZHOU C, LIU F. Multipoint design optimization of a transonic compressor blade by using an adjoint met-hod[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2014, 136(5):051005.
[18]	LUO J, LIU F. Multi-objective optimization of a transonic compressor blade by using an adjoint method[J]. AIAA Journal, 2015, 53(3):797-801.
[19]	LUO J, LIU F, MCBEAN I. Turbine blade row optimization through endwall contouring by an adjoint method[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2015, 31(2):505-518.
[20]	WALTHER B, NADARAJAH S. Optimum shape design for multirow turbomachinery configurations using a discrete adjoint approach and an efficient radial basis function deformation scheme for complex multiblock grids[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2015, 137(3):081006.
[21]	CUMPSTY N A. Compressor aerodynamics[M]. London:Longman Scientific & Technical, 1989:47-61.
[22]	LIU F, JAMESON A. Multigrid Navier-Stokes calculations for three-dimensional cascades[J]. AIAA Journal, 1993, 31(10):1785-1791.
[23]	ZHENG X, LIU F. Staggered upwind method for solving Navier-Stokes and k-ω turbulence model equations[J]. AIAA Journal, 1995, 33(6):991-998.
[24]	LIU F, ZHENG X. A strongly-coupled time-marching method for solving the Navier-Stokes and k-ω turbulence model equations with multigrid[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1996, 128(2):289-300.
[25]	SPALART P R, ALLMARAS S R. A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flow:AIAA-1992-0439[R]. Reston:AIAA, 1992.
[26]	DENTON J D. The calculation of three-dimensional viscous flow through multistage turbomachines[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 1992, 114(1):18-26.
[27]	GILES M. Nonreflecting boundary conditions for Euler equation calculations[J]. AIAA Journal, 1990, 28(12):2050-2058.
[28]	HICKS R M, HENNE P A. Wing design by numerical optimization[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1978, 15(7):407-412.
[29]	GILES M, PIERCE N. An introduction to the adjoint approach to design[J]. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 2000, 65(10):393-415.
[30]	ZYMARIS A, PAPADIMITRIOU D, GIANNAKOGLOU K, et al. Continuous adjoint approach to the Spalart-Allmaras turbulence model for incompressible flows[J]. Computers & Fluids, 2009, 38(8):1528-1538.
[31]	LUO J, ZHU Y, TANG X, et al. Flow reconstruction and aerodynamic shape optimization of turbomachinery blades by POD-based hybrid models[J]. Science China Technological Sciences, 2017, 60(11):1658-1673.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

基于伴随方法的单级低速压气机气动设计优化

Aerodynamic design optimization of a single low-speed compressor stage by an adjoint method

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 31

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	胡守超, 庄宇, 李贤, 江涛. 高超声速气动热标模HyHERM-Ⅰ试验[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(S2): 233-248.
[2]	安利平, 王昊, 王掩刚, 朱自环. 跨声速压气机湿压缩性能及流动特性[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 126024-126024.
[3]	程剑锐, 施崇广, 瞿丽霞, 徐悦, 尤延铖, 朱呈祥. 二维弯曲激波/湍流边界层干扰流动理论建模[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 125993-125993.
[4]	吴航空, 王丁喜, 黄秀全, 徐慎忍. 定黏假设"对伴随系统求解和梯度精度影响[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(7): 125512-125512.
[5]	王昊, 薛飞, 岳少原, 王掩刚. 对转压气机变转速比失速类型试验[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(7): 125596-125596.
[6]	周岩, 罗振兵, 王林, 夏智勋, 高天翔, 谢玮, 邓雄, 彭文强, 程盼. 等离子体合成射流激励器及其流动控制技术研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(3): 25027-025027.
[7]	魏自言, 李杰, 张恒, 杨钊. 某层流验证机层流翼段气动改进设计[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(11): 526760-526760.
[8]	桂幸民, 金东海, 张健成, 宋满祥, 赵洋, 胡大权. 计及叶片前缘周向不均匀源项的弯掠叶片流动机理[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(10): 527371-527371.
[9]	赵乐, 王维, 张乐福, 王伟超, 卢金玲, 楚武利. 变转速下跨声速压气机的耦合扩稳方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(1): 124942-124942.
[10]	时晓天, 吕蒙, 赵渊, 陶善聪, 郝乐, 袁湘江. 激波/湍流边界层干扰的流动控制技术[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(1): 625929-625929.
[11]	范孝华, 唐志共, 王刚, 杨彦广. 激波/湍流边界层干扰低频非定常性研究评述[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(1): 625917-625917.
[12]	高昌, 李正洲, 黄江涛, 贺元元, 吴颖川, 乐嘉陵, 桂丰. 基于连续伴随方法的高超声速飞行器高精度气动优化[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(7): 124490-124490.
[13]	童歆, 羌晓青, 虞培祥, 欧阳华. 基于曲率分布控制的叶型前缘设计方法[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(7): 124712-124712.
[14]	吴瀚, 王建宏, 黄伟, 杜兆波, 颜力. 激波/边界层干扰及微型涡流发生器控制研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(6): 25371-025371.
[15]	刘佳鑫, 于贤君, 孟德君, 史文斌, 刘宝杰. 高压压气机出口级叶型加工偏差特征及其影响[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(2): 423796-423796.