气隙构型对高频交流SDBD防除冰激励器的温升影响

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2020.24195

流体力学与飞行力学

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

气隙构型对高频交流SDBD防除冰激励器的温升影响

魏德宸¹, 张国鑫², 陈永彬¹, 刘森云³

1. 滨州学院航空工程技术研究院, 滨州 256600;
2. 中国航空研究院, 北京 100012;
3. 中国空气动力研究与发展中心结冰与防除冰重点实验室, 绵阳 621000

收稿日期:2020-05-07 修回日期:2020-05-30 出版日期:2021-06-15 发布日期:1900-01-01
通讯作者: 魏德宸 E-mail:weimoving@163.com
基金资助:
山东省自然科学基金（ZR2019PF021）；滨州学院博士科研启动基金（2018Y14）；结冰与防除冰重点实验室开放课题（IADL20200408）

Effects of air-gap on temperature rise of high frequency AC-SDBD anti-icing and deicing actuator

WEI Dechen¹, ZHANG Guoxin², CHEN Yongbin¹, LIU Senyun³

1. Institute of Aeronautical Engineering and Technology, Binzhou University, Binzhou 256600, China;
2. Chinese Aeronautical Establishment, Beijing 100012, China;
3. Key Laboratory of Icing and Anti/De-icing, China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center, Mianyang 621000, China

Received:2020-05-07 Revised:2020-05-30 Online:2021-06-15 Published:1900-01-01
Supported by:
Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2019PF021); Initial Scientific Research Fund of Doctor in Binzhou University(2018Y14); Open Fund of Key Laboratory of Icing and Anti/De-icing (IADL20200408)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 等离子体激励具有电离效应、气动效应和热效应，可被用于飞行器防除冰。背面电极的气隙构型对于交流供电的沿面介质阻挡放电（SDBD）防除冰激励器的单周期放电次数和放电电荷分布均有影响，电源频率也为影响激励器温升的重要因素。目前对于交流SDBD温升效果的研究均是基于背面电极无气隙的构型，且缺乏激励频率大于15 kHz的高频条件。为此制作了背面电极有气隙和无气隙的对照构型，在35~55 kHz的高频范围内，采用电学特性、红外测温、放电形态相结合的方式研究了交流SDBD防除冰激励器温升特性。结果表明：施加相同的电压或频率时，背面电极有气隙构型的SDBD激励器的裸露正面最高温度相比无气隙构型激励器可提高至151.51%；背面电极气隙的存在也可以使激励器正面尤其是正面等离子放电反方向的温升区域扩大；增加频率使交流SDBD激励器的温度非线性提高，有助于降低高压击穿风险。

关键词: 等离子体, 防冰, 除冰, 气隙, 温升, 高频, 沿面介质阻挡放电(SDBD)

Abstract: Dielectric barrier discharge produces ionization effect, aerodynamic effect, and thermal effect, and therefore can be used for aircraft anti-icing and deicing. The air-gap on the rear electrode influences both the discharge times per cycle and the charge distribution for Surface Dielectric Barrier Discharge (SDBD) actuators with Alternating Current power supply (AC-SDBD), and frequency is also an important factor affecting temperature rise of the actuator. However, current research on the temperature rise effect of AC-SDBD is based on the configuration without air-gaps on the rear electrode, and lacks high excitation frequencies above 15 kHz.The contrast configurations with and without air-gaps on the rear electrode are built. In the high frequency range of 35-55 kHz, the temperature rise characteristics of AC-SDBD are studied using the electrical characteristics, infrared temperature measurement, and discharge morphology. The results show that the maximum temperature on the exposed surface of the AC-SDBD actuator with air-gap on the rear electrode is 151.51% as much as that without air-gap when the same voltage or frequency is applied. The existence of the air-gap on the rear electrode can enlarge the temperature rise area on the exposed surface of the actuator, particularly in the direction opposite to the discharge. The temperature increases nonlinearly with the rise of frequency, thereby reducing the risk of high voltage breakdown.

Key words: plasma, anti-icing, deicing, air-gaps, temperature rise, high frequency, Surface Dielectric Barrier Discharge(SDBD)

中图分类号:

V244.1

魏德宸, 张国鑫, 陈永彬, 刘森云. 气隙构型对高频交流SDBD防除冰激励器的温升影响[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(6): 124195-124195.

WEI Dechen, ZHANG Guoxin, CHEN Yongbin, LIU Senyun. Effects of air-gap on temperature rise of high frequency AC-SDBD anti-icing and deicing actuator[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(6): 124195-124195.

参考文献

[1] PAUW D D, DOLATABADI A. Effect of superhydrophobic coating on the anti-icing and deicing of an aifoil[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2017, 54(2):490-499.
[2] 郑无计, 李颖晖, 周驰, 等. 基于动力学边界的结冰飞机安全预警方法[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(4):122478. ZHENG W J, LI Y H, ZHOU C, et al. Flight safety warning method for icing aircraft based on dynamic envelope[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2019, 40(4):122478(in Chinese).
[3] WALDMAN R M, HU H. High-speed imaging to quantify transient ice accretion process over an airfoil[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2016, 53(2):369-377.
[4] 李伟斌, 易贤, 杜雁霞, 等. 基于变分分割模型的结冰冰形测量方法[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(1):120167. LI W B, YI X, DU Y X, et al. A measurement approach for ice shape based on variational segmentation model[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2017, 38(1):120167(in Chinese).
[5] 卜雪琴, 李皓, 黄平, 等. 二维机翼混合相结冰数值模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(3):124085. BU X Q, LI H, HUANG P, et al. Numerical simulation of mixed phase icing on two-dimensional airfoil[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2021, 42(3):124085(in Chinese).
[6] XU H F, HE Y, STROBEL K L, et al. Flight of an aeroplane with solid-state propulsion[J]. Nature, 2018, 563:532-535.
[7] PLOURABOUÉ F. Flying with ionic wind[J]. Nature, 2018, 563:476-477.
[8] KELLEY C L, BOWLES P O, COONEY J, et al. Leading-edge separation control using alternating current and nanosecond pulse plasma actuators[J]. AIAA Journal, 2014, 52(9):1871-1884.
[9] SHEN L, WEN C. Leading edge vortex control on a delta wing with dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuators[J]. Applied Physics Letters, 2017, 110:251904.
[10] ONO R, OGURA K, MOGI T. Stabilization of premixed lean methane-air combustion using dielectric barrier discharge with low pollutant emissions[J]. Journal of Physics D:Applied Physics, 2017, 50(36):365201.
[11] 赵彬彬, 董威, 张屹. 等离子体射流防冰性能实验研究Ⅱ. 流向和展向布置DBD-PA防冰性能比较[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2018, 52(11):1532-1536. ZHAO B B, DONG W, ZHANG Y. Experimental study on the anti-icing performance of plasma jet II. Comparison of anti-icing performance using streamwise and spanwise DBD-PA[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2018, 52(11):1532-1536(in Chinese).
[12] 田永强, 蔡晋生, 杨磊磊, 等. 脉冲介质阻挡放电等离子体热效应实验[J]. 航空动力学报, 2019, 34(12):2663-2676. TIAN Y Q, CAI J S, YANG L L, et al. Experimental on the thermal effects of pulsed dielectric barrier discharge plasma[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2019, 34(12):2663-2676(in Chinese).
[13] 贾韫泽, 桑为民, 蔡旸. 基于数值模拟的NSDBD等离子体激励器防冰特性[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(4):121652. JIA Y Z, SANG W M, CAI Y. Anti-icing property of NSDBD plasma actuator based on numerical simulation[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2018, 39(4):121652(in Chinese).
[14] 田苗, 宋慧敏, 梁华, 等. 介质阻挡放电等离子体防除冰实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(11):4247-4256. TIAN M, SONG H M, LIANG H, et al. Experimental study on DBD discharge plasma for anti-icing and de-icing[J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering, 2019, 70(11):4247-4256(in Chinese).
[15] 徐金洲, 梁荣庆, 任兆杏, 等. 电源对介质阻挡放电(DBD)激发准分子(XeCl)辐射的影响[J]. 真空科学与技术学报, 2002, 22(5):338-342. XU J Z, LIANG R Q, REN Z X, et al. Influence of power supply on excimer XeCl emission excited by dielectric barrier discharge[J]. Chinese Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology, 2002, 22(5):338-342(in Chinese).
[16] CAI J S, TIAN Y Q, MENG X S, et al. An experimental study of icing control using DBD plasma actuator[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2017, 58(8):102.
[17] ZHOU W W, LIU Y, HU H, et al. Utilization of thermal effect induced by plasma generation for aircraft icing mitigation[J]. AIAA Journal, 2018, 56(3):1097-1104.
[18] MENG X S, CAI J S, TIAN Y Q, et al. Experimental study of deicing and anti-icing on a cylinder by DBD plasma actuation[C]//47th AIAA Plasma Dynamics and Lasers Conference. Reston:AIAA, 2016:1-14.
[19] 赵彬彬, 董威, 刘娟, 等. 等离子体射流防冰性能实验研究I. DBD-PA参数化分析及防冰效果验证[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2018, 52(8):924-929. ZHAO B B, DONG W, LIU J, et al. Experimental study on the anti-icing performance of plasma jet I. Parametric analysis of DBD-PA and verification on the anti-icing performance[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2018, 52(8):924-929(in Chinese).
[20] MENG X S, HU H Y, LI C, et al. Mechanism study of coupled aerodynamic and thermal effects using plasma actuation for anti-icing[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2019, 31:037103.
[21] TIAN Y Q, ZHANG Z K, CAI J S, et al. Experimental study of an anti-icing method over an airfoil based on pulsed dielectric barrier discharge plasma[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2018, 31(7):1449-1460.
[22] 李春茂, 董磊, 彭开晟, 等. 电极间隙对介质阻挡放电特性的影响[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2019, 54(4):679-685. LI C M, DONG L, PENG K S, et al. Influence of electrode gap on characteristics of dielectric barrier discharge[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2019, 54(4):679-685(in Chinese).
[23] MATSUMOTO T, KOIZUMI T, KAWAKAMI Y, et al. Perfect blackbody radiation from a graphene nanostructure with appli-cation to high-temperature spectral emissivity measurements[J]. Optics Express, 2013, 21(25):30964.
[24] PONS J, MOREAU E, TOUCHARD G. Asymmetric surface dielectric barrier discharge in air at atmospheric pressure:electrical properties and induced airflow properties and induced airflow characteristics[J]. Journal of Physics D:Applied Physics, 2005, 38(19):3635-3642.
[25] 李应红, 梁华, 马清源, 等. 脉冲等离子体气动激励抑制翼型吸力面流动分离的实验[J]. 航空学报, 2008, 29(6):1429-1435. LI Y H, LIANG H, MA Q Y, et al. Experimental investigation on airfoil suction side flow separation by pulse plasma aerodynamic actuation[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2008, 29(6):1429-1435(in Chinese).
[26] 陆纪椿, 史志伟, 杜海, 等. 等离子体激励器控制平板边界层转捩实验研究[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(4):1166-1173. LU J C, SHI Z W, DU H, et al. Experimental study of controlling flat transition using surface dielectric barrier discharge actuator[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37(4):1166-1173(in Chinese).
[27] ROTH R J, RAHEL J, DAI X, et al. The physics and phenomenology of one atmosphere uniform glow discharge plasma (OAUGDPTM) reactors for surface treatment applications[J]. Journal of Physics D:Applied Physics, 2005, 38(4):555-567.
[28] 杨德正, 王文春. 电极极性和脉冲峰值对等离子体发射光谱德影响[M]//邵涛, 严萍. 大气压气体放电及其等离子体应用. 北京:科学出版社, 2015:140-141. YANG D Z, WANG W C. Influence of electrode polarity and pulse peak value on plasma emission spectrum[M]//SHAO T, YAN P. Gas discharges at atmospheric pressure and the applications of plasma. Beijing:Science Press, 2015:140-141(in Chinese).
[29] YANG D Z, WANG W C, LI S Z, et al. A diffuse air plasma in bi-directional nanosecond pulsed dielectric barrier discharge[J]. Journal of Physics D:Applied Physics, 2020, 43:455202.
[30] 胡剑虹, 宁飞, 沈湘衡, 等. 目标表面发射率对红外热像仪测温精度的影响[J]. 中国光学, 2010, 3(2):152-156. HU J H, NING F, SHEN X H, et al. Influence of surface emissivity of objects on measuring accuracy of infrared thermal imagers[J]. Chinese Optics, 2010, 3(2):152-156(in Chinese).
[31] 郝玲艳, 李清泉, 司雯, 等. 氩气气流增强沿面介质阻挡放电等离子体特性的实验研究[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2016, 36(8):2296-2304. HAO L Y, LI Q Q, SI W, et al. Experimental study on improvement of plasma characteristics of surface dielectric barrier discharge caused by argon flow[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2016, 36(8):2296-2304(in Chinese).
[32] ONG L, GAO G, PENG K, et al. Effects of surface dielectric barrier discharge on aerodynamic characteristic of train[J]. AIP Advances, 2017, 7(7):075112.
[33] FORTE M, JOLIBOIS J, PONS J, et al. Optimization of a dielectric barrier discharge actuator by stationary and non-stationary measurements of the induced flow velocity:application to airflow control[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2007, 43(6):917-928.
[34] MERBAHI N, SEWRAJ N, MARCHAL F, et al. Luminescence of argon in a spatially stabilized mono-filamentary dielectric barrier micro-discharge:Spectroscopic and kinetic analysis[J]. Journal of Physics D:Applied Physics, 2004, 37(12):1664-1678.
[35] TAO S, KAIHUA L, CHENG Z, et al. Experimental study on repetitive unipolar nanosecond-pulse dielectric barrier discharge in air at atmospheric pressure[J]. Journal of Physics D:Applied Physics, 2008, 41(21):215203.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

气隙构型对高频交流SDBD防除冰激励器的温升影响

Effects of air-gap on temperature rise of high frequency AC-SDBD anti-icing and deicing actuator

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杨倩, 郭晓峰, 李芹, 董威. 基于POD和代理模型的热气防冰性能预测方法[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(1): 626992-626992.
[2]	黄雄, 曲仕茹, 张恒, 陈显调. 大型客机增升构型缝翼除冰状态失速特性[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(1): 627077-627077.
[3]	郑梅, 冯丽娟, 秦娜, 尹金鸽. 短舱防冰系统三维内外流耦合计算方法[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(1): 627425-627425.
[4]	谢理科, 梁华, 吴云, 方雨霖, 魏彪, 苏志, 刘雪城, 郑博睿. 等离子体激励与电加热式防冰性能对比[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(1): 627971-627971.
[5]	孙志坤, 史志伟, 张伟麟, 李铮, 孙琪杰. 等离子体激励器对高速翼型升阻特性的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(S2): 23-39.
[6]	化为卓, 高岭, 陈戈, 李益文, 巩耕, 王延涛, 魏彪. 基于等离子体炬的磁流体动力学实验系统[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(S2): 1-7.
[7]	罗凯, 王永海, 汪球, 栗继伟, 李峥, 聂春生, 李铮. 高焓风洞中等离子体激励流动控制试验[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(S2): 89-96.
[8]	张旭东, 李铮, 董昊, 高思源, 纪祖赑, 黎凯昕, 白光辉. 高超声速流场等离子体逆向喷流减阻特性[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(S2): 115-123.
[9]	景向嵘, 程盼, 罗振兵, 高天翔, 周岩, 邓雄. 电弧放电激励器破除冰特性及裂纹扩展规律[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(S2): 204-213.
[10]	李铮, 徐聪, 张健, 李萌萌, 马祎蕾, 白光辉. 等离子体合成射流激励器高速流场逆向喷流控制[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(S2): 225-232.
[11]	马正雪, 罗振兵, 赵爱红, 周岩, 谢玮, 刘强, 朱寅鑫, 彭文强. 高超声速流场等离子体合成射流逆向喷流特性[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(S2): 192-203.
[12]	田得阳, 平熠, 陈烨斯, 陈伟芳. 物理化学模型对流场电磁波传播特性影响[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(S2): 214-224.
[13]	韩路阳, 王斌, 蒲亮, 陈青, 郑海滨. 能量沉积减阻技术机理及相关问题研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 26032-026032.
[14]	刘雪城, 梁华, 宗豪华, 谢理科, 苏志. NACA0012翼型等离子体冰形调控试验[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 126283-126283.
[15]	刘汝兵, 韦文韬, 李飞, 林麒. 补气式等离子体合成射流激励器工作机制[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 125854-125854.