波转子非定常泄漏流动机理

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2016.0269

流体力学与飞行力学

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

波转子非定常泄漏流动机理

刘琛源, 刘火星

北京航空航天大学能源与动力工程学院, 北京 100083

收稿日期:2016-07-12 修回日期:2016-10-08 出版日期:2017-05-15 发布日期:2016-10-10
通讯作者: 刘火星 E-mail:liuhuoxing@buaa.edu.cn

Mechanism of nonsteady leakage flow of wave rotors

LIU Chenyuan, LIU Huoxing

School of Energy and Power Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100083, China

Received:2016-07-12 Revised:2016-10-08 Online:2017-05-15 Published:2016-10-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对制约波转子性能的泄漏问题，通过提取波转子中与泄漏相关的主要流动现象并建立波转子单通道泄漏模型，对非定常泄漏流动机制进行了详细的数值研究，对本文给出的非定常泄漏损失预测模型进行了数值验证。结果表明：转子通道中存在不同程度的压力波动，波动幅值与间隙宽度有关；连续反射膨胀波、周期性出现的弓形激波及其反射激波是压力波动的根本原因；间隙内部泄漏过程存在3个主要的流动阶段；泄漏过程中通道激波传播速度不变、波后时均压力不变；在一定间隙宽度范围内，激波马赫数、激波静增压比与无量纲间隙宽度均呈线性关系，当间隙宽度从0增大到0.08时，激波马赫数衰减7.3%，激波静增压比衰减10.1%；泄漏流动通过泄漏产生的主膨胀波对激波传播过程施加影响，通道激波衰减本质上是理想激波与主膨胀波叠加效应的结果；泄漏损失预测模型与数值结果吻合良好。

关键词: 燃气轮机, 波转子, 单通道模型, 非定常泄漏流动, 激波

Abstract:

The problem of leakage flow can restrict the performance of a wave rotor. This paper extracts main flow phenomena related to leakage in a wave rotor, and establishes a two-dimensional single passage leakage model. The mechanism of nonsteady leakage flow is analyzed numerically, and the prediction model for loss of unsteady leakage flow is further verified. The results show that there exists pressure oscillation of varying extent in rotor passage, and the oscillation amplitude is related to the gap width. The continuous reflected expansion wave, periodic emerging bow shock and its reflected shock are reasons for pressure oscillation. There exist three main flow stages in the leakage gap during leakage flow process and during which the propagation speed of passage shock and post-shock time-averaging pressure stay unchanged. Within a certain range of gap width, shock Mach number and shock static pressure ratio are both linearly dependent on the nondimensional leakage gap width. When the gap width is increased from 0 to 0.08, the shock Mach number decreases by 7.3%, and the shock static pressure ratio decreases by 10.1%. The propagation of channel shock wave is influenced by leakage flow process via main expansion wave, and shock wave attenuation is essentially the result of superposition of ideal shock wave and expansion wave. The results obtained with leakage loss prediction model is found to be consistent with CFD results.

Key words: gas turbine, wave rotor, single passage model, nonsteady leakage flow, shock wave

中图分类号:

V231.3

刘琛源, 刘火星. 波转子非定常泄漏流动机理[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(5): 120606-120606.

LIU Chenyuan, LIU Huoxing. Mechanism of nonsteady leakage flow of wave rotors[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2017, 38(5): 120606-120606.

参考文献

[1] WEBER H E. Shock wave engine design[M]. New York:John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 1995:1-4.
[2] DEMPSEY E, MULLER N, AKBARI P, et al. Performance optimization of gas turbines utilizing four-port wave rotors:AIAA-2006-4152[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2006.
[3] AKBARI P, KHARAZI A A, MULLER N. Utilizing wave rotor technology to enhance the turbo compression in power and refrigeration cycles:IMECE-2003-44222[R]. New York:ASME, 2003.
[4] AKBARI P, NALIM R, MULLER N. A review of wave rotor technology and its applications:IMECE-2004-60082[R]. New York:ASME, 2004.
[5] KENTFIELD J A C. Nonsteady, one-dimensional, internal, compressible flows:theory and applications[M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press, 1993:127-128.
[6] WILSON J. An experimental determination of losses in a three-port wave rotor[J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 1998, 120(4):833-842.
[7] PAXSON D E. Comparison between numerically modeled and experimentally measured wave-rotor loss mechanisms[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 1995, 11(5):908-914.
[8] AKBARI P, NALIM M R. Leakage assessment of pressure-exchange wave rotors[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2008, 24(4):732-740.
[9] WILSON J, WELCH G E, PAXSON D E. Experimental results of performance tests on a four-port wave rotor:AIAA-2007-1250[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2007.
[10] ELEUTERIO F T. Riemann solvers and numerical methods for fluid dynamics[M]. Heidelberg:Springer, 2009:115-119.
[11] GLASS I I, PATTERSON G N. A theoretical and experimental study of shock-tube flows[J]. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, 1955, 22(2):73-100.
[12] ZHANG G, SETOGUCHI T, KIM H D. Numerical simulation of flow characteristics in micro shock tubes[J]. Journal of Thermal Science, 2015, 24(3):246-253.
[13] OKAMOTO K, NAGASHIMA T. Visualization of wave rotor inner flow dynamics[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2007, 23(2):292-300.
[14] ZHANG G, KIM H D. Numerical simulation of shock wave and contact surface propagation in micro shock tubes[J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2015, 29(4):1689-1696.
[15] 阎超. 计算流体力学方法及应用[M]. 北京:北京航空航天大学出版社, 2006:171. YAN C. Methods and applications of computational fluid dynamics[M]. Beijing:Beihang University Press, 2006:171 (in Chinese).
[16] SAITO T, TAKAYAMA K. Numerical simulations of nozzle starting process[J]. Shock Waves, 1999, 9(2):73-79.
[17] DESHPANDE A, PURANIK B. Effect of viscosity and wall heat conduction on shock attenuation in narrow channels[J]. Shock Waves, 2015, 25(1):1-11.
[18] SKEWS B W. The perturbed region behind a diffracting shock wave[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1967, 29(4):705-719.
[19] TAKAWAMA K, INOUE O. Shock wave diffraction over a 90 degree sharp corner-posters presented at 18^th ISSW[J]. Shock Waves, 1991, 1(4):301-312.
[20] IGRA O, FALCOVITZ J, REICHENBACH H, et al. Experimental and numerical study of the interaction between a planar shock wave and a square cavity[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1996, 313:105-130.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

波转子非定常泄漏流动机理

Mechanism of nonsteady leakage flow of wave rotors

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	宋亚辉, 樊高宇, 瞿丽霞, 张跃林, 徐悦, 韩硕. 航空器声爆飞行试验测量技术研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(2): 626186-626186.
[2]	罗凯, 王永海, 汪球, 栗继伟, 李峥, 聂春生, 李铮. 高焓风洞中等离子体激励流动控制试验[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(S2): 89-96.
[3]	李铮, 徐聪, 张健, 李萌萌, 马祎蕾, 白光辉. 等离子体合成射流激励器高速流场逆向喷流控制[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(S2): 225-232.
[4]	胡守超, 庄宇, 李贤, 江涛. 高超声速气动热标模HyHERM-Ⅰ试验[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(S2): 233-248.
[5]	李珺, 王俊峰, 赵雅甜, 罗世彬. 面向非设计工况的激波针-喷流复合构型研究[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 125949-125949.
[6]	韩路阳, 王斌, 蒲亮, 陈青, 郑海滨. 能量沉积减阻技术机理及相关问题研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 26032-026032.
[7]	程剑锐, 施崇广, 瞿丽霞, 徐悦, 尤延铖, 朱呈祥. 二维弯曲激波/湍流边界层干扰流动理论建模[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 125993-125993.
[8]	王翼, 徐尚成, 周芸帆, 范晓樯, 王振国. 多目标考虑下高超声速进气道唇口角参数化设计与分析[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 125698-125698.
[9]	童福林, 董思卫, 段俊亦, 李新亮. 激波/湍流边界层干扰分离泡直接数值模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(7): 125437-125437.
[10]	张昊元, 孙东, 邱波, 朱言旦, 王安龄. 湍动能在激波/边界层干扰流动中的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(7): 125504-125504.
[11]	李定骏, 杨镠育, 孙帆, 江鹏, 陈艺文, 王铁军. 预热温度对热障涂层表面裂纹形成的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(6): 526184-526184.
[12]	周岩, 罗振兵, 王林, 夏智勋, 高天翔, 谢玮, 邓雄, 彭文强, 程盼. 等离子体合成射流激励器及其流动控制技术研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(3): 25027-025027.
[13]	李强, 万兵兵, 杨凯, 朱涛. 高超声速尖锥边界层压力脉动和热流脉动特性试验[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(2): 124956-124956.
[14]	司东现, 李祝飞, 姬隽泽, 张恩来, 杨基明. 椭圆内聚激波面间断化过程的激波动力学分析[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(12): 126093-126093.
[15]	章胜华, 邓枫, 覃宁, 刘学强. 激波控制鼓包对跨声速抖振影响的数值研究[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(11): 526806-526806.