翼伞弧面下反角、翼型和前缘切口对翼伞气动性能的影响

流体力学与飞行力学

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

翼伞弧面下反角、翼型和前缘切口对翼伞气动性能的影响

朱旭^1,2, 曹义华¹

1. 北京航空航天大学航空科学与工程学院, 北京 100191;
2. 中国舰船研究设计中心, 湖北武汉 430064

收稿日期:2011-09-01 修回日期:2011-10-27 出版日期:2012-07-25 发布日期:2012-07-24
通讯作者: 曹义华,Tel.: 010-82339537 E-mail: yihuacaobu@126.com E-mail:yihuacaobu@126.com

Effects of Arc-anhedral Angle, Airfoil and Leading Edge Cut on Parafoil Aerodynamic Performance

ZHU Xu^1,2, CAO Yihua¹

1. School of Aeronautic Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China;
2. China Ship Development and Design Center, Wuhan 430064, China

Received:2011-09-01 Revised:2011-10-27 Online:2012-07-25 Published:2012-07-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了研究翼伞弧面下反角、翼型和前缘切口对翼伞气动性能的影响,对带气室的、展弦比为3的不同特征几何参数翼伞模型的流场进行了三维、定常数值模拟。运用有限体积法对三维坐标系下不可压雷诺时均Navier-Stokes (RANS)方程进行了直接求解,采用剪切应力输运(SST)k-ω两方程湍流模型对湍流进行模拟。数值模拟得出的原始翼伞的气动性能参数与试验数据在总趋势上符合很好,不同几何参数翼伞模型计算结果表明:翼伞弧面下反角越大,升力及诱导阻力越小,升阻比变化不大;前缘半径、厚度小的翼伞翼型,阻力更小,升阻比大;前缘切口对翼伞影响区域限于前缘附近,压力分布同干净翼类似,降低了其失速迎角,对升力影响不大,但明显增大阻力。该数值方法可为进一步研究更多不同几何参数的翼伞模型提供参考。

关键词: 翼伞, 弧面下反角, 前缘切口, 气动性能, 数值模拟, 广义升力线理论

Abstract: To study the effects of the arc-anhedral angle, airfoil and leading edge cut of a parafoil on its aerodynamic performance, 3D steady flow field of parafoils with cells, an aspect ratio of 3, and characteristic geometric parameters is numerically simulated by using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) technique. The incompressible Reynolds-average Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations in a 3D coordinate system is solved by using the finite volume method. A k-ω shear stress transport (SST) two-equation turbulent model is also applied to simulate the turbulence. Numerical simulation results of the aerodynamic performance of the original model show good agreement with the tunnel experimental data. The results indicate that the arc-anhedral angle can obviously decrease the lift and induced drag of a parafoil, but the lift-drag ratio changes little. The model with a smaller leading edge radius and thickness of parafoil achieves larger lift-drag ratio. The leading edge cut has little effect on lift and its effect on the flow field is only confined to the region near the leading edge, making the pressure distribution of this model similar to the baseline airfoil. Meanwhile, the leading edge cut decreases the stall angle of attack and obviously increases drag. This paper can provide reference for further studies on parafoil aerodynamic performance with different geometric parameters.

Key words: parafoil, arc-anhedral angle, leading edge cut, aerodynamic performance, numerical simulation, generalized lifting-line theory

中图分类号:

V211.3

朱旭, 曹义华. 翼伞弧面下反角、翼型和前缘切口对翼伞气动性能的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2012, 33(7): 1189-1200.

ZHU Xu, CAO Yihua. Effects of Arc-anhedral Angle, Airfoil and Leading Edge Cut on Parafoil Aerodynamic Performance[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2012, 33(7): 1189-1200.

参考文献

[1] Nicolaides J D. Parafoil wind tunnel tests. AD731564, Indiana: University of Notre Dame, 1971.

[2] He W L. Study on lift-drag characteristic of ram air parachute in wind tunnel. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 1999, 20(S): 75-77. (in Chinese) 贺卫亮. 利用风洞试验研究冲压翼伞的升阻特性.航空学报, 1999, 20(S): 75-77.

[3] Zhan P G. The wind tunnel test technique and aerodynamic characteristics evaluation research on ram air parawings. Chengdu: School of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Sichuan University, 2004. (in Chinese) 战培国. 翼型伞风洞测力技术及工程估算方法研究. 成都: 四川大学制造科学与工程学院, 2004.

[4] Wang L R. Theory and application of parachutes. Beijing: China Astronautic Publishing House, 1997: 528-600. (in Chinese) 王利荣.降落伞理论与应用. 北京: 宇航出版社, 1997: 528-600.

[5] Zhu X, Cao Y H. Numerical simulation of planform geometry effect on parafoil aerodynamic performance.Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2011, 32(11): 1998-2007. (in Chinese) 朱旭, 曹义华. 翼伞平面形状对翼伞气动性能的影响. 航空学报, 2011, 32(11): 1998-2007.

[6] Lingard J S. Precision aerial delivery seminar ram-air parachute design. 13th AIAA Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conference. Clearwater Beach: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1995: 1-51.

[7] Lingard J S. The aerodynamic of gliding parachutes. A88-11201, London: RAS, 1986.

[8] Jann T. Aerodynamic coefficients for parafoil wing with arc anhedral-theoretical and experimental results. AIAA-2003-2106, 2003.

[9] Gonzalez M A. Prandtl theory applied to paraglider aerodynamics. AIAA-1993-1220, 1993.

[10] Slegers N, Costello M. Aspects of control for a parafoil and payload system. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2003, 26(6): 898-905.

[11] Mittal S, Saxena P, Singh A. Computation of two-dimensional flows past ram-air parachutes. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2001, 35(6): 643-667.

[12] Balaji R, Mittal S, Rai A K. Effect of leading edge cut on the aerodynamics of ram-air parachutes. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2005, 47(1): 1-17.

[13] Mohammadi M A, Johari H. Computation of flow over a high-performance parafoil canopy. Journal of Aircraft, 2010, 47(4): 1338-1345.

[14] Furfaro J, Hailey C E. An experimental study of parafoil section. AIAA-1997-1527, 1997.

[15] Uddin N, Mashud M. Wind tunnel test of a paraglider(flexible) wing canopy. International Journal of Mechanical & Mechatronics Engineering, 2010, 10(3): 7-18.

[16] Tezduyar T E, Kalro V, Garrard W. Parallel computational methods for 3D simulation of a parafoil with prescribed shape changes. Parallel Computing, 1997, 23(9): 1349-1363.

[17] Kalro V, Aliabadi S, Garrard W, et al. Parallel finite element simulation of large ram-air parachutes. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 1997, 24(7): 1353-1369.

[18] Menter F R. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA Journal, 1994, 32(8): 1598-1605.

[19] Geiger R H, Wailes W K. Advanced recovery systems wind tunnel test report. AD-A238157, 1990.

[20] Guermond J. A generalized lifting-line theory for curved and swept wings. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1990, 211: 497-513.

[21] Iosilevskii G. Lifting-line theory of an arched wing in asymmetric flight. Journal of Aircraft, 1996, 33(2): 1023-1026.

[22] Melin T. A vortex lattice MATLAB implementation for linear aerodynamic wing applications for linear aerodynamic wing applications. Sweden, Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), 2000.

[23] McGhee R J, Beasley W D. Low-speed aerodynamic characteristics of a 17-percent-thick airfoil section design for general aviation applications. NASA-TN-D-7428, 1974.

[24] Holger B. Aerodynamic improvement of paraglider performance. AIAA-1999-3148, 1999.

[25] Ware G M, Hassell J L. Wind-tunnel investigation of ram-air inflated all flexible wings of aspect ratio 1.0 to 3.0. NASA-TM-SX-1923, 1969.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

翼伞弧面下反角、翼型和前缘切口对翼伞气动性能的影响

Effects of Arc-anhedral Angle, Airfoil and Leading Edge Cut on Parafoil Aerodynamic Performance

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	孙志坤, 史志伟, 张伟麟, 李铮, 孙琪杰. 等离子体激励器对高速翼型升阻特性的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(S2): 23-39.
[2]	安利平, 王昊, 王掩刚, 朱自环. 跨声速压气机湿压缩性能及流动特性[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 126024-126024.
[3]	夏侯唐凡, 陈江涛, 邵志栋, 吴晓军, 刘宇. 随机和认知不确定性框架下的CFD模型确认度量综述[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 25716-025716.
[4]	杨建凯, 顾冬冬, 葛庆, 檀晨晨, 文雨. 铝合金激光增材制造支撑布局及精确成形机制[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(4): 525331-525331.
[5]	唐松祥, 李杰, 张恒, 牛笑天. 某层流验证机中央翼段高速巡航气动性能优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(11): 526766-526766.
[6]	姜有旭, 李杰, 杨钊. 某层流机翼验证机风洞试验数据修正方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(11): 526814-526814.
[7]	卫永斌, 段卓毅, 郭兆电, 杨成凤. 短舱气动性能参数化研究[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(11): 526742-526742.
[8]	杨钊, 李杰, 牛笑天. 层流机翼飞行验证平台雷诺数效应分析及修正[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(11): 527287-527287.
[9]	段俊亦, 童福林, 李新亮, 刘洪伟. 压缩-膨胀湍流边界层平均摩阻分解[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(1): 625915-625915.
[10]	刘朋欣, 袁先旭, 孙东, 傅亚陆, 李辰. 高温化学非平衡湍流边界层直接数值模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(1): 124877-124877.
[11]	沈鹏飞, 刘朋欣, 孙东, 袁先旭. 马赫6柱-裙构型激波/湍流边界层干扰摩阻统计特性[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(1): 626005-626005.
[12]	刘朋欣, 袁先旭, 梁飞, 李辰, 孙东. 高温化学非平衡湍流边界层脉动量象限分析[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(S1): 726338-726338.
[13]	鲍俊, 王瑜, 牛潜, 朱锡冬, 程建杰. 喷雾液滴撞击液膜影响参数及流动机理分析[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(S1): 726360-726360.
[14]	陈崇沛, 梁剑寒, 关清帝, 高天运. 守恒型可压缩一维湍流方法及其在超声速标量混合层中的应用[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(S1): 726364-726364.
[15]	李青, 涂国华, 余钊圣, 林昭武, 李婷婷, 袁先旭. 惯性颗粒在非均匀加速流中的输运问题[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(S1): 726390-726390.