基于代理模型的航空燃油泵空化性能分析

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2016.0102

流行力学与飞行力学

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

基于代理模型的航空燃油泵空化性能分析

熊英华¹, 刘影¹, 赵兴安¹, 孙华伟², 王国玉¹, 高德明¹

1. 北京理工大学机械与车辆学院, 北京 100081;
2. 中航工业集团公司南京机电液压工程研究中心, 南京 211106

收稿日期:2015-10-12 修回日期:2015-12-14 出版日期:2016-10-15 发布日期:2016-04-11
通讯作者: 刘影,Tel.:010-68912395 E-mail:liuying@bit.edu.cn E-mail:liuying@bit.edu.cn
作者简介:熊英华男,硕士,研究员。主要研究方向:燃油泵空化流动。Tel.:010-68912395 E-mail:xiongyhbit@163.com;刘影女,副教授。主要研究方向:流体机械空化流动。Tel.:010-68912395 E-mail:liuying@bit.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（51479002）；航空科学基金（2013ZC09001）

Analysis of cavitation performance of an aviation fuel pump based on surrogate model

XIONG Yinghua¹, LIU Ying¹, ZHAO Xing'an¹, SUN Huawei², WANG Guoyu¹, GAO Deming¹

1. School of Mechanical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China;
2. Nanjing Electrical and Hydraulic Engineering Researsh Center, Aviation Industry Corporation of China, Nanjing 211106, China

Received:2015-10-12 Revised:2015-12-14 Online:2016-10-15 Published:2016-04-11
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (51479002); Aeronautical Science Foundation of China (2013ZC09001)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基于代理模型的整体敏感度分析方法，对影响燃油泵空化性能的结构参数（即诱导轮出口安放角和叶轮进口安放角）进行了分析，得到影响泵空化性能的主要因素，并对燃油泵的结构参数进行了优化。研究中，采用基于旋转修正的k-ε湍流模型及Zwart空化模型对优化前后的燃油泵空化流场进行了计算。结果表明：在一定变化范围内，叶片安放角对燃油泵的外特性影响较小，对燃油泵空化特性影响较大；其中，叶轮进口安放角对燃油泵空化性能有较大影响，随叶轮进口安放角的增大，燃油泵空化性能呈先下降后上升的变化趋势；优化后诱导轮出口安放角和叶轮进口安放角分别增大了4.4°和3.2°，满足Pareto最优解，燃油泵的空化性能较优化前提高了18%左右。

关键词: 燃油泵, 代理模型, 湍流模型, 空化性能, 优化分析

Abstract:

In order to investigate the influence of the structure parameters (which are blade angle of inducer at exit and blade angle of impeller at inlet) of fuel pump on the cavitation performance of an aviation fuel pump, the global sensitivity analysis method that based on the surrogate method was applied, and also, the structure parameters of fuel pump had been optimized. In the numerical simulation, the local swirling correction turbulence model deriving from the standard k-ε two-equation model and Zwart cavitation model were applied. The results show that in a certain range of variation, the blade angle has a greater influence on the cavitation performance, instead of the external characteristics of fuel pump. Compared to the outlet angle of inducer, the inlet angle of impeller affects the cavitation performance more significantly. With the increase of the outlet angle of inducer, the cavitation performance firstly decreases and then increases. Based on the Pareto optimal solutions, the optimized outlet angle of inducer and inlet angle of impeller increase by 4.4°and 3.2°respectively, with the cavitation performance increasing by 18%.

Key words: fuel pumps, surrogate model, turbulence model, cavitation performance, analysis and optimization

中图分类号:

熊英华, 刘影, 赵兴安, 孙华伟, 王国玉, 高德明. 基于代理模型的航空燃油泵空化性能分析[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(10): 2952-2960.

XIONG Yinghua, LIU Ying, ZHAO Xing'an, SUN Huawei, WANG Guoyu, GAO Deming. Analysis of cavitation performance of an aviation fuel pump based on surrogate model[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2016, 37(10): 2952-2960.

参考文献

[1] 樊思齐, 李华聪. 航空发动机控制[M]. 西安:西北工业大学出版社, 2008. FAN S Q, LI H C. Aeroengine control[M]. Xi'an:Northwestern Polytechnical University Press, 2008(in Chinese).
[2] 薛梅新, 吴迪, 朴英. 加力燃油泵压出室非设计工况内流特征数值模拟[J]. 航空动力学报, 2012, 27(2):419-424. XUE X M, WU D, PIAO Y. Numerical simulation on internal flow characteristics in the discharge chamber of an afterburning fuel pump under off-design conditions[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2012, 27(2):419-424(in Chinese).
[3] 殷吉超, 朴英, 彭晓峰. 高速燃油离心泵内流场分析和气蚀过程仿真[J]. 计算机仿真, 2008, 25(6):70-74. YIN J C, PIAO Y, PENG X F. Numerical simulation of flow field and cavitations in high-speed kerosene centrifugal pump[J]. Computer Simulation, 2008, 25(6):70-74(in Chinese).
[4] 王凯. 离心泵多工况水力设计和优化及其应用[D]. 镇江:江苏大学, 2011. WANG K. Multi-conditions hydraulic design and optimization for centrifugal pumps and its application[D]. Zhenjiang:Jiangsu University, 2011(in Chinese).
[5] 何希杰. 离心泵叶轮入口参数最优化设计的研究[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 1987, 5(4):18-25. HE X J. Researching on optimization method for impeller inlet parameters of centrifugal pump[J]. Journal of Drainage and Irrigation Machinery Engineering, 1987, 5(4):18-25(in Chinese).
[6] 葛宰林, 吕斌, 于馨. 基于速度系数法的离心泵叶轮优化设计[J]. 大连铁道学院学报, 2006, 27(3):37-40. GE Z L, LV B, YU X. Optimal design of centrifugal pump impeller[J]. Journal of Dalian Railway Institute, 2006, 27(3):37-40(in Chinese).
[7] 高江永, 郭振苗. 离心泵叶轮与蜗壳设计几何参数的优化研究[J]. 水泵技术, 2007(4):6-9. GAO J Y, GUO Z M. Study on optimization of centrifugal pump impeller's and volute's designed parameters[J]. Pump Technology, 2007(4):6-9(in Chinese).
[8] SUANNE T, RUDOLF S. Optimization of hydraulic machinery bladings by multilevel CFD techniques[J]. International Journal of Rotating Machinery, 2005, 2(2):161-167.
[9] 刘厚林, 王凯, 袁寿其, 等. 一种基于CFD的离心泵多工况水力优化方法:CN101956711A[P]. 2011-01-26. LIU H L, WANG K, YUAN S Q, et al. A multi-conditions hydraulic optimization method for centrifugal pump based on CFD:CN101956711A[P]. 2011-01-26(in Chinese).
[10] GOEL T, DORNEY D J, HAFTKA R T, et al. Improving the hydrodynamic performance of diffuser vanes via shape optimization[J]. Computer & Fluids, 2008, 37(6):705-723.
[11] 杨卓懿, 庞永杰, 王建,等. 响应面模型在艇型多目标优化中的应用[J]. 哈尔滨工程大学学报, 2011, 32(4):407-410. YANG Z Y, PANG Y J, WANG J, et al. Application of a response surface model in multi-objective optimization for submersible shapes[J]. Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 2011, 32(4):407-410(in Chinese).
[12] 吴钦, 王国玉. 低温介质质量传输空化模型的代理分析及优化[J]. 应用力学学报, 2013,30(5):700-706. WU Q, WANG G Y. Surrogate-based analysis and optimization of the transport-based cryogenic cavitation model[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2013, 30(5):700-706(in Chinese).
[13] 赵宇, 王国玉, 黄彪. 考虑当地涡旋运动修正的湍流模型在非定常空化湍流流场计算中的应用[J]. 应用力学学报, 2014, 31(1):1-6. ZHAO Y, WANG G Y, HUANG B. Applications of LSC turbulence model on unsteady cavitating flows[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2014, 31(1):1-6(in Chinese).
[14] ZWART P J, GERBER A G, BELAMRI T. A two-phase flow model for predicting cavitation dynamics[C]//Proceedings of ICMF 2004 International Conference on Multiphase Flow. Yokohama, Japan:2004:1-11.
[15] 熊英华,刘影,李述林,等. 基于替代燃料的航空燃油泵内部空化特性[J].航空动力学报,2015,30(11):2607-2615. XIONG Y H, LIU Y, LI S L, et al. Cavitation characteristic in aviation fuel pump based on surrogate fuel[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2015,30(11):2607-2615(in Chinese).
[16] 关醒凡. 泵的理论与设计[M]. 北京:机械工业出版社, 1987. GUAN X F. Pumps theory and design[M]. Beijing:China Machine Press, 1987(in Chinese).
[17] QUEIPO N V, HAFTKA R T, SHYY W, et al. Surrogate-based analysis and optimization[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2005, 41:1-28.
[18] MACK Y, GOEL T, SHYY W, et al. Surrogate model-based optimization framework:A case study in aerospace design[J]. Studies in Computational Intelligence, 2007, 51:323-342.
[19] BASAK D, PAL S, PATRANABIS D C. Support vector regression[J]. Neural Information Processing Letters & Reviews, 2007, 11(10):203-224.
[20] GOEL T, HAFTKA R T, SHYY W, et al. Ensemble of surrogates[J]. Structure and Multidiscipline Optimization, 2007, 33(3):199-216.
[21] CHO Y C, DU W, GUPTA A, et al. Surrogate-based modeling and dimension-reduction techniques for thermo-fluid and energy systems[C]//ASME/JSME 20118th Thermal Engineering Joint Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers.New York:ASME, 2011:1-19.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

基于代理模型的航空燃油泵空化性能分析

Analysis of cavitation performance of an aviation fuel pump based on surrogate model

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	崔壮壮, 原昕, 赵国庆, 井思梦, 招启军. 共轴刚性旋翼高速直升机前飞性能操纵策略影响[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 529256-529256.
[2]	柳家齐, 陈荣钱, 楼锦华, 韩旭, 吴昊, 尤延铖. 基于深度学习的高速直升机旋翼翼型气动优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 529828-529828.
[3]	李玉涵, 杨宝玉, 吴亦农, 张强, 唐晓. 卫星光机载荷热模型参数高效修正方法研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(6): 628814-628814.
[4]	陈树生, 冯聪, 张兆康, 赵轲, 张新洋, 高正红. 基于全局/梯度优化方法的宽速域乘波-机翼布局气动设计[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(6): 629596-629596.
[5]	赵伟国, 强欢欢, 李兴国. 环形喷嘴宽度对高速诱导轮空化特性的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(4): 128730-128730.
[6]	汪洪波, 曾宇, 熊大鹏, 杨揖心, 孙明波. SST湍流模型的激波与可压缩效应改进[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(3): 128694-128694.
[7]	张恺玲, 李思怡, 段毅, 阎超. 进气道流动中SST湍流模型参数的不确定度量化[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(S2): 729429-729429.
[8]	曾宇, 汪洪波, 孙明波, 王超, 刘旭. SST湍流模型改进研究综述[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(9): 27411-027411.
[9]	赵欢, 高正红, 夏露. 基于新型多可信度代理模型的多目标优化方法[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(6): 126962-126962.
[10]	赵欢, 高正红, 夏露. 基于新型高维代理模型的气动外形设计方法[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(5): 126924-126924.
[11]	郑志阳, 张阳, 张钊, 吴宝海, 张莹. 基于GA⁃SVR的薄壁叶片辅助支撑布局优化方法[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(4): 426805-426805.
[12]	于汀, 李璐祎, 刘昱杉, 常泽明. 观测不确定性下的高效贝叶斯更新方法及其在机翼结构中的应用[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(24): 228592-228592.
[13]	陈涛, 徐兴平, 张宏达, 韩省思. 自适应湍流耦合建表燃烧模型的振荡燃烧数值模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(14): 628207-628207.
[14]	刘锬韬, 李瑞宇, 高丽敏, 赵磊. 基于数据同化的试验数据驱动的叶栅流场预测[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(14): 628201-628201.
[15]	陈伟芳, 孙精华, 田得阳, 陈烨斯. 物理化学模型对流场电磁散射特性的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(12): 127707-127707.