平面约束变胞机构构态切换能力的概率评估模型

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2022.26843

Abstract

Abstract:

The definition and evaluation of configuration transformation ability as well as the principle of force control during the process of configuration transformation are the research foundation for realizing the stable configuration transformation of metamorphic mechanisms. Considering the randomness of input errors in practical application， the establishment of a probabilistic evaluation model of the configuration transformation ability is the theoretical basis for reducing failure probability of kinematic performance of metamorphic mechanisms. Based on the structure composition principle of the multiconfiguration source metamorphic mechanism that can operate in an under-actuated state， the modularized calculation models are established for force analysis of the augmented Assur groups including metamorphic joints. According to the equivalent resistance gradient model of metamorphic joints， a force analysis model is deduced to describe mechanical control principle of the configuration transformation of constrained metamorphic mechanisms. Furthermore， considering the uncertainties in the link dimensions， masses， and compliance parameters et al， a reliability evaluation method of the configuration transformation moment for the constrained metamorphic mechanism is established. Considering the influence of kinematic failure at the adjacent moment of configuration transformation time， an interval reliability calculation method for the configuration transformation of constrained metamorphic mechanisms is proposed by using the calculation model of system reliability. Finally， the feasibility and effectiveness of the probabilistic evaluation method is verified by taking the metamorphic mechanism of paper folding as an example. This research provides the foundation for the reliability optimization design of the constrained metamorphic mechanism aiming at obtaining the repeatability of the configuration transformation with high probability. It also shows theoretical and practical significance in promoting the application of metamorphic mechanisms.

Key words: planar constrained metamorphic mechanisms, configuration transformation, probability, reliability, equivalent resistance, structure of metamorphic joint

CLC Number:

V328.5

Benqi SUN, Qiang YANG, Zhili SUN, Shujun LI, Hongkun MA, Ruonan WANG. A probabilistic evaluation model for configuration transformation ability of planar constrained metamorphic mechanisms[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(4): 426843-426843.

Figures/Tables 16

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

Fig. 9

Table 1

Table 2

Fig. 10

Fig. 11

Fig. 12

Fig. 13

Table 3

References 30

1	DAI J S， JONES J R. Mobility in metamorphic mechanisms of foldable/erectable kinds［J］. Journal of Mechanical Design， 1999， 121（3）： 375-382.
2	李端玲，戴建生，张启先，等. 基于构态变换的变胞机构结构综合［J］. 机械工程学报， 2002， 38（7）： 12-16.
	LI D L， DAI J S， ZHANG Q X， et al. Structure synthesis of metamorphic mechanisms based on the configumtion transformations［J］. Journal of Mechanical Engineering， 2002， 38（7）： 12-16 （in Chinese）.
3	戴建生，丁希仑，邹慧君. 变胞原理和变胞机构类型［J］. 机械工程学报， 2005， 41（6）： 7-12.
	DAI J S， DING X L， ZOU H J. Fundamentals and categorization of metamorphic mechanism［J］. Journal of Mechanical Engineering， 2005， 41（6）： 7-12 （in Chinese）.
4	王德伦，戴建生. 变胞机构及其综合的理论基础［J］. 机械工程学报， 2007， 43（8）： 32-42.
	WANG D L， DAI J S. Theoretical foundation of metamorphic mechanisms and its synthesis［J］. Journal of Mechanical Engineering， 2007， 43（8）： 32-42 （in Chinese）.
5	GAN D M， DAI J S， LIAO Q Z. Mobility change in two types of metamorphic parallel mechanisms［J］. Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics， 2009， 1（11）： 041007.
6	LI S J， DAI J S. Structure synthesis of single—Driven metamorphic mechanisms based on the augmented Assur groups［J］. Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics， 2012， 4（3）： 031004.
7	LI S J， DAI J S. Advances in reconfigurable mechanisms and robotics Ⅰ［M］. Tianjin： Springer Press， 2012： 53-62.
8	张武翔，丁希仑，戴建生. 基于约束变化特征分析的变胞机构构型综合方法［J］. 机械工程学报， 2013， 49（5）： 1-9.
	ZHANG W X， DING X L， DAI J S. Method for configuration synthesis of metamorphic mechanisms based on constraint variation［J］. Journal of Mechanical Engineering， 2013， 49（5）： 1-9 （in Chinese）.
9	杨强，王洪光，李树军，等. 含变胞运动副结构的约束变胞机构构型综合［J］. 机械工程学报， 2014， 50（13）： 1-8.
	YANG Q， WANG H G， LI S J， et al. Type synthesis of constrained metamorphic mechanisms with structural forms of the metamorphic joints［J］. Journal of Mechanical Engineering， 2014， 50（13）： 1-8 （in Chinese）.
10	LI S J， WANG H G， YANG Q. Constraint force analysis of metamorphic joints based on the augmented Assur groups［J］. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering， 2015， 28（4）： 747-755.
11	YANG Q， HAO G B， LI S J， et al. Practical structural design approach of multicon guration planar single-loop metamorphic mechanism with a single actuator［J］. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering， 2020， 33（5）： 29-43.
12	王汝贵，陈辉庆. 变胞机构多失效模式运动可靠性分析与优化［J］. 机械工程学报， 2021， 57（11）： 184-194.
	WANG R G， CHEN H Q. Analysis and optimization on kinematic reliability of metamorphic mechanisms with multiple failure modes［J］. Journal of Mechanical Engineering， 2021， 57（11）： 184-194 （in Chinese）.
13	刘胜利，王兴东，孔建益，等. 多源不确定性下平面变胞机构运动可靠性分析［J］. 机械工程学报， 2021， 57（17）： 64-75.
	LIU S L， WANG X D， KONG J Y， et al. Kinematic reliability analysis of planar metamorphic mechanism with multi-source uncertainties［J］. Journal of Mechanical Engineering， 2021， 57（17）： 64-75 （in Chinese）.
14	JOSHI S P， TIDWELL Z， CROSSLEY W A， et al. Comparison of morphing wing strategies based upon aircraft performance impacts［C］∥45th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures， Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference， 2004： 2348-2354.
15	张克涛，方跃法，房海蓉. 基于变胞原理的一种探测车机构设计与分析［J］. 北京航空航天大学学报， 2007， 33（7）： 838-841.
	ZHANG K T， FANG Y F， FANG H R. Design and analysis of a rover mechanism based on the metamorphic principle［J］. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics， 2007， 33（7）： 838-841 （in Chinese）.
16	ZHANG W X， DING X L， DAI J S. Design and stability of operating mechanism for a spacecraft hatch ［J］. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics， 2009， 22（4）： 453-458.
17	TALEBI H A， PATEL R V， ASMER H. Neural network based dynamic modeling of flexible-link manipulators with application to the SSRMS［J］. Journal of Field Robotics， 2015， 17（7）： 385-401.
18	ZHAO C， GUO H W， LIU R Q， et al. Design and kinematic analysis of a 3RRlS metamorphic parallel mechanism for large-Scale reconfigurable space multifingered hand［J］. Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics， 2018， 10（4）： 041012.
19	李波，陆建兰，黄利强，等. 一种平面天线可折叠变胞机构的设计分析研究［J］. 西北工业大学学报， 2018， 36（S1）： 33-40.
	LI B， LU J L， HUANG L Q， et al. Design and analysis of a foldable metamorphic mechanism with flat panel antennas［J］. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University， 2018， 36（S1）： 33-40 （in Chinese）.
20	JIA G L， HUANG H L， LI B， et al. Synthesis of a novel type of metamorphic mechanism module for large scale deployable grasping manipulators［J］. Mechanism and Machine Theory， 2018， 128 （7）： 544-559.
21	王珉，王谢苗，陈文亮，等. 具有变胞功能的自主移动制孔机构［J］. 北京航空航天大学学报， 2015， 41（3）： 398-404.
	WANG M， WANG X M， CHEN W L， et al. Autonomous mobile drilling mechanism with metamorphic function［J］. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics， 2015， 41（3）： 398-404 （in Chinese）.
22	樊伟，郑联语，王亚辉，等. 管路组件可重构装配工装系统的定位器自动配置与性能分析［J］. 航空学报， 2018， 39（5）： 421793.
	FAN W， ZHENG L Y， WANG Y H， et al. Automatic configuration and performance analysis of locators for reconfigurable assembly fixture system of pipeline components［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2018， 39（5）： 421793 （in Chinese）.
23	YANG Q， WANG H G， LI S J. Structural synthesis for broken strands repair operation metamorphic mechanism of EHV transmission lines［J］. Journal of Vibroengineering， 2014， 16（6）： 2768-2778.
24	宋艳艳，畅博彦，金国光，等. 变胞机构构态切换时的冲击问题分析与仿真研究［J］. 机械工程学报， 2020， 56（17）： 48-58.
	SONG Y Y， CHANG B Y， JIN G G， et al. Analysis and simulation of impact problem of metamorphic mechanism considering configuration transformation［J］. Journal of Mechanical Engineering， 2020， 56（17）： 48-58 （in Chinese）.
25	张武翔，丁希仑，戴建生. 一种变自由度机构构态变换的稳定性［J］. 中南大学学报（自然科学版）， 2007， 38（S1）： 564-569.
	ZHANG W X， DING X L， DAI J S. Stability of configuration transformation of a kind of variable freedom mechanism［J］. Journal of Central South University （Science and Technology）， 2007， 38（S1）： 564-569 （in Chinese）.
26	RONG Y， ZHANG X C， QU M K. Unified inverse dynamics for a novel class of metamorphic parallel mechanisms［J］. Applied Mathematical Modelling， 2019， 74（8）： 280-300.
27	于靖军，刘凯，孔宪文. 多模式机构研究进展［J］. 机械工程学报， 2020， 56（19）： 14-27.
	YU J J， LIU K， KONG X W. State of the art of multi-mode mechanisms［J］. Journal of Mechanical Engineering， 2020， 56（19）： 14-27 （in Chinese）.
28	SIMIONESCU P A. Kinematics of the RRR， RRT （passive） and RRRR， RRRT （active） linkage-mechanism building blocks with applications and reporting of new findings［J］. Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics， 2019， 11（6）： 1-24.
29	谢里阳. 机械可靠性理论、方法及模型中若干问题评述［J］. 机械工程学报， 2014， 50（14）： 27-35.
	XIE L Y. Issues and commentary on mechanical reliability theories， methods and models［J］. Journal of Mechanical Engineering， 2014， 50（14）： 27-35 （in Chinese）.
30	贾方，陈胜军，陈贺，等. 平面连杆机构运动可靠性等效正态设计法［J］. 机械设计， 2010， 27（5）： 54-58.
	JIA F， CHEN S J， CHEN H， et al. Equivalent normal design method for movement reliability of planar linkage mechanism［J］. Journal of Machine Design， 2010， 27（5）： 54-58 （in Chinese）.

参数	数值	参数	数值	参数	数值
l_AB /mm	N~（180，0.042）	l_BC /mm	N~（360，0.06）	l_CD /mm	N~（240，0.048）
l_CE /mm	N~（360，0.06）	l_EF /mm	N~（210，0.048）	l_AD /mm	315
maxl_AF /mm	870	m_AB /kg	N~（1，0.007）	m_BC /kg	N~（1.5，0.01）
m_CD /kg	N~（1，0.007）	m_CE /kg	N~（1.5，0.01）	m_EF /kg	N~（2，0.013）
m_slider/kg	N~（1，0.007）	J_AB /（kg·m²）	0.002 7	J_BC /（kg·m²）	0.016 2
J_CD /（kg·m²）	0.004 8	J_CE /（kg·m²）	0.016 2	J_EF /（kg·m²）	0.007 35
a/mm	250	k₁/（N·mm^-1）	N~（10，0.1）	d₁/mm	N~（100，0.667）
d₂/mm	N~（120，0.667）	b/mm	76	k₂/（N·mm^-1）	N~（0.5，0.01）
ω₁/（rad·s^-1）	N~（2π，0.01）	α/（°）	N~（120.3，0.167）	Δθ₁/（°）	N~（0，0.067）

参数	第Ⅰ构态	第Ⅱ构态	循环
机构类型	曲柄滑块机构	曲柄摇杆机构	下一循环
主动件转角	-290.2°~-15.2°	-15.2°~69.8°	下一循环
变胞副E夹角	停（120.3°）	120.3°~72.5°	下一循环
滑块位置	598.5~870 mm	停（870 mm）	下一循环
摇杆摆角	停（115.9°）	115.9°~88.8°	下一循环

构态	角度/（°）	μ_Z	σ_Z	β	可靠度	蒙特卡洛
构态Ⅰ	-21	2.581 7	0.519 4	4.970 5	1	1
构态Ⅰ	-20	1.791 8	0.525 6	3.408 8	0.999 7	0.999 6
构态Ⅰ	-19	1.331 4	0.533 7	2.494 7	0.993 7	0.963 3
构态Ⅰ	-18	1.247 4	0.544 0	2.293 0	0.989 1	0.988 6
构态Ⅰ	-17	1.584 6	0.557 0	2.844 9	0.997 8	0.998 1
构态Ⅰ	-16	2.383 2	0.572 9	4.159 9	1	1
切换时刻	-15.2	42.133 6	1.060 6	39.726 2	1	1
构态Ⅱ	-15	132.477 9	3.884 8	34.101 6	1	1

[1]	Qingdi GUAN, Jianhan LIANG, Lin ZHANG, Wenwu CHEN, Yuqiao CHEN. Probability density function method in general curvilinear coordinate system and its application in supersonic combustion [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(4): 126677-126677.
[2]	Fan ZHANG, Zijing SUN, Guosong XIAO, Jiachen LIU, Peng WANG. Reliability analysis for multi-phased mission of HUD system based on intuitionistic fuzzy Bayesian network [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(4): 226853-226853.
[3]	Feng JIANG, Huacong LI, Jiangfeng FU, Linxiong HONG. A RBF and active learning combined method for structural non-probabilistic reliability analysis [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(2): 226667-226667.
[4]	Muchen WU, Jiangtao CHEN, Tangfan XIAHOU, Wei ZHAO, Yu LIU. Separating sensitivity analysis of aleatory and epistemic uncertainties in non-parametric probability-box [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(1): 226658-226658.
[5]	ZHOU Qianli, DENG Yong. Quantum-like probability transformation of belief function [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S1): 726947-726947.
[6]	CHEN Zhiyuan, LI Luyi. Efficient methods for reliability sensitivity analysis of inputs with distribution parameter uncertainty [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(9): 325881-325881.
[7]	XIAHOU Tangfan, CHEN Jiangtao, SHAO Zhidong, WU Xiaojun, LIU Yu. Model validation metrics for CFD numerical simulation under aleatory and epistemic uncertainty [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(8): 25716-025716.
[8]	LI Xiaoyang, TAO Zhao, ZHANG Wei. Reliability modelling for fatigue based on uncertain differential equation [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(8): 225820-225820.
[9]	HE Yong, WANG Hong, LI Jing, QI Yankun. Joint decision making for condition-based maintenance and spare parts ordering of components based on vibration monitoring [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(5): 225304-225304.
[10]	WANG Tianshuai, HE Xiaofan, WANG Jinyu, LI Yuhai. Estimation method for DFR value of DED-TA15 titanium alloy based on bimodal lognormal distribution [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(3): 225013-225013.
[11]	LEI Shiying, SUN Jianzhong, LIU He. Cumulative damage index model and service reliability evaluation of turbine blade [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(3): 225064-225064.
[12]	ZHOU Chen, SHANG Bolin, SONG Bifeng, KE Erqin, WANG Yaozu. Contribution evaluation of aviation armament system-of-systems based on operation loop [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(2): 224958-224958.
[13]	KANG Rui, WANG Zili. Reliability systems engineering: A research review and prospect [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(10): 527505-527505.
[14]	CAI Ruiyan, LIU Yanhong, WEI Debin. k-terminal reliability analysis of satellite network based on QoS guarantee [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(1): 326020-326020.
[15]	HU Zhengwen, ZHANG Baoqiang, DENG Zhenhong. Cross-layer dimension reduction based on probability box global sensitivity analysis and active subspace method [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(9): 224582-224582.

A probabilistic evaluation model for configuration transformation ability of planar constrained metamorphic mechanisms

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 16

References 30

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments