超声速燃烧中的概率密度函数方法研究进展

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2023.28802

Abstract

Abstract:

The probability density function approach can accurately close the turbulent/chemical reaction interaction， and has been widely used in the numerical simulation of turbulent combustion. With the continuous development of the hypersonic propulsion technology， supersonic turbulent combustion in scramjet has brought new challenges to the application of probability density function approach. At first， this paper reviews the latest progress of the application of probability density function approach to supersonic turbulent combustion. The basic theory， key models and solution framework of probability density function approach are summarized. The specific challenges and related research work of the theory， model and numerical solution of the probability density function approach for supersonic turbulent combustion are introduced， including the compressibility effect， high-speed source term model correction， and small-scale hybrid model improvement. Then， the application of probability density function approach in supersonic turbulent combustion is reviewed. Finally， the application prospects and development direction of the probability density function approach in supersonic combustion are discussed.

Key words: probability density function, turbulent combustion, supersonic combustion, scramjet, large eddy simulation

CLC Number:

V231.21

Hongwei QIAO, Jianhan LIANG, Lin ZHANG, Mingbo SUN, Yuqiao CHEN. Research progress of probability density function approach in supersonic combustion[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(8): 28802-028802.

Figures/Tables 16

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Fig.8

Fig.9

Fig.10

Fig.11

Fig.12

Fig.13

Fig.14

Fig.15

Fig.16

References 103

1	SELEZNEV R K， SURZHIKOV S T， SHANG J S. A review of the scramjet experimental data base［J］. Progress in Aerospace Sciences， 2019， 106： 43-70.
2	崔兴达. 超声速气流中低频燃烧振荡问题研究［D］. 长沙：国防科学技术大学， 2014.
	CUI X D. Investigations on low frequency combustion oscillations in supersonic flow［D］.Changsha： National University of Defense Technology， 2014 （in Chinese）.
3	CHEN C P， GAO T Y， LIANG J H. Separation induced low-frequency unsteadiness in a supersonic combustor with single-side expansion［J］. Physics of Fluids， 2019， 31（5）： 056103.
4	赵国焱. 超声速气流中火焰闪回诱发与火焰传播机制研究［D］. 长沙：国防科技大学， 2019.
	ZHAO G Y. On the excitation of flame flashback and flame propagation mechanism in supersonic flow ［D］. Changsha： National University of Defense Technology， 2019 （in Chinese）.
5	FRY R S. A century of ramjet propulsion technology evolution［J］. Journal of Propulsion and Power， 2004， 20（1）： 27-58.
6	BARNES F W， SEGAL C. Cavity-based flameholding for chemically-reacting supersonic flows［J］. Progress in Aerospace Sciences， 2015， 76： 24-41.
7	SLOTNICK J， KHODADOUST A， ALONSO J， et al. CFD Vision 2030 Study： A path to revolutionary computational aerosciences： NASA/CR-2014-218178［R］. Washington， D.C.： NASA， 2014.
8	POTTURI A S， EDWARDS J R. Hybrid large-eddy/Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes simulations of flow through a model scramjet［J］. AIAA Journal， 2014， 52（7）： 1417-1429.
9	MOULE Y， SABELNIKOV V， MURA A. Highly resolved numerical simulation of combustion in supersonic hydrogen-air coflowing jets［J］. Combustion and Flame， 2014， 161（10）： 2647-2668.
10	PIERCE C D， MOIN P. Progress-variable approach for large-eddy simulation of non-premixed turbulent combustion［J］. Journal of Fluid Mechanics， 2004， 504： 73-97.
11	FOX R O. Computational models for turbulent reacting flows［M］. Cambridge： Cambridge University Press， 2003.
12	POPE S B. Small scales， many species and the manifold challenges of turbulent combustion［J］. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute， 2013， 34（1）： 1-31.
13	MENTER F R. Review of the shear-stress transport turbulence model experience from an industrial perspective［J］. International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics， 2009， 23（4）： 305-316.
14	NONOMURA T， FUJII K. Characteristic finite-difference WENO scheme for multicomponent compressible fluid analysis： Overestimated quasi-conservative formulation maintaining equilibriums of velocity， pressure， and temperature［J］. Journal of Computational Physics， 2017， 340： 358-388.
15	HICKEL S， EGERER C P， LARSSON J. Subgrid-scale modeling for implicit large eddy simulation of compressible flows and shock-turbulence interaction［J］. Physics of Fluids， 2014， 26（10）： 106101.
16	HAWORTH D C. Progress in probability density function methods for turbulent reacting flows［J］. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science， 2010， 36（2）： 168-259.
17	杨越，游加平，孙明波. 超声速燃烧数值模拟中的湍流与化学反应相互作用模型［J］. 航空学报， 2015， 36（1）： 261-273.
	YANG Y， YOU J P， SUN M B. Modeling of turbulence-chemistry interactions in numerical simulations of supersonic combustion［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2015， 36（1）： 261-273 （in Chinese）.
18	POPE S B. PDF methods for turbulent reactive flows［J］. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science， 1985， 11（2）： 119-192.
19	HAWORTH D C， TAHRY S H EL. Probability density function approach for multidimensional turbulent flow calculations with application to in-cylinder flows in reciprocating engines［J］. AIAA Journal， 1991， 29： 208-218.
20	ZHANG L， LIANG J H， SUN M B， et al. An energy-consistency-preserving large eddy simulation-scalar filtered mass density function （LES-SFMDF） method for high-speed flows［J］. Combustion Theory and Modelling， 2018， 22（1）： 1-37.
21	YALDIZLI M， MEHRAVARAN K， JABERI F A. Large-eddy simulations of turbulent methane jet flames with filtered mass density function［J］. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer， 2010， 53（11-12）： 2551-2562.
22	GUAN Q D， LIANG J H， SUN M B， et al. Large eddy simulation of supersonic mixing layers using a compressible filtered mass density function method［J］. Aerospace Science and Technology， 2022， 124： 107425.
23	黄立航，朱旻明，叶桃红. 改进密度耦合的稀疏拉格朗日FDF方法模拟Sandia火焰E［J］. 中国科学技术大学学报， 2020， 50（5）： 589-595， 604.
	HUANG L H， ZHU M M， YE T H. Sparse-Lagrangian FDF simulation of Sandia flame E with modified density coupling［J］. Journal of University of Science and Technology of China， 2020， 50（5）： 589-595， 604 （in Chinese）.
24	TANG Q， ZHAO W， BOCKELIE M， et al. Multi-environment probability density function method for modelling turbulent combustion using realistic chemical kinetics［J］. Combustion Theory and Modelling， 2007， 11（6）： 889-907.
25	SCHWARTZENTRUBER T E， BOYD I D. Progress and future prospects for particle-based simulation of hypersonic flow［J］. Progress in Aerospace Sciences， 2015， 72： 66-79.
26	ROWINSKI D H， POPE S B. Computational study of lean premixed turbulent flames using RANSPDF and LESPDF methods［J］. Combustion Theory and Modelling， 2013， 17（4）： 610-656.
27	YANG Y， WANG H F， POPE S B， et al. Large-eddy simulation/probability density function modeling of a non-premixed CO/H₂ temporally evolving jet flame［J］. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute， 2013， 34（1）： 1241-1249.
28	POPE S B. Mapping closures for turbulent mixing and reaction［J］. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics， 1991， 2（5）： 255-270.
29	关清帝. 一般曲线坐标系下拉格朗日PDF方法及其在超声速燃烧中的应用研究［D］. 长沙：国防科技大学， 2022.
	GUAN Q D. A study of the Lagrangian PDF method in a general curvilinear coordinate system and its application to supersonic combustion［D］. Changsha： National University of Defense Technology， 2022 （in Chinese）.
30	范周琴，孙明波，刘卫东. 湍流燃烧的概率密度函数输运方程模型研究［J］. 飞航导弹， 2010（5）： 90-95.
	FAN Z Q， SUN M B， LIU W D. Study on transport equation model of probability density function for turbulent combustion［J］. Aerodynamic Missile Journal， 2010（5）： 90-95 （in Chinese）.
31	刘亚明，柳朝晖，贺铸，等. 湍流被动标量研究的最新进展［J］. 力学进展， 2005， 35（4）： 549-558.
	LIU Y M， LIU Z H， HE Z， et al. Recent progress in statistics of turbulent passive scalar［J］. Advances in Mechanics， 2005， 35（4）： 549-558 （in Chinese）.
32	CELIS C， FIGUEIRA DA SILVA L F. Lagrangian mixing models for turbulent combustion： Review and prospects［J］. Flow， Turbulence and Combustion， 2015， 94（3）： 643-689.
33	任祝寅，解青，杨天威，等. 输运概率密度函数中的小尺度标量混合建模［J］. 空气动力学学报， 2020， 38（3）： 501-514.
	REN Z Y， XIE Q， YANG T W， et al. Micromixing models for transported PDF simulation of turbulent combustion［J］. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica， 2020， 38（3）： 501-514 （in Chinese）.
34	GONZALEZ-JUEZ E D， KERSTEIN A R， RANJAN R， et al. Advances and challenges in modeling high-speed turbulent combustion in propulsion systems［J］. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science， 2017， 60： 26-67.
35	PANT T， JAIN U， WANG H F. Transported PDF modeling of compressible turbulent reactive flows by using the Eulerian Monte Carlo fields method［J］. Journal of Computational Physics， 2021， 425： 109899.
36	GIVI P. Model-free simulations of turbulent reactive flows［J］. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science， 1989， 15（1）： 1-107.
37	BOGER M， VEYNANTE D， BOUGHANEM H， et al. Direct numerical simulation analysis of flame surface density concept for large eddy simulation of turbulent premixed combustion［J］. Symposium （International） on Combustion， 1998， 27（1）： 917-925.
38	COLUCCI P J， JABERI F A， GIVI P， et al. Filtered density function for large eddy simulation of turbulent reacting flows［J］. Physics of Fluids， 1998， 10（2）： 499-515.
39	JABERI F A， COLUCCI P J， JAMES S， et al. Filtered mass density function for large-eddy simulation of turbulent reacting flows［J］. Journal of Fluid Mechanics， 1999， 401： 85-121.
40	BORGHI R. Turbulent combustion modelling［J］. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science， 1988， 14（4）： 245-292.
41	SUBRAMANIAM S， POPE S B. A mixing model for turbulent reactive flows based on Euclidean minimum spanning trees［J］. Combustion and Flame， 1998， 115（4）： 487-514.
42	DOPAZO C. Relaxation of initial probability density functions in the turbulent convection of scalar fields［J］. Physics of Fluids， 1979， 22（1）： 20-30.
43	DEVAUD C B， STANKOVIĆ I， MERCI B. Deterministic Multiple Mapping Conditioning （MMC） applied to a turbulent flame in Large Eddy Simulation （LES）［J］. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute， 2013， 34（1）： 1213-1221.
44	WANDEL A P， LINDSTEDT R P. Hybrid multiple mapping conditioning modeling of local extinction［J］. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute， 2013， 34（1）： 1365-1372.
45	MEYER D W， JENNY P. A mixing model for turbulent flows based on parameterized scalar profiles［J］. Physics of Fluids， 2006， 18（3）： 35105.
46	MEYER D W. A new particle interaction mixing model for turbulent dispersion and turbulent reactive flows［J］. Physics of Fluids， 2010， 22（3）： 35103.
47	CAI J， WANG D H， TONG C N， et al. Investigation of subgrid-scale mixing of mixture fraction and temperature in turbulent partially premixed flames［J］. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute， 2009， 32（1）： 1517-1525.
48	WANG D H， TONG C N， BARLOW R S， et al. Experimental study of scalar filtered mass density function in turbulent partially premixed flames［J］. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute， 2007， 31（1）： 1533-1541.
49	YU C K， BYKOV V， MAAS U. Coupling of simplified chemistry with mixing processes in PDF simulations of turbulent flames［J］. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute， 2019， 37（2）： 2183-2190.
50	BYKOV V， GOL’DSHTEIN V， MAAS U. Simple global reduction technique based on decomposition approach［J］. Combustion Theory and Modelling， 2008， 12（2）： 389-405.
51	周华. 湍流预混燃烧的输运概率密度函数模拟研究［D］. 北京：清华大学， 2017.
	ZHOU H. Transported probability density function simulations of turbulent premixed flames［D］.Beijing： Tsinghua University， 2017 （in Chinese）.
52	BANAEIZADEH A， AFSHARI A， SCHOCK H， et al. Large-eddy simulations of turbulent flows in internal combustion engines［J］. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer， 2013， 60： 781-796.
53	ESMAEILI M， AFSHARI A， JABERI F A. Turbulent mixing in non-isothermal jet in crossflow［J］. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer， 2015， 89： 1239-1257.
54	WANG H F， POPE S B. Large eddy simulation/probability density function modeling of a turbulent CH₄/H₂/N₂ jet flame［J］. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute， 2011， 33（1）： 1319-1330.
55	KOMPERDA J， GHIASI Z， LI D R， et al. A hybrid discontinuous spectral element method and filtered mass density function solver for turbulent reacting flows［J］. Numerical Heat Transfer， Part B： Fundamentals， 2020， 78（1）： 1-29.
56	TANG Q， XU J， POPE S B. Probability density function calculations of local extinction and no production in piloted-jet turbulent methane/air flames［J］. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute， 2000， 28（1）： 133-139.
57	SHEIKHI M R H， GIVI P， POPE S B. Velocity-scalar filtered mass density function for large eddy simulation of turbulent reacting flows［J］. Physics of Fluids， 2007， 19（9）： 95106.
58	LINDSTEDT R P， LOULOUDI S A， VÁOS E M. Joint scalar probability density function modeling of pollutant formation in piloted turbulent jet diffusion flames with comprehensive chemistry［J］. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute， 2000， 28（1）： 149-156.
59	王海峰，陈义良，刘明侯. 湍流扩散燃烧的数值研究—PDF方法和火焰面模型的性能比较［J］. 工程热物理学报， 2005， 26（S1）： 241-244.
	WANG H F， CHEN Y L， LIU M H. Numerical investigation of turbulent nonpremixed combustion： Performance of PDF method and flamelet models ［J］. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics， 2005， 26（S1）： 241-244 （in Chinese）.
60	黄庆，朱旻明，叶桃红，等. PDF方法模拟钝体驻定的湍流扩散火焰［J］. 计算物理， 2008， 25（6）： 733-743.
	HUANG Q， ZHU M M， YE T H， et al. PDF simulation of bluff-body stabilized turbulent non-premixed flame［J］. Chinese Journal of Computational Physics， 2008， 25（6）： 733-743 （in Chinese）.
61	SHARMA E， DE S， CLEARY M J. LES of a lifted methanol spray flame series using the sparse Lagrangian MMC approach［J］. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute， 2021， 38（2）： 3399-3407.
62	CARRARA M D， DESJARDIN P E. A filtered mass density function approach for modeling separated two-phase flows for LES I： Mathematical formulation［J］. International Journal of Multiphase Flow， 2006， 32（3）： 365-384.
63	LI Z， BANAEIZADEH A， JABERI F A. Two-phase filtered mass density function for LES of turbulent reacting flows［J］. Journal of Fluid Mechanics， 2014， 760： 243-277.
64	GERLINGER P. Lagrangian transported MDF methods for compressible high speed flows［J］. Journal of Computational Physics， 2017， 339： 68-95.
65	TURKERI H， ZHAO X Y， MURADOGLU M. Large eddy simulation/probability density function modeling of turbulent swirling stratified flame series［J］. Physics of Fluids， 2021， 33（2）： 025117.
66	VALIDI A， SCHOCK H， JABERI F. Turbulent jet ignition assisted combustion in a rapid compression machine［J］. Combustion and Flame， 2017， 186： 65-82.
67	MURADOGLU M， LIU K， POPE S B. PDF modeling of a bluff-body stabilized turbulent flame［J］. Combustion and Flame， 2003， 132（1-2）： 115-137.
68	WANG L P， HAWKES E R， CHEN J H. Flame edge statistics in turbulent combustion［J］. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute， 2011， 33（1）： 1439-1446.
69	TIRUNAGARI R R， POPE S B. LES/PDF for premixed combustion in the DNS limit［J］. Combustion Theory and Modelling， 2016， 20（5）： 834-865.
70	TIRUNAGARI R R， POPE S B. Characterization of extinction/reignition events in turbulent premixed counterflow flames using strain-rate analysis［J］. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute， 2017， 36（2）： 1919-1927.
71	STEINBERG A M， HAMLINGTON P E， ZHAO X Y. Structure and dynamics of highly turbulent premixed combustion［J］. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science， 2021， 85： 100900.
72	DRISCOLL J F， CHEN J H， SKIBA A W， et al. Premixed flames subjected to extreme turbulence： Some questions and recent answers［J］. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science， 2020， 76： 100802.
73	LIU Q L， BACCARELLA D， LEE T H. Review of combustion stabilization for hypersonic airbreathing propulsion［J］. Progress in Aerospace Sciences， 2020， 119： 100636.
74	ZEMAN O. On the decay of compressible isotropic turbulence［J］. Physics of Fluids A： Fluid Dynamics， 1991， 3（5）： 951-955.
75	DELARUE B J， POPE S B. Calculations of subsonic and supersonic turbulent reacting mixing layers using probability density function methods［J］. Physics of Fluids， 1998， 10（2）： 487-498.
76	MÖBUS H， GERLINGER P， BRÜGGEMANN D. Scalar and joint scalar-velocity-frequency Monte Carlo PDF simulation of supersonic combustion［J］. Combustion and Flame， 2003， 132（1-2）： 3-24.
77	HSU A T， TSAI Y L P， RAJU M S. Probability density function approach for compressible turbulent reacting flows［J］. AIAA Journal， 1994， 32（7）： 1407-1415.
78	BANAEIZADEH A， LI Z R， JABERI F A. Compressible scalar filtered mass density function model for high-speed turbulent flows［J］. AIAA Journal， 2011， 49（10）： 2130-2143.
79	NIK M， GIVI P， MADNIA C， et al. EPVS-FMDF for LES of high-speed turbulent flows［C］∥ Proceedings of the 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition. Reston： AIAA， 2012.
80	陈志辉，徐旭. 用简化PDF方法分析温度脉动在超声速湍流燃烧中的作用［J］. 燃烧科学与技术， 2008， 14（5）： 468-473.
	CHEN Z H， XU X. Examine the effect of temperature fluctuation on supersonic combustion by assumed PDF approach［J］. Journal of Combustion Science and Technology， 2008， 14（5）： 468-473 （in Chinese）.
81	KOO H， DONDE P， RAMAN V. LES-based Eulerian PDF approach for the simulation of scramjet combustors［J］. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute， 2013， 34（2）： 2093-2100.
82	DONDE P， KOO H， RAMAN V. A multivariate quadrature based moment method for LES based modeling of supersonic combustion［J］. Journal of Computational Physics， 2012， 231（17）： 5805-5821.
83	IRANNEJAD A， BANAEIZADEH A， JABERI F. Large eddy simulation of turbulent spray combustion［J］. Combustion and Flame， 2015， 162（2）： 431-450.
84	ANSARI N， STRAKEY P A， GOLDIN G M， et al. Filtered density function simulation of a realistic swirled combustor［J］. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute， 2015， 35（2）： 1433-1442.
85	DE ALMEIDA Y P， NAVARRO-MARTINEZ S. Large Eddy Simulation of a supersonic lifted flame using the Eulerian stochastic fields method［J］. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute， 2019， 37（3）： 3693-3701.
86	DE ALMEIDA Y P， NAVARRO-MARTINEZ S. Large eddy simulation of supersonic combustion using the Eulerian stochastic fields method［J］. Flow， Turbulence and Combustion， 2019， 103（4）： 943-962.
87	张林. 高速湍流燃烧LES-TPDF方法及其应用研究［D］. 长沙：国防科技大学， 2018.
	ZHANG L. LES-TPDF methods and their applications for high-speed turbulent combustion［D］.Changsha： National University of Defense Technology， 2018 （in Chinese）.
88	BELJADID A， LEFLOCH P G， MISHRA S， et al. Schemes with well-controlled dissipation. Hyperbolic systems in nonconservative form［J］. Communications in Computational Physics， 2017， 21（4）： 913-946.
89	ZHANG L， LIANG J H， SUN M B， et al. A conservative and consistent scalar filtered mass density function method for supersonic flows［J］. Physics of Fluids， 2021， 33（2）： 26101.
90	DE ALMEIDA Y P， NAVARRO-MARTINEZ S. Joint-velocity scalar energy probability density function method for large eddy simulations of compressible flow［J］. Physics of Fluids， 2021， 33（3）： 35155.
91	CAO R R， WANG H F， POPE S B. The effect of mixing models in PDF calculations of piloted jet flames［J］. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute， 2007， 31（1）： 1543-1550.
92	CHEN W W， LIANG J H， ZHANG L， et al. A numerical investigation of mixing models in LES-FMDF for compressible reactive flows［J］. Energies， 2021， 14（16）： 5180.
93	WANG H F， PANT T， ZHANG P. LES/PDF modeling of turbulent premixed flames with locally enhanced mixing by reaction［J］. Flow， Turbulence and Combustion， 2018， 100（1）： 147-175.
94	关清帝，梁剑寒，张林，等. 一般曲线坐标系下概率密度函数方法及其在超声速燃烧中的应用［J］. 航空学报， 2023， 44（4）： 126677.
	GUAN Q D， LIANG J H， ZHANG L， et al. Probability density function method in general curvilinear coordinate system and its application in supersonic combustion［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2023， 44（4）： 126677 （in Chinese）.
95	INKARBEKOV M， AITZHAN A， KALTAYEV A， et al. A GPU-accelerated filtered density function simulator of turbulent reacting flows［J］. International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics， 2020， 34（6）： 381-396.
96	HUANG W， DU Z B， YAN L， et al. Flame propagation and stabilization in dual-mode scramjet combustors： A survey［J］. Progress in Aerospace Sciences， 2018， 101： 13-30.
97	赵国焱，孙明波，吴锦水. 基于不同PDF的超声速扩散燃烧火焰面模型对比［J］. 推进技术， 2015， 36（2）： 232-237.
	ZHAO G Y， SUN M B， WU J S. Comparison of supersonic diffusion combustion flamelet model based on different PDF［J］. Journal of Propulsion Technology， 2015， 36（2）： 232-237 （in Chinese）.
98	丁海昕，钟诚文. 不同PDF模型在超燃冲压发动机数值模拟中的应用［J］. 航空工程进展， 2019， 10（5）： 698-706.
	DING H X， ZHONG C W. Application of different PDF models for numerical simulation of scramjet［J］. Advances in Aeronautical Science and Engineering， 2019， 10（5）： 698-706 （in Chinese）.
99	IRANNEJAD A， JABERI F A， KOMPERDA J， et al. Large eddy simulation of supersonic turbulent combustion with FMDF［C］∥ Proceedings of the 52nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting. Reston： AIAA， 2014.
100	KOMPERDA J， GHIASI Z， LI D R， et al. Simulation of the cold flow in a ramp-cavity combustor using a DSEM-LES/FMDF hybrid scheme［C］∥ Proceedings of the 54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting. Reston： AIAA， 2016.
101	王方，王煜栋，姜胜利，等. AECSC-JASMIN湍流燃烧仿真软件研发和检验［J］. 航空学报， 2021， 42（12）： 625003.
	WANG F， WANG Y D， JIANG S L， et al. Development and testing of AECSC-JASMIN turbulent combustion simulation software［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2021， 42（12）： 625003 （in Chinese）.
102	王方，窦力，魏观溢，等. 基于PDF-LES模型的凹腔支板火焰稳定器模拟［J］. 工程热物理学报， 2021， 42（3）： 758-767.
	WANG F， DOU L， WEI G Y， et al. The simulation of cavity flameholder by PDF-LES method［J］. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics， 2021， 42（3）： 758-767 （in Chinese）.
103	GIVI P. Filtered density function for subgrid scale modeling of turbulent combustion［J］. AIAA Journal， 2006， 44（1）： 16-23.

[1]	Xiaoyong LIU, Mingfu WANG, Jianwen LIU, Xin REN, Xuan ZHANG. Review and prospect of research on scramjet [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(5): 529878-529878.
[2]	Bing WAN, Jun CHEN, Hanchen BAI. Full flow path performance design method for wide range scramjet based on equivalent thermodynamic process [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(4): 128757-128757.
[3]	Jianheng JI, Zun CAI, Taiyu WANG, Mingbo SUN, Zhenguo WANG. Flow and combustion process for wide speed range scramjet: Review [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(3): 28696-028696.
[4]	Yuming ZHANG, Yuting DAI, Guangjing HUANG, Chao YANG, Shujie JIANG. Gust alleviation and aeroacoustic characteristics of flexible morphing trailing edge airfoil [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(10): 129219-129219.
[5]	Xiang ZHAO, Zhixun XIA, Chuanbo FANG, Likun MA, Chaolong LI, Yifan DUAN. Theoretical analysis of performance of solid rocket scramjet [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(5): 126971-126971.
[6]	Qingdi GUAN, Jianhan LIANG, Lin ZHANG, Wenwu CHEN, Yuqiao CHEN. Probability density function method in general curvilinear coordinate system and its application in supersonic combustion [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(4): 126677-126677.
[7]	Jiahui SONG, Aiguo XU, Long MIAO, Yugan LIAO, Fuwen LIANG, Feng TIAN, Mingqing NIE, Ningfei WANG. Entropy increase characteristics of shock wave/plate laminar boundary layer interaction [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(21): 528520-528520.
[8]	Fangcheng SHI, Zhenxun GAO, Yuyan TIAN, Chongwen JIANG, Tiantian WANG, Chun-Hian LEE. Large eddy simulation of ideally expanded supersonic jet noise [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(2): 626266-626266.
[9]	Mingbo SUN, Jiajian ZHU, Tiangang LUO, Qinyuan LI, Yifu TIAN, Minggang WAN, Yongchao SUN. Research progress of unsteady supersonic combustion controlled by electric excitation technology [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(15): 528787-528787.
[10]	Zhixun XIA, Yunchao FENG, Likun MA, Binbin CHEN, Chaolong LI, Pengnian YANG, Yandong LIU, Ying QU, Kangchun ZHAO, Libei ZHAO, Penghao REN. Research progress of solid rocket scramjet combustion technology [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(15): 528793-528793.
[11]	Ying ZHANG, Xiaoying LI, Jianan YIN, Xiaotong ZHOU. Flexible control of aircraft departure pushback time based on probabilistic taxiing time [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(10): 327452-327452.
[12]	Binbin ZHAO, Heng ZHANG, Jie LI. Review of numerical simulation on complex separated flow of iced airfoil [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(1): 627211-627211.
[13]	ZHANG Junduo, ZUO Qinghai, LIN Mengda, HUANG Weixi, PAN Weijun, CUI Guixiang. Numerical simulation on near-field evolution of wake vortices of ARJ21 plane with crosswind [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(5): 125043-125043.
[14]	LI Chaolong, XIA Zhixun, MA Likun, ZHAO Xiang, LUO Zhenbing, DUAN Yifan. Experiment on performance of solid rocket scramjet [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(12): 126075-126075.
[15]	MA Guangwei, SUN Mingbo, ZHAO Guoyan, LI Fan, LIANG Changhai, CHEN Huifeng. Simulation of scramjet with different wall temperatures and difference schemes [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(S1): 726353-726353.

Research progress of probability density function approach in supersonic combustion

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 16

References 103

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments