基于GA⁃SVR的薄壁叶片辅助支撑布局优化方法

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2021.26805

Abstract

Abstract:

As a typical thin-walled workpiece with complex curved surface， the blade is prone to deflection， that is， elastic deformation， which seriously affects the machining accuracy of the blade. As to this problem， a four degree-of-freedom rotary auxiliary support mechanism is designed to increase the machining rigidity of the blade， and a layout optimization method of auxiliary support for thin-wall blade based on GA is proposed. Firstly， a finite element simulation model for blade milling is established considering material removal and the coupling effect between milling force and elastic deformation. Secondly， the layout scheme of auxiliary support is taken as design variable， the largest value and standard deviation of overall machining elastic deformation are taken as the quality evaluation index of the layout. The sample set is constructed by Latin hypercube design and finite element simulation model. The surrogate forecast model is trained with Support Vector machine Regression （SVR）. Then， elite strategy Genetic Algorithm （GA） is used to optimize the auxiliary support layout of thin-walled blade. Finally， the milling and CMM experiments of thin-walled blade are carried out， and the results show that the optimal auxiliary support layout scheme can suppress the blade elastic deformation by 57.6%.

Key words: thin-walled blade, elastic deformation, deformation prediction and control, SVR surrogate model, support layout optimization

CLC Number:

V261.2

Zhiyang ZHENG, Yang ZHANG, Zhao ZHANG, Baohai WU, Ying ZHANG. Layout optimization of auxiliary support for thin-walled blade based on GA-SVR[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(4): 426805-426805.

Figures/Tables 26

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Table 1

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

Table 2

Layout scheme sampling data set of blade concave

布局方案编号	$u i 1$	$u i 2$	$v i$	$Δ m a x$ /mm	$Δ s d$ /mm
1	0.415	0.583	0.876	0.163 8	0.038 9
︙	︙	︙	︙	︙	︙
10	0.327	0.523	0.981	0.178 9	0.042 3
11	0.523	0.555	0.177	0.128 4	0.028 0
12	0.975	0.306	0.463	0.068 6	0.012 7
︙	︙	︙	︙	︙	︙
100	0.443	0.992	0.900	0.168 4	0.040 1

Table 2

Fig. 9

Table 3

Table 4

Fig. 10

Fig. 11

Fig. 12

Fig. 13

Fig. 14

Table 5

Fig. 15

Table 6

Fig. 16

Fig. 17

Fig. 18

Fig. 19

Table 7

References 26

1	TAO W， CAO Y L， YANG J X. Analysis of the influence of blade’s machining error on aerodynamic performance of impeller based on NUMECA［J］. Procedia CIRP， 2015， 27： 155-162.
2	曹玉杰. 复杂曲面薄壁件五轴加工变形预测技术研究［D］. 大连：大连理工大学， 2014： 40-46.
	CAO Y J. Research on deformation prediction of five-axis machining thin-walled complex surface［D］. Dalian： Dalian University of Technology， 2014： 40-46 （in Chinese）.
3	黄泽华，李建勇，樊文刚，等. 复杂曲面薄壁叶片点铣加工弹性变形预测［J］. 西安交通大学学报， 2012， 46（5）： 67-72.
	HUANG Z H， LI J Y， FAN W G， et al. Deformation prediction of thin-walled vane with complex surface in ball end milling［J］. Journal of Xi’an Jiaotong University， 2012， 46（5）： 67-72 （in Chinese）.
4	蔡永林，林立，黄泽华. 薄壁叶片加工误差分析与预测［J］. 北京交通大学学报， 2012， 36（1）： 104-107.
	CAI Y L， LIN L， HUANG Z H. Error analysis and prediction of manufacturing for thin-walled blade［J］. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University， 2012， 36（1）： 104-107 （in Chinese）.
5	LI Z L， TUYSUZ O， ZHU L M， et al. Surface form error prediction in five-axis flank milling of thin-walled parts［J］. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture， 2018， 128： 21-32.
6	HOU Y H， ZHANG D H， MEI J W， et al. Geometric modelling of thin-walled blade based on compensation method of machining error and design intent［J］. Journal of Manufacturing Processes， 2019， 44： 327-336
7	ALTINTAS Y， TUYSUZ O， HABIBI M， et al. Virtual compensation of deflection errors in ball end milling of flexible blades［J］. CIRP Annals， 2018， 67： 365-368
8	HUANG T， ZHANG X M， DING H. Tool orientation optimization for reduction of vibration and deformation in ball-end milling of thin-walled impeller blades［J］. Procedia CIRP， 2017， 58： 210-215
9	WAN X J， ZHANG Y. A novel approach to fixture layout optimization on maximizing dynamic machinability［J］. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture， 2013， 70： 32-44.
10	DOU J P， WANG X S， WANG L. Machining fixture layout optimization under dynamic conditions based on evolutionary techniques［J］. International Journal of Production Research， 2012， 50： 4294-4315.
11	王仲奇，李诚，杨勃，等. 基于花授粉算法的曲面薄壁件定位布局优化［J］. 中国机械工程， 2017， 28（18）： 2231-2236.
	WANG Z Q， LI C， YANG B， et al. Fixture locating layout optimization of curved thin-walled parts based on FDA［J］. China Mechanical Engineering， 2017， 28（18）： 2231-2236 （in Chinese）.
12	XING Y F. Fixture layout design of sheet metal parts based on global optimization algorithms［J］. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering， 2017， 139（10）： 101004.
13	LI X N， ZHAO Z H. Location layout design of aircraft parts assembly based on MSVR［J］. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics， 2020， 33（5）： 1532-1540.
14	秦国华，赵旭亮，吴竹溪. 基于神经网络与遗传算法的薄壁件多重装夹布局优化［J］. 机械工程学报， 2015， 51（1）： 203-212.
	QIN G H， ZHAO X L， WU Z X. Optimization of multi-fixturing layout for thin-walled workpiece based on neural network and genetic algorithm［J］. Journal of Mechanical Engineering， 2015， 51（1）： 203-212 （in Chinese）.
15	WANG Z Q， YANG B， KANG Y G， et al. Development of a prediction model based on RBF neural network for sheet metal fixture locating layout design and optimization［J］. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience， 2016， 1687： 5265-5273.
16	杨元，王仲奇，杨勃，等. 基于SVR的航空薄壁件夹具布局优化预测模型［J］. 计算机集成制造系统， 2017， 23（6）： 1302-1309.
	YANG Y， WANG Z Q， YANG B， et al. Prediction model for aeronautical thin-walled part fixture layout optimization based on SVR［J］. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems， 2017， 23（6）： 1302-1309 （in Chinese）.
17	YANG B， WANG Z Q， YANG Y， et al. Optimum fixture locating layout for sheet metal part by integrating kriging with cuckoo search algorithm［J］. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology， 2017， 91（1-4）： 327-340.
18	MA J J， ZHANG D H， WU B H， et al. Vibration suppression of thin-walled workpiece machining considering external damping properties based on magnetorheological fluids flexible fixture［J］. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics， 2016， 29（4）： 1074-1083.
19	FEI J X， LIN B， YAN S， et al. Chatter mitigation using moving damper［J］. Journal of Sound & Vibration， 2017， 410： 49-63.
20	LIU C， SUN J， LI Y， et al. Investigation on the milling performance of titanium alloy thin-walled part with air jet assistance［J］. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology， 2018， 95： 2865-2874.
21	WU D， WANG H， PENG J， et al. Machining fixture for adaptive CNC machining process of near-net-shaped jet engine blade［J］. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics， 2019， 33（4）： 1311-1328.
22	WANG H， HUANG L， YAO C， et al. Integrated analysis method of thin-walled turbine blade precise machining［J］. International Journal of Precision Engineering & Manufacturing， 2015， 16： 1011-1019.
23	ZENG S S， WAN X J， LI W L， et al. A novel approach to fixture design on suppressing machining vibration of flexible workpiece［J］. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture， 2012， 58： 29-43.
24	荆怀靖. 面向离线误差补偿的虚拟加工技术研究［D］. 哈尔滨：哈尔滨工业大学， 2005： 80-81.
	JING H J. Research on virtual machining technology for off-line error compensation［D］. Harbin： Harbin Institute of Technology， 2005： 80-81 （in Chinese）.
25	WU B H， ZHENG Z Y， WANG J， et al. Layout optimization of auxiliary support for deflection errors suppression in end milling of flexible blade［J］. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology， 2021， 115（5-6）： 1889-1905.
26	周志华. 机器学习［M］. 北京：清华大学出版社， 2016： 133-136.
	ZHOU Z H. Machine learning［M］. Beijing： Tsinghua University Press， 2016： 133-136 （in Chinese）.

节点编号	x	y	z	i	j	k	u	v	φ
877 7	285.00	96.24	5.28	0	0.02	1.00	0	0	1.43
︙	︙	︙	︙	︙	︙	︙	︙	︙	︙
881 5	285.00	53.54	9.72	0	0.18	0.98	0.47	0	10.22
881 7	285.00	51.32	10.13	0	0.19	0.98	0.50	0	10.68
881 9	285.00	49.10	10.56	0	0.19	0.98	0.52	0	11.13
︙	︙	︙	︙	︙	︙	︙	︙	︙	︙
885 7	285.00	7.71	21.97	0	0.22	0.98	1.00	0	12.48

刀具类型	硬质合金球头刀（直径：12 mm，齿数：4）
切削深度/mm	0.3
切削宽度/mm	0.5
切削速度/（m·min^-1）	80
每齿进给/（mm·z^-1）	0.08

曲线参数	最小预测误差/%	最大预测误差/%	平均预测误差/%
v=0.15	1.3	12.6	6.6
v=0.50	1.4	17.8	10.8
u=0.90	6.6	23.1	17.6

曲线参数	最小预测误差/%	最大预测误差/%	平均预测误差/%	平均抑制效果/%
v=0.05	5.6	24.2	17.1	24.2
v=0.10	2.5	33.4	15.2	34.8
v=0.15	3.0	23.1	10.8	49.1
v=0.20	6.4	37.5	16.7	51.1
v=0.25	4.6	38.9	18.2	57.6

[1]	CAI Jin, YAN Xue, LI Wei, MENG Qingxun. Numerical analysis of ultrasonic shot peening based on DEM-FEM coupling [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(4): 525925-525925.
[2]	GUO Qiuting, SUN Yan, GUO Zheng, LIU Guangyuan. Separation method for Reynolds number/static aeroelastic coupling effect in wind tunnel test [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 526312-526312.
[3]	WANG Yuntao, SUN Yan, MENG Dehong, ZHANG Shujun, YANG Xiaochuan. Numerical simulation of aerodynamic characteristics of CRM-WB configuration with support system and wing deformation [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2017, 38(10): 121202-121202.
[4]	Zhu Xi-xiong;Zhu Guo-rui;Huang Xu-sheng;Cheng Jiang-ying. THE NON-LINEAR THERMOVISCOELASTIC-PLASTIC CONSTITUTIVE RELATIONS FOR AN AERONAUTICAL PMMA [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 1992, 13(11): 594-601.

Layout optimization of auxiliary support for thin-walled blade based on GA-SVR

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 26

References 26

Related Articles 4

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments