矩独立重要性分析的Kriging代理模型方法

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2015.0248

Abstract

Abstract:

Structural importance analysis is one of the research focuses on the fields of structural uncertainty analysis. As a kind of moment-independent importance measure index, the failure probability-based importance measure attracts attention of the researchers for the reason of that it can be used to effectively reflect the influence of the input uncertainties on the failure probability. However, compared with other kinds of importance measure indices, there are still some difficulties to accurately and efficiently estimate the failure probability-based moment-independent importance measure. In this context, a highly efficient method for moment-independent importance analysis is proposed. The proposed method firstly constructs a Kriging surrogate model with a slight number of experimental design samples to fully approximate the actual input-output response function. Then, the numerical simulation strategy is adopted to carry out the importance measure analysis of the constructed Kriging model. Finally, the main effect and total effect indices of the failure probability-based importance measure for each input variables can be obtained, the effect ranking order of each input variables on the failure probability can be provided as well. Compared with the existing methods, because of the introduction of Kriging surrogate model, the calculating times of the actual response function are greatly decreased and the computing accuracy is guaranteed as well. The application results of two engineering examples illustrate the superiorities of the proposed method in the aspect of calculating efficiency and accuracy, and indicate its excellent applicability.

Key words: importance measure, global sensitivity, moment-independent, Kriging model, surrogate model

CLC Number:

V19
TB114.3

ZHAO Hailong, YUE Zhufeng, LIU Wei. A Kriging surrogate model method for moment-independent importance analysis[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2016, 37(7): 2234-2241.

References

[1] ZIO E. Reliability engineering:Old problems and new challenges[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2009, 94(2):125-141.
[2] CASTILLO E, MINGUEZ R, CASTILLO C. Sensitivity analysis in optimization and reliability problems[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2008, 93(12):1788-1800.
[3] LU Z, SONG J, SONG S, et al. Reliability sensitivity by method of moments[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2010, 34(10):2860-2871.
[4] LU Z, ZHOU C, SONG Z, et al. Subset simulation-based method for cumulative distribution function sensitivity of output response in random environment[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C:Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 2012, 226(11):2770-2790.
[5] SALETLLI A. Sensitivity analysis for importance assessment[J]. Risk Analysis, 2002, 22(3):3-18.
[6] MCKAY M D. Nonparametric variance-based methods of assessing uncertainty importance[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 1997, 57(3):267-279.
[7] SOBOL I M. Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates[J]. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 2001, 55(1):271-280.
[8] SALTELLI A. Making best use of model evaluations to compute sensitivity indices[J]. Computer Physics Communications, 2002, 145(2):280-297.
[9] CUI L, LU Z, ZHAO X. Moment-independent importance measure of basic random variable and its probability density evolution solution[J]. Science China Technological Sciences, 2010, 53(4):1138-1145.
[10] LI L, LU Z, FENG J, et al. Moment-independent importance measure of basic variable and its state dependent parameter solution[J]. Structural Safety, 2012, 38:40-47.
[11] BORGONOVO E. A new uncertainty importance measure[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2007, 92(6):771-784.
[12] WEI P, LU Z, YUAN X. Monte Carlo simulation for moment-independent sensitivity analysis[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2013, 110:60-67.
[13] WEI P, LU Z, HAO W, et al. Efficient sampling methods for global reliability sensitivity analysis[J]. Computer Physics Communications, 2012, 183(8):1728-1743.
[14] KLEIJNEN J P C. Kriging metamodeling in simulation:A review[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2009, 192(3):707-716.
[15] KAYMAZ I. Application of Kriging method to structural reliability problems[J]. Structural Safety, 2005, 27(2):133-151.
[16] ECHARD B, GAYTON N, LEMAIRE M. AK-MCS:An active learning reliability method combining Kriging and Monte Carlo simulation[J]. Structural Safety, 2011, 33(2):145-154.
[17] ZHAO H, YUE Z, LIU Y, et al. An efficient reliability method combining adaptive importance sampling and Kriging metamodel[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2015, 39(7):1853-1866.
[18] JIN R, CHEN W, SUDJIANTO A. An efficient algorithm for constructing optimal design of computer experiments[J]. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 2005, 134(1):268-287.
[19] 张磊刚, 吕震宙, 陈军. 基于失效概率的矩独立重要性测度的高效算法[J]. 航空学报, 2014, 35(8):2199-2206. ZHANG L G, LU Z Z, CHEN J. An efficient method for failure probability-based moment-independent importance measure[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2014, 35(8):2199-2206(in Chinese).
[20] 罗阳军, 高宗战, 岳珠峰, 等. 随机-有界混合不确定性下结构可靠性优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2011, 32(6):1058-1066. LUO Y J, GAO Z Z, YUE Z F, et al. Reliability-based optimization design for structures with stochastic and bounded parameter uncertainties[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2011, 32(6):1058-1066(in Chinese).

A Kriging surrogate model method for moment-independent importance analysis

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Qian YANG, Xiaofeng GUO, Qin LI, Wei DONG. Hot air anti-icing performance estimation method based on POD and surrogate model [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(1): 626992-626992.
[2]	Junjie NIU, Weimin SANG, Dong LI, Lian HAO, Zelin WANG. Icing test flight area determination method based on surrogated model of water droplet collection [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(1): 627697-627697.
[3]	Qilei GUO, Weimin SANG, Junjie NIU, Ye YUAN. UAV flight strategy considering icing risk under complex meteorological conditions [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(1): 627518-627518.
[4]	LI Haiquan, CHEN Xiaoqian, ZUO Linxuan, ZHAO Zhuolin. Surrogate model for flight load analysis based on random forest [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(3): 225640-225640.
[5]	HU Zhengwen, ZHANG Baoqiang, DENG Zhenhong. Cross-layer dimension reduction based on probability box global sensitivity analysis and active subspace method [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(9): 224582-224582.
[6]	YE Nianhui, LONG Teng, WU Yufei, TANG Yifan, SHI Renhe. Kriging-assisted constrained differential evolution algorithm [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(6): 324580-324580.
[7]	HU Weijie, HUANG Zenghui, LIU Xuejun, LYU Hongqiang. Missile aerodynamic performance prediction of Gaussian process through automatic kernel construction [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(4): 524093-524093.
[8]	FAN Zhouwei, YU Xiongqing, WANG Chao, ZHONG Bowen. Sensitivity analysis of key design parameters of commercial aircraft using deep neural network [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(4): 524353-524353.
[9]	JIA Beixi, LYU Zhenzhou, LEI Jingyu. Parameterized simulation platform of turbine cooling film blade life reliability analysis [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(12): 224747-224747.
[10]	PENG Zhenrui, CAO Mingming, LIU Mandong. Model updating method based on wavelet decomposition of acceleration frequency response function [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(7): 223548-223548.
[11]	LI Chunna, ZHANG Yangkang. An efficient adaptive global optimization method suitable for aerodynamic optimization [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(5): 623352-623352.
[12]	HAN Zhonghua, XU Chenzhou, QIAO Jianling, LIU Fei, CHI Jiangbo, MENG Guanyu, ZHANG Keshi, SONG Wenping. Recent progress of efficient global aerodynamic shape optimization using surrogate-based approach [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(5): 623344-623344.
[13]	WEI Chuang, YANG Long, LI Chunpeng, ZHANG Tiejun. Research progress and application of ARI_OPT software for aerodynamic shape optimization [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(5): 623370-623370.
[14]	GUO Jiahao, ZHOU Zhou, FAN Zhongyun. A quick design method of propeller coupled with CFD correction [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(2): 123216-123216.
[15]	ZHANG Wei, GAO Zhenghong, ZHOU Lin, XIA Lu. Adaptive parameterization method for surrogate-based global optimization [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(10): 123815-123815.