基于POD和代理模型的热气防冰性能预测方法

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2022.26992

Abstract

Abstract:

Most large civil aircraft use hot air anti-icing systems as anti-icing strategies for airfoils and nacelles. A novel estimation method for hot air anti-icing system performance based on Proper Orthogonal Decomposition （POD） and surrogate models is proposed to shorten the design cycle of hot air anti-icing system. POD is adopted for data compression and characteristics extraction for the anti-icing performance snapshot matrix obtained by numerical calculation， and a lower-dimensional approximation for the snapshot matrix is derived from the projection subspace consisting of a set of basis modes. Support vector regression method is used to construct the surrogate models between the fitting coefficients of basis modes and the piccolo tube geometric parameters. The validation of the estimation method on a three-dimensional slat piccolo tube hot air anti-icing system shows that this method has a good surface temperature prediction and can accurately predict the runback water distribution within the droplet impingement area. The time consumption of the established estimation method reduces significantly compared to the numerical simulation method， which is of great significance for the hot air anti-icing system optimal design.

Key words: hot air anti-icing, performance estimation, proper orthogonal decomposition, surrogate model, support vector regression

CLC Number:

V221⁺.92

Qian YANG, Xiaofeng GUO, Qin LI, Wei DONG. Hot air anti-icing performance estimation method based on POD and surrogate model[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(1): 626992.

Figures/Tables 18

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Table 1

Range of hot air anti-icing geometric parameters

Parameter	Range
L/mm	［20， 40］
$x p i c$ /mm	［5， 20］
$y p i c$ /mm	［-10， 10］
$θ 0$ /（°）	［-20， 20］
$θ 1$ /（°）	［0， 45］

Table 1

Table 2

Training samples

No.	L/mm	$x p i c$ /mm	$y p i c$ /mm	$θ 0$ /（°）	$θ 1$ /（°）
1	31.49	17.99	-5.23	2.78	13.52
2	37.95	6.21	5.95	-1.02	32.56
3	23.21	15.41	5.01	0.10	20.05
4	25.39	6.11	0.33	14.34	7.76
$⋮$	$⋮$	$⋮$	$⋮$	$⋮$	$⋮$
1 000	20.55	17.56	0.01	15.50	2.50

Table 2

Table 3

Testing samples

No.	L/mm	$x p i c$ /mm	$y p i c$ /mm	$θ 0$ /（°）	$θ 1$ /（°）
1	39.75	15.19	1.15	8.10	40.84
2	30.45	5.19	-2.35	-8.50	11.36
3	38.45	18.19	3.95	-9.90	12.49
4	21.45	-2.06	0.75	-8.90	26.44
$⋮$	$⋮$	$⋮$	$⋮$	$⋮$	$⋮$
200	26.05	14.44	3.05	-2.70	23.96

Table 3

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

Fig. 9

Fig. 10

Fig.11

Fig. 12

Fig. 13

Fig.14

Fig.15

References 30

1	桂业伟，周志宏，李颖晖，等. 关于飞机结冰的多重安全边界问题［J］. 航空学报， 2017， 38（2）： 520734.
	GUI Y W， ZHOU Z H， LI Y H， et al. Multiple safety boundaries protection on aircraft icing［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2017， 38（2）： 520734 （in Chinese）.
2	李浩然，段玉宇，张宇飞，等. 结冰模拟软件AERO-ICE中的关键数值方法［J］. 航空学报， 2021， 42（S1）： 726371.
	LI H R， DUAN Y Y， ZHANG Y F， et al. Numerical method of ice-accretion software AERO-ICE［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2021， 42（S1）： 726371 （in Chinese）.
3	APPIAH-KUBI P. U.S inflight icing accidents and incidents， 2006 to 2010［D］. Knoxville： University of Tennessee， 2011.
4	GREEN S. A study of U.S. inflight icing accidents and incidents， 1978 to 2002［C］∥ 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston： AIAA， 2006.
5	周志宏，易贤，桂业伟，等. 过冷大水滴条件下结冰风洞试验中模型参数的计算方法： CN104268399A［P］. 2015-01-07.
	ZHOU Z H， YI X， GUI Y W， et al. Computing method of model parameters in icing wind tunnel experiment under supercooled large droplet condition： CN104268399A［P］. 2015-01-07 （in Chinese）.
6	杨倩，董威，郭之强，等. 涡扇发动机短舱结冰试验相似方法［J］. 航空动力学报， 2019， 34（9）： 1988-2000.
	YANG Q， DONG W， GUO Z Q， et al. Scaling method of turbofan engine nacelle under icing test［J］. Journal of Aerospace Power， 2019， 34（9）： 1988-2000 （in Chinese）.
7	郁嘉，卜雪琴，林贵平，等. 非结冰气象条件下机翼热气防冰系统数值模拟［J］. 空气动力学学报， 2016， 34（5）： 562-567.
	YU J， BU X Q， LIN G P， et al. Numerical simulation of a wing hot air anti-icing system in dry air conditions［J］. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica， 2016， 34（5）： 562-567 （in Chinese）.
8	郭之强，郑梅，董威，等. 表面凸起对机翼热气防冰腔内换热强化的影响［J］. 航空学报， 2017， 38（2）： 520709.
	GUO Z Q， ZHENG M， DONG W， et al. Influence of surface convex on heat transfer enhancement of wing hot air anti-icing system［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2017， 38（2）： 520709 （in Chinese）.
9	姜萍. 飞行器热气防冰系统数值模拟与设计［D］. 南京：南京航空航天大学， 2017.
	JIANG P. Numerical simulation and design of airplane’s hot-air anti-icing system［D］. Nanjing： Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics， 2017 （in Chinese）.
10	郭辉，徐浩军，刘凌. 基于回归型支持向量机的空战目标威胁评估［J］. 北京航空航天大学学报， 2010， 36（1）： 123-126.
	GUO H， XU H J， LIU L. Target threat assessment of air combat based on support vector machines for regression［J］. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics， 2010， 36（1）： 123-126 （in Chinese）.
11	POURBAGIAN M， TALGORN B， HABASHI W G， et al. Constrained problem formulations for power optimization of aircraft electro-thermal anti-icing systems［J］. Optimization and Engineering， 2015， 16（4）： 663-693.
12	YONDO R， ANDRÉS E， VALERO E. A review on design of experiments and surrogate models in aircraft real-time and many-query aerodynamic analyses［J］. Progress in Aerospace Sciences， 2018， 96： 23-61.
13	叶年辉，龙腾，武宇飞，等. 基于Kriging代理模型的约束差分进化算法［J］. 航空学报， 2021， 42（6）： 324580.
	YE N H， LONG T， WU Y F， et al. Kriging-assisted constrained differential evolution algorithm［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2021， 42（6）： 324580 （in Chinese）.
14	张智超，高太元，张磊，等. 基于径向基神经网络的气动热预测代理模型［J］. 航空学报， 2021， 42（4）： 524167.
	ZHANG Z C， GAO T Y， ZHANG L， et al. Aeroheating agent model based on radial basis function neural network［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2021， 42（4）： 524167 （in Chinese）.
15	ROWLEY C W. Model reduction for fluids， using balanced proper orthogonal decomposition［J］. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos， 2005， 15（3）： 997-1013.
16	PINNAU R. Model reduction via proper orthogonal decomposition［M］∥Model Order Reduction： Theory， Research Aspects and Applications. Berlin， Heidelberg： Springer， 2008： 95-109.
17	VOLKWEIN S. Model reduction using proper orthogonal decomposition［R］. Graz： Institute of Mathematics and Scientific Computing， University of Graz， 2011.
18	蒋耀林. 模型降阶方法［M］. 北京：科学出版社， 2010.
	JIANG Y L. Model reduction method［M］. Beijing： Science Press， 2010 （in Chinese）.
19	STEIN M. Large sample properties of simulations using Latin hypercube sampling［J］. Technometrics， 1987， 29（2）： 143-151.
20	SMOLA A J， SCHÖLKOPF B. A tutorial on support vector regression［J］.Statistics and Computing， 2004， 14（3）： 199-222.
21	AWAD M， KHANNA R. Support vector regression［M］∥Efficient Learning Machines. Berkeley： Apress， 2015： 67-80.
22	SIROVICH L. Turbulence and the dynamics of coherent structures. I. Coherent structures［J］. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics， 1987， 45（3）： 561-571.
23	SIROVICH L. Turbulence and the dynamics of coherent structures. II. Symmetries and transformations［J］. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics， 1987， 45（3）： 573-582.
24	SIROVICH L. Turbulence and the dynamics of coherent structures. III. Dynamics and scaling［J］. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics， 1987， 45（3）： 583-590.
25	陈希，招启军. 考虑遮蔽区影响的旋翼三维水滴撞击特性计算新方法［J］. 航空学报， 2017， 38（6）： 120745.
	CHEN X， ZHAO Q J. New method for predicting 3-D water droplet impingement on rotor considering influence of shadow zone［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2017， 38（6）： 120745 （in Chinese）.
26	ZHU J， DONG W， ZHENG M， et al. Numerical investigation of heat and mass transfer on an anti-icing inlet cone［J］. Journal of Propulsion and Power， 2016， 32（3）： 789-797.
27	DONG W， ZHU J， ZHOU Z X， et al. Heat transfer and temperature analysis of an aeroengine strut under icing conditions［J］. Journal of Aircraft， 2015， 52（1）： 216-225.
28	SAN J Y， CHEN J J. Effects of jet-to-jet spacing and jet height on heat transfer characteristics of an impinging jet array［J］. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer， 2014， 71： 8-17.
29	GOLDSTEIN R J， BEHBAHANI A I， HEPPELMANN K K. Streamwise distribution of the recovery factor and the local heat transfer coefficient to an impinging circular air jet［J］. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer， 1986， 29（8）： 1227-1235.
30	邱亚松，白俊强，华俊. 基于本征正交分解和代理模型的流场预测方法［J］. 航空学报， 2013， 34（6）： 1249-1260.
	QIU Y S， BAI J Q， HUA J. Flow field estimation method based on proper orthogonal decomposition and surrogate model［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2013， 34（6）： 1249-1260 （in Chinese）.

[1]	Rongzu LI, Li LIU, Dun YANG. Optimal design of hydrogen-powered UAV based on multi-source domain fusion surrogate model [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2025, 46(9): 630979-630979.
[2]	Yunwen FENG, Da TENG, Cheng LU, Rui WANG, Junyu CHEN. Integrated mechanism and generative adversarial surrogate modeling for aircraft systems reliability evaluation [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2025, 46(7): 230948-230948.
[3]	Kaishang LI, Haoqi FAN, Runzi WANG, Xiancheng ZHANG, Shantung TU. Life design method of high-temperature equipment based on dual-scale damage theory [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2025, 46(5): 531706-531706.
[4]	Xiaotong TAN, Heyong XU. Flow feature and aero-optical effect for laser turret in transonic flow [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2025, 46(14): 131493-131493.
[5]	Jufeng YANG, Wenxin HUANG, Jiukang SUN, Zhongchen MA, Guodong FAN, Xi ZHANG. Joint estimation of multidimensional battery health indicators for electric vertical take-off and landing aircraft applications [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2025, 46(14): 331440-331440.
[6]	Junpei ZHA, Bao CHEN, Fei WU, Weipeng LI. Numerical research on aeroacoustics of supersonic single/twin rectangular jets [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2025, 46(14): 131447-131447.
[7]	Lulu JIANG, Xin PAN, Wei JIANG, Rui FENG, Gang CHEN. Optimization shape design of capsule-supersonic parachute system based on fusion surrogate strategy [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2025, 46(1): 630471-630471.
[8]	Zhuangzhuang CUI, Xin YUAN, Guoqing ZHAO, Simeng JING, Qijun ZHAO. Influence of control strategy on forward flight performance of coaxial rigid rotor high⁃speed helicopters [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(9): 529256-529256.
[9]	Jiaqi LIU, Rongqian CHEN, Jinhua LOU, Xu HAN, Hao WU, Yancheng YOU. Aerodynamic shape optimization of high-speed helicopter rotor airfoil based on deep learning [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(9): 529828-529828.
[10]	Shusheng CHEN, Cong FENG, Zhaokang ZHANG, Ke ZHAO, Xinyang ZHANG, Zhenghong GAO. Aerodynamic design of wide-speed-range waverider-wing configuration based on global & gradient optimization method [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(6): 629596-629596.
[11]	Yuhan LI, Baoyu YANG, Yinong WU, Qiang ZHANG, Xiao TANG. Research on parameters correction method for thermal model of satellite optomechanical load [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(6): 628814-628814.
[12]	Wei WANG, Weigang AN, Bifeng SONG, Wenqing YANG. Dynamic soaring performance of albatross-inspired morphing wing [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(24): 630576-630576.
[13]	Mingqi LIU, Zhonghua HAN, Tao DU, Chenzhou XU, Han ZENG, Keshi ZHANG, Wenping SONG. Optimal control efficiency characteristics and wide-speed-range aerodynamic design optimization method for grid fins of launch vehicle [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(20): 129887-129887.
[14]	Zhendong GUO, Haojie LI, Liming SONG, Hualiang ZHANG, Zhao YIN. Robust optimization method based on adaptive sparse polynomial chaos [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(19): 630273-630273.
[15]	Yongjie ZHANG, Jingpiao ZHOU, Lei SHI, Dong LI, Binqian ZHANG. Optimization design method of central fuselage spherical deficient surface frames in blended⁃wing⁃body civil aircraft based on PRSEUS structure [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(12): 229331-229331.

Hot air anti-icing performance estimation method based on POD and surrogate model

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 18

References 30

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments