跨声速风洞试验模型主动减振结构优化设计

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2021.24944

固体力学与飞行器总体设计

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

跨声速风洞试验模型主动减振结构优化设计

曾开春¹, 寇西平^1,2, 杨兴华¹, 余立¹, 查俊¹

1. 中国空气动力研究与发展中心高速空气动力研究所, 绵阳 621000;
2. 西北工业大学航空学院, 西安 710072

收稿日期:2020-11-03 修回日期:2020-11-27 发布日期:2022-03-04
通讯作者: 寇西平 E-mail:kouxiping@cardc.cc

Optimization of active vibration damping structure for transonic wind tunnel test model

ZENG Kaichun¹, KOU Xiping^1,2, YANG Xinghua¹, YU Li¹, ZHA Jun¹

1. High-speed Aerodynamic Institute, China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center, Mianyang 621000, China;
2. School of Aeronautics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China

Received:2020-11-03 Revised:2020-11-27 Published:2022-03-04

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对跨声速风洞试验模型支撑结构，采用压电作动器嵌入支杆，形成一体化主动减振系统来抑制模型在风洞试验过程中的振动。分析了模型支撑结构在风洞试验过程中的振动特性和主动减振系统的控制原理，建立了压电作动器/风洞模型支撑结构相互耦合的动力学模型。在此基础上，采用模态可控性理论及模态价值理论，给出了主动减振结构控制能力的定量描述方法，构建了能够表征系统各受控模态可控性的优化设计目标函数。最后，针对一个简化的风洞试验模型主动减振结构，建立了动力学解析模型，给出了优化设计问题的数学表达和约束指标，并采用遗传算法进行了优化设计研究。结果表明，采用本文给出的方法对主动减振结构进行优化设计，可以在满足约束指标要求前提下，显著提高压电作动器对系统各受控模态的可控性，进而提高系统的减振控制效果。

关键词: 风洞试验, 模型振动, 压电作动器, 结构优化, 主动振动控制

Abstract: To solve the vibration problem of the model support system in high-speed wind tunnel tests, we embed piezoelectric stack actuators into the sting to form an integrated active vibration damping structure. The vibration characteristics of the support system during wind tunnel tests and the vibration control mechanism of the active vibration damping system are studied, and the coupled dynamic model of the model support system structure with piezoelectric stack actuators established. Utilizing the modal controllability theory and the modal cost theory, we present the quantitative description method for the control ability of the active vibration damping structure, and construct the optimization design objective function, which can reflect the controllability of the main controlled modes of the system. To improve the control ability of the active vibration damping structure for an idealized model support system, we conduct optimization design using genetic algorithm, with analytical dynamic equations derived and the mathematical expression of the optimization problem and the constraint conditions given. The results show that the optimization design method proposed in this paper can significantly improve the controllability of the active vibration damping structure on the premise of meeting the constraint requirements.

Key words: wind tunnel tests, model vibration, piezoelectric stack actuators, structure optimization, active vibration control

中图分类号:

V211.74

曾开春, 寇西平, 杨兴华, 余立, 查俊. 跨声速风洞试验模型主动减振结构优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(2): 224944-224944.

ZENG Kaichun, KOU Xiping, YANG Xinghua, YU Li, ZHA Jun. Optimization of active vibration damping structure for transonic wind tunnel test model[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(2): 224944-224944.

参考文献

[1] CLARENCE Y J,Jr, THOMAS P J,Jr, GLOSS B. National transonic facility model and model support vibration problems[C]//16th Aerodynamic Ground Testing Conference. Reston:AIAA, 1990.
[2] EDWARDS J W. National transonic facility model and tunnel vibrations[J].Journal of Aircraft, 2009, 46(1):46-52.
[3] YOUNG C P, BUEHRLE R D, BALAKRISHNA S, et al. Effects of vibration on inertial wind-tunnel model attitude measurement devices:NASA TM-109083[R]. Washington,D.C.:NASA, 1994.
[4] BUEHRLE R D, YOUNG C P. Modal correction method for dynamically induced errors in wind tunnel model attitude measurements:NASA TM-111560[R]. Washington,D.C.:NASA, 1995.
[5] 叶正寅, 谢飞. 弹性振动对翼型失速迎角附近流场的影响[J].航空学报, 2006, 27(6):1028-1032. YE Z Y, XIE F. The effects of elastic vibration on the flow field near stall-incidence of the airfoil[J].Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2006, 27(6):1028-1032(in Chinese).
[6] 叶正寅, 解亚军, 武洁. 模型振动对翼型流场和气动性能的影响[J].工程力学, 2009, 26(4):240-245. YE Z Y, XIE Y J, WU J. The effects of wind-tunnel model vibration on flow field and aerodynamics of an airfoil[J].Engineering Mechanics, 2009, 26(4):240-245(in Chinese).
[7] BUEHRLE R D. System dynamic analysis of a wind tunnel model with applications to improve aerodynamic data quality[D]. Cincinnati:University of Cincinnati, 1997:1-16.
[8] 陈卫东, 邵敏强, 杨兴华, 等. 跨声速风洞测力模型主动减振系统的试验研究[J].振动工程学报, 2007, 20(1):91-96. CHEN W D, SHAO M Q, YANG X H, et al. Experimental evaluation of an active vibration control system for wind tunnel aerodynamic models[J].Journal of Vibration Engineering, 2007, 20(1):91-96(in Chinese).
[9] SHEN X, DAI Y K, CHEN M X, et al. Active vibration control of the sting used in wind tunnel:Comparison of three control algorithms[J].Shock and Vibration, 2018, 2018:1905049.
[10] LIU W, MEN D Z, WEN Z Q, et al. An active damping vibration control system for wind tunnel models[J].Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2019, 32(9):2109-2120.
[11] 佘重禧, 陈卫东, 邵敏强. 跨声速风洞测力模型的降阶及H_∞减振控制[J].噪声与振动控制, 2014, 34(1):67-71, 81. SHE C X, CHEN W D, SHAO M Q. Model reduction and active vibration suppression of a wind tunnel test model by H_∞ control[J].Noise and Vibration Control, 2014, 34(1):67-71, 81(in Chinese).
[12] FEHREN H, GNAUERT U, WIMMEL R, et al. Validation testing with the active damping system in the European Transonic Windtunnel[C]//39th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston:AIAA, 2001.
[13] QUEST J. ETW-High quality test performance in cryogenic environment[C]//21 st Aerodynamic Measurement Technology and Ground Testing Conference. Reston:AIAA,2000.
[14] SCHIMANSKI D, QUEST J. Tools and techniques for high Reynolds number testing status and recent improvements at ETW[C]//41 st Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston:AIAA, 2003.
[15] SCHIMANSKI D, QUEST J. Flight Reynolds number testing at ETW:AIAA-2009-0422[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2009.
[16] BALAKRISHNA S, HOULDEN H, BUTLER D, et al. Development of a wind tunnel active vibration reduction system[C]//45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston:AIAA, 2007.
[17] BALAKRISHNA S, BUTLER D, WHITE E, et al. Active damping of sting vibrations in transonic wind tunnel testing[C]//46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston:AIAA, 2008.
[18] BALAKRISHNA S, BUTLER D, ACHESON M, et al. Design and performance of an active sting damper for the NASA common research model[C]//49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition. Reston:AIAA, 2011.
[19] RIVERS M B, BALAKRISHNA S. NASA common research model test envelope extension with active sting damping at NTF[C]//32nd AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. Reston:AIAA, 2014.
[20] 余立, 杨兴华, 寇西平, 等. 跨声速风洞模型主动减振系统试验研究[J].南京航空航天大学学报, 2019, 51(4):526-533. YU L, YANG X H, KOU X P, et al. Experiment on active vibration reduction system for transonic wind tunnel model[J].Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics, 2019, 51(4):526-533(in Chinese).
[21] 宋来收, 夏品奇. 直升机振动主动控制的机身/压电叠层作动器耦合优化法[J].航空学报, 2011, 32(10):1835-1841. SONG L S, XIA P Q. Coupled fuselage/piezoelectric stack actuator optimization method for active vibration control of helicopter[J].Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2011, 32(10):1835-1841(in Chinese).
[22] HAMDAN A M A, NAYFEH A H. Measures of modal controllability and observability for first-and second-order linear systems[J].Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 1989, 12(3):421-428.
[23] SKELTON R, SINGH R, RAMAKRISHNAN J. Component model reduction by component cost analysis[C]//Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference. Reston:AIAA, 1988.
[24] 梁力, 杨智春, 欧阳炎, 等. 垂尾抖振主动控制的压电作动器布局优化[J].航空学报, 2016, 37(10):3035-3043. LIANG L, YANG Z C, OUYANG Y, et al. Optimization of piezoelectric actuator configuration on a vertical tail for buffeting control[J].Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37(10):3035-3043(in Chinese).

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

跨声速风洞试验模型主动减振结构优化设计

Optimization of active vibration damping structure for transonic wind tunnel test model

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	孙朋朋, 刘平安, 樊枫, 曾伟. 悬停状态共轴刚性旋翼机身气动干扰特性[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 529284-529284.
[2]	王畅, 何龙, 徐栋霞, 唐敏, 马率, 吴希明. 共轴刚性旋翼桨毂流动控制减阻研究[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 529084-529084.
[3]	张卫国, 唐敏, 武杰, 彭先敏, 章贵川, 聂博文, 王亮权, 李超群. 倾转旋翼机风洞试验综述[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 530114-530114.
[4]	聂博文, 王亮权, 黄志银, 何龙, 杨仕鹏, 颜鸿涛, 章贵川. 复合式高速无人直升机飞行动力学建模与控制策略设计[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 529848-529848.
[5]	刘柳, 向先宏, 张宇飞, 陈海昕, 魏闯, 朱剑, 杨普. 一种高升阻比非常规翼身融合燕尾气动布局[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(6): 629630-629630.
[6]	孟亮, 杨金沅, 杨智威, 高彤, 刘洪权, 张卫红. 典型飞机壁板结构的抗屈曲优化设计与试验验证[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(5): 529679-529679.
[7]	陈立, 曾孝云, 黄文, 张建飞. 简谐基础加速度激励下的点阵结构优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(5): 529704-529704.
[8]	陈远玲, 陈家文, 潘越洋, 闫明洋. 基于熵产理论的航空柱塞泵涡轮增压系统优化[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(4): 429015-429015.
[9]	李海星, 周峰, 颜巍, 白峰, 赵克良. 砂纸冰对民机平尾气动特性的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(2): 128657-128657.
[10]	李学良, 李创创, 苏伟, 吴杰. 分布式粗糙元对高超声速边界层不稳定性的影响试验[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(2): 128627-128627.
[11]	刘宇, 秦梦婕, 王强, 易贤. 含盐海水飞沫的结冰风洞试验相似准则[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(S2): 729297-729297.
[12]	杨秋明, 朱永峰, 陈华伟, 刘晓林. 镂空图案化电加热组件防冰性能试验研究[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(S2): 729334-729334.
[13]	高世琦, 丁博, 解旭祯, 李铮, 陈林, 钱首元, 焦子涵, 白光辉. 等离子体激励在高速流动中的减阻机制[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(S2): 729373-729373.
[14]	许岭松, 吴渊, 朱东宇, 张付昆, 刘昱. FL⁃61结冰风洞翼型俯仰振荡机构研制[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(S2): 729296-729296.
[15]	金毅, 孙姝, 郭赟杰, 谭慧俊, 张悦. 超声速可调进气道内流双解现象及其节流特性[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(7): 127134-127134.