超声速湍流密度脉动预测的神经网络方法

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2018.22244

流体力学与飞行力学

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

超声速湍流密度脉动预测的神经网络方法

王正魁, 靳旭红, 朱志斌, 程晓丽

中国航天空气动力技术研究院, 北京 100074

收稿日期:2018-04-26 修回日期:2018-06-20 出版日期:2018-10-15 发布日期:2018-07-04
通讯作者: 靳旭红 E-mail:jinxuhong08@163.com

Neural network method for predicting density fluctuations in supersonic turbulence

WANG Zhengkui, JIN Xuhong, ZHU Zhibin, CHENG Xiaoli

China Academy of Aerospace Aerodynamics, Beijing 100074, China

Received:2018-04-26 Revised:2018-06-20 Online:2018-10-15 Published:2018-07-04

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对气动光学效应对湍流密度脉动预测的需求，发展了超声速湍流密度脉动预测的神经网络方法，从直接数值模拟（DNS）的超声速湍流边界层的流场数据中挖掘规律，建立了包含5个隐含层的密度脉动模型。实验结果表明，所发展的神经网络方法可以很好地预测密度脉动均方值，它不仅能很好地预测训练样本，对测试样本预测的精度和稳定性也显著高于传统模型，且具有一定的泛化能力。通过特征选择和加入先验信息，确定了密度脉动模型的7个输入参数特征量，进一步提高了模型的泛化能力和实用性。

关键词: 气动光学, 湍流, 密度脉动, 神经网络, 边界层

Abstract: Considering the demand for predicting density fluctuation in turbulence of in prediction of the aero-optical effect, this paper develops a neural network method to predict the density fluctuation in supersonic turbulence. A model for the density fluctuation with 5 hidden layers is built by mining the regularity from the flow field data of supersonic turbulent boundary layers, which are simulated by the Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS) method. The experimental results show that the neural network method proposed is able to predict the mean square values of density fluctuation accurately. The method can predict the training samples well, and can get the prediction of test samples with better accuracy and stability than traditional models, and has certain capability of generalization. By selecting features and adding prior information, the 7 features of input parameters of the density fluctuation model are determined to further improve the capability of generalization and practicability of the model.

Key words: aero-optics, turbulence, density fluctuation, neural network, boundary layer

中图分类号:

V211.3

王正魁, 靳旭红, 朱志斌, 程晓丽. 超声速湍流密度脉动预测的神经网络方法[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(10): 122244-122244.

WANG Zhengkui, JIN Xuhong, ZHU Zhibin, CHENG Xiaoli. Neural network method for predicting density fluctuations in supersonic turbulence[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2018, 39(10): 122244-122244.

参考文献

[1] GIERLOFF J, ROBERTSON S, BOUSKA D. Computer analysis of aero-optic effects:AIAA-1992-2794[R]. Reston,VA:AIAA, 1992.
[2] CLARK R, FARRIS R. A numerical method to predict aero-optical performance in hypersonic flight:AIAA-1987-1396[R]. Reston,VA:AIAA, 1987.
[3] LUTZ S A. Modeling of density fluctuations in supersonic turbulent boundary layer[J]. AIAA Journal, 1989, 27(6):822-823.
[4] POND J E, SUTTON G W. Aero-optic performance of an aircraft forward-facing optical turret[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2015, 43(3):600-607.
[5] RODI W. A new algebraic relation for calculating the Reynolds stresses[C]//Gesellschaft fuer angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik, Wissenschaftliche Jahrestagung, 1976:219-221.
[6] WEI H, CHEN C. A second-order algebraic model for turbulent density fluctuation:AIAA-1996-0427[R]. Reston, VA:AIAA, 1996.
[7] WEATHERITT J, PICHLER R, SANDBERG R D, et al. Machine learning for turbulence model development using a high-fidelity HPT cascade simulation:GT2017-63497[R]. New York:ASME, 2017.
[8] LING J, TEMPLETON J. Evaluation of machine learning algorithms for prediction of regions of high Reynolds averaged Navier Stokes uncertainty[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2015, 27(8):42032-42094.
[9] LING J. Using machine learning to understand and mitigate model form uncertainty in turbulence models[C]//14th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications. Piscataway, NJ:IEEE Press, 2015:813-818.
[10] WANG J X, WU J L, XIAO H. Physics-informed machine learning for predictive turbulence modeling:Using data to improve RANS modeled Reynolds stresses[J]. Physical Review Fluids, 2016, 2:034603.
[11] EDELING W N, IACCARINO G, CINNELLA P. Data-free and data-driven RANS predictions with quantified uncertainty[J]. Flow, Turbulence & Combustion, 2018, 100(3):593-616.
[12] PARISH E J, DURAISAMY K. A paradigm for data-driven predictive modeling using field inversion and machine learning[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2016, 305:758-774.
[13] SINGH A P, DURAISAMY K. Using field inversion to quantify functional errors in turbulence closures[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2016, 28(4):045110.
[14] TRACEY B, DURAISAMY K, ALONSO J J. A machine learning strategy to assist turbulence model development:AIAA-2015-1287[R]. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2015.
[15] YARLANKI S, RAJENDRAN B, HAMANN H. Estimation of turbulence closure coefficients for data centers using machine learning algorithms[C]//Thermal and Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems. Piscataway, NJ:IEEE Press, 2012:38-42.
[16] RAY J, LEFANTZI S, ARUNAJATESAN S, et al. Bayesian parameter estimation of a k-ε model for accurate jet-in-crossflow simulations[J]. AIAA Journal, 2016, 54(8):2432-2448.
[17] RAY J, LEFANTZI S, ARUNAJATESAN S, et al. Bayesian calibration of a k-ε turbulence model for predictive jet-in-crossflow simulations:AIAA-2014-2085[R]. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2014.
[18] DURAISAMY K, ZHANG Z J, SINGH A P. New approaches in turbulence and transition modeling using data-driven techniques:AIAA-2015-1284[R]. Reston,VA:AIAA, 2015.
[19] ZHANG Z J, DURAISAMY K. Machine learning methods for data-driven turbulence modeling:AIAA-2015-2460[R]. Reston,VA:AIAA, 2015.
[20] ZHANG X, SHU C. Positivity-preserving high order finite difference WENO schemes for compressible Euler equations[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2012, 231(5):2245-2258.
[21] JIANG G, SHU C. Efficient Implementation of weighted ENO schemes[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1996, 126(1):202-228.
[22] SCHLATTER P, STOLZ S, KLEISER L. Large-eddy simulation of transition in wall-bounded flow[C]//40th JAXA Workshop on "Investigation and Control of Boundary-Layer Transition". Tokyo:Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, 2007:13-16.
[23] GATSKI T B, ERLEBACHER G. Numerical simulation of a spatially evolving supersonic turbulent boundary layer:NASA/TM-2002-211934[R]. Washington, D.C.:NASA, 2002.
[24] PIROZZOLI S, GRASSO F, GATSKI T B. Direct numerical simulation and analysis of a spatially evolving supersonic turbulent boundary layer at M=2.25[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2004, 16(3):530-545.
[25] WANG K, WANG M. Aero-optics of subsonic turbulent boundary layers[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2012, 696:122-151.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

超声速湍流密度脉动预测的神经网络方法

Neural network method for predicting density fluctuations in supersonic turbulence

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	乔竑玮, 梁剑寒, 张林, 孙明波, 陈玉俏. 超声速燃烧中的概率密度函数方法研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(8): 28802-028802.
[2]	吴文昌, 马燕凯, 韩省思, 闵耀兵, 燕振国. 一种光滑型TENO非线性加权的WCNS格式[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(8): 129052-129052.
[3]	马菲, 张琼, 赖培军, 岳一笛. 基于BP神经网络的试飞训练安全性量化模型[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(5): 529957-529957.
[4]	倪育德, 闫苗玉, 刘瑞华. 基于DOA-BP神经网络的电离层TEC短期预测[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(4): 328707-328707.
[5]	杨博, 于贺, 樊子辰. 微观能量分析气动光学效应时变误差的方法[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(4): 128703-128703.
[6]	汪洪波, 曾宇, 熊大鹏, 杨揖心, 孙明波. SST湍流模型的激波与可压缩效应改进[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(3): 128694-128694.
[7]	赖江, 范召林, 王乾, 董思卫, 童福林, 袁先旭. 高超声速有攻角锥裙直接数值模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(2): 128610-128610.
[8]	李海星, 周峰, 颜巍, 白峰, 赵克良. 砂纸冰对民机平尾气动特性的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(2): 128657-128657.
[9]	李学良, 李创创, 苏伟, 吴杰. 分布式粗糙元对高超声速边界层不稳定性的影响试验[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(2): 128627-128627.
[10]	曾繁宇, 邱云龙, 曹占伟, 张伦, 陈伟芳. 超声速湍流边界层阵列式微吹气流动控制与减阻特性[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(S2): 729396-729396.
[11]	张恺玲, 李思怡, 段毅, 阎超. 进气道流动中SST湍流模型参数的不确定度量化[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(S2): 729429-729429.
[12]	李忠智, 马金毅, 艾剑良, 董一群. 拟VGG16网络的航空传感器故障检测分类[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(S1): 727615-727615.
[13]	刘武, 吴云燕, 刘玮, 田明明, 黄天鹏. 考虑未知扰动的RLV再入鲁棒容错姿态控制[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(S1): 727787-727787.
[14]	刘晨阳, 吴大伟, 郭一泽, 吕欣赛, 周佳妮, 邵书义. 不确定强耦合下四旋翼姿态鲁棒自适应控制[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(S1): 727645-727645.
[15]	曾宇, 汪洪波, 孙明波, 王超, 刘旭. SST湍流模型改进研究综述[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(9): 27411-027411.