民机驾驶舱人为因素适航符合性验证技术

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2015.0317

部件与分系统设计及其他

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

民机驾驶舱人为因素适航符合性验证技术

董大勇¹, 俞金海¹, 李宝峰¹, 陈迎春²

1. 上海飞机设计研究院, 上海 201210;
2. 中国商用飞机有限责任公司, 上海 201210

收稿日期:2015-10-15 修回日期:2015-11-22 出版日期:2016-01-25 发布日期:2015-12-04
通讯作者: 陈迎春,Tel.:021-20865010,E-mail:chenyingchun@comac.cc E-mail:chenyingchun@comac.cc
作者简介:董大勇男,博士,高级工程师。主要研究方向:驾驶舱人为因素设计与评估。Tel:021-20865603,E-mail:dondayong@comac.cc;俞金海男,博士,研究员。主要研究方向:飞机总体设计。Tel:021-20865601,E-mail:yujinhai@comac.cc;李宝峰男,博士,高级工程师。主要研究方向:驾驶舱人机界面设计与评估。Tel:021-20865609,E-mail:libaofeng@comac.cc;陈迎春男,博士,研究员。主要研究方向:飞机总体设计。Tel:021-20865010,E-mail:chenyingchun@comac.cc
基金资助:
国家"973"计划(2010CB734100)

Airworthiness compliance certification technology of civil aircraft flight deck human factor

DONG Dayong¹, YU Jinhai¹, LI Baofeng¹, CHEN Yingchun²

1. Shanghai Aircraft Design and Research Institute, Shanghai 201210, China;
2. Commercial Aircraft Corporation of China Ltd., Shanghai 201210, China

Received:2015-10-15 Revised:2015-11-22 Online:2016-01-25 Published:2015-12-04
Supported by:
National Basic Research Program of China(2010CB734100)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

由于人为差错无法完全避免,因此民机驾驶舱人为因素适航符合性验证过程中难以充分表明对规章条款的符合性,通过对人为因素CS-25.1302条款适航条款的详细分析,对驾驶舱人为因素符合性验证的总体思路作出规划,明确了在符合性验证工作中针对飞机系统集成水平、复杂性和新颖度特点的重点关注要素。详细阐述了相似性声明、设计描述、计算分析、评估和试验等驾驶舱人为因素符合性验证方法及其适用条件,结合中国自主研制的大型客机型号开展了驾驶舱评估和飞行员在环模拟器试验中的符合性验证技术研究,研究结果在型号实践中得到应用并表明是有效的。

关键词: 驾驶舱, 人为因素, 适航, 符合性方法, 型号审定

Abstract:

Human error cannot be completely avoided.It is difficult to demonstrate the flight deck design fulfill the regulation in human factor airworthiness compliance certification.General approach planning of the flight deck human factor compliance is proposed on the basis of an indepth study of the CS-25.1302 regulation.In the certification work,system integration level,complexity and novelty are emphasized.Key means of compliance including statements of similarity,design description,calculations/analysis,evaluations and test are described in detail.Combined with the type certification project,research on flight deck human factor evaluation and simulator test compliance technology has been carried out.The application to type certification verifies the effectiveness of the compliance technology.

Key words: flight deck, human factors, airworthiness, means of compliance, type certification

中图分类号:

V216.7
V221

董大勇, 俞金海, 李宝峰, 陈迎春. 民机驾驶舱人为因素适航符合性验证技术[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(1): 310-316.

DONG Dayong, YU Jinhai, LI Baofeng, CHEN Yingchun. Airworthiness compliance certification technology of civil aircraft flight deck human factor[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2016, 37(1): 310-316.

参考文献

[1] 卜晓敏.航空人为因素事故/事件分析模型研究[D].天津:中国民航大学,2008:5-10.BU X M.Research on the aviation human factor accident/incident analysis model[D].Tianjin:Civil Aviation University of China,2008:5-10(in Chinese).
[2] EDUARDO S,DAN M.Human factors in aviation[M].2nd ed.Salt Lake City,UT:Academic Press,2010:15-20.
[3] 中国民用航空局航空安全办公室.中国民航航空安全报告(2013年)[R].北京:中国民用航空局,2014:5-8.Aviation Safety Office,Civil Aviation Administration of China.Aviation safety report of CAAC(2013)[R].Beijing:Civil Aviation Administration of China,2014:5-8(in Chinese).
[4] 孟昭蓉,杨春生.世界航空事故汇编[M].北京:中国民用航空杂志社,2002:3-10.MENG Z R,YANG C S.World aviation accident collection[M].Beijing:Civil Aviation Journal Press of China,2002:3-10(in Chinese).
[5] WICKENS C D,LEE J D,LIU Y L,et al.Introduction to human factors engineering[M].2nd ed.Upper Saddle River,NJ:Prentice Hall Inc.,2003:17-23.
[6] WIEGMANN D A,SHAPPELL S.A human error analysis of commercial aviation accidents using the human factors analysis and classification system(HFACS):DOT/FAA/AM-01/3[R].Washington,D.C.:U.S.Department of Transportation,Federal Aviation Adminstration,2001:32-41.
[7] Annual review of aircraft accident data U.S.general aviation,Calendar year 2005:NTSB/ARG-09/01[R].Washington,D.C.:National Transportation Safety Board,2005:1-15.
[8] Review of US civil aviation accidents,Calendar year 2011:NTSB/ARA-14/01[R].Washington,D.C.:National Transportation Safety Board,2011:1-10.
[9] Review of U.S.civil aviation accidents,2007-2009:NTSB/ARA-11/01[R].Washington,D.C.:National Transportation Safety Board,2011:5-17.
[10] Federal Aviation Adminstration.Human factors policy:ATO 9550.8A[S].Washington,D.C.:Federal Aviation Adminstration,2005:1-3.
[11] Federal Aviation Adminstration.Factors to consider when reviewing an applicant's proposed human factors methods of compliance for flight deckcertification:ANM-01-03A[S].Washington,D.C.:Federal Aviation Adminstration,2003:3-15.
[12] EMMERSON P,GRAEBER R C.Human factors-HWG final report[R].Washington,D.C.:Federal Aviation Adminstration,2004:3-8.
[13] European Aviation Safety Agency.Certification specifications,Admt3:CS-25[S].Cologne,Germany:European Aviation Safety Agency,2007:BOOK1 1-F-1.
[14] Federal Aviation Adminstration.Airworthiness standards:Transport category airplanes,No.137:FAR-25[S].Washington,D.C.:Federal Aviation Adminstration,2013:1-3.
[15] 龙升照,黄端生,陈道木,等.人－机－环境系统工程理论及应用基础[M].北京:科学出版社,2004:12-25.LONG S Z,HUANG D S,CHEN D M,et al.Man-machine-environment system engineering theory and application[M].Beijing:Science Press,2004:12-25(in Chinese).
[16] SHERIDAN T B.人与自动化——系统设计和研究问题[M].胡保生,译.西安:西安交通大学出版社,2007:35-38.SHERIDAN T B.Human and automation:System design and research issues[M].HU B S,translated.Xi'an:Xi'an Jiaotong University Press,2007:35-38(in Chinese).
[17] 赵江洪.人机工程学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2008:174-211.ZHAO J H.Ergonomics[M].Beijing:Higher Education Press,2008:174-211(in Chinese).
[18] 曾庆新,庄达民,马银香.脑力负荷与目标辨认[J].航空学报,2007,28(8):76-80.ZENG Q X,ZHUANG D M,MA Y X.Mental workload and target identification[J].Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica,2007,28(8):76-80(in Chinese).
[19] ŠENOL M B,DA ?DEVIREN M,KURT M,et al.Evaluation of cockpit design by using quantitative and qualitative tools[C]//Proceedings of 2009 IEEE the 16th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management Piscataway,NJ:IEEE Press,2009,1:847-851.
[20] 中国民用航空局.航空器型号合格审定程序:AP-21-AA-2011-03-R4[S].北京:中国民用航空局,2011:123.Civil Aviation Administration of China.Aircraft type certification procedure:AP-21-AA-2011-03-R4[S].Beijing:Civil Aviation Administration of China,2011:123(in Chinese).

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

民机驾驶舱人为因素适航符合性验证技术

Airworthiness compliance certification technology of civil aircraft flight deck human factor

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	陈勇, 孔维梁, 刘洪. 飞机过冷大水滴结冰气象条件运行设计挑战[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(1): 626973-626973.
[2]	卢昱锦, 肖天航, 邓双厚, 支豪林, 朱震浩, 陆召严. 着水初始条件对水陆两栖飞机着水性能的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(7): 124483-124483.
[3]	董磊, 向晨阳, 赵长啸, 党香俊, 史春蕾. 民机驾驶舱显示触控系统人机工效综合评价[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(6): 624053-624053.
[4]	杨志刚, 张炯, 李博, 曾锐, 毛研勋. 民用飞机智能飞行技术综述[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(4): 525198-525198.
[5]	张丽芬, 葛鑫, 刘振侠. 人工制备冰雹的力学性能试验研究[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(2): 224255-224255.
[6]	贾宝惠, 邓婉怡, 王毅强. 三层三级民机修理级别经济性分析模型的改进[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(3): 323468-323468.
[7]	郭向东, 张平涛, 赵照, 赖庆仁, 郭龙. 大型结冰风洞云雾场适航应用符合性验证[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(10): 123879-123879.
[8]	潘立军, 吴大卫, 谭兆光, 张怡哲, 柴啸, 袁昌盛, 陈迎春. 基于适航符合性的翼身融合布局客机客舱布置设计[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(9): 623044-623044.
[9]	韩志熔, 赵克良, 颜巍. 格尼襟翼在冰风洞混合翼设计中的应用[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(2): 522387-522387.
[10]	何志全, 刘杨, 李泽江. 大型民用飞机缝翼全尺寸静力试验载荷设计[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(2): 522197-522197.
[11]	马赞, 周中华, 王鹏, 胡剑波, 柯炳清. 仅用作航空器追踪的北斗机载设备适航要求分析[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(11): 323155-323155.
[12]	申蒸洋, 陈孝明, 黄领才. 大型水陆两栖飞机特殊任务模式对总体设计的挑战[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(1): 522400-522400.
[13]	杨成凤, 郭兆电, 邓文剑. 机轮溅水特性及对进气道吸水的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(2): 121453-121453.
[14]	王兴, 晏晓瑜. 基于单边效能的纵向操纵适航符合性分析[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(S1): 721529-721529.
[15]	代晓晴, 张翔, 李森, 郑建弘. 某民用涡扇发动机飞行包线内吸雨量计算分析[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(7): 121076-121076.