基于适航符合性的翼身融合布局客机客舱布置设计

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2019.23044

翼身融合民机技术专栏

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

基于适航符合性的翼身融合布局客机客舱布置设计

潘立军¹, 吴大卫¹, 谭兆光¹, 张怡哲², 柴啸¹, 袁昌盛², 陈迎春¹

1. 中国商用飞机有限责任公司上海飞机设计研究院, 上海 201210;
2. 西北工业大学航空学院, 西安 710072

收稿日期:2019-03-25 修回日期:2019-04-03 出版日期:2019-09-15 发布日期:2019-04-28
通讯作者: 陈迎春 E-mail:chenyingchun@comac.cc
基金资助:
部级项目

Cabin layout design for BWB civil aircraft based on airworthiness compliance

PAN Lijun¹, WU Dawei¹, TAN Zhaoguang¹, ZHANG Yizhe², CHAI Xiao¹, YUAN Changsheng², CHEN Yingchun¹

1. Shanghai Aircraft Design and Research Institute, Commercial Aircraft Corporation of China, Ltd., Shanghai 201210, China;
2. School of Aeronautics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China

Received:2019-03-25 Revised:2019-04-03 Online:2019-09-15 Published:2019-04-28
Supported by:
Ministry-Level Project

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于适航符合性，结合结构空间限制，从过道宽度、最大并排座椅数、应急出口布置、应急撤离、乘务员座椅布置、洗手间和厨房布置等方面，对某翼身融合布局客机方案的客舱布置开展设计，得到了382座典型两舱布置方案，该方案具有2对机头A型出口和4个机腹A型出口，4条纵向通道和5条横向通道。该布局可以满足适航标准对过道宽度、最大并排座椅数、应急出口类型、应急出口均布性、应急出口通路、乘务员数量、乘务员视界等相关要求。通过与座级相当的常规客机对比，该布局纵向和垂向空间舒适性较高，公务舱座椅排距约多出58%，靠近舱室壁板的乘客头部空间约多出4%~18%；但横向空间舒适性稍差。通过应急撤离仿真系统分析，该布局满足"90 s应急撤离"要求。

关键词: 客舱布置, 适航符合性, 翼身融合, 客机, 客舱剖面设计

Abstract: Based on airworthiness compliance and considering of structural space, the cabin layout design for a BWB civil aircraft is carried out with constraints in aisle width, maximum number of seats abreast, emergency exit arrangement, emergency evacuation, flight attendant seats, lavatories, and galleys arrangement. A typical 2-class cabin layout of 382 seats is designed, containing 2 pairs of Type A exits on both sides of the front centerbody, 4 Type A exits on the bottom of the rear center-body, 4 longitudinal aisles, and 5 cross aisles. This cabin layout can meet the airworthiness for aisle width, maximum number of seats abreast, type of emergency exit, emergency exit uniformity, emergency exit access, number of flight attendants, and flight attendants vision. Compared with the conventional civil aircraft with similar seats, the layout has higher longitudinal and vertical space comfort. The business class seat pitch is about 58% higher, and the head space of the passengers near the cabin sidings is about 4%-18% higher; but the lateral space comfort is slightly worse. The emergency evacuation simulation system analysis shows that the layout meets the requirement of "90 s emergency evacuation".

Key words: cabin layout, airworthiness compliance, BWB, civil aircraft, cabin cross-section design

中图分类号:

V223⁺.2

潘立军, 吴大卫, 谭兆光, 张怡哲, 柴啸, 袁昌盛, 陈迎春. 基于适航符合性的翼身融合布局客机客舱布置设计[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(9): 623044-623044.

PAN Lijun, WU Dawei, TAN Zhaoguang, ZHANG Yizhe, CHAI Xiao, YUAN Changsheng, CHEN Yingchun. Cabin layout design for BWB civil aircraft based on airworthiness compliance[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2019, 40(9): 623044-623044.

参考文献 25

[1]	索欣诗. 翼身融合布局大型客机总体方案综合分析评价与优化[D]. 南京:南京航空航天大学, 2017:1-4. SUO X S. Integrated analysis, evaluation and optimization in conceptual design of blended wing body commercial aircraft[D]. Nanjing:Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2017:1-4(in Chinese).
[2]	朱自强, 王晓璐, 吴宗成, 等. 民机的一种新型布局形式——翼身融合体飞机[J]. 航空学报, 2008, 29(1):49-59. ZHU Z Q, WANG X L, WU Z C, et al. A new type of transport-Blended wing body aircraft[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2008, 29(1):49-59(in Chinese).
[3]	LIEBECK R H. Design of the blended wing body subsonic transport[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2004, 41(1):10-25.
[4]	DOMMELEN J V, VOS R. A conceptual design and analysis tool for blended wing body aircraft[C]//ICAS, 2012.
[5]	PAULUS D, SALMON T, MOHR B, et al. Configuration selection for a 450-passenger ultraefficient 2020 aircraft[J]. Progress in Flight Dynamics, GNC, and Avionics, 2013, 6:601-618.
[6]	MORRIS A J. MOB a European distributed multi-disciplinary design and optimization project[R]. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2002.
[7]	LI P F, ZHANG B Q, CHEN Y C, et al. Aerodynamic design methodology for blended wing body transport[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2012, 25(4):508-516.
[8]	QIN N, VAVALLE A, MOIGNE A L, et al. Aerodynamic considerations of blended wing body aircraft[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2004, 40(6):321-343.
[9]	KUNTAWALA N B. Preliminary aerodynamic shape optimization of a blended-wing-body aircraft configuration[C]//49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2011.
[10]	VELICKI A, THRASH P, JEGLEY D. Airframe development for the hybrid wing body aircraft[C]//47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2009.
[11]	HANSEN L U, HEINZE W, HORST P. Representation of structural solutions in blended wing body preliminary design[C]//ICAS, 2006.
[12]	GOOS J. Weight prediction of the primary structure of a flying wing aircraft[C]//66th Annual Conference of Society of Allied Weight Engineers, Inc. Madrid:SAWE, 2007.
[13]	FELDER J L, KIM H D, BROWN G V. Turboelectric distributed propulsion engine cycle analysis for hybrid-wing-body aircraft[C]//47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2009.
[14]	VOSKUIJL M, ROCCA G L, DIRCKEN F. Controllability of blended wing body aircraft[C]//ICAS, 2008.
[15]	MOHR B, PAULUS D, BAIER H, et al. Design of a 450-passenger blended wing body aircraft for active control investigations[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G:Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2012, 226(12):1513-1522.
[16]	李路路, 张彬乾, 李沛峰, 等. 大型客机无尾布局航向组合舵面控制技术研究[J]. 飞行力学, 2013, 31(5):450-454. LI L L, ZHANG B Q, LI P F, et al. Research on control technology of combined control surface for large tailless civil aircraft[J]. Flight Dynamics, 2013, 31(5):450-454(in Chinese).
[17]	JUNG D W, LOWENBERG M H. Stability and control assessment of a blended-wing-body airliner configuration[C]//AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference and Exhibit. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2005.
[18]	《飞机设计手册》总编委会. 飞机设计手册第7册:民机构型初步设计与推进系统一体化设计[M]. 北京:航空工业出版社, 2006:11, 18. Chief Editorial Board of Aircraft Design Manual. Aircraft design manual book 7:Preliminary design of civil aircraft configuration and integrated design of propulsion system[M]. Beijing:Aviation Industry Press, 2006:11, 18(in Chinese).
[19]	中国民用航空局. 中国民用航空规章第25部:运输类飞机适航标准:CCAR-25-R4[S]. 北京:中国民用航空局, 2011:80-90. CAAC. Part 25 of China civil aviation regulations:Transport airplane airworthiness criterion:CCAR-25-R4[S]. Beijing:CAAC, 2011:80-90(in Chinese).
[20]	RAYMER D P. Aircraft design:A conceptual approach[M]. 5th ed. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2012.
[21]	ROSKAM J. Airplane design[M]. Ottawa, KS:Roskam Aviation and Engineering Corporation, 1985.
[22]	SCHAUFELE R D. The elements of aircraft preliminary design[M]. California:Aries Publications, 2000.
[23]	JENKINSON L R, SIMPKIN P, RHODES D. Civil jet aircraft design[M]. London:Arnold, 2000.
[24]	中国民用航空局. 大型飞机公共航空运输承运人运行合格审定规则[S]. 北京:中国民用航空局, 2010:96. CAAC. Large aircraft public air transport carrier operating certification rules[S]. Beijing:CAAC, 2010:96(in Chinese).
[25]	张玉刚, 宋笔锋, 薛红军. 基于元胞自动机的民机应急撤离仿真系统设计[J]. 飞机设计, 2011, 31(1):45-50, 60. ZHANG Y G, SONG B F, XUE H J. Design of civil airplane emergency evacuation simulation system based on improved cellular automata[J]. Aircraft Design, 2011, 31(1):45-50, 60(in Chinese).

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

基于适航符合性的翼身融合布局客机客舱布置设计

Cabin layout design for BWB civil aircraft based on airworthiness compliance

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 25

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	刘柳, 向先宏, 张宇飞, 陈海昕, 魏闯, 朱剑, 杨普. 一种高升阻比非常规翼身融合燕尾气动布局[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(6): 629630-629630.
[2]	周贵荣, 徐见源, 马少博, 宗军耀, 沈金清, 朱海杰. 大型客机航电系统综合集成关键技术综述[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(5): 529956-529956.
[3]	郑云隆, 刘沛清, 屈秋林, 戴佳骅, 田逾. BWB飞机水上迫降运动特性数值研究[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(21): 528588-528588.
[4]	顾奕然, 黄江涛, 陈树生, 刘德园, 高正红. 基于逆向增广Burgers方程的声爆反演技术[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(2): 626258-626258）.
[5]	陈勇, 钟科林, 罗悦, 王淼. 支线客机关键技术与发展方向[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(2): 26697-026697.
[6]	曹传军, 刘天一, 朱伟, 王进春. 民用大涵道比涡扇发动机高压压气机技术进展[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(12): 27824-027824.
[7]	黄雄, 曲仕茹, 张恒, 陈显调. 大型客机增升构型缝翼除冰状态失速特性[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(1): 627077-627077.
[8]	付军泉, 史志伟, 耿玺, 朱佳晨, 王力爽, 吴大卫, 潘立军. 基于试验分岔分析的翼身融合飞行器纵向稳定性[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(1): 124931-124931.
[9]	范周伟, 余雄庆, 王朝, 钟伯文. 基于深度神经网络的客机总体设计参数敏感性分析[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(4): 524353-524353.
[10]	何萌, 杨体浩, 白俊强, 杨一雄. 基于后缘襟翼偏转的大型客机变弯度技术减阻收益[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(7): 123462-123462.
[11]	王继明, 高云海, 焦仁山. 大型客机低速构型高雷诺数风洞腹撑支架干扰数值模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(4): 123526-123526.
[12]	付军泉, 史志伟, 周梦贝, 吴大卫, 潘立军. 一种翼身融合飞行器的失速特性研究[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(1): 123176-123176.
[13]	张明辉, 陈真利, 毛俊, 王刚, 谭兆光, 王龙, 张彬乾. 翼身融合布局民机克鲁格襟翼设计[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(9): 623048-623048.
[14]	柴啸, 陈迎春, 谭兆光, 陈真利, 司江涛, 李杰, 张彬乾. 翼身融合布局客机总体参数分析与优化[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(9): 623042-623042.
[15]	王刚, 张明辉, 毛俊, 桑为民, 陈真利, 王龙, 张彬乾. 翼身融合民机扰流板增升技术[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(9): 623045-623045.