共轴刚性旋翼悬停状态地面效应气动特性

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2019.23055

流体力学与飞行力学

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

共轴刚性旋翼悬停状态地面效应气动特性

卢丛玲, 祁浩天, 徐国华, 史勇杰

南京航空航天大学直升机旋翼动力学国家级重点实验室, 南京 210016

收稿日期:2019-04-03 修回日期:2019-04-12 出版日期:2019-12-15 发布日期:2019-05-07
通讯作者: 徐国华 E-mail:ghxu@nuaa.edu.cn
基金资助:
江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目

Aerodynamic characteristics of hovering coaxial rigid rotor in ground effect

LU Congling, QI Haotian, XU Guohua, SHI Yongjie

National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Rotorcraft Aeromechanics, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China

Received:2019-04-03 Revised:2019-04-12 Online:2019-12-15 Published:2019-05-07
Supported by:
A Project Funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了研究地面效应下共轴刚性旋翼的气动特性，建立了一套基于非定常雷诺平均Navier-Stokes方程的气动干扰数值方法，采用运动嵌套网格模拟双旋翼的反转运动。地面采用无滑移边界条件，并对旋翼和地面附近的网格进行加密，以更好地捕捉旋翼的流场细节和尾迹特征。计算结果与Lynx尾桨试验结果进行对比，验证了所建立方法的有效性。对地面效应下共轴刚性旋翼的气动性能和流场进行分析，结果发现：相对于单独的上下旋翼而言，共轴旋翼地面效应下的拉力增益更大，这是由于上下旋翼桨叶表面的压强干扰受地面高压的影响而减弱；地面的干扰主要影响双旋翼尾迹的径向位置，对其轴向位置影响不大，上下旋翼尾迹在地面附近相互融合、分裂，形成复杂的桨尖涡尾迹；双旋翼在地效下的尾迹径向扩张半径比单旋翼大，这是由于双旋翼的径向射流速度更大；随着旋翼距地面高度的增加，双旋翼间的气动干扰强度逐渐恢复，因此下旋翼拉力增益的下降速度比上旋翼更大；共轴旋翼桨尖涡相对卷起高度和扩张半径均随离地高度增加而减小。

关键词: 共轴刚性旋翼, 地面效应, 气动干扰, 旋翼尾迹, 计算流体力学, 嵌套网格

Abstract: In order to analyze the aerodynamic characteristics of hovering coaxial rigid rotors in ground effect, a numerical method based on unsteady Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes equations is established. Moving overset grid is applied to simulate the reversal motion of the coaxial rotors. The non-slip boundary condition is adopted on the ground, and the grid around the rotors and the ground are refined to better capture the details of the flow field and the wake of the rotors. The comparison between the calculations and the experimental results of Lynx tail rotor verifies the effectiveness of the established method. The analyses of aerodynamic characteristics and the flow field of coaxial rigid rotors in ground effect show that the thrust increment of coaxial rotors in ground effect is larger than that of single upper and lower rotors. The increment is caused by the weakening of the interference between the surface of upper and lower blades due to high ground pressure. The ground interference mainly affects the radial position of the wake of the coaxial rotors, but it has little effect on its axial position. Upper and lower rotor wakes fuse and split with each other near the ground, forming complex tip vortex. The radius of the coaxial rotors wake in ground effect is larger than that of single rotor, because the radial jet velocity of the coaxial rotors is larger. With the increase of the height of the rotor from the ground, the aerodynamic interference intensity between the coaxial rotors gradually recovers, making the descending speed of the thrust increment of the lower rotor larger than that of the upper rotor. The relative roll height and the expansion radius of the coaxial rotors tip vortex decrease with the increase of off-ground height.

Key words: coaxial rigid rotor, ground effect, aerodynamic interaction, rotor wake, CFD, overset grid

中图分类号:

V211.52

卢丛玲, 祁浩天, 徐国华, 史勇杰. 共轴刚性旋翼悬停状态地面效应气动特性[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(12): 123055-123055.

LU Congling, QI Haotian, XU Guohua, SHI Yongjie. Aerodynamic characteristics of hovering coaxial rigid rotor in ground effect[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2019, 40(12): 123055-123055.

参考文献 25

[1]	SHERIDAN P F, WEISNER W. Aerodynamics of helicopter flight near ground[C]//Proceedings of 33rd Annual Forum of American Helicopter Society, 1977.
[2]	CURTISS H C, SUN M, PUTNAM W F, et al. Rotor aerodynamics in ground effect at low advance ratios[J]. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 1984, 29(1):48-55.
[3]	LIGHT J S. Tip vortex geometry of a hovering helicopter rotor in ground effect[J]. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 1993, 38(2):34-42.
[4]	GANESH B, KOMERATH N. Study of ground vortex structure of rotorcraft in ground effect at low advance ratios[C]//24th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2006.
[5]	何承健, 高正. 贴地飞行的旋翼尾迹研究[J]. 航空学报, 1986, 7(4):325-331. HE C J, GAO Z. A study of the rotor wake in nap-of-the-earth[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 1986, 7(4):325-331(in Chinese).
[6]	孙茂, CURTISS H C. 近地低速飞行时旋翼尾涡系的畸变及其诱导速度[J]. 空气动力学学报, 1989, 7(1):35-42. SUN M, CURTISS H C. Rotor vortex wake distortion and its induced velocity in ground effect at low speed[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 1989, 7(1):35-42(in Chinese).
[7]	BHATTACHARYYA S, CONLISK A T. The structure of the rotor wake in ground effect[C]//41th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2003.
[8]	HWANG J Y, CHOI J H, KWON O J. Assessment of S-76 rotor hover performance in ground effect using an unstructured mixed mesh method[C]//54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2016.
[9]	LAKSHMINARAYAN V K, KALRA T S, BAEDER J D. Detailed computational investigation of a hovering microscale rotor in ground effect[J]. AIAA Journal, 2013, 51(4):893-909.
[10]	CROZON C, STEIJL R, BARAKOS G N. Numerical study of helicopter rotors in a ship airwake[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2014, 51(6):1813-1832.
[11]	SUGIURA M, TANABE Y, SUGAWARA H, et al. Numerical simulations and measurements of the helicopter wake in ground effect[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2017, 54(1):209-219.
[12]	KUTZ B M, BENSING F, KEßLER M, et al. CFD calculation of a helicopter rotor hovering in ground effect[C]//DILLMANN A, HELLER G, KREPLIN H P, et al. New Results in Numerical and Experimental Fluid Mechanics VIII:Contributions to the 17th STAB/DGLR Symposium Berlin, Germany 2010. Berlin Heidelberg:Springer, 2013:297-304.
[13]	叶靓, 招启军, 徐国华. 基于非结构嵌套网格方法的旋翼地面效应数值模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2009, 30(5):780-786. YE L, ZHAO Q J, XU G H. Numerical simulation on flowfield of rotor in ground effect based on unstructured embedded grid method[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2009, 30(5):780-786(in Chinese).
[14]	朱明勇, 招启军, 王博. 基于CFD和混合配平算法的直升机旋翼地面效应模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(8):2539-2551. ZHU M Y, ZHAO Q J, WANG B. Simulation of helicopter rotor in ground effect based on CFD method and hybrid trim algorithm[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37(8):2539-2551(in Chinese).
[15]	康宁, 孙茂. 旋翼近地飞行时诱导速度的N-S方程计算[J]. 空气动力学学报, 1998, 16(2):221-225. KANG N, SUN M. Navier-Stokes calculations of induced velocity of a rotor in forward flight with ground effects[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 1998, 16(2):221-225(in Chinese).
[16]	康宁, 孙茂. 旋翼尾流与地面干扰时地面涡现象的研究[J]. 力学学报, 1998, 30(5):615-620. KANG N, SUN M. Investigation of the ground vortex phenomenon due to the interaction between rotor's wake and the ground[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 1998, 30(5):615-620(in Chinese).
[17]	KANG N, SUN M. Simulated flowfields in near-ground operation of single-and twin-rotor configurations[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2000, 37(2):214-220.
[18]	覃燕华, 朱清华, 邵松. 共轴双旋翼悬停地面效应气动特性分析[J]. 南京航空航天大学学报, 2015, 47(2):266-274. QIN Y H, ZHU Q H, SHAO S. Aerodynamic characteristics analysis for hovering coaxial rotors in ground effect[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics, 2015, 47(2):266-274(in Chinese).
[19]	陆陶冶, 陈仁良, 吉洪蕾, 等. 共轴双旋翼悬停地面效应分析[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2017, 49(10):45-52. LU T Y, CHEN R L, JI H L, et al. Performance analysis of coaxial-rotorfor hovering in ground effect[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2017, 49(10):45-52(in Chinese).
[20]	TAN J F, SUN Y M, BARAKOS G N. Vortex approach for downwash and outwash of tandem rotors in ground effect[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2018, 55(6):2491-2509.
[21]	ROE P L. Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors, and difference schemes[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1981, 43:357-372.
[22]	LUO H, BAUM J D, LÃHNER R. A fast, matrix-free implicit method for computing low Mach number flows on unstructured grids[J]. International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics, 2000, 14(2):133-157.
[23]	SPALART P, ALLMARAS S. A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows[C]//30th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston, VA:AIAA, 1992.
[24]	祁浩天, 史勇杰, 徐国华, 等. 共轴刚性旋翼气动干扰及操纵特性分析[J]. 航空动力学报, 2017, 32(12):3004-3012. QI H T, SHI Y J, XU G H, et al. Analysis of aerodynamic interaction andtrim characteristics of rigid coaxial rotor[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2017, 32(12):3004-3012(in Chinese).
[25]	LAKSHMINARAYAN V K, BAEDER J D. High-resolution computational investigation of trimmed coaxial rotor aerodynamics in hover[C]//63rd American Helicopter Society Annual Forum, 2007.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

共轴刚性旋翼悬停状态地面效应气动特性

Aerodynamic characteristics of hovering coaxial rigid rotor in ground effect

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 25

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	刘琦, 史勇杰, 胡志远, 徐国华. 共轴刚性旋翼气动及噪声特性的参数影响分析[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 528856-528856.
[2]	崔壮壮, 原昕, 赵国庆, 井思梦, 招启军. 共轴刚性旋翼高速直升机前飞性能操纵策略影响[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 529256-529256.
[3]	孙朋朋, 刘平安, 樊枫, 曾伟. 悬停状态共轴刚性旋翼机身气动干扰特性[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 529284-529284.
[4]	柳家齐, 陈荣钱, 楼锦华, 韩旭, 吴昊, 尤延铖. 基于深度学习的高速直升机旋翼翼型气动优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 529828-529828.
[5]	王畅, 何龙, 徐栋霞, 唐敏, 马率, 吴希明. 共轴刚性旋翼桨毂流动控制减阻研究[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 529084-529084.
[6]	韩少强, 宋文萍, 韩忠华, 许建华. 高速共轴刚性旋翼非定常流动高精度数值模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 529064-529064.
[7]	王梓旭, 李攀, 鲁可, 朱振华, 陈仁良. 共轴刚性旋翼高速直升机配平策略优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 529069-529069.
[8]	邓景辉. 电动垂直起降飞行器的技术现状与发展[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(5): 529937-529937.
[9]	陆凤霞, 韦坤, 王春雷, 鲍和云, 朱如鹏. 直升机中减三相流金属屑末可达性[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(1): 128524-128524.
[10]	刘坤达, 刘雪明, 朱波, 张清瑞. 面向狭窄通道穿越的多机编队安全鲁棒控制[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(S2): 729768-729768.
[11]	任炯, 王刚, 胡国栋, 石晓露. 自适应Walsh函数有限体积方法[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(8): 127444-127444.
[12]	曹文博, 刘溢浪, 张伟伟. 基于降阶模型和梯度优化的流场加速收敛方法[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(6): 127090-127090.
[13]	刘思华, 王占莹, 李利剑, 张敏弟. 头型对射弹高速入水稳定性的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(21): 528437-528437.
[14]	樊宇翔, 赵瑞, 左政玄, 杨光, 李宇. 气体引射效应对壁面热流和摩擦阻力的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(21): 528587-528587.
[15]	乔建领, 韩忠华, 丁玉临, 宋文萍, 宋笔锋. 分层大气湍流场对远场声爆传播的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(2): 626350-626350.