基于DMD方法的缝翼低频噪声机理分析

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2017.121469

流体力学与飞行力学

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

基于DMD方法的缝翼低频噪声机理分析

魏佳云¹, 李伟鹏¹, 许思为¹, 赵克良², 孙一峰²

1. 上海交通大学航空航天学院, 上海 200240;
2. 中国商飞上海飞机设计研究院总体气动部, 上海 201315

收稿日期:2017-06-01 修回日期:2017-07-11 出版日期:2018-01-15 发布日期:2018-01-15
通讯作者: 李伟鹏,E-mail:liweipeng@sjtu.edu.cn E-mail:liweipeng@sjtu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（11202131，11772194）；国家"973"计划（2014CB744802）；上海市地面交通工具空气动力学与热环境系统模拟重点实验室基金（VATLAB-2016-02）

Analysis of mechanism of slat low frequency noise based on zonal DMD

WEI Jiayun¹, LI Weipeng¹, XU Siwei¹, ZHAO Keliang², SUN Yifeng²

1. School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China;
2. Department of Overall Aerodynamics, Shanghai Aircraft Design and Research Institute, Shanghai 201315, China

Received:2017-06-01 Revised:2017-07-11 Online:2018-01-15 Published:2018-01-15
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (11202131, 11772194); National Basic Research Program of China (2014CB744802); Foundation of Shanghai Key Laboratory of Vehicle Aerodynamic and Vehicle Thermal Management Systems (VATLAB-2016-02)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 认识缝翼低频噪声的产生机理十分重要，可指导先进的主被动噪声控制方法。本文开展了缝翼噪声的大涡模拟（LES），利用动态模态分解（DMD）方法研究了缝翼低频噪声的产生机理。研究结果表明缝翼低频噪声具有显著的偶极子特性，其利用DMD分析揭示了缝翼噪声的产生机理，缝翼低频噪声源于剪切层中的大尺度涡结构与缝翼下壁面的周期性撞击效应，大尺度涡结构与低频噪声之间存在的流-声耦合的闭环反馈机制，根据反馈机制提出并验证了一种预测低频噪声的理论预测模型。

关键词: 缝翼噪声, 大涡模拟, 动态模态分解(DMD), 流-声耦合, 闭环反馈机制

Abstract: It is crucial to know the mechanism of low-frequency noise from the leading-edge slat, which can guide an advanced active and passive control of slat noise. According to the highly reliable Large Eddy Simulation (LES), this paper reveals the mechanism of slat noise using the method of Dynamic Mode Decomposition (DMD). The results indicate that the dipole features of slat noise come from the collision between large scale vortexes in the free shear layer and the lower surface of the slat. There is a close loop feedback mechanism of flow-acoustic coupling existing between large scale vortexes and low-frequency acoustic waves from the reattachment point. Based on this mechanism, a theoretical predictive model is also proposed and verified.

Key words: slat noise, large eddy simulation, dynamic mode decomposition (DMD), flow-acoustic coupling, closed-loop feedback

中图分类号:

V224⁺.5

魏佳云, 李伟鹏, 许思为, 赵克良, 孙一峰. 基于DMD方法的缝翼低频噪声机理分析[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(1): 121469-121469.

WEI Jiayun, LI Weipeng, XU Siwei, ZHAO Keliang, SUN Yifeng. Analysis of mechanism of slat low frequency noise based on zonal DMD[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2018, 39(1): 121469-121469.

参考文献

[1] DOBRZYNSKI W. Almost 40 years of airframe noise research-What did we achieve[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2010, 47(2):353-367.[2] CHOW L C, MAU K, REMY H. Landing gears and high lift devices airframe noise research[C]//CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference.Reston,VA:AIAA, 2002.[3] FLEURY V, MALBÉQUI P. Slat noise assessment from airbus A340 flyover phased-array microphone measurements[J]. AIAA Journal, 2012,51(7):1667-1674.[4] KHORRAMI M R, LOCKARD D P. Effects of geometric details on slat noise generation and propagation[J]. International Journal of Aeroacoustics, 2010,9(4, 5):655-678.[5] KHORRAMI M R, BERKMAN M E, CHOUDHARI M. Unsteady flow computations of a slat with a blunt trailing edge[J]. AIAA Journal, 2000, 39(11):2050-2058.[6] KOLB A, FAULHABER P, DROBIETZ R, et al. Aeroacoustic wind tunnel measurements on a 2D high-lift configuration[C]//CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2007.[7] ROSSITER J E. Wind tunnel experiments on the flow over rectangular cavities at subsonic and transonic speed[R]. Aeronautical Research Council Reports and Memoranda, 1964:3438.[8] KHORRAMI M R, SINGER B A, MERT E, et al. Time-accurate simulations and acoustic analysis of slat free shear layer[J]. AIAA Journal, 2002, 40(7):1284-1291.[9] IMAMURA T, ENOMOTO S, YOKOKAWA Y, et al. Three-dimensional unsteady flow computations around a conventional slat of high-lift devices[J]. AIAA Journal, 2008, 46(5):1044-1053.[10] IMAMURA T, URA H, YOKOKAWA Y, et al. Designing of slat cove filler as a noise reduction device for leading-edge slat[C]//CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference.Reston,VA:AIAA, 2007.[11] KÖNIG D, KOH S R, MEINKE M, et al. Two-step simulation of slat noise[J]. Computers and Fluids, 2010, 39(3):512-524.[12] SCHMID P J. Dynamic mode decomposition of numerical and experimental data[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2010, 656(1):5-28.[13] JOVANOVIC M R, SCHMID P J, NICHOLS J W. Sparsity-promoting dynamic mode decomposition[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2014, 26(2):024103.[14] LELE S K. Compact finite difference schemes with spectral-like resolution[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1992, 103:16-42.[15] VISBAL M R, GAITONDE D V. On the use of higher-order finite-difference schemes on curvilinear and deforming meshes[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2002, 181:155-185.[16] NISHIDA H, NONOMURA T. ADI-SGS scheme on ideal magneto hydrodynamics[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2008, 228:3182-3188.[17] NONOMURA T, FUJⅡ K. Over expansion effects on characteristics of Mach waves from a supersonic cold jet[J]. AIAA Journal, 2011, 49(10):2282-2294.[18] KAWAI S, FUJⅡ K. Compact scheme with filtering for large-eddy simulation of transitional boundary layer[J]. AIAA Journal, 2008, 46(3):690-700.[19] TERRAACOL M, MANOHA E, LEMOINE B. Investigation of the unsteady flow and noise source generation in a slat cove:hybrid zonal RANS/LES simulation and dedicated experiment[C]//CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2011.[20] LOCKARD D P, CHOUDHARI M M. Noise radiation from a leading-edge slat[C]//CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference Reston, VA:AIAA,2009.[21] SPALART P R, ALLMARAS S R. A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows[C]//CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference. Reston, VA:AIAA, 1992.[22] DELCAYRE F, DUBIEF Y. On coherent-vortex identification in turbulence[J]. Journal of Turbulence, 2001, 1(11):1-22.[23] JENKINS L N, KHORRAMI M R, CHOUDHARI M. Characterization of unsteady flow structures near leading-edge slat[C]//CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference.Reston,VA:AIAA, 2004.[24] CHOUDHARI M M, KHORRAMI M R. Effect of three-dimensional shear layer structures on slat cove unsteadiness[J]. AIAA Journal, 2007, 45(9):2174-2186.[25] 寇家庆, 张伟伟, 高传强. 基于POD和DMD方法的跨声速抖振模态分析[J].航空学报, 2016, 37(9):2679-2689. KOU J Q, ZHANG W W, GAO C Q. Modal analysis of transonic buffet based on POD and DMD method[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37(9):2679-2689(in Chinese).

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

基于DMD方法的缝翼低频噪声机理分析

Analysis of mechanism of slat low frequency noise based on zonal DMD

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	乔竑玮, 梁剑寒, 张林, 孙明波, 陈玉俏. 超声速燃烧中的概率密度函数方法研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(8): 28802-028802.
[2]	张育鸣, 戴玉婷, 黄广靖, 杨超, 蒋树杰. 柔性变形后缘翼型阵风减缓及气动噪声分析[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(10): 129219-129219.
[3]	张子佩, 赵钟, 陈坚强, 刘健, 邓小兵. 风雷软件LES开发设计与验证[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(6): 127171-127171.
[4]	关清帝, 梁剑寒, 张林, 陈文武, 陈玉俏. 一般曲线坐标系下概率密度函数方法及其在超声速燃烧中的应用[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(4): 126677-126677.
[5]	施方成, 高振勋, 田雨岩, 蒋崇文, 王田天, 李椿萱. 超声速理想膨胀喷流噪声的大涡模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(2): 626266-626266.
[6]	赵宾宾, 张恒, 李杰. 翼型结冰状态复杂分离流动数值模拟综述[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(1): 627211-627211.
[7]	张钧铎, 左青海, 林孟达, 黄伟希, 潘卫军, 崔桂香. ARJ21飞机尾涡在侧风条件下的近地演化数值模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(5): 125043-125043.
[8]	谢晨月, 王建春, 万敏平, 陈十一. 基于人工神经网络的可压缩湍流大涡模拟模型[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(9): 625723-625723.
[9]	王萍, 郑晓静. 风沙两相流数值模拟研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(9): 625767-625767.
[10]	王德鑫, 褚佑彪, 刘难生, 李祝飞, 杨基明. 高背压进气道中内外流耦合作用的大涡模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(9): 625754-625754.
[11]	刘远强, 王艳冰, 项松, 王梦琪. 面向电动飞机应用的不同叶尖螺旋桨噪声特性[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(3): 624567-624567.
[12]	王方, 王煜栋, 姜胜利, 陈军, 唐军, 徐华胜, 李象远, 邢竞文, 高东硕, 金捷. AECSC-JASMIN湍流燃烧仿真软件研发和检验[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(12): 625003-625003.
[13]	朱志斌, 尚庆, 白鹏, 刘强. 翼型低雷诺数层流分离现象随雷诺数的演化特征[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(5): 122528-122528.
[14]	张红军, 朱志斌, 尚庆, 刘智勇, 沈清. 锯齿形转捩片触发高超声速进气道边界层转捩的大涡模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(10): 122930-122930.
[15]	张阳, 马振海, 邹建锋, 郑耀, 谢家华. 一种高阶精度大涡模拟技术用于激波/火焰相互作用[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(10): 122298-122298.