C/C热防护结构高温气流损伤导波监测实验方法

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2021.25659

固体力学与飞行器总体设计

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

C/C热防护结构高温气流损伤导波监测实验方法

郑辉, 邱雷, 袁慎芳, 杨晓飞, 卢绪龙, 薛兆鹏

南京航空航天大学, 机械结构力学及控制国家重点实验室, 结构健康监测与预测研究中心, 南京 210016

收稿日期:2021-04-12 修回日期:2022-01-05 出版日期:2022-08-15 发布日期:2022-01-04
通讯作者: 邱雷,E-mail:lei.qiu@nuaa.edu.cn E-mail:lei.qiu@nuaa.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(51921003,51975292);江苏省杰出青年基金(BK20211519);机械结构力学及控制国家重点实验室自主课题重点项目(MCMS-I-0521K01);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(1001-XAC21022);江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助。

Experimental method of guided wave monitoring for high temperature airflow damage of C/C thermal protection structures

ZHENG Hui, QIU Lei, YUAN Shenfang, YANG Xiaofei, LU Xulong, XUE Zhaopeng

Research Center of Structural Health Monitoring and Prognosis, State Key Lab of Mechanics and Control of Mechanical Structures, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China

Received:2021-04-12 Revised:2022-01-05 Online:2022-08-15 Published:2022-01-04
Supported by:
Natural Science Foundation of China (51921003,51975292),Outstanding Youth Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China (BK20211519),Research Fund of State Key Laboratory of Mechanics and Control of Mechanical Structures (Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics)(MCMS-I-0521K01),the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (1001-XAC21022),Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 热防护结构(TPS)的健康监测对高超声速飞行器的安全服役和高效运维至关重要。导波结构健康监测(SHM)方法具有灵敏度高、通过压电传感器组网可实现大面积区域监测等优点,是一种很有前景的高超声速飞行器结构健康监测方法,但目前国内外针对高超声速飞行器TPS导波监测方法的相关研究很少,其中TPS高温气流损伤实验和监测方面的研究更少。针对该问题,提出了基于导波的高超声速飞行器TPS真实损伤监测实验方法,以碳/碳(C/C)复合材料TPS为具体研究对象,通过大于1 800 ℃的氧-乙炔高温气流烧蚀TPS施加真实损伤,开展了导波在TPS上的传播特性研究,从损伤前后导波信号和特征参数的对比以及损伤程度的表征等方面分析了损伤对导波的影响。结果表明,损伤产生后TPS上导波幅值和波速发生明显变化,通过对导波信号在损伤前后的变化程度进行量化,可以反映出TPS损伤程度,验证了导波监测方法对TPS损伤及其扩展的监测是可行的,为进一步开展高超声速飞行器TPS导波监测理论和方法的研究提供了一种实验方法和依据。

关键词: 高超声速飞行器, 热防护结构, 碳/碳, 结构健康监测, 导波, 氧-乙炔烧蚀

Abstract: The health monitoring of Thermal Protection Structures (TPS) is essential for the safe service and efficient maintenance of hypersonic vehicles. The guided wave based Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) method is a promising method for SHM of hypersonic vehicles, due to its advantages, such as high sensitivity and large monitoring area based on piezoelectric sensor network. However, there are few relevant researches on guided wave monitoring methods for hypersonic vehicles TPS at home and abroad, especially on the experimental and monitoring method for the high-temperature airflow damage on TPS. To solve this problem, an experimental method based on guided waves for the real damage monitoring of hypersonic vehicles TPS is proposed. Through taking the carbon / carbon (C/C) composite TPS as the research object and applying real damage onto it via a high-temperature oxygen-acetylene gas flow above 1 800 ℃, the propagation characteristics of guided wave on TPS are studied. The influence of damage on guided waves is analyzed in terms of the comparison of the signal and characteristic parameters of guided waves before and after damage and the characterization of the damage degree. The results show that the amplitude and propagation velocity of the guided wave change significantly after the damage occurred. By quantifying the change of the guide wave signals before and after damage, the damage degree of TPS can be good indicated, which verifies that the guided wave monitoring method is feasible for monitoring TPS damage and its expansion, providing an experimental method and basis for further research on the guided wave monitoring theory and method of hypersonic vehicles TPS.

Key words: hypersonic vehicle, thermal protection structures, carbon / carbon, structural health monitoring, guided wave, oxygen-acetylene ablation

中图分类号:

郑辉, 邱雷, 袁慎芳, 杨晓飞, 卢绪龙, 薛兆鹏. C/C热防护结构高温气流损伤导波监测实验方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 225659-225659.

ZHENG Hui, QIU Lei, YUAN Shenfang, YANG Xiaofei, LU Xulong, XUE Zhaopeng. Experimental method of guided wave monitoring for high temperature airflow damage of C/C thermal protection structures[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(8): 225659-225659.

参考文献

[1] SZIROCZAK D, SMITH H. A review of design issues specific to hypersonic flight vehicles[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2016, 84: 1-28.
[2] UYANNA O, NAJAFI H. Thermal protection systems for space vehicles: A review on technology development, current challenges and future prospects[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2020, 176: 341-356.
[3] 杜善义, 方岱宁, 孟松鹤, 等. "近空间飞行器的关键基础科学问题"重大研究计划结题综述[J]. 中国科学基金, 2017, 31(2): 109-114. DU S Y,FANG D N, MENG S H, et al. Review of the achievements of major research plan on "Key fundamental scientific problems on hypersonic vehicle"[J]. Bulletin of National Natural Science Foundation of China, 2017, 31(2): 109-114 (in Chinese).
[4] 龙乐豪, 蔡巧言, 王飞, 等. 重复使用航天运输系统发展与展望[J]. 科技导报, 2018, 36(10): 84-92. LONG L H, CAI Q Y, WANG F, et al. Development of reusable space transportation technologies[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2018, 36(10): 84-92 (in Chinese).
[5] DARYABEIGI K. Thermal analysis and design optimization of multilayer insulation for reentry aerodynamic heating[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2002, 39(4): 509-514.
[6] XIE G N, WANG Q, SUNDEN B, et al. Thermomechanical optimization of lightweight thermal protection system under aerodynamic heating[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2013, 59(1-2): 425-434.
[7] 李宇峰, 贺利乐, 张璇, 等. 典型热防护壁板结构的热模态分析[J]. 应用力学学报, 2017, 34(1): 43-49, 194. LI Y F, HE L L, ZHANG X, et al. Thermal modal analysis of typical thermo-defend panel structure[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2017, 34(1): 43-49, 194 (in Chinese).
[8] 解维华, 韩国凯, 孟松鹤, 等. 返回舱/空间探测器热防护结构发展现状与趋势[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(8): 022792. XIE W H, HAN G K, MENG S H, et al. Development status and trend of thermal protection structure for return capsules and space probes[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2019, 40(8): 022792 (in Chinese).
[9] YANG J, CHANG F K. Detection of bolt loosening in C-C composite thermal protection panels: I. Diagnostic principle[J]. Smart Materials and Structures, 2006, 15(2): 591-599.
[10] KUNDU T, DAS S, JATA K V. Health monitoring of a thermal protection system using lamb waves[J]. Structural Health Monitoring, 2009, 8(1): 29-45.
[11] GYEKENYESI A L, MARTIN R E, MORSCHER G N, et al. Impedance-based structural health monitoring of a ceramic matrix composite[J]. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 2009, 20(7): 875-882.
[12] GUO Z Q, KIM K, LANZARA G, et al. Micro-fabricated, expandable temperature sensor network for macro-scale deployment in composite structures[C]//2011 Aerospace Conference. Piscataway: IEEE Press, 2011: 1-6.
[13] YEE C, RAY M, TANG F, et al. Ablation recession sensor for ablative materials based on ultraminiature thermocouples[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2014, 51(6): 1789-1796.
[14] MENG S H, YANG Q, XIE W H, et al. Structure redesign of the integrated thermal protection system and fuzzy performance evaluation[J]. AIAA Journal, 2016, 54(11): 3598-3607.
[15] SUBRAHMANYAM P, RASKY D. Entry, descent, and landing technological barriers and crewed MARS vehicle performance analysis[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2017, 91: 1-26.
[16] 袁慎芳, 刘凌峰, 邱雷, 等. C/C热防护结构弹性波仿真分析方法及损伤对弹性波的影响[J]. 复合材料学报, 2019, 36(10): 2448-2457. YUAN S F, LIU L F, QIU L, et al. Elastic wave simulation analysis method and damage effect on elastic wave in C/C thermal protection structures[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2019, 36(10): 2448-2457 (in Chinese).
[17] 张佳奇, 刘明辉, 刘科海, 等. 基于超声导波的返回舱热防护结构烧蚀层厚度监测方法[J]. 航天器环境工程, 2019, 36(5): 487-494. ZHANG J Q, LIU M H, LIU K H, et al. A method based on ultrasonic guidedwavefor monitoringthe thickness of ablation layer for thermal protection structures of re-entry capsules[J]. Spacecraft Environment Engineering, 2019, 36(5): 487-494 (in Chinese).
[18] 袁慎芳. 结构健康监控[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2007. YUAN S F. Structural health monitoring and damage control[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2007 (in Chinese).
[19] SHEN Y F, GIURGIUTIU V. WaveFormRevealer: An analytical framework and predictive tool for the simulation of multi-modal guided wave propagation and interaction with damage[J]. Structural Health Monitoring, 2014, 13(5): 491-511.
[20] YUAN S F, REN Y Q, QIU L, et al. A multi-response-based wireless impact monitoring network for aircraft composite structures[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2016, 63(12): 7712-7722.
[21] MITRA M, GOPALAKRISHNAN S. Guided wave based structural health monitoring: A review[J]. Smart Materials and Structures, 2016, 25(5): 053001.
[22] MEI H F, YUAN S F, QIU L, et al. Damage evaluation by a guided wave-hidden Markov model based method[J]. Smart Materials and Structures, 2016, 25(2): 025021.
[23] YUAN S F, CHEN J, YANG W B, et al. On-line crack prognosis in attachment lug using Lamb wave-deterministic resampling particle filter-based method[J]. Smart Materials and Structures, 2017, 26(8): 085016.
[24] QIU L, YAN X X, LIN X D, et al. Multiphysics simulation method of lamb wave propagation with piezoelectric transducers under load condition[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2019, 32(5): 1071-1086.
[25] LIU X S, FU Q G, WANG H, et al. Microstructure, thermophysical property and ablation behavior of high thermal conductivity carbon/carbon composites after heat-treatment[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2020, 33(5): 1541-1548.
[26] IHN J B, CHANG F K. Detection and monitoring of hidden fatigue crack growth using a built-in piezoelectric sensor/actuator network: I. Diagnostics[J]. Smart Materials and Structures, 2004, 13(3): 609-620.
[27] CHO H, LISSENDEN C J. Structural health monitoring of fatigue crack growth in plate structures with ultrasonic guided waves[J]. Structural Health Monitoring, 2012, 11(4): 393-404.
[28] CHEN J, YUAN S F, JIN X. On-line prognosis of fatigue cracking via a regularized particle filter and guided wave monitoring[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2019, 131: 1-17.
[29] MICHAELS J E. Detection, localization and characterization of damage in plates with an array of spatially distributed ultrasonic sensors[J]. Smart Materials and Structures, 2008, 17(3): 035035.
[30] TORKAMANI S, ROY S, BARKEY M E, et al. A novel damage index for damage identification using guided waves with application in laminated composites[J]. Smart Materials and Structures, 2014, 23(9): 095015.
[31] QIU L, YUAN S F, CHANG F K, et al. On-line updating Gaussian mixture model for aircraft wing spar damage evaluation under time-varying boundary condition[J]. Smart Materials and Structures, 2014, 23(12): 125001.
[32] LIU M L, WANG Q, ZHANG Q M, et al. Hypervelocity impact induced shock acoustic emission waves for quantitative damage evaluation using miniaturized piezoelectric sensor network[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2019, 32(5): 1059-1070.
[33] 贺平, 王玲玲, 莫纪安, 等. 烧蚀材料烧蚀试验方法: GJB 323B—2018[S]. 北京: 国防科工委军标出版社, 2018. HE P, WANG L L, MO J A, et al. Test method for abla-tion of ablators: GJB 323B—2018[S]. Beijing: Military Standard Press of Commission of Science, Technology and Industry for National Defense, 2018 (in Chinese).
[34] QIU L, YUAN S F, WANG Q, et al. Design and experiment of PZT network-based structural health monitoring scanning system[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2009, 22(5): 505-512.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

C/C热防护结构高温气流损伤导波监测实验方法

Experimental method of guided wave monitoring for high temperature airflow damage of C/C thermal protection structures

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	孙志坤, 史志伟, 张伟麟, 李铮, 孙琪杰. 等离子体激励器对高速翼型升阻特性的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(S2): 23-39.
[2]	吴锐, 石文泽, 卢超, 李秋锋, 陈果. 航空不锈钢薄板电磁超声SH导波检测定量分析方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 425888-425888.
[3]	刘强, 涂国华, 罗振兵, 陈坚强, 赵瑞, 袁先旭. 延迟高超声速边界层转捩技术研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(7): 25357-025357.
[4]	孙聪. 高超声速飞行器强度技术的现状、挑战与发展趋势[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(6): 527590-527590.
[5]	王育鹏, 吕帅帅, 杨宇, 李嘉欣, 王叶子. 基于域自适应的复合材料结构损伤识别方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(6): 526752-526752.
[6]	石文泽, 程进杰, 胡硕臻, 卢超, 陈尧. 脉冲压缩在铝薄板电磁超声导波检测中的应用[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(3): 425063-425063.
[7]	罗世彬, 庙智超, 宋佳文. 高超声速飞行器前缘主动冷却影响因素[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(12): 627023-627023.
[8]	曲抒旋, 巩文斌, 孙小珠, 张东兴, 梁志强, 高丽敏, 吕卫帮. 基于碳纳米管薄膜的复合材料在线损伤监测[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(1): 424949-424949.
[9]	高昌, 李正洲, 黄江涛, 贺元元, 吴颖川, 乐嘉陵, 桂丰. 基于连续伴随方法的高超声速飞行器高精度气动优化[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(7): 124490-124490.
[10]	刘智侃, 刘深深, 刘骁, 曾磊, 代光月. 基于物理量梯度修正的RBF数据传递方法[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(7): 124506-124506.
[11]	左浩, 许才彬, 杨志勃. 基于导波传播模型的MUSIC损伤识别算法[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(6): 225143-225143.
[12]	艾邦成, 陈思员, 韩海涛, 胡龙飞, 鲁芹, 初敏, 邓代英, 俞继军. 疏导式热防护结构传热极限特性[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(2): 623989-623989.
[13]	李嘉兴, 王大轶, 鄂薇, 葛东明. 大动态干扰下基于光学图像的自主导航技术[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(11): 524907-524907.
[14]	路遥. 基于跟踪微分器的高超声速飞行器Backstepping控制[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(11): 524737-524737.
[15]	丁一波, 岳晓奎, 代洪华, 崔乃刚. 考虑进气约束的高超声速飞行器预定性能控制[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(11): 524838-524838.