TBO模式下终端区进场交通流优化模型与仿真分析

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2020.23844

电子电气工程与控制

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

TBO模式下终端区进场交通流优化模型与仿真分析

张洪海¹, 汤一文¹, 许炎²

1. 南京航空航天大学民航学院, 南京 211106;
2. 克兰菲尔德大学航空中心, 贝德福德郡 MK430AL

收稿日期:2020-01-16 修回日期:2020-02-06 出版日期:2020-07-15 发布日期:2020-04-20
通讯作者: 张洪海 E-mail:honghaizhang@nuaa.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（71971114，61573181）

Optimizing arrival traffic flow in airport terminal airspace under trajectory based operations

ZHANG Honghai¹, TANG Yiwen¹, XU Yan²

1. College of Civil Aviation, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China;
2. Centre for Aeronautics, Cranfield University, Bedford MK430 AL, United Kingdom

Received:2020-01-16 Revised:2020-02-06 Online:2020-07-15 Published:2020-04-20
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (71971114, 61573181)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 持续增长的交通需求量和日趋饱和的可用空域资源促使未来空中交通管理向基于航迹运行（TBO）的精细化管理模式转变。在TBO概念的基础上，依据目前繁忙机场终端区常见进场航线结构，提出了对应TBO模式下的截点直飞方式与融合点方式进场交通流优化模型，并以法国戴高乐机场终端区为例，构建了仿真运行环境。基于实际飞行计划与雷达记录轨迹模拟生成了航空器四维航迹，而后运用上述2种模型对进场交通流进行了优化，根据仿真结果对特定交通流参数展开了对比分析。研究结果表明，模型可通过航迹选择、时隙分配、顺序交换及动态间隔等方式有效化解终端区内潜在的航空器冲突并保持交通流安全高效运行，同时在一定程度上揭示了TBO模式下交通流的部分运行特性，为以四维航迹为核心的未来空中交通管理策略提供了理论支持。

关键词: 空中交通管理, 机场终端区, 基于航迹运行, 交通流特性, 仿真优化

Abstract: Continuously increasing traffic demand and gradually saturated airspace are promoting a transformation which will shift future air traffic management system to a refined management mode with Trajectory Based Operation (TBO) as its core. Conforming to the TBO concept and current air route structure in busy terminal airspace, traffic flow optimization models corresponding to short-cut directly fly arrival mode and merge-point arrival mode with TBO characterized are proposed respectively. Charles de Gaulle Airport is taken as an example to build the terminal airspace simulation environment. Based on actual flight plans and radar data, four-dimensional flight trajectories are generated and optimized by the two models. According to the simulation outcomes, analysis and comparisons of traffic flow characteristics for the two models are carried out. The results show that the models can effectively avoid potential aircraft conflicts and maintain a safe and efficient traffic flow operation in terminal airspace by implementing trajectory selection, time slot rescheduling, dynamic separation, sequence exchange, etc. It reveals traffic flow characteristics under the TBO mode and provides theoretical support for the future air traffic management strategy centered on the four-dimensional trajectory.

Key words: air traffic management, terminal airspace, trajectory-based operation, traffic flow characteristics, simulation and optimization

中图分类号:

V355

张洪海, 汤一文, 许炎. TBO模式下终端区进场交通流优化模型与仿真分析[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(7): 323844-323844.

ZHANG Honghai, TANG Yiwen, XU Yan. Optimizing arrival traffic flow in airport terminal airspace under trajectory based operations[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(7): 323844-323844.

参考文献 21

[1]	JUNG Y, HOANG T, MONTOYA J, et al. A concept and implementation of optimized operations of airport surface traffic[C]//10th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) Conference. Reston:AIAA, 2010:9213.
[2]	DE NEUFVILLE R, ODONI A. Airport systems:Planning, design, and management[M]. New York:McGraw-Hill Professional, 2003:144-146.
[3]	GROPPE M, PAGLIARI R, HARRIS D. Applying cognitive work analysis to study airport collaborative decision making design[C]//Proceedings of the ENRI International Workshop on ATM/CNS,2009:77-88.
[4]	SESAR. European ATM master plan-The roadmap for sustainable air traffic management[R].Luxembourg:SESAR Consortium, 2012.
[5]	FAA. The future of the NAS[R]. Washington, D.C.:Federal Aviation Administration, 2016.
[6]	RUIZ S, PIERA M A, DEL POZO I. A medium term conflict detection and resolution system for terminal maneuvering area based on spatial data structures and 4D trajectories[J]. Transportation Research Part C:Emerging Technologies, 2013, 26:396-417.
[7]	张军峰,蒋海行,武晓光,等.基于BADA及航空器意图的四维航迹预测[J].西南交通大学学报,2014,49(3):553-558. ZHANG J F, JIANG H X, WU X G, et al. 4 dimension trajectory forecast based on BADA and aircraft intent[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2014, 49(3):553-558(in Chinese).
[8]	KORN B, HELMKE H, KUENZ A. 4D trajectory management in the extended TMA:Coupling AMAN and 4D FMS for optimized approach trajectories[C]//25th International Council of Aeronautical Sciences, 2006.
[9]	JOHNSON S C, BARMORE B. NextGen far-term concept exploration for integrated gate-to-gate trajectory-based operations[C]//16th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference. Reston:AIAA 2016.
[10]	HANSEN M, NIKOLERIS T, LOVELL D, et al. Use of queuing models to estimate delay savings from 4D trajectory precision[C]//Eighth USA/Europe Air Traffic Management Research and Development Seminar,2009.
[11]	NIKOLERIS T, HANSEN M. Queueing models for trajectory-based aircraft operations[J]. Transportation Science, 2012, 46(4):501-511.
[12]	RAMASAMY S, SABATINI R, GARDI A, et al. Next generation flight management system for real-time trajectory based operations[J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2014, 3446:344-349.
[13]	XU Y, PRATS X, DELAHAYE D. Synchronization of traffic flow and sector opening for collaborative demand and capacity balancing[C]//2018 IEEE/AIAA 37th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC). Piscataway:IEEE Press, 2018:1-10.
[14]	张洪海,杨磊,别翌荟, 等.终端区进场交通流广义跟驰行为与复杂相变分析[J].航空学报,2015,36(3):949-961. ZHANG H H, YANG L, BIE Y H, et al. Analysis on generalized following behavior and complex phase transition law of approaching traffic flow in terminal airspace[J]. Acta Aeronautia et Astronautica Sinica,2015,36(3):949-961(in Chinese).
[15]	ZHANG H, YANG X, FAN W, et al. Guidance control strategy for air traffic flow in terminal areas[J]. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 2016, 8(10):15-64.
[16]	ZELINSKI S J, JUNG J. Arrival scheduling with shortcut path options and mixed aircraft performance[C]//Proceedings of the Eleventh USA/Europe Air Traffic Management Research and Development Seminar,2015.
[17]	LIANG M, DELAHAYE D, MARÉCHAL P. Integrated sequencing and merging aircraft to parallel runways with automated conflict resolution and advanced avionics capabilities[J]. Transportation Research Part C:Emerging Technologies, 2017, 85:268-291.
[18]	LIANG M, DELAHAYE D, MARéCHAL P. A framework of point merge-based autonomous system for optimizing aircraft scheduling in busy TMA[C]//5th SESAR Innovation Days, 2015.
[19]	BALAKRISHNAN H, JUNG Y. A framework for coordinated surface operations planning at Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport[C]//AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit. Reston:AIAA, 2007.
[20]	PRETE J, KROZEL J, MITCHELL J, et al. Flexible, performance-based route planning for super-dense operations[C]//AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit,2008.
[21]	Eurocontrol Experimental Centre. Point merge integration of arrival flows enabling extensive RNAV application and continuous descent[R]. Paris:Eurocontrol, 2010.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

TBO模式下终端区进场交通流优化模型与仿真分析

Optimizing arrival traffic flow in airport terminal airspace under trajectory based operations

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 21

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	水笑雨, 王艳军, 王子明, 彭明田, 孙强. 考虑机场公平性的机场群航班时刻分配[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(8): 327212-327212.
[2]	谢华, 苏方正, 尹嘉男, 韩斯特, 张新珏. 复杂低空无人机飞行冲突网络建模与精细管理[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(18): 328226-328226.
[3]	王兵, 邹润原, 常哲宁. 基于改进模拟退火的航空器起飞质量估算方法[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(16): 328090-328090.
[4]	王飞, 韩翔宇. 基于分形插值的空中交通流量短期预测[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 325585-325585.
[5]	谢华, 黎子弘, 杨磊, 朱永文, 刘芳子. 容量受限下城市对航班四维航迹优化[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 325581-325581.
[6]	赵嶷飞, 王梦琦. 空中交通工程学理论内涵与关键科学技术[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(12): 26537-026537.
[7]	张军峰, 游录宝, 杨春苇, 胡荣. 基于多目标帝国竞争算法的进场排序与调度[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(6): 324439-324439.
[8]	陈志杰, 汤锦辉, 王冲, 程季锃, 曹珊, 邵欣. 人工智能赋能空域系统,提升空域分层治理能力[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(4): 525018-525018.
[9]	杨磊, 李文博, 刘芳子, 陈雨童, 赵征. 柔性空域结构下连续下降航迹多目标优化[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(2): 324157-324157.
[10]	陈雨童, 胡明华, 杨磊, 张昊然, 赵征. 受限航路空域自主航迹规划与冲突管理技术[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(9): 324045-324045.
[11]	叶博嘉, 鲍序, 刘博, 田勇. 基于机器学习的航空器进近飞行时间预测[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(10): 324136-324136.
[12]	马园园, 胡明华, 尹嘉男, 田文. 多机场终端区进离场交通流协同排序方法[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(2): 320222-320234.
[13]	杨磊, 胡明华, 尹苏皖, 张洪海. 大型繁忙机场场面离场交通流拥堵特征分析[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(6): 1921-1930.
[14]	马园园, 胡明华, 张洪海, 尹嘉男, 吴凡. 多机场终端区进场航班协同排序方法[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(7): 2279-2290.
[15]	张洪海, 杨磊, 别翌荟, 尹苏皖. 终端区进场交通流广义跟驰行为与复杂相变分析[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(3): 949-961.