基于联合k/n(G)模型的DIMA系统可靠性建模与分析

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2018.21971

电子电气工程与控制

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

基于联合k/n(G)模型的DIMA系统可靠性建模与分析

阎芳^1,2,3, 邢培培^2,3, 赵长啸^1,2,3, 王鹏^1,2,3

1. 中国民航大学天津市民用航空器适航与维修重点实验室, 天津 300300;
2. 中国民航大学民航航空器适航审定技术重点实验室, 天津 300300;
3. 中国民航大学适航学院, 天津 300300

收稿日期:2017-12-26 修回日期:2018-03-01 出版日期:2018-06-15 发布日期:2018-03-01
通讯作者: 赵长啸,E-mail:zhaochangxiao@yeah.net E-mail:zhaochangxiao@yeah.net
基金资助:
国家"973"计划（2014CB744902）；国家自然科学基金-民航联合基金（U1533105）

Reliability modeling and analysis of DIMA system based on joint k/n(G) model

YAN Fang^1,2,3, XING Peipei^2,3, ZHAO Changxiao^1,2,3, WANG Peng^1,2,3

1. Civil Aircraft Airworthiness and Repair Key Laboratory of Tianjin, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Civil Aircraft Airworthiness Technology, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China;
3. School of Airworthiness, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China

Received:2017-12-26 Revised:2018-03-01 Online:2018-06-15 Published:2018-03-01
Supported by:
National Basic Research Program of China (2014CB744902); Joint Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China and the Civil Aviation Administration of China (U1533105)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对分布式综合模块化航空电子（DIMA）系统的动态重构特性，分析了动态重构策略及重构过程，构建了面向DIMA系统的联合k/n（G）可靠性模型。以驻留于DIMA系统的综合显示功能为例进行了实验分析，讨论了系统重构过程可靠度与时间变化关系，给出了利用一般k/n（G）可靠性模型建模的可靠度变化曲线，通过对比分析验证了联合k/n（G）模型的适用性和合理性；通过参数敏感性分析，观察不同模块配置参数对系统可靠度的影响，得出相关结论，为提高DIMA系统动态重构过程的可靠性和优化资源配置提供指导。

关键词: 分布式综合模块化航空电子(DIMA), 动态重构, 联合k/n(G)模型, 可靠性, 有效性, 敏感性

Abstract: Considering the dynamic reconfiguration of the Distributed Integrated Modular Avionics (DIMA) system, the dynamic reconfiguration strategy and reconfiguration process are analyzed, and a joint k/n (G) reliability model for the DIMA system is constructed. An experimental analysis of the comprehensive display function residing in the DIMA system is carried out. The relationship between reliability and time of the system reconfiguration process is discussed, and the change of reliability curve is given using the general k/n (G) reliability model. Comparative analysis is conducted to show the applicability and rationality of the joint k/n (G) model. Through the parameter sensitivity analysis, the impact of different model configuration parameters on the system reliability is observed. The results can provide effective guidance for improving the reliability of the dynamic reconfiguration process of the DIMA system and optimizing resource allocation.

Key words: Distributed Integrated Modular Avionics (DIMA), dynamic reconfiguration, joint k/n (G) model, reliability, effectiveness, sensitivity

中图分类号:

V243

阎芳, 邢培培, 赵长啸, 王鹏. 基于联合k/n(G)模型的DIMA系统可靠性建模与分析[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(6): 321971-321971.

YAN Fang, XING Peipei, ZHAO Changxiao, WANG Peng. Reliability modeling and analysis of DIMA system based on joint k/n(G) model[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2018, 39(6): 321971-321971.

参考文献

[1] MOIR L, ALLAN S. 飞机航空电子系统[M]. 支超有, 秦成, 译. 北京:国防工业出版社, 2015:136-144. MOIR L, ALLAN S. Civil avionics systems[M]. ZHI C Y, QIN C, translated. Beijing:National Defence Industry Press, 2015:136-144(in Chinese).
[2] 王国庆, 谷青范, 王淼,等. 新一代综合化航空电子系统构架技术研究[J]. 航空学报, 2014, 35(6):1473-1486. WANG G Q, GU Q F, WANG M, et al. Research on the architecture technology for new generation integrated avionics system[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2014, 35(6):1473-1486(in Chinese).
[3] ROBATI T, GHERBI A, MULLINS J. A modeling and verification approach to the design of distributed IMA architectures using TTEthernet[J]. Procedia Computer Science, 2016, 83:229-236.
[4] FUCHSEN R. IMA NextGen:A new technology for the Scarlett program[J]. IEEE Aerospace & Electronic Systems Magazine, 2010, 25(10):10-16.
[5] 王鹏, 阎芳, 白杰,等. 一种综合模块化航电系统重构决策系统及决策方法:CN 103825902A[P]. 2014-05-28. WANG P, YAN F, BAI J, et al. An IMA reconstruction decision system and decision method:CN 103825902A[P]. 2014-05-28(in Chinese).
[6] EFKEMANN C, PELESKA J. Model-based testing for the second generation of integrated modular avionics[C]//IEEE Fourth International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops. Washington, D.C:IEEE Computer Society, 2011:55-62.
[7] ANNIGHÖFER B, THIELECKE F. A systems architecting framework for optimal distributed integrated modular avionics architectures[J]. Ceas Aeronautical Journal, 2015, 6(3):485-496.
[8] JU H Y, WANG S H. Reliability analysis for the process of DIMA dynamic reconfiguration[C]//Proceedings of the 26th European Safety and Reliability Conference. London:CRC Press, 2016:679-684.
[9] 王鹏, 刘锐, 刘万和,等. 综合模块化航空电子系统可靠性评估方法研究[J]. 电光与控制, 2015(10):56-61. WANG P, LIU R, LIU W H, et al. On reliability assessment method of integrated modular avionics system[J]. Electronics Optics & Control, 2015(10):56-61(in Chinese).
[10] ROBATI T, GHERBI A, KOUHENA E, et al. Design and simulation of distributed IMA architectures using TTEthernet:A model-driven approach[J]. Journal of Ambient Intelligence & Humanized Computing, 2017, 8(3):1-11.
[11] WANG G Q, GU Q F. Research on distributed integrated modular avionics system architecture design and implementation[C]//Digital Avionics Systems Conference. Piscataway, NJ:IEEE Press, 2014:7D6-1-7D6-10.
[12] WOLFIG R. 综合化模块化航空电子系统的分布式平台[M]. 牛文生, 译. 北京:航空工业出版社, 2015:29-31. WOLFIG R. A distributed platform for integrated modular avionics[M]. NIU W S, translated. Beijing:Aviation Industry Press, 2015:29-31(in Chinese).
[13] 崔西宁, 沈玉龙, 李亚晖. 综合化航空电子系统安全技术研究进展[J]. 计算机应用与软件, 2012(11):130-136. CUI X N, SHEN Y L, LI Y H. Process in research of security technologies in integrated avionics system[J]. Computer Applications and Software, 2012(11):130-136(in Chinese).
[14] 熊华钢, 王中华. 先进航空电子综合技术[M]. 北京:国防工业出版社, 2009:266-269. XIONG H G, WANG Z H. Advanced integrated avionics technology[M]. Beijing:National Defence Industry Press, 2009:266-269(in Chinese).
[15] BIEBER P, NOULARD E, PAGETTI C, et al. Preliminary design of future reconfigurable IMA platforms[J]. ACM Sigbed Review, 2009, 6(3):1-5.
[16] 詹志娟, 周庆, 洪蓉. DIMA动态重构管理方法研究[C]//2016航空试验测试技术学术交流会论文集. 北京:测控技术杂志社, 2016:190-192. ZHAN Z J, ZHOU Q, HONG R. Research on the method of the dynamic reconfiguration management in DIMA[C]//Proceedings of Aeronautical Test and Measurement Technology Symposium in 2016. Beijing:Measurement & Control Technology Press, 2016:190-192(in Chinese).
[17] ASAAC. Final draft of proposed guidelines for system issues-Volume4:System configuration/reconfiguration:ASAAC-STANAG 4626(Part VI)[S]. Belgium Brussels:North Atlantic Treaty Organization, 2004.
[18] ASAAC. Ministry of defence interim defence standard 00-76 ASAAC standards part 1:Proposed standards for common functional modules[S]. Belgium Brussels:North Atlantic Treaty Organization, 2005.
[19] LI R C, MIN X. On a generalized k-out-of-n system and its reliability[J]. International Journal of Systems Science, 2005, 36(5):267-274.
[20] COIT D W, CHATWATTANASIRI N, WATTANAPONGSAKORN N, et al. Dynamic k-out-of-n system reliability with component partnership[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2015, 138:82-92.
[21] COIT D W, CHATWATTANASIRI N, WATSOOKTIP T, WATTANAPONGSAKORN N. System reliability optimization with k-out-of-n subsystems and changing k[C]//International Conference on Reliability, Maintainability and Safety. Piscataway, NJ:IEEE Press, 2011:1382-1387.
[22] 宋成艳, 杨永华, 杨明. 基于APEX的飞机综合信息显示系统[C]//首届中国航空科学技术大会. 北京:中国航空学会,2013. SONG C Y, YANG Y H, YANG M. The integrated information display system of aircraft based on APEX[C]//First China Aviation Science and Technology Conference, Beijing:CSAA, 2013(in Chinese).
[23] 赵长啸, 何锋, 阎芳,等. 面向风险均衡的AFDX虚拟链路路径寻优算法[J]. 航空学报, 2018,39(1):321435. ZHAO C X, HE F, YAN F, et al. Path optimization algorithem of AFDX virtual link to balance the network risk[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2018,39(1):321435(in Chinese).
[24] FAA. AC 25-11B, advisory circular:Transport category, airplane electronic Display System[S]. Washington, D. C.:Federal Aviation Authority, 2014.
[25] ASAAC. Final draft of proposed guidelines for system issues-Volume7:Safety:ASAAC-STANAG 4626(Part VI)[S]. Belgium Brussels:North Atlantic Treaty Organization, 2004.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

基于联合k/n(G)模型的DIMA系统可靠性建模与分析

Reliability modeling and analysis of DIMA system based on joint k/n(G) model

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	龚煜廉, 张建国, 吴志刚, 褚光远, 范晓铎, 黄赢. 主动学习基自适应PC⁃Kriging模型的复合材料结构可靠度算法[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(8): 228982-228982.
[2]	张帆, 程伯晗, 王鹏, 董磊. 二元共载系统退化相关的两阶段退化模型及可靠性分析[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(7): 229046-229046.
[3]	薛小锋, 赵淼龑, 杜倩宜, 冯蕴雯, 樊俊铃, 焦婷. 基于人员和环境因素定量化的检测可靠性[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(6): 228859-228859.
[4]	姜乐, 陈以彪, 李炎军, 李贵林, 刘涛. 航空发动机增压式离心通风器流动与分离特性[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(2): 128675-128675.
[5]	张恺玲, 李思怡, 段毅, 阎超. 进气道流动中SST湍流模型参数的不确定度量化[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(S2): 729429-729429.
[6]	孙晓哲, 侯东, 杨建忠. 双余度机电作动器力纷争机理及敏感性[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(S1): 727661-727661.
[7]	郑新前, 王钧莹, 黄维娜, 伏宇, 程荣辉, 熊洪洋. 航空发动机不确定性设计体系探讨[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(7): 27099-027099.
[8]	王志凯, 陈盛, 范玮. 神经网络宽度对燃烧室排放预测的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(5): 126816-126816.
[9]	孙本奇, 杨强, 孙志礼, 李树军, 马宏坤, 王若男. 平面约束变胞机构构态切换能力的概率评估模型[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(4): 426843-426843.
[10]	张帆, 孙紫荆, 肖国松, 刘嘉琛, 王鹏. 基于直觉模糊贝叶斯网络的HUD系统多阶段任务可靠性分析[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(4): 226853-226853.
[11]	顾孟奇, 朱家才, 郭万林, 薛松. 可重复使用运载火箭结构疲劳耐久性与可靠性展望[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(23): 628299-628299.
[12]	杨乐昌, 汪晨星. 基于多源异构信息的航空发动机转子参数校准与可靠性分析[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(23): 228575-228575.
[13]	冯蕴雯, 唐家强, 冯成慧, 陈先民, 薛小锋. 基于载荷共享理论的多传力路径耳片可靠性研究[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(20): 228528-228528.
[14]	姜峰, 李华聪, 符江锋, 洪林雄. 基于RBF和主动学习的非概率可靠度求解方法[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(2): 226667-226667.
[15]	冯蕴雯, 林心怡, 薛小锋, 杨祥, 刘佳奇. 高可靠单向爆破的民机防爆结构设计[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(18): 228297-228297.