航空学报 > 2015, Vol. 36 Issue (1): 159-175   doi: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2014.0214

高超声速复杂气动问题数值方法研究进展

王江峰, 伍贻兆, 季卫栋, 樊孝峰, 赵法明, 吕侦军   

  1. 南京航空航天大学 航空宇航学院, 南京 210016
  • 收稿日期:2014-08-15 修回日期:2014-09-02 出版日期:2015-01-15 发布日期:2014-09-24
  • 通讯作者: 王江峰,Tel.: 025-84891231 E-mail: wangjf@nuaa.edu.cn E-mail:wangjf@nuaa.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:王江峰 男, 博士, 教授, 博士生导师。主要研究方向:高超声速飞行器布局设计、燃烧流场数值模拟技术、气动加热计算技术等。 Tel: 025-84891231 E-mail: wangjf@nuaa.edu.cn;伍贻兆 男, 博士, 教授, 博士生导师。主要研究方向:计算流体力学,飞行器气动布局设计。 Tel: 025-84891231 E-mail: wyzao@nuaa.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    国家"863"计划

Progress in numerical simulation techniques of hypersonic aerodynamic problems

WANG Jiangfeng, WU Yizhao, JI Weidong, FAN Xiaofeng, ZHAO Faming, LYU Zhenjun   

  1. College of Aerospace Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China
  • Received:2014-08-15 Revised:2014-09-02 Online:2015-01-15 Published:2014-09-24
  • Supported by:

    National High-tech Research and Development Program of China

摘要:

高超声速流场具有复杂流动特征,其中真实气体效应、磁流体干扰效应和力热结构耦合效应等对气动力分析产生了重要影响。将流体力学研究扩展到分子动力学、电磁流体力学以及流固耦合等交叉学科领域,这给数值模拟方法带来了巨大挑战。针对高超声速气动力/热分析的热点问题,重点关注高温效应与低密度流动效应、磁流体干扰效应和力热结构耦合效应等,结合算例分析了相应的数值求解技术;在气动热方面主要比较了3类求解方法(纯工程方法、纯数值方法和基于Prandtl边界层理论的方法),并给出了相应算例;对于气动力/热/结构耦合问题,从耦合模型及耦合计算方法两方面开展了分析。最后指出了高超声速复杂气动问题数值求解技术未来需重点关注的几个方面。

关键词: 高超声速, 数值模拟, 气动加热, 磁流体力学, 气动热弹性力学, 气动力/热/结构耦合

Abstract:

Hypersonic flow field has complex flow characteristics in which real gas effects, magnetic fluid interference effects and fluid/thermal/structural coupling effects have an important impact on the aerodynamic force. They extend fluid dynamics to molecular dynamics, electromagnetic fluid dynamics, fluid/structure interaction and other interdisciplinary fields, which have brought great challenges to the numerical simulation methods. Aimed at hot issues of hypersonic aerodynamic force and aerodynamic heat, high-temperature effects, low-density flow effect, magnetic fluid interference effect and fluid/thermal/structural coupling effect have been significantly emphasized. Several examples and the corresponding numerical solution techniques are given in this paper. Three methods of aerodynamic heating are compared, i.e., pure engineering method, pure numerical method and Prandtl boundary layer theory-based method. For fluid/thermal/structural coupling problem, analyses are carried out in two aspects, i.e., coupling model and coupling calculation method. Finally, several problems of numerical simulation technologies which need to be emphasized in the future are figured out.

Key words: hypersonic, numerical simulation, aerodynamic heating, magnetohydrodynamics, aerothermoelasticity, fluid/thermal/structural coupling

中图分类号: