基于数据驱动的扭转度偏差对压气机性能的影响

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2023.29938

Abstract

Abstract:

To investigate the impact of introducing changes in the dimensionality and correlation of twist deviation on the quantitative results of compressor performance， we adopt a data-driven non-intrusive polynomial chaos method to quantitatively study the uncertainty effect of blade twist deviation on the aerodynamic performance of a single-stage axial subsonic compressor based on the measurement results of twist deviation of a certain compressor rotor blade， and conduct sensitivity analysis. The research results indicate that the standard deviation of compressor performance under various operating conditions decreases with the increase of the twist deviation dimension introduced. Through quantitative comparison， it was observed that considering twist deviations of the blade tip and root sections is sufficient to ensure the convergence of compressor performance standard deviation and performance probability distribution form. However， in sensitivity analysis， it was revealed that more dimensions of twist deviation introduced can lead to more accurate identification of the most sensitive twist deviation region in compressor performance. As the correlation between twist deviations on various sections gradually strengthens， the fluctuation degree of compressor performance under different operating conditions also increases. Though the difference between the first-order sensitivity indices of compressor performance to twist deviations gradually decreases， the ranking of compressor performance sensitivity to twist deviations on various sections remains unchanged.

Key words: data driven, twist deviation, uncertainty quantification, sensitivity analysis, compressor

CLC Number:

V231.3

Tianyuan JI, Wuli CHU, Haoguang ZHANG, Zhengtao GUO, Dejun MENG. Effect of data-driven twist deviation on compressor performance[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(19): 629938.

Figures/Tables 23

Table 1

Fig.1

Table 2

Table 3

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Table 4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Table 5

Fig.8

Fig.9

Fig.10

Fig.11

Fig.12

Fig.13

Fig.14

Fig.15

Fig.16

Fig.17

Fig.18

References 49

1	BERGNER J， KABLITZ S， HENNECKE D K， et al. Influence of sweep on the 3D shock structure in an axial transonic compressor［C］∥Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2005： Power for Land， Sea， and Air. New York： ASME， 2008： 343-352.
2	李萍. 叶片加工误差及数据传递对压气机气动性能的影响［D］. 西安：西北工业大学， 2015： 1-8.
	LI P. Effect of blade machining error and data transfer on compressor aerodynamic performance［D］. Xi’an： Northwestern Polytechnical University， 2015： 1-8 （in Chinese）.
3	罗佳奇，朱亚路，刘锋. 基于伴随方法的叶片加工偏差气动灵敏度分析［J］. 工程热物理学报， 2017， 38（3）： 498-503.
	LUO J Q， ZHU Y L， LIU F. Aerodynamic sensitivity analysis for manufacturing variations of a turbine blade by an adjoint method［J］. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics， 2017， 38（3）： 498-503 （in Chinese）.
4	WU C Y. Arbitrary surface flank milling and flank SAM in the design and manufacturing of jet engine fan and compressor airfoils［C］∥Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2012： Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition. New York： ASME， 2013： 21-30.
5	但玥，王浩浩，高丽敏，等. 扭转度误差对跨声速压气机叶片性能的影响［J］. 推进技术， 2023， 44（10）： 89-96.
	DAN Y， WANG H H， GAO L M， et al. Effects of twist angle error on transonic compressor blades performance［J］. Journal of Propulsion Technology， 2023， 44（10）： 89-96 （in Chinese）.
6	BAMMERT K， SANDSTEDE H. Influences of manufacturing tolerances and surface roughness of blades on the performance of turbines［J］. Journal of Engineering for Power， 1976， 98（1）： 29-36.
7	张国臣，刘波，曹志远. 静子叶栅安装角异常非定常流场数值研究［J］. 推进技术， 2014， 35（2）： 187-194.
	ZHANG G C， LIU B， CAO Z Y. Numerical analysis of unsteady flow for stagger angle of stator cascade adjusting abnormally［J］. Journal of Propulsion Technology， 2014， 35（2）： 187-194 （in Chinese）.
8	张国臣，刘波，杨小东，等. 叶栅安装角异常的非定常流场数值模拟［J］. 航空动力学报， 2014， 29（10）： 2450-2456.
	ZHANG G C， LIU B， YANG X D， et al. Numerical simulation of unsteady flow field on abnormal stagger angle of cascade［J］. Journal of Aerospace Power， 2014， 29（10）： 2450-2456 （in Chinese）.
9	叶学民，李新颖，李春曦. 第一级叶轮单动叶安装角异常对动叶可调轴流风机性能的影响［J］. 中国电机工程学报， 2014， 34（14）： 2297-2306.
	YE X M， LI X Y， LI C X. Effect of the first-stage impeller with single abnormal blade on the performance of a variable pitch axial fan［J］. Proceedings of the CSEE， 2014， 34（14）： 2297-2306 （in Chinese）.
10	高丽敏，蔡宇桐，曾瑞慧，等. 叶片加工误差对压气机叶栅气动性能的影响［J］. 推进技术， 2017， 38（3）： 525-531.
	GAO L M， CAI Y T， ZENG R H， et al. Effects of blade machining error on compressor cascade aerodynamic performance［J］. Journal of Propulsion Technology， 2017， 38（3）： 525-531 （in Chinese）.
11	DALBANJAN M S， SARANGI N. Sensitivity study of stagger angle on the aerodynamic performance of transonic axial flow compressors［C］∥Proceedings of the National Aerospace Propulsion Conference. Singapore： Springer， 2023： 3-14.
12	LANGE A， VOIGT M， VOGELER K， et al. Probabilistic CFD simulation of a high-pressure compressor stage taking manufacturing variability into account［C］∥Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2010： Power for Land， Sea， and Air. New York： ASME， 2010： 617-628.
13	李玉，楚武利，姬田园. 叶片安装角偏差对动叶性能影响的不确定性研究［J］. 西安交通大学学报， 2023， 57（4）： 49-59.
	LI Y， CHU W L， JI T Y. Uncertainty research of effects of blade stagger angle deviation on the performance of rotor［J］. Journal of Xi’an Jiaotong University， 2023， 57（4）： 49-59 （in Chinese）.
14	GUO Z T， CHU W L， ZHANG H G. A data-driven non-intrusive polynomial chaos for performance impact of high subsonic compressor cascades with stagger angle and profile errors［J］. Aerospace Science and Technology， 2022， 129： 107802.
15	LANGE A， VOIGT M， VOGELER K， et al. Impact of manufacturing variability on multistage high-pressure compressor performance［J］. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power， 2012， 134（11）： 112601.
16	李晓丽，楚武利. 安装角变化对多级轴流压缩机性能影响的分析［J］. 风机技术， 2008， 50（5）： 27-29.
	LI X L， CHU W L. Analysis on the influence of variable installation angle on performance of multistage axial-flow compressor［J］. Compressor， Blower & Fan Technology， 2008， 50（5）： 27-29 （in Chinese）.
17	LANGE A， VOIGT M， VOGELER K， et al. Impact of manufacturing variability and nonaxisymmetry on high-pressure compressor stage performance［J］. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power， 2012， 134（3）： 032504.
18	姬田园，楚武利，张皓光，等. 真实安装角偏差影响压气机性能的不确定性量化［J］. 航空动力学报， 2024， 39（10）： 20220858.
	JI T Y， CHU W L， ZHANG H G， et al. Uncertainty quantification of real stagger angle deviation affecting compressor performance［J］. Journal of Aerospace Power， 2024， 39（10）： 20220858 （in Chinese）.
19	刘佳鑫，于贤君，孟德君，等. 高压压气机出口级叶型加工偏差特征及其影响［J］. 航空学报， 2021， 42（2）： 423796.
	LIU J X， YU X J， MENG D J， et al. State and effect of manufacture deviations of compressor blade in high-pressure compressor outlet stage［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2021， 42（2）： 423796 （in Chinese）.
20	GUO Z T， CHU W L， ZHANG H G. Uncertainty analysis of global and local performance impact of inflow and geometric uncertainties using sparse grid-based non-intrusive polynomial chaos［J］. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers， Part A： Journal of Power and Energy， 2022， 236（7）： 1239-1256.
21	姬田园，楚武利，戴雨晨，等. 叶顶间隙偏差对叶片气动性能影响的不确定性研究［J］. 推进技术， 2022， 43（10）： 134-146.
	JI T Y， CHU W L， DAI Y C， et al. Uncertainty research of effects of blade tip clearance deviation on blade aerodynamic performance［J］. Journal of Propulsion Technology， 2022， 43（10）： 134-146 （in Chinese）.
22	郑似玉，滕金芳，羌晓青. 叶片加工超差对高压压气机性能影响和敏感性分析［J］. 机械工程学报， 2018， 54（2）： 216-224.
	ZHENG S Y， TENG J F， QIANG X Q. Sensitivity analysis of manufacturing variability on high-pressure compressor performance［J］. Journal of Mechanical Engineering， 2018， 54（2）： 216-224 （in Chinese）.
23	WANG W， CHU W L， ZHANG H G， et al. Experimental and numerical study of tip injection in a subsonic axial flow compressor［J］. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics， 2017， 30（3）： 907-917.
24	CHI Z D， CHU W L， ZHANG Z Y， et al. Research on the stability enhancement mechanism of multi-parameter interaction of casing treatment in an axial compressor rotor［J］. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers， Part G： Journal of Aerospace Engineering， 2022， 236（12）： 2405-2419.
25	CHI Z D， CHU W L， ZHANG H G， et al. Stall margin evaluation and data mining based multi-objective optimization design of casing treatment for an axial compressor rotor［J］. Physics of Fluids， 2023， 35（8）： 086117.
26	CHI Z D， CHU W L， ZHANG H G， et al. Unsteady effects of casing treatment on tip flow structures in a subsonic compressor rotor［C］∥Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2022： Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition. New York： ASME， 2022.
27	ZHANG H G， LIU W H， WANG E H， et al. Mechanism investigation of enhancing the stability of an axial flow rotor by blade angle slots［J］. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers， Part G： Journal of Aerospace Engineering， 2019， 233（13）： 4750-4764.
28	ZHANG H G， LI Q， DONG F Y， et al. Mechanism of affecting the performance and stability of an axial flow compressor with inlet distortion［J］. Journal of Thermal Science， 2021， 30（4）： 1406-1420.
29	JI T Y， CHU W L， LIANG C Yet al. Uncertainty quantification on the influence of blade thickness deviation at different rotational speeds based on flow dissipation analysis［J］. Physics of Fluids， 2023， 35（6）： 066126.
30	SCHLÜTER L， VOIGT P， VOIGT M， et al. The validation of a parametric leading edge model for probabilistic CFD analyses of post-service compressor airfoils［C］∥Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2022： Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition. New York： ASME， 2022.
31	LIU B J， LIU J X， YU X J， et al. A novel decomposition method for manufacture variations and the sensitivity analysis on compressor blades［J］. Aerospace， 2022， 9（10）： 542.
32	WANG J Y， WANG B T， YANG H L， et al. Compressor geometric uncertainty quantification under conditions from near choke to near stall［J］. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics， 2023， 36（3）： 16-29.
33	姬田园，楚武利，郭正涛，等. 一种叶片截面几何特征参数的获取方法： CN115168986A［P］. 2022-10-11.
	JI T Y， CHU W L， GUO Z T， et al. A method for obtaining geometric feature parameters of blade section： CN115168986A［P］. 2022-10-11 （in Chinese）.
34	ROSENBLATT M. Remarks on some nonparametric estimates of a density function［J］. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics， 1956， 27（3）： 832-837.
35	PROTS A， SCHLÜTER L， VOIGT M， et al. Impact of epistemic uncertainty on performance parameters of compressor blades［C］∥Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2022： Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition. New York： ASME， 2022.
36	赵轲，高正红，黄江涛，等. 基于PCE方法的翼型不确定性分析及稳健设计［J］. 力学学报， 2014， 46（1）： 10-19.
	ZHAO K， GAO Z H， HUANG J T， et al. Uncertainty quantification and robust design of airfoil based on polynomial chaos technique［J］. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics， 2014， 46（1）： 10-19 （in Chinese）.
37	GOPINATHRAO N P， BAGSHAW D， MABILAT C， et al. Non-deterministic CFD simulation of a transonic compressor rotor［C］∥Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2009： Power for Land， Sea， and Air. New York： ASME， 2010： 1125-1134.
38	CHU W L， JI T Y， CHEN X Y， et al. Mechanism analysis and uncertainty quantification of blade thickness deviation on rotor performance［J］. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers， Part A： Journal of Power and Energy， 2023， 237（6）： 1188-1202.
39	WIENER N. The homogeneous chaos［J］. American Journal of Mathematics， 1938， 60（4）： 897-936.
40	XIA Z H， LUO J Q， LIU F. Performance impact of flow and geometric variations for a turbine blade using an adaptive NIPC method［J］. Aerospace Science and Technology， 2019， 90： 127-139.
41	XIU D B， KARNIADAKIS G E. Modeling uncertainty in flow simulations via generalized polynomial chaos［J］. Journal of Computational Physics， 2003， 187（1）： 137-167.
42	AHLFELD R， BELKOUCHI B， MONTOMOLI F. SAMBA： Sparse approximation of moment-based arbitrary polynomial chaos［J］. Journal of Computational Physics， 2016， 320： 1-16.
43	王浩浩，高丽敏，杨光，等. 一种鲁棒的数据驱动不确定性量化方法及在压气机叶栅中的应用［J］. 航空学报， 2023， 44（17）： 128169.
	WANG H H， GAO L M， YANG G， et al. Robust data-driven uncertainty quantification method and its application in compressor cascade［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2023， 44（17）： 128169 （in Chinese）.
44	GUO Z T， CHU W L. Stochastic aerodynamic analysis for compressor blades with manufacturing variability based on a mathematical dimensionality reduction method［J］. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers， Part C： Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science， 2022， 236（10）： 5719-5735.
45	OLADYSHKIN S， NOWAK W. Data-driven uncertainty quantification using the arbitrary polynomial chaos expansion［J］. Reliability Engineering & System Safety， 2012， 106： 179-190.
46	ISUKAPALLI S S， ROY A， GEORGOPOULOS P G. Stochastic response surface methods （SRSMs） for uncertainty propagation： Application to environmental and biological systems［J］. Risk Analysis， 1998， 18（3）： 351-363.
47	MARCELLO ANILE A， SPINELLA S， RINAUDO S. Stochastic response surface method and tolerance analysis in microelectronics［J］. COMPEL-the International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering， 2003， 22（2）： 314-327.
48	SOBOL’ I M. Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates［J］. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation， 2001， 55（1-3）： 271-280.
49	MARA T A， TARANTOLA S. Variance-based sensitivity indices for models with dependent inputs［J］. Reliability Engineering & System Safety， 2012， 107： 115-121.

参数	100%设计转速	71%设计转速
旋转速度/（r·min^-1）	15 200	10 765
设计质量流量/（kg·s^-1）	5.6	4.5
设计总压比	1.249	1.12
设计等熵效率	0.905	0.92
叶尖相对马赫数	0.78	0.7
叶片数	30	30
轮毂比	0.61	0.61
平均展弦比	1.94	1.94
叶顶间隙/mm	0.35	0.35

参数	数值
主通道网格结构	O-4H型网格
径向网格节点	85
轴向网格节点	177
周向网格节点	53
叶顶间隙网格结构	蝶形网格
叶顶间隙内径向网格节点	17
壁面第1层网格厚度/m	2×10^-6
y⁺	<2
网格总数/10⁴	102

参数	数值
湍流模型	Spalart-Allmaras模型
空间离散格式	2阶迎风格式
时间离散格式	显式4阶Runge-Kutta格式
入口气流方向	径向方向
入口总温/K	288
入口总压/Pa	101 325
壁面条件	绝热无滑移边界

叶高截面	分布区间/（°）	平均值/（°）	标准差/（°）
95%	［-0.448， 0.336］	-0.020 00	0.178 89
50%	［-0.493， 0.413］	-0.014 84	0.203 74
5%	［-0.476， 0.340］	-0.033 21	0.185 13

叶片组	Spearman相关系数
叶片组	95%和50%叶高截面	95%和5%叶高截面	50%和5% 叶高截面
G4	0.222 4	0.285 3	0.286 4
G5	0.522 4	0.585 3	0.586 4
G6	0.822 4	0.885 3	0.886 4

Effect of data-driven twist deviation on compressor performance

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 23

References 49

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Zhouwei FAN, Chuihuan KONG, Ming LIU, Zhaoguang TAN. Sensitivity analysis on key parameters of hybrid hydrogen fuel cell commercial aircraft [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2025, 46(9): 631066-631066.
[2]	Fei XUE, Yuqi QIN, Wendong LIU, Yangang WANG. Experiments on stall initial disturbance characteristics of contra-rotating compressor with distorted inflow [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2025, 46(2): 130474-130474.
[3]	Ming CAI, Limin GAO, Ruiyu LI, Bo OUYANG, Bo LIU. Establishment of standard model of linear cascade wind tunnel for subsonic compressor [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2025, 46(2): 130547-130547.
[4]	Shanyue GUAN, Zhengyu TIAN, Wenjia XIE, Qianyue FU, Yuhang CHU, Jiajun ZHU. Analysis of plasma chemical reactions of hypersonic reentry blunt in flight corridor [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2025, 46(18): 131735-131735.
[5]	Ruiyu LI, Ming CAI, Bo OUYANG, Limin GAO, Bo LIU, Baojie LIU. Standard cascade test for typical high-load and large turning angle compressor arfoils [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2025, 46(16): 131651-131651.
[6]	Han ZHOU, Qian CHEN, Hongyu WANG, Haolan SHI, Pengxuan WEI, Jiacheng LI, Tianhong ZHANG, Hanlin SHENG. A high flux dual variable cycle engine model coupled with instability simulation [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2025, 46(14): 131436-131436.
[7]	Yongxin SHI, Kuo TIAN, Bo WANG. Topology optimization of aerospace axisymmetric structures based on bidirectional density function [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(S1): 730585-730585.
[8]	Yueteng WU, Dun BA, Juan DU, Yunfei LI, Juntao CHANG. Compressor flow field reconstruction method based on deep attention networks [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(24): 630580-630580.
[9]	Chunhua LI, Jianzhong SUN, Jilong LU. Maintenance-oriented approach for HPT blade life digital twin modeling [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(21): 629385-629385.
[10]	Le JIANG, Yibiao CHEN, Yanjun LI, Guilin LI, Tao LIU. Flow and separation characteristics of pressurized centrifugal separator for aero⁃engine [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(2): 128675-128675.
[11]	Tianhe GAO, Kuo TIAN, Lei HUANG, Shu ZHANG, Zengcong LI. Data⁃driven shape⁃topology optimization method for curved shells [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(2): 428806-428806.
[12]	Yanhe TAO, Qintao GUO, Jin ZHOU, Jiaqian MA, Xiaofa LI. Efficient variational Bayesian model updating under observation uncertainty [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(19): 229969-229969.
[13]	Ming HUANG, Kaiyuan ZHANG, Zhigang LI, Jun LI. Uncertainty quantification of aerothermal performance of squealer tip with film cooling structure [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(19): 629979-629979.
[14]	Haowan ZHUANG, Chuanjun CAO, Yan WANG, Jinfang TENG, Mingmin ZHU, Xiaoqing QIANG. Uncertainty analysis of non-axisymmetric stagger angle based on NIPC [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(19): 630145-630145.
[15]	Cancan LI, Zuoli XIAO, Jiaqi LUO. Impact of pressure variations at inlet and outlet boundaries on aerodynamic performance of multi-stage axial compressor [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(19): 630168-630168.