基于NIPC的非轴对称安装角不确定性分析

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2024.30145

Abstract

Abstract:

An uncertainty quantification method based on the non-intrusive polynomial chaos is developed to assess the impacts of non-axisymmetric stagger angle distribution on the aerodynamic performance of compressors. Uncertainty quantification is carried out to analyze the aerodynamic performance of an eight-passage high-pressure compressor rotor with non-axisymmetric stagger angles. The changes of the rotor performance are quantificationally attributed to the variation of the average stagger angle and the nonuniformity. The results show that the mass flow rate and isentropic efficiency at the design point are mainly affected by the nonuniformity， which accounts for 65.6% and 71.8%， respectively， while the pressure ratio is evenly influenced by the average stagger angle and nonuniformity. At the small mass flow point， nonuniformity mainly leads to the decrease of mass flow rate and total pressure ratio， which account for 88.2% and 66.2%， respectively， while the isentropic efficiency is evenly influenced by the average stagger angle and nonuniformity. The radial distribution of isentropic efficiency shows that the uncertainty in isentropic efficiency of radial position below 20% span is mainly caused by the change of the average stagger angle， while the isentropic efficiency at about 30% span is mainly affected by the nonuniformity. The performance and flow field analysis of the extreme cases show that the non-axisymmetric stagger angle distribution mainly affects the isentropic efficiency below 50% span at the small flow rate.

Key words: non-axisymmetric, stagger angle, compressor, aerodynamic performance, uncertainty quantification

CLC Number:

V231.3

Haowan ZHUANG, Chuanjun CAO, Yan WANG, Jinfang TENG, Mingmin ZHU, Xiaoqing QIANG. Uncertainty analysis of non-axisymmetric stagger angle based on NIPC[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(19): 630145.

Figures/Tables 20

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Table 1

Distribution of stagger angle variation in 8-passage non-axisymmetric cases

方案	$Δ γ 1$ /（°）	$Δ γ 2$ /（°）	$Δ γ 3$ /（°）	$Δ γ 4$ /（°）	$Δ γ 5$ /（°）	$Δ γ 6$ /（°）	$Δ γ 7$ /（°）	$Δ γ 8$ /（°）
1	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98
2	0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98
3	0.370 98	0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98
4	0.370 98	-0.370 98	0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98
5	0.370 98	0.370 98	0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98
6	0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98
7	0.370 98	0.370 98	-0.370 98	0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98
8	0.370 98	-0.370 98	0.370 98	0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98
9	0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98
10	0.370 98	0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98
11	0.370 98	-0.370 98	0.370 98	-0.370 98	0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98
12	0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	0.370 98	0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98
13	0.370 98	-0.370 98	0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98
14	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-1.167 21	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98
15	0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-1.167 21	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98
16	-0.370 98	0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-1.167 21	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98
17	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	0.370 98	-0.370 98	-1.167 21	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98
18	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	0.370 98	-1.167 21	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98
19	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	1.167 21	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98
20	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-1.167 21	0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98
21	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-1.167 21	-0.370 98	0.370 98	-0.370 98
22	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-1.167 21	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	0.370 98

Table 1

Table 2

Distribution of stagger angle variation in Case 2 with circumferentially translational move

方案	$Δ γ 1$ /（°）	$Δ γ 2$ /（°）	$Δ γ 3$ /（°）	$Δ γ 4$ /（°）	$Δ γ 5$ /（°）	$Δ γ 6$ /（°）	$Δ γ 7$ /（°）	$Δ γ 8$ /（°）
2-1	0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98
2-2	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98	-0.370 98

Table 2

Table 3

Fig.4

Table 4

Non-axisymmetric stagger angle distribution in random cases

方案	$Δ γ 1$ /（°）	$Δ γ 2$ /（°）	$Δ γ 3$ /（°）	$Δ γ 4$ /（°）	$Δ γ 5$ /（°）	$Δ γ 6$ /（°）	$Δ γ 7$ /（°）	$Δ γ 8$ /（°）
随机1	-1.145 83	1.127 40	-0.008 81	0.497 95	0.098 96	0.592 43	-0.704 24	-0.573 94
随机2	-0.781 14	-0.451 79	-0.059 90	-0.459 79	-0.596 02	-1.059 33	-1.101 18	-0.567 22
随机3	-0.932 44	1.226 98	0.469 03	0.577 83	1.130 67	0.839 85	0.651 86	0.243 20
随机4	0.432 12	0.230 80	-0.120 95	0.182 42	0.465 79	-0.491 44	-0.486 73	0.006 85
随机5	0.056 21	0.004 93	-0.198 74	0.691 89	0.457 89	-0.283 13	0.061 35	0.022 02
随机6	-0.043 24	-0.397 90	0.619 95	-0.253 41	0.825 23	-0.445 84	0.119 75	-0.352 07
随机7	-0.373 01	-0.451 69	-0.866 25	0.174 72	0.523 08	-1.321 12	-0.517 36	-0.042 70
随机8	0.216 48	-0.221 40	0.852 71	0.322 99	0.380 93	-0.185 29	-0.321 06	0.262 95
随机9	0.673 03	0.154 94	-0.139 11	-0.163 61	-0.503 02	0.144 85	-0.371 28	0.035 94

Table 4

Table 5

Fig.5

Table 6

Fig.6

Fig.7

Fig.8

Fig.9

Table 7

Distribution of stagger angle deviation in extreme cases

方案	$Δ γ 1$ /（°）	$Δ γ 2$ /（°）	$Δ γ 3$ /（°）	$Δ γ 4$ /（°）	$Δ γ 5$ /（°）	$Δ γ 6$ /（°）	$Δ γ 7$ /（°）	$Δ γ 8$ /（°）
极端1	-0.432 89	-1.089 60	-1.152 39	-0.490 24	-1.092 17	0.067 75	-1.299 03	-0.902 26
极端2	0.453 32	1.340 31	1.364 86	0.131 04	0.694 63	0.927 00	1.257 91	0.660 69

Table 7

Fig.10

Table 8

Fig.11

Fig.12

References 30

1	HE L， CHEN T， WELLS R G， et al. Analysis of rotor-rotor and stator-stator interferences in multi-stage turbomachines［J］. Journal of Turbomachinery， 2002， 124（4）： 564-571.
2	GOODHAND M N， MILLER R J， LUNG H W. The impact of geometric variation on compressor two-dimensional incidence range［J］. Journal of Turbomachinery， 2015， 137（2）： 021007.
3	METHEL J， SMITH N R， BERDANIER R A， et al. Effects of circumferential nonuniformity in compressor flow fields including vane wake variability［J］. Journal of Propulsion and Power， 2018， 34（4）： 1080-1089.
4	LANGE A， VOIGT M， VOGELER K， et al. Impact of manufacturing variability and nonaxisymmetry on high-pressure compressor stage performance［J］. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power， 2012， 134（3）： 032504.
5	ZHENG S Y， TENG J F， WU Y， et al. Impact of nonuniform stagger angle distribution on high-pressure compressor rotor performance［C］∥Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2018： Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition. NewYork： ASME， 2018.
6	LEJON M， ANDERSSON N， ELLBRANT L， et al. The impact of manufacturing variations on performance of a transonic axial compressor rotor［C］∥Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2018： Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition. NewYork：ASME， 2018.
7	CLARK J P， BECK J A， KASZYNSKI A A， et al. The effect of manufacturing variations on unsteady interaction in a transonic turbine［J］. Journal of Turbomachinery， 2018， 140（6）： 061007.
8	SLADOJEVIĆ I. Forced response analysis of aeroelastically coupled mistuned bladed disks［D］. London： Imperial College， 2006.
9	SLADOJEVIC´ I， SAYMA A I， IMREGUN M. Influence of stagger angle variation on aerodynamic damping and frequency shifts［C］∥Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2007： Power for Land， Sea， and Air. NewYork：ASME， 2009.
10	EKICI K， KIELB R E， HALL K C. Aerodynamic asymmetry analysis of unsteady flows in turbomachinery［J］. Journal of Turbomachinery， 2010， 132（1）： 011006.
11	LOU F Y， MATTHEWS D R， KORMANIK N J， et al. Accounting for circumferential flow nonuniformity in a multi-stage axial compressor［C］∥Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2021： Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition. NewYork： ASME， 2021.
12	GHISU T， PARKS G T， JARRETT J P， et al. Adaptive polynomial chaos for gas turbine compression systems performance analysis［J］. AIAA Journal， 2010， 48（6）： 1156-1170.
13	WUNSCH D， HIRSCH C， NIGRO R， et al. Quantification of combined operational and geometrical uncertainties in turbo-machinery design［C］∥Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2015： Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition. NewYork：ASME， 2015.
14	MONTOMOLI F. Uncertainty quantification in computational fluid dynamics and aircraft engines［M］. Cham： Springer International Publishing， 2019.
15	PEPPER N， MONTOMOLI F， SHARMA S. Data fusion for uncertainty quantification with non-intrusive polynomial chaos［J］. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering， 2021， 374： 113577.
16	WANG K， CHEN F， YU J Y， et al. Nested sparse-grid stochastic collocation method for uncertainty quantification of blade stagger angle［J］. Energy， 2020， 201： 117583.
17	李玉，楚武利，姬田园. 叶片安装角偏差对动叶性能影响的不确定性研究［J］. 西安交通大学学报， 2023， 57（4）： 49-59.
	LI Y， CHU W L， JI T Y. Uncertainty research of effects of blade stagger angle deviation on the performance of rotor［J］. Journal of Xi’an Jiaotong University， 2023， 57（4）： 49-59 （in Chinese）.
18	JI T Y， CHU W L， LIANG C Y， et al. Uncertainty quantification on the influence of blade thickness deviation at different rotational speeds based on flow dissipation analysis［J］. Physics of Fluids， 2023， 35（6）： 066126.
19	WANG J Y， ZHENG X Q. Review of geometric uncertainty quantification in gas turbines［J］. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power， 2020， 142（7）： 070801.
20	PALAR P S， TSUCHIYA T， PARKS G T. Multi-fidelity non-intrusive polynomial chaos based on regression［J］. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering， 2016， 305： 579-606.
21	GUO Z T， CHU W L， ZHANG H G. A data-driven non-intrusive polynomial chaos for performance impact of high subsonic compressor cascades with stagger angle and profile errors［J］. Aerospace Science and Technology， 2022， 129： 107802.
22	GUO Z T， CHU W L， ZHANG H G， et al. Aerodynamic evaluation of cascade flow with actual geometric uncertainties using an adaptive sparse arbitrary polynomial chaos expansion［J］. Physics of Fluids， 2023， 35（3）： 036122.
23	蔡宇桐，高丽敏，马驰，等. 基于NIPC的压气机叶片加工误差不确定性分析［J］. 工程热物理学报， 2017， 38（3）： 490-497.
	CAI Y T， GAO L M， MA C， et al. Uncertainty quantification on compressor blade considering manufacturing error based on NIPC method［J］. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics， 2017， 38（3）： 490-497 （in Chinese）.
24	夏志恒，罗佳奇. 涡轮叶片来流角扰动不确定性量化分析［J］. 航空动力学报， 2020， 35（3）： 519-531.
	XIA Z H， LUO J Q. Uncertainty quantification of inlet incidence angle variation for turbine blade［J］. Journal of Aerospace Power， 2020， 35（3）： 519-531 （in Chinese）.
25	REITZ G， SCHLANGE S， FRIEDRICHS J. Design of experiments and numerical simulation of deteriorated high pressure compressor airfoils［C］∥Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2016： Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition. NewYork： ASME， 2016.
26	SURIYANARAYANAN V， RENDU Q， VAHDATI M， et al. Effect of manufacturing tolerance in flow past a compressor blade［J］. Journal of Turbomachinery， 2022， 144（4）： 041005.
27	WIENER N. The homogeneous chaos［J］. American Journal of Mathematics， 1938， 60（4）： 897.
28	ASKEY R， WILSON J. Some basic hypergeometric orthogonal polynomials that generalize Jacobi polynomials［J］. Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society， 1985， 54（319）： 1-55.
29	庄皓琬，滕金芳，马宇晨，等. 非轴对称安装角对压气机转子叶片性能的影响［J］. 航空动力学报， 2021， 36（9）： 1999-2011.
	ZHUANG H W， TENG J F， MA Y C， et al. Impacts of non-axisymmetric stagger angle on performance of compressor rotor blade［J］. Journal of Aerospace Power， 2021， 36（9）： 1999-2011 （in Chinese）.
30	JOSLYN H D， DRING R P. Axial compressor stator aerodynamics［J］. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power， 1985， 107（2）： 485-492.

方案	P_t1/Pa	T_t1/K	P₁/Pa	P_t2/Pa	T_t2/K	P₂/Pa	q_mr	π_r	η_r
2-1	979 645	650.764	893 366	1 215 853	695.078	1 049 570	1.004 7	1.004 0	1.000 1
2-2	979 645	650.764	893 366	1 215 853	695.078	1 049 570	1.004 7	1.004 0	1.000 1

方案	预测值			模拟值			相对误差
方案	q_mr	π_r	η_r	q_mr	π_r	η_r	ε_qm/%	ε_pr/%	ε_η/%
随机1	0.998 8	1.000 0	0.998 7	0.999 1	0.999 9	0.998 6	-0.03	0.01	0.01
随机2	1.010 8	1.003 8	1.001 5	1.010 7	1.003 7	1.001 5	0.01	0.01	0
随机3	0.990 4	0.996 8	0.996 9	0.989 9	0.996 8	0.997 1	0.05	0	-0.02
随机4	0.999 1	0.999 6	0.998 3	0.998 9	0.999 6	0.998 1	0.02	0	0.02
随机5	0.997 4	0.998 8	0.998 6	0.997 4	0.998 9	0.998 5	0.01	-0.01	0.01
随机6	0.998 6	0.999 8	0.998 7	0.999 0	0.999 9	0.998 7	-0.04	-0.01	0
随机7	1.005 7	1.001 4	1.000 1	1.005 8	1.001 3	1.000 2	-0.01	0.01	-0.01
随机8	0.996 9	0.998 6	0.998 2	0.996 7	0.998 6	0.998 0	0.03	0	0.02
随机9	1.000 0	1.000 1	0.999 4	1.000 2	1.000 0	0.999 4	-0.02	0.01	0
原型	1.000 4	1.000 0	1.000 1	1.000 0	1.000 0	1.000 0	0.04	0	0.01

工况点	Δq_mr，load/%	Δq_mr，nu/%	Δπ_r，load/%	Δπ_r，nu/%	Δη_r，load/%	Δη_r，nu/%
设计点	34.4	65.6	52.5	47.5	18.2	71.8
小流量点	11.8	88.2	33.8	66.2	53.3	46.7

方案	工况	q_mr	π	η/%	SM/%
原型	DP	1.000 0	1.239 1	93.43	13.65
	NS1	0.936 0	1.269 0	93.61
	NS2	0.907 9	1.278 5	93.39
极端1	DP	1.000 9	1.251 3	93.67	8.78
极端1	NS1	0.939 0	1.277 1	93.61	8.78
极端2	DP	1.001 7	1.222 6	92.81	14.27
极端2	NS2	0.909 2	1.268 2	93.39	14.27

[1]	Fei XUE, Yuqi QIN, Wendong LIU, Yangang WANG. Experiments on stall initial disturbance characteristics of contra-rotating compressor with distorted inflow [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2025, 46(2): 130474-130474.
[2]	Ming CAI, Limin GAO, Ruiyu LI, Bo OUYANG, Bo LIU. Establishment of standard model of linear cascade wind tunnel for subsonic compressor [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2025, 46(2): 130547-130547.
[3]	Kai HAN, Junqiang BAI, Shaodong FENG, Shilong YU, Junwei HUANG, Chu TANG, Yasong QIU. A novel high-efficiency and high-precision momentum source method for distributed ducted fans in aero-propulsion coupling configuration [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2025, 46(17): 131728-131728.
[4]	Ruiyu LI, Ming CAI, Bo OUYANG, Limin GAO, Bo LIU, Baojie LIU. Standard cascade test for typical high-load and large turning angle compressor arfoils [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2025, 46(16): 131651-131651.
[5]	Han ZHOU, Qian CHEN, Hongyu WANG, Haolan SHI, Pengxuan WEI, Jiacheng LI, Tianhong ZHANG, Hanlin SHENG. A high flux dual variable cycle engine model coupled with instability simulation [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2025, 46(14): 131436-131436.
[6]	Jinhua LOU, Rongqian CHEN, Jiaqi LIU, Yue BAO, Hao WU, Yancheng YOU. Aircraft aerodynamic performance prediction and inverse design based on a gated diffusion model [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2025, 46(10): 631183-631183.
[7]	Weiguo ZHANG, Min TANG, Jie WU, Xianmin PENG, Guichuan ZHANG, Bowen NIE, Liangquan WANG, Chaoqun LI. Overview of wind tunnel test research on tiltrotor aircraft [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(9): 530114-530114.
[8]	Yueteng WU, Dun BA, Juan DU, Yunfei LI, Juntao CHANG. Compressor flow field reconstruction method based on deep attention networks [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(24): 630580-630580.
[9]	Chunhua LI, Jianzhong SUN, Jilong LU. Maintenance-oriented approach for HPT blade life digital twin modeling [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(21): 629385-629385.
[10]	Haixing LI, Feng ZHOU, Wei YAN, Feng BAI, Keliang ZHAO. Effects of roughness ice on aerodynamic performance of civil aircraft horizontal tail [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(2): 128657-128657.
[11]	Tianyuan JI, Wuli CHU, Haoguang ZHANG, Zhengtao GUO, Dejun MENG. Effect of data-driven twist deviation on compressor performance [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(19): 629938-629938.
[12]	Yanhe TAO, Qintao GUO, Jin ZHOU, Jiaqian MA, Xiaofa LI. Efficient variational Bayesian model updating under observation uncertainty [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(19): 229969-229969.
[13]	Ming HUANG, Kaiyuan ZHANG, Zhigang LI, Jun LI. Uncertainty quantification of aerothermal performance of squealer tip with film cooling structure [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(19): 629979-629979.
[14]	Cancan LI, Zuoli XIAO, Jiaqi LUO. Impact of pressure variations at inlet and outlet boundaries on aerodynamic performance of multi-stage axial compressor [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(19): 630168-630168.
[15]	Zhendong GUO, Haojie LI, Liming SONG, Hualiang ZHANG, Zhao YIN. Robust optimization method based on adaptive sparse polynomial chaos [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(19): 630273-630273.

Uncertainty analysis of non-axisymmetric stagger angle based on NIPC

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 20

References 30

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments