航空器声爆飞行试验测量技术研究进展

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2022.26186

Abstract

Abstract:

Sonic boom is a key factor affecting safety， economy， and environmental-friendliness of supersonic aircraft flight. Measuring and assessing sonic boom under real atmospheric conditions through flight tests is an important technical approach in induced problem research. The sonic boom measurement flight test is a complicated systematic engineering work， requiring breakthroughs of a series of sonic boom field measurement techniques from near-field to far-field. This paper presents an overview of sonic boom measurement flight test activities over the nearly past seventy years， and summarizes the development history and characteristics of the sonic boom flight test technology in three stages. Based on the analysis of propagation characteristics of sonic boom， the technical measurement scheme of the entire propagation path is proposed. Then， the sonic boom measurement technology by probe aircraft， aerostat and ground facilities is reviewed with emphasis on technical points， and the development trends are prospected. Finally other necessary parameter measurement methods and some key issues and future research directions of sonic boom measurement techniques of flight tests are briefly presented. Based on this， the technical development deficiencies of sonic boom flight tests in China are analyzed and some research directions are suggested.

Key words: sonic boom, sonic boom measurement, flight test, shock wave, supersonic aircraft

CLC Number:

V217⁺.1

Yahui SONG, Gaoyu FAN, Lixia QU, Yuelin ZHANG, Yue XU, Shuo HAN. Progress of aircraft sonic boom flight test measurement technology: Review[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(2): 626186-626186.

Figures/Tables 19

Table 1

Representative sonic boom flight test programs

项目名称	时间/年	项目来源	试验对象
F100 Sonic Boom Flight Tests （SBFT）^［32］	1956	美国NASA、EAFB等	F100
National Sonic Boom Evaluation Program （NSBEP）^{［33-34，36-37］}	1966—1967	美国NASA、EAFB等	XB-70、B58、F-104
Public Response to SR-71’s Sonic Boom Tests （PRSSBT）^［38-39］	1967	美国NASA、EAFB等	SR-71
French Operation Jericho Carton （FOJC）^［40-41］	1969	法国Service Technique Aeronautique （STA）	Mirage Ⅲ、MirageⅣ
1970 BREN （Bare Reactor Experiments Nevada） tower tests^［42-43］	1970	美国NASA、Air Force等	F104
Concorde flight tests^［44］	1976—1978	瑞典Kiruna Geophysical Institute	“协和号Concorde”
U.S. Air Force’s Noise and Sonic Boom Impact Technology program （NSBIT）^［45］	1987	美国Air Force、EAFB等	F-4、T-38、AT-38、SR-71、F-111、F-14、F-15、F-16、F-18
High-Speed Research program （HSR）^［46］	1993	美国NASA	Tu-144
Have BEARs^［47］	1994	美国Air Force	F-16B
SR-71 Sonic Boom Propagation Experiment of high-speed research program （SR-71 SBPE）^［48］	1995	美国NASA	SR-71
Quiet Supersonic Platform： Shaped Sonic Boom Demonstration （QSP-SSBD）^［49-51］	2000—2004	美国DARPA	F-5E、F-5 SSBD
Quiet Spike^{TM ［5，52］}	2006	美国Gulfstream、NASA等	F-15B
Waveforms and Sonic boom Perception and Response （WSPR）^［53］	2010—	美国NASA、Wyle等	F/A-18
Drop test for Simplified Evaluation of Non-symmetrically Distributed sonic boom （D-SEND）^{［16，21］}	2011，2015	日本JAXA	第1阶段NWM和LBM，第2阶段为S3CM
Superboom Caustic Analysis and Measurement Project （SCAMP）^［54-55］	2011	美国NASA、Wyle等	F-18B
Farfield Investigation of No-boom Thresholds project （FaINT）^［56］	2012	美国NASA、Wyle、Boeing和法国Dassault等	F-18B
Quiet Supersonic Flights 2018 （QSF18）^［57］	2018	美国NASA	F/A-18
OS-X0试验飞行器声爆特性测量试验^［58］	2018	航空工业空气动力研究院、北京零壹空间科技有限公司	OS-X0试验飞行器
Carpet Determination In Entirety Measurements （CarpetDIEM）^［59］	2019—	美国NASA Armstrong	F/A-18
RegUlation and norM for low sonic Boom Levels （RUMBLE）^［22-24］	2020	欧盟、俄罗斯等国家和地区的研究机构	Su-30
某型歼击机超低空/高空飞行地面声爆测量试验^［29］	2020	中国飞行试验研究院、中国航空研究院等	某型歼击机J-XX
Low-Boom Flight Demonstration （LBFD）^［13-15］	2022—2025 （计划）	美国NASA、Lockheed Martin、FAA、ICAO	正在研制的X-59 QueSST
Boom Supersonic Overture （SST）/ XB-1声爆飞行试验^［60-61］	2021—2025 （计划）	美国Boom Supersonic	正在研制的Overture SST和其验证机XB-1

Table 1

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

Fig. 9

Fig. 10

Fig. 11

Fig. 12

Fig. 13

Fig. 14

Fig. 15

Fig. 16

Fig. 17

Fig. 18

References 110

1	HENNE P A. Case for small supersonic civil aircraft［J］. Journal of Aircraft， 2005， 42（3）： 765-774.
2	PLOTKIN K， MAGLIERI D. Sonic boom research： History and future （invited）［C］∥ 33rd AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit. Reston： AIAA， 2003.
3	Federal Aviation Administration. Electronic code of federal regulations， Part 91-General operating and flight rules， Subpart I - Operating noise limits ［S］. Washington， D. C.： Federal Aviation Administration，1989.
4	CHUDOBA B， COLEMAN G， OZA A， et al. What price supersonic speed？ A design anatomy of supersonic transportation Part 1［J］. The Aeronautical Journal （1968）， 2008， 112： 141-151.
5	COWART R， GRINDLE T. An overview of the Gulfstream/NASA Quiet Spike^TM flight test program［C］∥ 46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston： AIAA， 2008.
6	LOUBEAU A. Recent progress on sonic boom research at NASA ［C］∥ International Noise 2012， 2012.
7	BENSON L R. Quieting the boom： The shaped sonic boom demonstrator and the quest for quiet supersonic flight［M］. Washington， D.C.： NASA， 2013： 1-216.
8	MAGLIERI D， BOBBITT P， PLOTKIN K， et al. Sonic boom： Six decades of research： NASA/SP-2014-622 ［R］.Washington， D.C.： NASA， 2014.
9	朱自强，兰世隆. 超声速民机和降低音爆研究［J］. 航空学报， 2015， 36（8）： 2507-2528.
	ZHU Z Q， LAN S L. Study of supersonic commercial transport and reduction of sonic boom［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2015， 36（8）： 2507-2528 （in Chinese）.
10	钱战森，韩忠华. 声爆研究的现状与挑战［J］. 空气动力学学报， 2019， 37（4）： 601-619， 600.
	QIAN Z S， HAN Z H. Progress and challenges of sonic boom research［J］. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica， 2019， 37（4）： 601-619， 600 （in Chinese）.
11	Air Force U.S.. The sonic boom problem ［R］. Washington， D.C.： Office， Director of Development Planning DCS/Research and Development HQ USAF， 1963.
12	朱自强，吴宗成，陈迎春. 民机空气动力设计先进技术［M］. 上海：上海交通大学出版社， 2013： 49-54.
	ZHU Z Q， WU Z C， CHEN Y C. Advanced technology of aerodynamic design for commercial aircraft［M］. Shanghai： Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press， 2013： 49-54 （in Chinese）.
13	GIPSON L. Low boom flight demonstrator （LBFD）［EB/OL］. （2018-9-5）［2021-7-20］. .
14	KAMLET M. NASA marks continued progress on X-59 ［EB/OL］. （2020-9-7）［2021-7-20］. .
15	DOEBLER W J， RATHSAM J. How loud is X-59’s shaped sonic boom？［C］∥ Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics， 5th International Conference on the Effects of Noise on Aquatic Life， 2019.
16	MASAHISA H， KENJI Y. D-send project for low sonic boom design technology ［C］∥ 28th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences， 2012.
17	徐悦，韩忠华，尤延铖，等. 新一代绿色超声速民机的发展现状与挑战［J］. 科学通报， 2020， 65（S1）： 127-133.
	XU Y， HAN Z H， YOU Y C， et al. Progress and challenges of next generation green supersonic civil aircraft［J］. Chinese Science Bulletin， 2020， 65（S1）： 127-133 （in Chinese）.
18	SAITO Y， UKAI T， MIYAKOSHI K， et al. Sonic boom estimation using the multipole method for free-flight experiments［C］∥ 52nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting. Reston： AIAA， 2014.
19	FOMIN V M， KISELEVA T A， VOLKOV V F， et al. Sonic boom problem： Past， present and future ［C］∥ Proceeding of the 1st International Conference on High-Speed Vehicle Science and Technology （HISST）， 2018.
20	DE FLORIO F. Airworthiness： An introduction to aircraft certification and operations［M］. 3rd ed. Saint Louis： Elsevier Science， 2016.
21	HONDA M. D-SEND#2 successful flight ［J］. JAXA Aeronautics Magazine Flight Path， 2015（9＆10）： 5-7.
22	GROSSARTH S， SCHRECKENBERG D， OOSTEN N V， et al. Psychological assessment of noise annoyance due to low sonic boom［C］∥ Forum Acusticum 2020， 2020.
23	EMMANUELLI A， LECHAT T， DRAGNA D， et al. Ground effects on sonic boom reflection［J］. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America， 2019， 146（4）： 2781.
24	LØVHOLT F， NOREN-COSGRIFF K， PARK J， et al. Building vibration due to sonic boom—Results from simulations and field measurements［J］. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America， 2021， 149（4）： A100.
25	Federal Aviation Administration. Fact sheet-supersonic flight ［EB/OL］. （2020-11-25）［2021-7-20］. .
26	WAGGONER E， CLIATT L J， HILL M A， et al. An overview of lessons learned from sonic boom flight research projects conducted by NASA Armstrong flight research center［C］∥ 2018 Flight Testing Conference. Reston： AIAA， 2018.
27	HAERING E， CLIATT L， BUNCE T， et al. Initial results from the variable intensity sonic boom propagation database［C］∥ 14th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference （29th AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference）. Reston： AIAA， 2008.
28	DOWNING J. Lateral spread of sonic boom measurements from US Air Force boomfile flight tests： US Air Force AL-TR-1992-0095 ［R］. Washington， D.C.： United States Air Force， 1992.
29	徐悦. 绿色超声速民机的低声爆设计与评估［J］. 国际航空， 2021（4）： 30-32.
	XU Y. CAE developing low-boom supersonic civil aircraft concept［J］. International Aviation， 2021（4）： 30-32 （in Chinese）.
30	PARK M A， NEMEC M. Nearfield summary and statistical analysis of the second AIAA sonic boom prediction workshop［J］. Journal of Aircraft， 2018， 56（3）： 851-875.
31	RALLABHANDI S K， LOUBEAU A. Summary of propagation cases of the second AIAA sonic boom prediction workshop［J］. Journal of Aircraft， 2018， 56（3）： 876-895.
32	MULLENS M E. A flight test investigation of the sonic boom： U.S. Air Force AFFTC TN 56-20 ［R］. Washington， D.C.： United States Air Force， 1956.
33	ClOW L W. 6th weather wing pamphlet-weather-sonic boom： No.105-1-1 ［R］. Washington， D.C.： 6th Weather Wing Air Weather Service， United States Air Force， 1966.
34	HILTON D， MAGLIERI D. Experiments on the effects of atmospheric refraction and airplane accelerations on sonic-boom ground-pressure patterns： NASA TN-D 3520 ［R］. Washington， D.C.： NASA， 1966.
35	周自全. 飞行试验工程［M］. 北京：航空工业出版社， 2010： 1-20.
	ZHOU Z Q. Flight test engineering［M］. Beijing： Aviation Industry Press， 2010： 1-20 （in Chinese）.
36	KRYTER K， JOHNSON P J， YOUNG J R. Psychological experiments on sonic booms conducted at Edwards air force base： AD689844 ［R］. California： Stanford Research Institute， 1968.
37	HUBBARD H H， MAYES WILLIAM H. Sonic boom effects on people and structures： NASA SP-147 ［R］. Washington， D.C.： NASA， 1967.
38	MAGLIERI D J， HUCKEL V， HENDERSON R. Sonic boom measurements for SR-71 aircraft operating at Mach numbers to 3.0 and altitudes to 24384 meters： NASA TN D-6823 ［R］. Washington， D.C.： NASA， 1972.
39	STEPHEN R N， EDWARD A， HAERING JR E A， et al. Ground-based sensors for the SR-71 sonic boom propagation experiment： NASA-TM-104310 ［R］. Washington， D.C.： NASA， 1995.
40	HILTON D， HUBBARD H H， HUCKEL V， et al. Ground measurements of sonic-boom pressures for the altitude range of 10， 000 to 75， 000 feet： NASA TR R-198 ［R］. Washington， D.C.： NASA， 1964.
41	WANNER J L， VALLEE J， VIVIER C， et al. Theoretical and experimental studies of the focus of sonic booms［J］. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America， 1972， 52（1A）： 13-32.
42	HUBBARD H H， MAGLIERI D， HUCKEL V. Variability of sonic boom signatures with emphasis on the extremities of the ground exposure patterns： NASA SP-255 ［R］. Washington， D.C.： NASA， 1971.
43	HAGLUND G， KANE E. Flight test measurements and analysis of sonic boom phenomena near the shock wave extremity： NASA CR-2167 ［R］. Washington， D.C.： NASA， 1973.
44	LISZKA L. Long‐distance focusing of Concorde sonic boom［J］. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America， 1978， 64（2）： 631-635.
45	HABER J， NAKAKI D. Noise and sonic boom impact technology. Sonic boom damage to conventional structures： U.S. Air Force HSD-TR-89-001 ［R］. Washington， D.C.： United States Air Force， 1989.
46	MACK R J. A Whitham theory sonic-boom analysis of the TU-144 aircraft at a Mach number of 2.2 ［C］∥ 1995 NASA High-Speed Research Program Sonic Boom Workshop： Volume Ⅱ-Configuration a Design， Analysis， and Testing. Washington， D.C.： NASA， 1995： 1-17.
47	DOWNING M， ZAMOT N. USAF flight test investigation of focused sonic booms［J］. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America， 1995， 97（5）： 3257.
48	HAERING E， EHERNBERGER L， WHITMORE S. Preliminary airborne measurements for the SR-71 sonic boom propagation experiment： NASA TM 104307 ［R］. Washington， D.C.： NASA， 1995.
49	PAWLOWSKI J， GRAHAM D， BOCCADORO C， et al. Origins and overview of the shaped sonic boom demonstration program［C］∥ 43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston： AIAA， 2005.
50	HAERING JR. E A， MURRAY J E， PURIFOY D D，et al. Airborne measurements of shaped sonic boom demonstration aircraft pressure signatures and comparisons to CFD： AIAA-2005-0009 ［R］. Reston： AIAA， 2005.
51	PLOTKIN K J， HAERING JR E A， MURRAY J E， et al. Ground data collection of shaped sonic boom experiment aircraft pressure signatures［C］∥ 43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston： AIAA， 2005.
52	HOWE D， WAITHE K， EDWARD HAERING J JR. Quiet spike near field flight test pressure measurements with CFD comparisons［C］∥ 46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston： AIAA， 2008.
53	CLIATT L J， HAERING E A， JONES T P， et al. A flight research overview of WSPR， a pilot project for sonic boom community response［C］∥ 32nd AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. Reston： AIAA， 2014.
54	PAGE J， PLOTKIN K， HAERING E， et al. SCAMP： Superboom caustic Analysis and measurement project overview［C］∥ 51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition. Reston： AIAA， 2013.
55	PAGE J， HOBBS C， HAERING E， et al. SCAMP： Focused sonic boom experimental execution and measurement data acquisition［C］∥ 51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition. Reston： AIAA， 2013.
56	CLIATT L J， HILL M A， HAERING E A， et al. A summary of the lateral cutoff analysis and results from NASA’s farfield investigation of no-boom thresholds［C］∥ AIP Conference Proceedings， 2015， 1685（1）： 090007.
57	KAMLET M. NASA flights off GALVESTONWILL test ways to measure response to low booms ［J］. Airport Noise Report， 2018， 30（36）： 143-146.
58	钱战森，刘中臣，冷岩，等. OS-X0试验飞行器声爆特性飞行测量与数值模拟分析［J］. 空气动力学学报， 2019， 37（4）： 675-682.
	QIAN Z S， LIU Z C， LENG Y， et al. Flight measurement and numerical simulation of sonic boom signature of OS-X0 experimental aircraft［J］. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica， 2019， 37（4）： 675-682 （in Chinese）.
59	BELL D O. NASA deploys 30-Mile array ahead of quiet supersonic X-Plane tests ［J］. Noise Regulation Report： The Nation's Only Independent Noise Control Publication， 2019，46（9）： 73-74.
60	BTOADBENT M. Overture ［J］. Air International， 2019， 96（5）： 98.
61	O'Hare MAUREEN. Boom supersonic aims to fly anywhere in the world in four hours for $ 100’ ［N］. CNN Travel， 2021-5-18.
62	KAMLET M. NASA’s improved supersonic cockpit display shows precise locations of sonic booms ［EB/OL］. （2016-12-18）［2021-7-20］. .
63	BUONANNO M， CHAI S， MARCONI F， et al. Overview of sonic boom reduction efforts on the lockheed martin N+2 supersonic validations program［C］∥ 32nd AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. Reston： AIAA， 2014.
64	MEREDITH K， DAHLIN J， GRAHAM D， et al. Computational fluid dynamics comparison and flight test measurement of F-5E off-body pressures［C］∥ 43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston： AIAA， 2005.
65	LIEBHARDT B， LÜTJENS K， UENO A， et al. JAXA’s S4 supersonic low-boom airliner-A collaborative study on aircraft design， sonic boom simulation， and market prospects［C］∥ AIAA Aviation 2020 Forum. Reston： AIAA， 2020.
66	WELGE H， NELSON C， BONET J. Supersonic vehicle systems for the 2020 to 2035 timeframe［C］∥ 28th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. Reston： AIAA， 2010.
67	SARROW V W， STOUT T A， BRADLEY K A， et al. SonicBAT： Some highlights and subsequent developments ［C］ ∥ 23rd International Congress on Acoustics （ICA 2019）， 2019.
68	KAMLET M. NASA test flights examine effect of atmospheric turbulence on sonic booms ［EB/OL］. （2018-7-27）［2021-7-20］. .
69	HEINECK J T， BANKS D W， SMITH N T， et al. Background-oriented schlieren imaging of supersonic aircraft in flight［J］. AIAA Journal， 2020， 59（1）： 11-21.
70	CREECH G. NASA Dryden flies new supersonic shockwave probes ［EB/OL］. （2017-8-7）［2021-7-20］. .
71	Federal Aviation Administration. Special flight authorizations for supersonic aircraft FAA-2019-0415 （Amdt 91-362）［S］. Washington， D.C.： Federal Aviation Administration， 2021.
72	Federal Aviation Administration. Noise certification of supersonic airplanes FAA-2020-0316 （Notice No. 20-06）［S］. Washington， D.C.： Federal Aviation Administration， 2020.
73	PAGE J A， LOUBEAU A. Overall vehicle system noise： Sonic boom［J］. CEAS Aeronautical Journal， 2019， 10（1）： 335-353.
74	LEATHERWOOD J D， SULLIVAN B M， SHEPHERD K P， et al. Summary of recent NASA studies of human response to sonic booms［J］. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America， 2002， 111（1 Pt 2）： 586-598.
75	MARSHALL A J. Development of a model of startle resulting from exposure to sonic booms ［D］. West Lafayette： Purdue University， 2012.
76	BOLANDER C R， HUNSAKER D F， SHEN H， et al. Procedure for the calculation of the perceived loudness of sonic booms［C］∥ AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum. Reston： AIAA， 2019.
77	WALKDEN F. The shock pattern of a wing-body combination， far from the flight path［J］. Aeronautical Quarterly， 1958， 9（2）： 164-194.
78	LANSING D L. Some effect of flight maneuvers on the distribution of sonic booms ［J］. Proceedings of Symposium on Atmospheric Acoustic Propagation， 1961， 1： 24-43.
79	DOWNING M， ZAMOT N， MOSS C， et al. Controlled focused sonic booms from maneuvering aircraft［J］. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America， 1998， 104（1）： 112-121.
80	HENDERSON H R， HILTON D， HUCKEL V， et al. Measurements of sonic boom signatures from flights at cutoff Mach number： NASA SP-255 ［R］. Washington， D.C.： NASA， 1971.
81	COULOUVRAT F， BLUMRICH R， HEIMANN D. Meteorologically induced variability of sonic boom of a supersonic aircraft in cruising or acceleration phase［C］ ∥ International Symposium on Nonlinear Acoustics-Sonic-Boom Forum， 2006.
82	BAIZE D G， MCELROY M O， FENBERT J A， et al. A performance assessment of eight low-boom high-speed civil transport concepts： NASA CP-1999-209699 ［R］. Washington， D.C.： NASA， 1999.
83	KANE E， PALMER T Y. Meteorological aspects of the sonic boom： FAA SRDS RD 64-160 ［R］. Washington， D.C.： FAA， 1964.
84	RICKLEY E J， PIERCE A D. Detection and assessment of secondary sonic booms in New England［J］. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America， 1981， 69（S1）： S100.
85	HUTCHINSON A D， BOWERSOX R D. A sonic boom propagation code for studying atmospheric effects and uncertainties［C］∥ AIAA Scitech 2021 Forum. Reston： AIAA， 2021.
86	YAMASHITA R， SUZUKI K. Full-field sonic boom simulation in stratified atmosphere［J］. AIAA Journal， 2016， 54（10）： 3223-3231.
87	RENDÓN P L， COULOUVRAT F. Reflection of caustics and focused sonic booms［J］. Wave Motion， 2005， 42（3）： 211-225.
88	WEINSTEIN L M， STACY K， VIEIRA G J， et al. Imaging supersonic aircraft shock waves［J］. Journal of Flow Visualization and Image Processing， 1997， 4（3）： 189-199.
89	KAMLET M. NASA flights advance celestial schlieren imagery for supersonic aircraft ［EB/OL］. （2017-12-15）［2021-7-20］. .
90	NORRI G. Seen as well as heard ［J］. Aviation Week & Space Technology， 2015， 177（18）： 64.
91	GIPSON L， DUNBAR B. Low-boom flight demonstration： The mission ［EB/OL］. （2020-9-18）［2021-7-20］. .
92	MAGLIERI D J， HUBBARD H H. Ground measurements of the shock-wave noise from supersonic bomber airplanes in the altitude range from 30 000 to 50 000 Feet： NASA TN D-880 ［R］. Washington， D.C.： NASA， 1961.
93	LEE R A， DOWNING J M. Boom event analyzer recorder-Unmanned sonic boom monitor［J］. Journal of Aircraft， 1996， 33（1）： 171-175.
94	KAMLET M. Cutting edge ground recorders selected to measure future X-59 quiet supersonic flights ［EB/OL］. （2021-3-22）［2021-7-20］ .
95	HENDERSON H R， HUCKEL V， MAGLIERI D， et al. Variability in sonic-boom signatures measured along an 8000-foot linear array： NASA TN-5040 ［R］. Washington， D.C.： NASA， 1969.
96	MAGLIERI D， HILTON D， MCLEOD N. Summary of sonic boom signatures resulting from atmospheric effects ［C］∥ 5th Meeting of the （FAUSST） French Anglo-Saxon United States Supersonic Transport Committee， 1967.
97	HILTON D A， NEWMAN J W JR. Instrumentation techniques for measurement of sonic-boom signatures［J］. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America， 1966， 39（5B）： S31-S35.
98	PLOTKIN K， PAGE J， GRAHAM D， et al. Ground measurements of a shaped sonic boom［C］∥ 10th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference. Reston： AIAA， 2004.
99	SCHULTZ T， UNDERBRINK J R， HUNTING C， et al. Finding the boom： Phased array processing applied to sonic boom direction of arrival estimation［C］∥ 22nd AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference. Reston： AIAA， 2016.
100	MAGLIERI D J， RITCHIE V S， BRYANT J F JR. In-flight shock wave pressure measurements above and below a bomber airplane at Mach numbers from 1.42 to 1.69： NASA TN-D1968 ［R］. Washington， D.C.： NASA， 1963.
101	MAGLIERI D J， HENDERSON H R， TINETTI A F. Measured sonic boom signatures above and below the XB-70 airplane flying at Mach 1.5 and 37 000 feet： NASA/CR-2011-217077 ［R］. Washington， D.C.： NASA， 2011.
102	KAMLET M. NASA tests supersonic shock probe using historical NACA flight test technique ［EB/OL］. （2019-12-6）［2021-7-20］. .
103	BANKS D， VANDAM C P， SHIU H， et al. Visualization of In-flight flow phenomena using infrared thermography［C］∥ 9th International Symposium on Flow Visualization， 2000.
104	MAGLIERI D. Sonic boom flight research-Some effects of airplane operations and the atmosphere on sonic boom signatures： NASA SP-147 ［R］. Washington， D.C.： NASA， 1965.
105	MERINO-MARTÍNEZ R， SIJTSMA P， SNELLEN M， et al. A review of acoustic imaging methods using phased microphone arrays［J］. CEAS Aeronautical Journal， 2019， 10（1）： 197-230.
106	YANG J L， HE L B， ZHU H J， et al. Progress of calibration on methods for high sound pressure microphone ［C］∥ 26th International Congress on Sound and Vibration 2019： ICSV26， 2019.
107	TIAN B， LI K， LIU J， et al. Eccentric reflective optical fiber MEMS micro-pressure sensor ［J］. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering， 2020， 30（8）： 085010.
108	HESSLER E， HESSLER D M， BRANDSTATT P， et al. Experimental study to determine wind-induced noise and windscreen attenuation effects on microphone response for environmental wind turbine and other applications ［J］. Noise Control Engineering Journal， 2008， 56（4）： 300-309.
109	FIELDS R S JR， TSO J， SODERMAN P T. An experimental investigation of cavity flow oscillations and tones of an In-flow microphone［J］. International Journal of Aeroacoustics， 2006， 5（2）： 173-191.
110	CONNER M. NASA Armstrong fact sheet： Fiber optic sensing system ［EB/OL］. （2018-1-17）［2021-7-20］. .

[1]	Di WANG, Yan LENG, Long YANG, Zhonghua HAN, Zhansen QIAN. Atmospheric turbulence effects on sonic boom propagation based on augmented Burgers equation [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(2): 626318-626318.
[2]	Yiran GU, Jiangtao HUANG, Shusheng CHEN, Deyuan LIU, Zhenghong GAO. Sonic boom inversion technology based on inverse augmented Burgers equation [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(2): 626258-626258）.
[3]	Jianling QIAO, Zhonghua HAN, Yulin DING, Wenping SONG, Bifeng SONG. Effects of stratified atmospheric turbulence on farfield sonic boom propagation [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(2): 626350-626350.
[4]	Shanjie XU, Hongqiang LYU, Zhongchen LIU, Yan LENG, Xuejun LIU. Data analysis of sonic boom test based on probability model [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(2): 626269-626269.
[5]	Zhongchen LIU, Zhansen QIAN, Xuefei LI, Yan LENG, Dapeng GUO. Wind tunnel test techniques for exhaust nozzle plume effects on near-field sonic boom [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(2): 626952-626952.
[6]	Zheng LI, Cong XU, Jian ZHANG, Mengmeng LI, Yilei MA, Guanghui BAI. Reverse jet flow control by plasma synthetic jet actuator in high speed flow field [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 225-232.
[7]	HAN Luyang, WANG Bin, PU Liang, CHEN Qing, ZHENG Haibin. Research progress on mechanism and related problems of energy deposition drag reduction technology [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(9): 26032-026032.
[8]	CHENG Jianrui, SHI Chongguang, QU Lixia, XU Yue, YOU Yancheng, ZHU Chengxiang. Theoretical model of 2D curved shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(9): 125993-125993.
[9]	CEN Fei, LIU Zhitao, JIANG Yong, GUO Tianhao, ZHANG Lei, KONG Yinan. Unsteady aerodynamics modeling of civil transport configuration under extreme flight conditions [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(8): 125582-125582.
[10]	ZHAO Kun, LIANG Junbiao, Ivan BELYAEV, Victor KOPIEV, Gareth BENNETT. Review of civil airplane landing gear noise study and its control approaches [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(8): 26996-026996.
[11]	TONG Fulin, DONG Siwei, DUAN Junyi, LI Xinliang. Direct numerical simulation of separation bubble in shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(7): 125437-125437.
[12]	ZHANG Haoyuan, SUN Dong, QIU Bo, ZHU Yandan, WANG Anling. Influence of turbulent kinetic energy on shock wave/boundary layer interaction [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(7): 125504-125504.
[13]	ZHOU Yitao, YANG Yang, WU Zhigang, YANG Chao. Flight test for gust alleviation on a high aspect ratio UAV platform [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(6): 526126-526126.
[14]	CHEN Guangqiang, DOU Guohui, WEI Haogong, ZOU Xin, LI Qi, LIU Zhou, ZHOU Weijiang. Air data sensing technology of Mars probe [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(3): 626619-626619.
[15]	ZHOU Yan, LUO Zhenbing, WANG Lin, XIA Zhixun, GAO Tianxiang, XIE Wei, DENG Xiong, PENG Wenqiang, CHENG Pan. Plasma synthetic jet actuator for flow control: Review [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(3): 25027-025027.

Progress of aircraft sonic boom flight test measurement technology: Review

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 19

References 110

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments