考虑测试性设计缺陷修正延时的测试性增长模型建模与评价方法

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2019.23079

Abstract

Abstract: For existing testability growth models ignores the rectifying process of testability design limitations, causes the testability growth process describes incompletely, and the tracking and projecting imprecise, a Testability Growth Model (TGM) which considers the rectifying delay based on Bell-shaped curve are proposed. Firstly, the mechanism relation between the discovering process of Testability Design Limitation (TDL) and the rectifying process of TDL is analyzed. And on the basis, three bell-shaped curves are used to describe the variation tendency of remaining testability design limitations, the three bell-shaped curves are Rayleigh curve and Delay-S curve, then, TGMs which consider bell-shaped TDL rectifying delay process are founded. Finally, a data set is used to verify the fitting, estimation and prediction of TGM. Result shows that:Gamma curve is more accurate to fit the number of Remaining Testability Design Limitation (RTDL) and that TGM considering the rectifying delay can give good result in fitting, estimation and prediction, and the accuracy of estimation can reach 10^-2 order of magnitude.

Key words: testability growth model, testability design limitation, rectifying delay, Gamma curve, Rayleigh curve, Delay-S curve

CLC Number:

LI Tianmei, SI Xiaosheng, YANG Zonghao, XU Congqi, ZHANG Qi. Foundation and assessment of testability growth model considering testability design limitation rectifying delay function[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2019, 40(9): 323079-323079.

References 15

[1]	全国量和单位标准化技术委员会.装备测试大纲:GJB2547-1995[S].北京:中国标准出版社, 1995:68-108. National Technical Committee on Quantity and Unit Standardization. Testability program for materiel:GJB2547-1995[S]. Beijing:Standards Press of China, 1995:68-108(in Chinese).
[2]	田仲, 石君友.系统测试性设计分析与验证[M].北京:北京航空航天大学出版社,2003:361-396. TIAN Z, SHI J Y. Design,analysis and demonstration of system testability[M]. Beijing:Beihang University Press, 2003:361-396(in Chinese).
[3]	LI T M, XU C Q, QIU J, et al. The assessment and foundation of bell-shaped testability growth effort functions dependent system testability growth models based on NHPP[J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2015,27(1):1-18.
[4]	ZHAO C X, QIU J, LIU G J, et al. A testability growth model and its application[C]//IEEE Autotestcon. Piscataway, NJ:IEEE Press, 2014:121-128.
[5]	ZHAO C X, KRISHINA P, LIU G J, et al. A Markov Chain-based testability growth model with a cost-benefit function[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics:Systems, 2016, 46(4):524-534.
[6]	SCHNEIDEWIND N. Modeling the fault correction process[C]//Proceddings of the 12th International Conference on Software Reliability Engineering, 2001:185-190.
[7]	PHAM H, ZHANG X M. NHPP software reliability and cost models with testing coverage[J].European Journal of Operational Research, 2003, 145(6):443-454.
[8]	舒艳君. 故障检测与修正过程的NHPP类软件可靠性增长模型研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学, 2009:50-102. SHU Y J. Research on NHPP software reliability growth models of fault detection and correction processes[D]. Harbin:Harbin Institute of Technology, 2009:50-102(in Chinese).
[9]	PHAM H, NORDMANN L, ZHANG X M. A general imperfect software debugging model with s-shaped fault-detection rate[J]. IEEE Transaction on Power Systems, 1999, 48(2):169-176.
[10]	LI Q Y, LI H F, LU M Y, et al. Software reliability growth model with s-shaped testing effort function[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2011,37(2):149-160.
[11]	PHAM H, ZHANG X M. NHPP software reliability and cost models with testing coverage[J].European Journal of Operational Research, 2003, 145(8):443-454.
[12]	PHAM H. Software reliability and cost models:Perspectives, comparison and practice[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2003,149(6):475-489.
[13]	PENG R, LI Y F, ZHANG W J, et al. Testing effort dependent software reliability model for imperfect debugging considering both detection and correction[J].Reliability Engineering and System Safety,2014, 126(4):37-43.
[14]	KAPUR P K, PHAM H, GUPTA A, et al. Software reliability assessment with applications[M]. London:Springer-Verlag, 2011:315-386.
[15]	HUANG C, LIN C. Software reliability analysis by considering fault dependency and debugging time lag[J]. IEEE Transaction on Reliability, 2006, 55(3):436-450.

Foundation and assessment of testability growth model considering testability design limitation rectifying delay function

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References 15

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Feng JIANG, Huacong LI, Jiangfeng FU, Linxiong HONG. A RBF and active learning combined method for structural non-probabilistic reliability analysis [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(2): 226667-226667.
[2]	Yuanliang XUE, Guodong JIN, Lining TAN, Jiankun XU. Adaptive UAV target tracking algorithm based on multi-scale fusion [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(1): 326107-326107.
[3]	Junjie NIU, Weimin SANG, Dong LI, Lian HAO, Zelin WANG. Icing test flight area determination method based on surrogated model of water droplet collection [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(1): 627697-627697.
[4]	Kai LUO, Yonghai WANG, Qiu WANG, Jiwei LI, Zheng LI, Chunsheng NIE, Zheng LI. Plasma-actuated flow control test in high enthalpy shock tunnel [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 89-96.
[5]	Gezhao NIU, Yanming LIU, Lan GAO, Tingkun ZHANG, Bowen BAI. Bistatic polarization scattering characteristic of plasma-sheath-covered blunt cone [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 97-105.
[6]	Zhikun SUN, Zhiwei SHI, Weilin ZHANG, Zheng LI, Qijie SUN. Effect of plasma actuator on lift-drag characteristics of high-speed airfoil [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 23-39.
[7]	. Effects of rectangular micro-scale structures on the hypersonic rarefied shear flow [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 0, (): 0-0.
[8]	Han-Ru LIU Nan-Shu CHEN. Review of porous media using in flow control and aerodynamic noise reduction [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 0, (): 0-0.
[9]	. [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 0, (): 0-0.
[10]	. Integrated Optimization of sensor and actuator layout for Shape control [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 0, (): 0-0.
[11]	CHEN Zhiyuan, LI Luyi. Efficient methods for reliability sensitivity analysis of inputs with distribution parameter uncertainty [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(9): 325881-325881.
[12]	LUO Shengfeng, WANG Guangjian, MA Xiaobin, ZHENG Lili, WANG Ruijun. Simulation of flame spread of titanium-alloy sheet under effect of titanium droplet [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(9): 425652-425652.
[13]	CAO Ming, WANG Peng, ZUO Hongfu, ZENG Haijun, SUN Jianzhong, YANG Weidong, WEI Fang, CHEN Xuefeng. Current status, challenges and opportunities of civil aero-engine diagnostics & health management Ⅱ: Comprehensive off-board diagnosis, life management and intelligent condition based MRO [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(9): 625574-625574.
[14]	. Analysis of Mechanism and Sensitivity of Force Fight in Dual Redundant Electro-mechanical Actuators(ICGNC2022 Recommend Paper) [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 0, (): 0-0.
[15]	ZHANG Shengfei, LI Tianmei, HU Changhua, DU Dangbo, SI Xiaosheng. Missing data generation method and its application in remaining useful life prediction based on deep convolutional generative adversarial network [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(8): 225708-225708.