层流机翼及其增升装置嵌套协同优化方法

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2021.25377

流体力学与飞行力学

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

层流机翼及其增升装置嵌套协同优化方法

罗佳杰, 宋文滨

上海交通大学航空航天学院, 上海 200240

收稿日期:2021-02-04 修回日期:2021-03-22 出版日期:2022-08-15 发布日期:2021-03-18
通讯作者: 宋文滨,E-mail:swb@sjtu.edu.cn E-mail:swb@sjtu.edu.cn
基金资助:
工信部十二五民机专项

Nested collaborative optimization of laminar wing and its high-lift devices

LUO Jiajie, SONG Wenbin

School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China

Received:2021-02-04 Revised:2021-03-22 Online:2022-08-15 Published:2021-03-18
Supported by:
Special Project for Civil Aircraft of MIIT during 12th Five-year Plan

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 层流机翼可以显著减少飞机的气动阻力,层流机翼的参数选择受到飞机总体参数的影响,同时需要和增升装置开展协同设计。采用前缘克鲁格和后缘富勒襟翼方案,首先对巡航构型的干净翼型和着陆构型的多段翼型开展嵌套协同优化。在此基础上,针对三维层流机翼和增升装置,通过自由转捩RANS计算和基于响应面的高效多级优化相结合的方法,实现了融合增升装置的层流机翼气动设计。

关键词: 层流机翼, 增升装置, 参数化建模, 计算流体力学, 气动优化

Abstract: The laminar wing technology can reduce the drag of the aircraft significantly. Selection of laminar wing parameters is affected by the overall parameters of the aircraft. Collaborative design of the laminar wing with its high-lift devices also needs to be carried out. Firstly, the clean airfoil of cruise configuration and the multi-segment airfoil of landing configuration are optimized by using leading-edge Kruger flaps and trailing-edge Fowler flaps. On this basis, the aerodynamic design for the three-dimensional laminar wing and its high-lift devices is realized through combination of RANS calculation of free transition and the efficient multi-level optimization based on the response surface.

Key words: laminar wing, high-lift device, parametric modeling, CFD, aerodynamic optimization

中图分类号:

V224

罗佳杰, 宋文滨. 层流机翼及其增升装置嵌套协同优化方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 125377-125377.

LUO Jiajie, SONG Wenbin. Nested collaborative optimization of laminar wing and its high-lift devices[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(8): 125377-125377.

参考文献

[1] CLEMONS L, WLEZIEN R W. Unsteady active flow control on the leading edge of a high-lift configuration thin airfoil[C]//8th AIAA Flow Control Conference. Reston: AIAA, 2016.
[2] WILD J. Recent research topics in high-lift aerodynamics[J]. CEAS Aeronautical Journal, 2016, 7(3): 345-355.
[3] CAMPBELL R L, LYNDE M N. Natural laminar flow design for wings with moderate sweep[C]//34th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. Reston: AIAA, 2016.
[4] SEITZ A, KRUSE M, WUNDERLICH T, et al. The DLR project LamAiR: Design of a NLF forward swept wing for short and medium range transport application[C]//29th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. Reston: AIAA, 2011.
[5] HAN Z H, CHEN J, ZHANG K S, et al. Aerodynamic shape optimization of natural-laminar-flow wing using surrogate-based approach[J]. AIAA Journal, 2018, 56(7): 2579-2593.
[6] DENISON M, PULLIAM T H. Implementation and assessment of the amplification factor transport laminar-turbulent transition model[C]//2018 Fluid Dynamics Conference. Reston: AIAA, 2018.
[7] GAO Z H, HUANG J T. Advanced research on laminar flow aerodynamic configuration optimization for green aircraft[C]//AIAA Aviation 2014 Forum. Reston: AIAA, 2014.
[8] ZHANG Y F, FANG X M, CHEN H X, et al. Supercritical natural laminar flow airfoil optimization for regional aircraft wing design[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2015, 43: 152-164.
[9] ZHAO H, GAO Z H, GAO Y. Design optimization of natural-laminar-flow airfoil for complicated flight conditions[C]//35th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. Reston: AIAA, 2017.
[10] 张启鹏. 超临界自然层流翼型优化方法研究[D]. 南京: 南京航空航天大学, 2018. ZHANG Q P. Optimization methods for supercritical natural laminar airfoils[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2018 (in Chinese).
[11] CELLA U, QUAGLIARELLA D, DONELLI R, et al. Design and test of the UW-5006 transonic natural-laminar-flow wing[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2010, 47(3): 783-795.
[12] STREIT T S, SEITZ A, HEIN S, et al. NLF potential of laminar transonic long range aircraft[C]//AIAA Aviation 2020 Forum. Reston: AIAA, 2020.
[13] LYNDE M N, CAMPBELL R L, VIKEN S A. Additional findings from the common research model natural laminar flow wind tunnel test[C]//AIAA Aviation 2019 Forum. Reston: AIAA, 2019.
[14] BRIGHT M, KORNTHEUER A, KOMADINA S, et al. Development of advanced high lift leading edge technology for laminar flow wings[C]//51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition. Reston: AIAA, 2013.
[15] Boeing Commercial Airplane Group. High Reynolds number hybrid laminar flow control (HLFC) flight experiment II. Aerodynamic design: NASA CR 209324[R].Washington, D.C.: NASA, 1999.
[16] Boeing Commercial Airplane Group. High Reynolds number hybrid laminar flow control (HLFC) flight experiment III. Leading edge design, fabrication, and installation: NASA CR 209325[R].Washington, D.C.: NASA, 1999.
[17] IANNELLI P, Wild J, MINERVINO M, et al. Design of a high-lift system for a laminar wing[C]//5th European Conference for Aeronautics and Space Sciences (Eucass), 2013.
[18] WILD J. Kruger design for an HLFC wing[C]//5th CEAS Air and Space Conference, 2015.
[19] FRANKE D M, WILD J. Aerodynamic design of a folded krüger device for a HLFC wing[C]//New Results in Numerical and Experimental Fluid Mechanics X, 2016: 17-27.
[20] BOSNYAKOV S, KAZHAN E, KURSAKOV I, et al. Aerodynamic performance of the DeSiReH high-lift laminar wing at free flight and ETW in-tunnel conditions[C]//Progress in Flight Physics - Volume 7. Les Ulis: EDP Sciences, 2015: 33-44.
[21] AKAYDIN H D, HOUSMAN J A, KIRIS C C, et al. Computational design of a krueger flap targeting conventional slat aerodynamics[C]//22nd AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference. Reston: AIAA, 2016.
[22] DAM C P V. The aerodynamic design of multi-element high-lift systems for transport airplanes[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2002, 38(2): 101-144.
[23] STRUBER H. The aerodynamic design of the A350XWB-900 high-lift system[C]//29th Congress of the International Council of Aeronautical Sciences, 2014.
[24] 李高华, 宋文滨, 张淼, 等. 翼型高低速性能优化及其对缝翼设计影响研究[J]. 飞行力学, 2011, 29(5): 31-34, 43. LI G H, SONG W B, ZHANG M, et al. Concurrent optimization of airfoil high/low performance and its impact on slat design[J]. Flight Dynamics, 2011, 29(5): 31-34, 43 (in Chinese).
[25] BASHA W A, GHALY W S. Drag prediction in transitional flow over airfoils[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2007, 44(3): 824-832.
[26] FEJTEK I, FEJTEK I. Summary of code validation results for a multiple element airfoil test case[C]//28th Fluid Dynamics Conference. Reston: AIAA, 1997.
[27] POWELL N A, CLEMENS A, VELEZ-VALENCIA A, et al. Gulfstream’s contributions to the third AIAA high lift prediction workshop[C]//2018 Applied Aerodynamics Conference. Reston: AIAA, 2018.
[28] CODER J G, PULLIAM T H, JENSEN J C. Contributions to HiLiftPW-3 using structured, overset grid methods[C]//2018 AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting. Reston: AIAA, 2018.
[29] LUO J J, SHI Y J, SONG W B. Finlet optimization for airfoil trailing edge noise minimization using ANN[C]//AIAA Aviation 2020 Forum. Reston: AIAA, 2020.
[30] JEONG S, MURAYAMA M, YAMAMOTO K. Efficient optimization design method using Kriging model[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2005, 42(2): 413-420.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

层流机翼及其增升装置嵌套协同优化方法

Nested collaborative optimization of laminar wing and its high-lift devices

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王海峰, 刘坤澎, 江泓鑫, 杜晨曦. 螺旋桨多设计点气动优化方法和变桨距角策略[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 528831-528831.
[2]	刘琦, 史勇杰, 胡志远, 徐国华. 共轴刚性旋翼气动及噪声特性的参数影响分析[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 528856-528856.
[3]	柳家齐, 陈荣钱, 楼锦华, 韩旭, 吴昊, 尤延铖. 基于深度学习的高速直升机旋翼翼型气动优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 529828-529828.
[4]	孙蓬勃, 周洲, 李旭, 王科雷. 目标气动特性下动力翼参数影响分析与优化[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(6): 629368-629368.
[5]	陆凤霞, 韦坤, 王春雷, 鲍和云, 朱如鹏. 直升机中减三相流金属屑末可达性[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(1): 128524-128524.
[6]	任炯, 王刚, 胡国栋, 石晓露. 自适应Walsh函数有限体积方法[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(8): 127444-127444.
[7]	曹文博, 刘溢浪, 张伟伟. 基于降阶模型和梯度优化的流场加速收敛方法[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(6): 127090-127090.
[8]	赵欢, 高正红, 夏露. 基于新型高维代理模型的气动外形设计方法[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(5): 126924-126924.
[9]	刘超宇, 屈峰, 孙迪, 刘传振, 钱战森, 白俊强. 基于离散伴随的高超声速密切锥乘波体气动优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(4): 126664-126664.
[10]	樊宇翔, 赵瑞, 左政玄, 杨光, 李宇. 气体引射效应对壁面热流和摩擦阻力的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(21): 528587-528587.
[11]	刘思华, 王占莹, 李利剑, 张敏弟. 头型对射弹高速入水稳定性的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(21): 528437-528437.
[12]	乔建领, 韩忠华, 丁玉临, 宋文萍, 宋笔锋. 分层大气湍流场对远场声爆传播的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(2): 626350-626350.
[13]	田洁华, 孙迪, 屈峰, 白俊强. 基于CST⁃GAN的翼型参数化方法[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(18): 128280-128280.
[14]	王圣业, 邓小刚, 董义道, 王东方, 蔡佳鸿. 面向工程湍流的高精度数值方法[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(15): 528728-528728.
[15]	夏侯唐凡, 陈江涛, 邵志栋, 吴晓军, 刘宇. 随机和认知不确定性框架下的CFD模型确认度量综述[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 25716-025716.