层流机翼及其增升装置嵌套协同优化方法

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2021.25377

流体力学与飞行力学

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

层流机翼及其增升装置嵌套协同优化方法

罗佳杰, 宋文滨

上海交通大学航空航天学院, 上海 200240

收稿日期:2021-02-04 修回日期:2021-03-22 出版日期:2022-08-15 发布日期:2021-03-18
通讯作者: 宋文滨,E-mail:swb@sjtu.edu.cn E-mail:swb@sjtu.edu.cn
基金资助:
工信部十二五民机专项

Nested collaborative optimization of laminar wing and its high-lift devices

LUO Jiajie, SONG Wenbin

School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China

Received:2021-02-04 Revised:2021-03-22 Online:2022-08-15 Published:2021-03-18
Supported by:
Special Project for Civil Aircraft of MIIT during 12th Five-year Plan

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 层流机翼可以显著减少飞机的气动阻力,层流机翼的参数选择受到飞机总体参数的影响,同时需要和增升装置开展协同设计。采用前缘克鲁格和后缘富勒襟翼方案,首先对巡航构型的干净翼型和着陆构型的多段翼型开展嵌套协同优化。在此基础上,针对三维层流机翼和增升装置,通过自由转捩RANS计算和基于响应面的高效多级优化相结合的方法,实现了融合增升装置的层流机翼气动设计。

关键词: 层流机翼, 增升装置, 参数化建模, 计算流体力学, 气动优化

Abstract: The laminar wing technology can reduce the drag of the aircraft significantly. Selection of laminar wing parameters is affected by the overall parameters of the aircraft. Collaborative design of the laminar wing with its high-lift devices also needs to be carried out. Firstly, the clean airfoil of cruise configuration and the multi-segment airfoil of landing configuration are optimized by using leading-edge Kruger flaps and trailing-edge Fowler flaps. On this basis, the aerodynamic design for the three-dimensional laminar wing and its high-lift devices is realized through combination of RANS calculation of free transition and the efficient multi-level optimization based on the response surface.

Key words: laminar wing, high-lift device, parametric modeling, CFD, aerodynamic optimization

中图分类号:

V224

罗佳杰, 宋文滨. 层流机翼及其增升装置嵌套协同优化方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 125377-125377.

LUO Jiajie, SONG Wenbin. Nested collaborative optimization of laminar wing and its high-lift devices[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(8): 125377-125377.

参考文献

[1] CLEMONS L, WLEZIEN R W. Unsteady active flow control on the leading edge of a high-lift configuration thin airfoil[C]//8th AIAA Flow Control Conference. Reston: AIAA, 2016.
[2] WILD J. Recent research topics in high-lift aerodynamics[J]. CEAS Aeronautical Journal, 2016, 7(3): 345-355.
[3] CAMPBELL R L, LYNDE M N. Natural laminar flow design for wings with moderate sweep[C]//34th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. Reston: AIAA, 2016.
[4] SEITZ A, KRUSE M, WUNDERLICH T, et al. The DLR project LamAiR: Design of a NLF forward swept wing for short and medium range transport application[C]//29th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. Reston: AIAA, 2011.
[5] HAN Z H, CHEN J, ZHANG K S, et al. Aerodynamic shape optimization of natural-laminar-flow wing using surrogate-based approach[J]. AIAA Journal, 2018, 56(7): 2579-2593.
[6] DENISON M, PULLIAM T H. Implementation and assessment of the amplification factor transport laminar-turbulent transition model[C]//2018 Fluid Dynamics Conference. Reston: AIAA, 2018.
[7] GAO Z H, HUANG J T. Advanced research on laminar flow aerodynamic configuration optimization for green aircraft[C]//AIAA Aviation 2014 Forum. Reston: AIAA, 2014.
[8] ZHANG Y F, FANG X M, CHEN H X, et al. Supercritical natural laminar flow airfoil optimization for regional aircraft wing design[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2015, 43: 152-164.
[9] ZHAO H, GAO Z H, GAO Y. Design optimization of natural-laminar-flow airfoil for complicated flight conditions[C]//35th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. Reston: AIAA, 2017.
[10] 张启鹏. 超临界自然层流翼型优化方法研究[D]. 南京: 南京航空航天大学, 2018. ZHANG Q P. Optimization methods for supercritical natural laminar airfoils[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2018 (in Chinese).
[11] CELLA U, QUAGLIARELLA D, DONELLI R, et al. Design and test of the UW-5006 transonic natural-laminar-flow wing[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2010, 47(3): 783-795.
[12] STREIT T S, SEITZ A, HEIN S, et al. NLF potential of laminar transonic long range aircraft[C]//AIAA Aviation 2020 Forum. Reston: AIAA, 2020.
[13] LYNDE M N, CAMPBELL R L, VIKEN S A. Additional findings from the common research model natural laminar flow wind tunnel test[C]//AIAA Aviation 2019 Forum. Reston: AIAA, 2019.
[14] BRIGHT M, KORNTHEUER A, KOMADINA S, et al. Development of advanced high lift leading edge technology for laminar flow wings[C]//51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition. Reston: AIAA, 2013.
[15] Boeing Commercial Airplane Group. High Reynolds number hybrid laminar flow control (HLFC) flight experiment II. Aerodynamic design: NASA CR 209324[R].Washington, D.C.: NASA, 1999.
[16] Boeing Commercial Airplane Group. High Reynolds number hybrid laminar flow control (HLFC) flight experiment III. Leading edge design, fabrication, and installation: NASA CR 209325[R].Washington, D.C.: NASA, 1999.
[17] IANNELLI P, Wild J, MINERVINO M, et al. Design of a high-lift system for a laminar wing[C]//5th European Conference for Aeronautics and Space Sciences (Eucass), 2013.
[18] WILD J. Kruger design for an HLFC wing[C]//5th CEAS Air and Space Conference, 2015.
[19] FRANKE D M, WILD J. Aerodynamic design of a folded krüger device for a HLFC wing[C]//New Results in Numerical and Experimental Fluid Mechanics X, 2016: 17-27.
[20] BOSNYAKOV S, KAZHAN E, KURSAKOV I, et al. Aerodynamic performance of the DeSiReH high-lift laminar wing at free flight and ETW in-tunnel conditions[C]//Progress in Flight Physics - Volume 7. Les Ulis: EDP Sciences, 2015: 33-44.
[21] AKAYDIN H D, HOUSMAN J A, KIRIS C C, et al. Computational design of a krueger flap targeting conventional slat aerodynamics[C]//22nd AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference. Reston: AIAA, 2016.
[22] DAM C P V. The aerodynamic design of multi-element high-lift systems for transport airplanes[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2002, 38(2): 101-144.
[23] STRUBER H. The aerodynamic design of the A350XWB-900 high-lift system[C]//29th Congress of the International Council of Aeronautical Sciences, 2014.
[24] 李高华, 宋文滨, 张淼, 等. 翼型高低速性能优化及其对缝翼设计影响研究[J]. 飞行力学, 2011, 29(5): 31-34, 43. LI G H, SONG W B, ZHANG M, et al. Concurrent optimization of airfoil high/low performance and its impact on slat design[J]. Flight Dynamics, 2011, 29(5): 31-34, 43 (in Chinese).
[25] BASHA W A, GHALY W S. Drag prediction in transitional flow over airfoils[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2007, 44(3): 824-832.
[26] FEJTEK I, FEJTEK I. Summary of code validation results for a multiple element airfoil test case[C]//28th Fluid Dynamics Conference. Reston: AIAA, 1997.
[27] POWELL N A, CLEMENS A, VELEZ-VALENCIA A, et al. Gulfstream’s contributions to the third AIAA high lift prediction workshop[C]//2018 Applied Aerodynamics Conference. Reston: AIAA, 2018.
[28] CODER J G, PULLIAM T H, JENSEN J C. Contributions to HiLiftPW-3 using structured, overset grid methods[C]//2018 AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting. Reston: AIAA, 2018.
[29] LUO J J, SHI Y J, SONG W B. Finlet optimization for airfoil trailing edge noise minimization using ANN[C]//AIAA Aviation 2020 Forum. Reston: AIAA, 2020.
[30] JEONG S, MURAYAMA M, YAMAMOTO K. Efficient optimization design method using Kriging model[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2005, 42(2): 413-420.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

层流机翼及其增升装置嵌套协同优化方法

Nested collaborative optimization of laminar wing and its high-lift devices

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	乔建领, 韩忠华, 丁玉临, 宋文萍, 宋笔锋. 分层大气湍流场对远场声爆传播的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(2): 626350-626350.
[2]	夏侯唐凡, 陈江涛, 邵志栋, 吴晓军, 刘宇. 随机和认知不确定性框架下的CFD模型确认度量综述[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 25716-025716.
[3]	余煜玺, 张伟彬, 孙轶, 丛明辉, 朱建, 宋经远. 动密封用Ni基合金斜圈弹簧的变形行为及回弹力模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(7): 425527-425527.
[4]	陈广强, 豆国辉, 魏昊功, 邹昕, 李齐, 刘周, 周伟江. 火星探测器大气数据测量方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(3): 626619-626619.
[5]	姜有旭, 李杰, 杨钊. 某层流机翼验证机风洞试验数据修正方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(11): 526814-526814.
[6]	王猛, 李玉军, 赵荣奂, 衷洪杰. 基于在线加热涂层的宽速域转捩探测技术[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(11): 526820-526820.
[7]	奕建苗, 邓枫, 覃宁, 刘学强. 快速预测跨声速流场的深度学习方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(11): 526747-526747.
[8]	杨体浩, 白俊强, 段卓毅, 史亚云, 邓一菊, 周铸. 喷气式客机层流翼气动设计综述[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(11): 527016-527016.
[9]	杨钊, 李杰, 牛笑天. 层流机翼飞行验证平台雷诺数效应分析及修正[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(11): 527287-527287.
[10]	耿延升, 艾梦琪, 王伟, 耿建中, 赵彦. 高效层流翼型设计及试验验证[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(11): 526798-526798.
[11]	邓一菊, 段卓毅, 艾梦琪. 层流机翼设计技术现状与发展[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(11): 526778-526778.
[12]	牛笑天, 李杰, 周智鹏, 杨钊, 昌陌尘. 某层流机翼验证机跨声速层流特性敏感性分析[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(11): 526771-526771.
[13]	王迪, 钱战森, 冷岩. 广义Burgers方程声爆传播模型高阶格式离散[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(1): 124916-124916.
[14]	鲍俊, 王瑜, 牛潜, 朱锡冬, 程建杰. 喷雾液滴撞击液膜影响参数及流动机理分析[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(S1): 726360-726360.
[15]	王子航, 吕宏强. 基于CFD高精度算法的雷电电磁场研究[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(S1): 726366-726366.