基于浸入式边界法的叶栅颤振数值模拟

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2015.0052

固体力学与飞行器总体设计

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

基于浸入式边界法的叶栅颤振数值模拟

胡国暾, 杜林, 孙晓峰

北京航空航天大学能源与动力工程学院, 北京 100191

收稿日期:2014-12-02 修回日期:2015-02-26 出版日期:2015-07-15 发布日期:2015-03-02
通讯作者: 孙晓峰男, 博士, 教授, 博士生导师。主要研究方向: 气动声学, 气动弹性力学, 流动稳定性。 Tel: 010-82317408 E-mail: sunxf@buaa.edu.cn E-mail:sunxf@buaa.edu.cn
作者简介:胡国暾女, 博士研究生。主要研究方向: 气动弹性稳定性。 Tel: 010-82316337-81 E-mail: huguotun@126.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金 (51236001)

Numerical simulation of an oscillating cascade based on immersed boundary method

HU Guotun, DU Lin, SUN Xiaofeng

School of Energy and Power Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China

Received:2014-12-02 Revised:2015-02-26 Online:2015-07-15 Published:2015-03-02
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (51236001)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基于浸入式边界法建立了求解振荡叶栅非定常流动的快速计算模型,并在模型中添加湍流模型,使之能够考虑更加接近实际流动的情况。具体的方法是求解目前为止最常用的雷诺时均Navier-Stokes方程并添加低雷诺数湍流模型(Lam-Bremhorst模型,k-ε模型的一种)进行计算,为了验证该方法的正确性,分别对层流边界层和湍流边界层进行了数值模拟,计算结果与布拉修斯解和壁面率吻合得很好,证明了湍流模型的可靠性。在此基础上,对高雷诺数条件下的振荡叶栅进行了数值模拟。结果表明,折合速度是影响叶栅振荡的重要因素,这与层流计算的结论类似。值得注意的是耦合过程没有生成贴体网格,减小了计算时间,可以准确快速地模拟真实的叶栅流动情况。

关键词: 浸入式边界法, 湍流模型, 流固耦合, 叶轮机械, 气动弹性稳定性

Abstract:

A fast explicit numerical method is established to solve the unsteady flow with an oscillating cascade on the basis of the immersed boundary method. In order to consider more practical problems, a turbulence model is introduced into this method. The specific method is to solve the Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes equations with low Reynolds number turbulence model, i.e., Lam-Bremhorst model, which is one of the k-ε models. In order to validate the method, two simulation cases, laminar boundary layer and turbulent boundary layer are carried out and results agree well with the Blasius solution and the law of wall. Based on these benchmark cases, a numerical simulation at high Reynolds number for an oscillating cascade is then established. It is found that the oscillating of cascade is greatly influenced by the reduced velocity which is just the same solution of the laminar results. It is worth noting that the coupling process is not necessary to generating any body-fitting grid, which makes it much faster in computational process for such a cascade problem.

Key words: immersed boundary method, turbulence model, fluid-structure interaction, turbomachinery, aeroelastic stability

中图分类号:

V215.3

胡国暾, 杜林, 孙晓峰. 基于浸入式边界法的叶栅颤振数值模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(7): 2269-2278.

HU Guotun, DU Lin, SUN Xiaofeng. Numerical simulation of an oscillating cascade based on immersed boundary method[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2015, 36(7): 2269-2278.

参考文献

[1] Ballhaus W F, Goorjina P M. Computation of unsteady transonic flows by the indicial method[J]. AIAA Journal, 1978, 16(2): 117-124.
[2] He L. An Euler solution for unsteady flows around oscillating blades[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 1990, 112(4): 714-722.
[3] He L, Denton J D. Three dimensional time-marching inviscid and viscous solutions for unsteady flows around vibrating blade, ASME Paper, 1993-GT-92[R]. New York: ASME, 1993.
[4] Sadeghi M, Liu F. Computation of mistuning effects on cascade flutter[J]. AIAA Journal, 2001, 39(1): 22-28.
[5] Sadeghi M, Liu F. Computation of cascade flutter by uncoupled and coupled methods[J]. International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics, 2005, 19(8): 559-569.
[6] Sadeghi M, Yang S, Liu F, et al. Parallel computation of wing flutter with a coupled Navier-Stokes/CSD method, AIAA-2003-1347[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2003.
[7] Sadeghi M, Liu F. Investigation of mistuning effects on cascade flutter using a coupled method[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2007, 23(2): 266-272.
[8] Kazawa J, Watanabe T. Numerical analysis toward active control of cascade flutter with smart structure, AIAA-2002-4079[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2002.
[9] Piperno S. Explicit/implicit fluid/structure staggered procedures with a structural predictor and fluid subcycling for 2D inviscid aeroelastic simulations[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 1997, 25(10): 1207-1226.
[10] Gottfried D A. Simulation of fluid-structure interaction in turbomachinery[D]. West Lafayette: Purdue University, 2000.
[11] Xie H. 3-D nonlinear dynamic fluid-structure coupling numerical method and its application research[D]. Xi'an: Xi'an Jiaotong University, 2003 (in Chinese). 谢浩. 三维非线性动态流体-结构耦合数值方法及其应用研究[D]. 西安: 西安交通大学, 2003.
[12] Hu P G, Xue L P, Mao S L, et al. Material point method applied to fluid-structure interaction(FSI)/aeroelasticity problems, AIAA-2010-1464[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2010.
[13] Hu P G, Xue L P, Kamakoti R, et al. Material point method with least squares technique for nonlinear aeroelasticity and fluid-structure interactions (FSI) in ASTE-P Toolset, AIAA-2010-8224[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2010.
[14] Peskin C S. Flow patterns around heart values: a numerical method[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1972, 10(2): 252-271.
[15] Zhong G H, Sun X F. A simulation strategy for an oscillating cascade in the turbomachinery using immersed boundary method[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2009, 25(2): 312-321.
[16] Hu G T, Sun X F. A numerical modeling of the vortex-induced vibration of cascade in turbomachinery using immersed boundary method[J]. Journal of Thermal Science, 2011, 20(3): 229-237.
[17] Hu G T, Du L, Sun X F. An immersed boundary method for simulating oscillating rotor baldes[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2014, 35(8): 2112-2125 (in Chinese). 胡国暾, 杜林, 孙晓峰. 基于浸入式边界法的振荡转子叶片数值模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2014, 35(8): 2112-2125.
[18] Goldstein D, Handler R, Sirovich L. Modeling a no-slip flow with an external force field[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1993, 105(2): 354-366.
[19] Lam C K, Bremborst K A. Modified form of the k-εmodel for predicting wall turbulence[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 1981, 103(3): 456-460.
[20] Wilcox D C. Comparison of two-equation turbulence models for boundary layers with pressure gradient[J]. AIAA Journal, 1993, 31(8): 1414-1421.
[21] Chen M Z. Fundamentals of viscous fluid dynamics[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2002 (in Chinese). 陈懋章. 粘性流体动力学基础[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2002.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

基于浸入式边界法的叶栅颤振数值模拟

Numerical simulation of an oscillating cascade based on immersed boundary method

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张东飞, 高军辉. GPU加速高阶谱差分方法在风扇噪声中的应用[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(8): 128941-128941.
[2]	代雨柔, 李健, 薛晓鹏, 荣伟. 超声速下盘缝带伞不同收口方式的气动特性[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(7): 128811-128811.
[3]	汪洪波, 曾宇, 熊大鹏, 杨揖心, 孙明波. SST湍流模型的激波与可压缩效应改进[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(3): 128694-128694.
[4]	张恺玲, 李思怡, 段毅, 阎超. 进气道流动中SST湍流模型参数的不确定度量化[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(S2): 729429-729429.
[5]	曾宇, 汪洪波, 孙明波, 王超, 刘旭. SST湍流模型改进研究综述[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(9): 27411-027411.
[6]	刘为佳, 李映坤, 陈雄, 李春雷. 基于流固耦合的激波/边界层干扰作用下壁板颤振特性[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(6): 127085-127085.
[7]	包文龙, 贾贺, 薛晓鹏, 黄雪姣, 高树义, 荣伟, 王奇, 吴壮志. 开“窗”结构对环帆伞开伞过程影响[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(5): 226936-226936.
[8]	刘畅, 张耘隆, 闫指江, 赵磊, 季辰. 锤头体火箭弹性模型脉动压力风洞试验[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(23): 128384-128384.
[9]	罗剑桥, 解春雷, 金泽华, 孟军辉. 跨介质飞行器近水面滑跳流固耦合仿真及可滑跳区域研究[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(21): 528632-528632.
[10]	张永杰, 崔博, 王明振, 张楚哲, 罗琳胤, 陈向明, 刘小川. 水陆两栖飞机着水试验与理论分析方法研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(21): 528665-528665.
[11]	刘汉儒, 陈南树, 刘宇, 胡之颉. 多孔介质流动控制及气动降噪研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(16): 27923-027923.
[12]	李秋琳, 周莉, 孙鹏, 史经纬, 王占学. 出口宽高比对S弯喷管流固耦合特性影响[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(14): 628204-628204.
[13]	刘锬韬, 李瑞宇, 高丽敏, 赵磊. 基于数据同化的试验数据驱动的叶栅流场预测[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(14): 628201-628201.
[14]	陈涛, 徐兴平, 张宏达, 韩省思. 自适应湍流耦合建表燃烧模型的振荡燃烧数值模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(14): 628207-628207.
[15]	陈伟芳, 孙精华, 田得阳, 陈烨斯. 物理化学模型对流场电磁散射特性的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(12): 127707-127707.