铝合金焊接接头预腐蚀强度特性及预测

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2013.0064

固体力学与飞行器总体设计

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

铝合金焊接接头预腐蚀强度特性及预测

张俊苗¹, 聂宏¹, 薛彩军¹, 吴会强², 鄢东洋²

1. 南京航空航天大学机械结构力学及控制国家重点实验室, 江苏南京 210016;
2. 北京宇航系统工程研究所, 北京 100076

收稿日期:2012-10-19 修回日期:2013-01-04 出版日期:2013-09-25 发布日期:2013-01-17
通讯作者: 聂宏,Tel.:025-84892411 E-mail:hnie@nuaa.edu.cn E-mail:hnie@nuaa.edu.cn
作者简介:张俊苗男, 博士研究生。主要研究方向: 机械结构疲劳寿命预测技术。Tel: 025-84892384 E-mail: zjmin2001@hotmail.com;聂宏男, 博士, 教授, 博士生导师。主要研究方向: 结构疲劳寿命预测。Tel: 025-84892411 E-mail: hnie@nuaa.edu.cn;薛彩军男, 博士, 副教授, 硕士生导师。主要研究方向: 飞机结构强度。Tel: 025-84892384 E-mail: cjxue@nuaa.edu.cn;吴会强男, 博士, 高级工程师。主要研究方向: 航天器推进剂贮箱结构的研究与设计。Tel: 010-68381963 E-mail: wuhq888@sina.com;鄢东洋男, 博士, 工程师。主要研究方向: 航天器推进剂贮箱结构的研究与设计。Tel: 010-68381963 E-mail: bryan168.yan@gmail.com
基金资助:
江苏省自然科学基金(BK2012795)

Properties and Prediction of Pre-corrosion Strength of Aluminum Alloy Welded Joints

ZHANG Junmiao¹, NIE Hong¹, XUE Caijun¹, WU Huiqiang², YAN Dongyang²

1. State Key Laboratory of Mechanics and Control of Mechanical Structures, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China;
2. Beijing Institute of Astronautical Systems Engineering, Beijing 100076, China

Received:2012-10-19 Revised:2013-01-04 Online:2013-09-25 Published:2013-01-17
Supported by:
Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK2012795)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为保证航空航天器中贮存腐蚀溶液的焊接结构的耐久性,有必要对焊接接头预腐蚀强度特性进行研究。首先进行2219-T87铝合金焊接接头试样在酸性模拟溶液中的腐蚀试验,获取焊接接头和母材的腐蚀性能数据;根据腐蚀试验数据,结合焊接接头局部力学试验数据,采用有限元方法对焊接接头预腐蚀强度和断裂位置进行预测;通过焊接接头预腐蚀拉伸试验对预测结果进行验证。研究结果表明:焊接接头腐蚀性能最主要的特点是焊缝区、热影响区和母材的腐蚀性能存在显著差异;腐蚀性能是影响焊接接头预腐蚀强度的重要因素,且其影响随着腐蚀时间的增加而逐渐增大,导致长时间腐蚀的试样在拉伸试验中的断裂位置由力学性能薄弱的熔合区转移到腐蚀性能薄弱的母材区;所提出的预测方法具有试验规模小、结果准确且适应性强的优点。

关键词: 焊接接头, 铝合金, 腐蚀, 有限元法, 耐腐蚀性能

Abstract:

In order to ensure the durability of welded structures used for long-term storage of corrosive solutions in the aerospace field, it is necessary to study the pre-corrosion strength properties of welded joints. Corrosion tests of welded joint specimens AA2219-T87 are conducted in an acid solution to obtain the corrosion property data of the welded joints and base metal, and the differences of corrosion properties between the welded joint and base metal are summarized. Based on the data of corrosion tests and welded joint local strength tests, a finite element method is used to predict the pre-corrosion strength and fracture position of welded joints, the results of which are verified by pre-corrosion tensile tests. The study shows that the major characteristic of a welded joint's corrosion resistance is the existence of obvious differences of corrosive resistance among the weld zone, the heat affected zone and the base metal. The corrosion resistance is an important factor for the pre-corrosion strength of welded joints, and its influence increases with time, leading to the translocation of fracture positions of long-time corroded specimens from areas of poor mechanical property to areas of poor corrosion property during tensile tests. The proposed prediction method of welded joint pre-corrosion strength can yield accurate results with a minimum number and scale of tests.

Key words: welded joints, aluminum alloy, corrosion, finite element method, corrosion resistance

中图分类号:

V416.5

张俊苗, 聂宏, 薛彩军, 吴会强, 鄢东洋. 铝合金焊接接头预腐蚀强度特性及预测[J]. 航空学报, 2013, 34(9): 2161-2168.

ZHANG Junmiao, NIE Hong, XUE Caijun, WU Huiqiang, YAN Dongyang. Properties and Prediction of Pre-corrosion Strength of Aluminum Alloy Welded Joints[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2013, 34(9): 2161-2168.

参考文献

[1] Wang H F, Zuo D W, Wang H Y, et al. Microstructure and mechanical properties of 5554 aluminum alloy TIG welded seam. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics, 2010, 42(6): 753-757. (in Chinese) 汪洪峰, 左敦稳, 王宏宇, 等. 5554铝合金TIG焊缝组织与性能. 南京航空航天大学学报, 2010, 42(6): 753-757.

[2] Ghidini T, Dalle D C. Fatigue life predictions using fracture mechanics methods. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2009, 76(1): 134-148.

[3] Ambriz R R, Chicot D, Benseddiq N, et al. Local mechanical properties of the 6061-T6 aluminum weld using micro-traction and instrumented indentation. European Journal of Mechanics, 2011, 30(3): 307-315.

[4] John R, Jata K V, Sadananda K. Residual stress effects on near-threshold fatigue crack growth in friction stir welds in aerospace alloys. International Journal of Fatigue, 2003, 25(9): 939-948.

[5] Liljedahl C D M, Zanellato O, Fitzpatrick M E, et al. The effect of weld residual stresses and their re-distribution with crack growth during fatigue under constant amplitude loading. International Journal of Fatigue, 2010, 32(4): 735-743.

[6] Pouget G, Reynolds A P. Residual stress and microstructure effects on fatigue crack growth in AA2050 friction stir welds. International Journal of Fatigue, 2008, 30(3): 463-472.

[7] Zhang D F, Chen Y L. Corrosion damage evolvement rule of aluminum alloy under equivalent accelerated conditon. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics, 2010, 42(3): 340-342.(in Chinese) 张丹峰, 陈跃良. 当量加速试验条件下铝合金腐蚀形态演化规律. 南京航空航天大学学报, 2010, 42(3): 340-342.

[8] Alexopoulos N D, Papanikos P. Experimental and theoretical studies of corrosion-induced mechanical properties degradation of Aircraft 2024 aluminum alloy. Material Science and Engineering A, 2008, 498(1-2): 248-257.

[9] Paolinelli L D, Perez T, Simison S N. The effect of pre-corrosion and steel microstructure on inhibitor performance in CO₂ corrosion. Corrosion Science, 2008, 50(9): 2456-2464.

[10] Burns J T, Kim S, Gangloff R P. Effect of corrosion severity on fatigue evolution in Al-Zn-Mg-Cu. Corrosion Science, 2010, 52(2): 498-508.

[11] Frederic M, Gilbert H. Influence of frequency and exposure to a saline solution on the corrosion fatigue crack growth behaviour of the aluminum alloy 2024. International Journal of Fatigue, 2009, 31(11-12): 1684-1695.

[12] Liu J Z, Chen B, Ye X B, et al. Fatigue and crack growth behavior of pre-corroded aluminum alloy 2024-T62 and its life prediction based on fracture mechanics. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2011, 32(1): 107-116. (in Chinese) 刘建中, 陈勃, 叶序彬, 等. 含腐蚀预损伤铝合金2024-T62的疲劳断裂行为及基于断裂力学的寿命预测. 航空学报, 2011, 32(1): 107-116.

[13] Zhang Y H, Lu G Z, Chen Y L. Predicting fatigue life from pre-corroded LY12-CZ aluminium test. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2005, 26(6): 779-782. (in Chinese) 张有宏, 铝国志, 陈跃良. LY12-CZ铝合金预腐蚀及疲劳损伤研究. 航空学报, 2005, 26(6): 779-782.

[14] United State Department of Defense. Fusion welding for aerospace applications. MIL-STD-2219, 1990.

[15] Gao Y P, Liang X B, Dong L, et al. GB/T 228-2010 Metallic-materials tensile testing-part 1: method of test at room temperature. Beijing: China Standard Press, 2010: 1-25. (in Chinese) 高怡裴, 梁新帮, 董莉, 等. GB/T 228-2010 金属材料拉伸试验第1部分:室温试验方法. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2010: 1-25.

[16] Ji X C, Wang Y, Li H L. GB/T 16545-1996 Corrosion of metal and alloys-removal of corrosion products from corrosion test specimens. Beijing: China Standard Press, 1996: 253-260. (in Chinese) 纪晓春, 王云, 李慧玲. GB/T 16545-1996 金属和合金的腐蚀试样上腐蚀产物的清除. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 1996: 253-260.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

铝合金焊接接头预腐蚀强度特性及预测

Properties and Prediction of Pre-corrosion Strength of Aluminum Alloy Welded Joints

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	高同州, 贺小帆, 王晓雷, 李紫光, 朱振涛, 詹志新. 基于CDM理论与SVM模型的2014-T6铝合金疲劳寿命预测[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(7): 228952-228952.
[2]	张福泽. 全机日历寿命确定及相关问题[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(3): 229863-229863.
[3]	应岳峰, 陈琪昊, 王卫东, 毛欣宇. 焊丝超声振动对铝合金熔化极气体保护焊缝成形及气孔的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(2): 428711-428711.
[4]	王四季, 张羽薇, 黄开明, 吕彪, 赵海凤, 王虎, 廖明夫. 基于改进粒子群算法的直升机动力涡轮转子系统优化方法[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(1): 228608-228608.
[5]	崔静, 白娟, 牛书鑫, 王一凡, 杨广峰, 王立文. 抑冰功能型表面的耐磨耐蚀特性[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(S2): 729288-729288.
[6]	唐论, 余圣甫, 郑博, 史玉升, 陈颖. 圆柱面点阵自生Al₂O₃铝合金粉芯丝材开发及应用[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(9): 626864-626864.
[7]	林忠钦, 于忠奇, 戴冬华, 樊晓光, 余圣甫, 顾冬冬, 李淑慧, 史玉升. 复杂高筋薄壁构件旋压-增材复合制造技术发展与展望[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(9): 627493-627493.
[8]	金士杰, 王志诚, 田鑫, 孙旭, 林莉. 基于半跨模式波的铝合金板底面缺陷TOFD检测[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(4): 426674-426674.
[9]	邹田春, 巨乐章, 管玉玺, 李泽钢, 陈红呈. 铺层方式对CFRP⁃Al胶接接头疲劳行为的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(18): 428264-428264.
[10]	何盼, 卢超, 石文泽, 朱颖, 陈果, 赵莉萍. 铝合金激光超声表面检测中EMAT接收性能对比[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(16): 428085-428085.
[11]	张志强, 勾青泽, 路学成, 王浩, 曹轶然, 郭志永. 高强铝合金CMT+P电弧增材制造熔滴过渡行为[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(13): 427881-427881.
[12]	张天刚, 黄嘉浩, 侯晓云, 张志强. 激光清洗铝合金表面复合漆层作用机制[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(11): 427656-427656.
[13]	张子瑜, 郝林. 扩展有限元法在断裂力学相场模型中的应用[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 225976-225976.
[14]	胡宪亮, 乔红超, 赵吉宾, 陆莹, 吴嘉俊, 杨玉奇. 激光冲击波对单晶合金抗热腐蚀性能的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(4): 525591-525591.
[15]	石文泽, 程进杰, 胡硕臻, 卢超, 陈尧. 脉冲压缩在铝薄板电磁超声导波检测中的应用[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(3): 425063-425063.