首页 >

复杂装备可靠性从失效评估到不确定性治理:内涵、方法与展望-飞行器结构不确定性分析与可靠性优化设计”专栏

彭文胜1,曾照洋2,郑畅东1,李瑾岳3,林聪1   

  1. 1. 中国航空综合技术研究所
    2. 中国航空综合技术研究所航空综合环境航空科技重点实验室
    3. 北京航空航天大学
  • 收稿日期:2026-04-17 修回日期:2026-08-06 出版日期:2026-08-18 发布日期:2026-08-18
  • 通讯作者: 郑畅东
  • 基金资助:
    强对抗环境下异构无人集群智能弹性编队控制方法研究;实测数据驱动的复材翼面类结构修配补偿与公差优化设计

Complex Equipment Reliability: From Failure Assessment to Uncertainty Governance — Connotations, Methods, and Prospects

  • Received:2026-04-17 Revised:2026-08-06 Online:2026-08-18 Published:2026-08-18
  • Contact: Chang-Dong ZHENG

摘要: 随着现代装备系统持续向复杂化、智能化和网络化演进,其全寿命周期中的不确定性已从单一、局部、静态向多源、动态、高度耦合方向演进,传统以失效统计和静态评估为主的可靠性理论方法正面临适用边界重构。本文面向复杂装备可靠性问题,系统梳理不确定性量化与不确定性控制的研究现状与进展,重点讨论现代可靠性工程由“失效分析”向“不确定性认知—传播分析—主动调控”闭环范式演进的内在逻辑。首先,追溯装备可靠性内涵的演进过程,阐明在复杂不确定性背景下,鲁棒性与韧性对传统可靠性概念的拓展,并分析装备系统不确定性的分类方式及对可靠性与安全性的影响;汽车,归纳梳理了不确定性量化中关键方法与应用情况以及不确定性控制的代表性策略。同时,探讨了人工智能、数字孪生及社会—技术系统工程等关键使能技术在不确定性量化与控制融合中的支撑作用与集成路径。最后,围绕可信AI深度融合、实时在线与自适应不确定性量化与控制、复杂体系不确定性治理以及人—机—组织协同下的整体可靠性保障等方向进行展望。研究表明,复杂装备可靠性研究的核心任务正由被动失效评估,向不确定性及其风险演化的主动治理,这一转变将成为推动装备可靠性工程理论创新与技术突破的重要牵引。

关键词: 装备可靠性, 不确定性量化, 不确定性控制, 鲁棒性, 韧性

Abstract: As modern equipment systems continue to evolve towards greater complexity, intelligence, and networking, the uncertainties throughout their life cycles have shifted from being singular, local, and static to being multi-source, dynamic, and highly coupled. Traditional reliability theories and methods based on failure statistics and static assessment are facing a fundamental restructuring of their applicability boundaries. Focusing on the reliability of complex equipment, this paper systematically reviews the state of the art and progress in uncertainty quantification and uncertainty control, with an emphasis on the intrinsic logic behind the paradigm shift of modern reliability engineering from "failure analysis" to a closed-loop paradigm of "uncertainty cognition – propagation analysis – active regulation". First, we trace the evolution of the connotation of equipment reliability, clarify how robustness and resilience extend the traditional concept of reliability under complex uncertainty, and analyze the classification of uncertainties in equipment systems and their impacts on reliability and safety. Second, we summarize key methods and applications in uncertainty quantification, as well as representative strategies for uncertainty control. Furthermore, we discuss the supporting roles and integration pathways of key enabling technologies—such as artificial intelligence, digital twins, and socio-technical systems engineering—in the fusion of uncertainty quantification and control. Finally, we provide an outlook on directions including deep integration of trustworthy AI, real-time online and adaptive uncertainty quantification and control, uncertainty governance of complex systems-of-systems, and holistic reliability assurance under human–machine–organization synergy. The study shows that the core mission of complex equipment reliability research is shifting from passive failure assessment to proactive governance of uncertainties and their risk evolution—a transformation that will serve as a major driving force for theoretical innovation and technological breakthroughs in equipment reliability engineering.

Key words: equipment reliability, uncertainty quantification, uncertainty control, robustness, resilience

中图分类号: