基于自适应笛卡尔网格的飞翼布局流动模拟

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2021.25674

流体力学与飞行力学

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

基于自适应笛卡尔网格的飞翼布局流动模拟

陈浩^1,2, 华如豪^1,2, 袁先旭^1,2, 唐志共², 毕林^1,2

1. 中国空气动力研究与发展中心空气动力学国家重点实验室, 绵阳 621000;
2. 中国空气动力研究与发展中心计算空气动力研究所, 绵阳 621000

收稿日期:2021-04-15 修回日期:2021-09-06 出版日期:2022-08-15 发布日期:2021-09-06
通讯作者: 毕林,E-mail:bzbaby1010@163.com E-mail:bzbaby1010@163.com
基金资助:
国家数值风洞工程;空气动力学国家重点实验室创新基金

Simulation of flow around fly-wing configuration based on adaptive Cartesian grid

CHEN Hao^1,2, HUA Ruhao^1,2, YUAN Xianxu^1,2, TANG Zhigong², BI Lin^1,2

1. State Key Laboratory of Aerodynamics, China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center, Mianyang 621000, China;
2. Computational Aerodynamics Institute, China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center, Mianyang 621000, China

Received:2021-04-15 Revised:2021-09-06 Online:2022-08-15 Published:2021-09-06
Supported by:
National Numerical Windtunnel Project;State Key Laboratory of Aerodynamics Research Fund

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 小展弦比飞翼布局具有较好的隐身和气动性能,是未来战机的先进布局。对飞翼飞机进行CFD数值模拟时,其全翼式设计使得高质量贴体网格的生成存在一定的难度。相比之下,自适应笛卡尔网格方法具有自动化和高质量兼顾的优势。本文对自适应笛卡尔网格技术进行发展,并开展小展弦比飞翼布局的数值仿真研究。采用全线程树笛卡尔网格数据结构,结合改进后的网格单元类型判断方法,以及基于几何特征和流场解特征的自适应方法,并通过虚拟层技术优化近壁网格,发展了高效、鲁棒、高质量的三维自适应笛卡尔网格生成技术;对于非贴体物面边界的处理,发展了基于浸入边界方法思想的虚拟单元重构技术,构造了高保真的非贴体笛卡尔网格边界条件;针对黏性流动控制方程,发展了笛卡尔网格框架下的数值离散方法,建立了适用于自适应笛卡尔网格的Navier-Stokes方程数值求解器;基于上述工作,开展了自适应笛卡尔网格技术在小展弦比飞翼布局低速流动问题中的应用研究,证明了本文所发展的技术方法的可靠性,并探究了自适应技术对于流场特征和气动力特性的影响作用。

关键词: 飞翼, 笛卡尔网格, 浸入边界方法, 非贴体, 自适应技术

Abstract: The fly-wing configuration with low aspect ratio has better stealth and aerodynamic performance, and therefore, is the advanced configuration of future fighter. In CFD simulation of fly-wing aircraft, the full wing design makes it difficult to generate high quality body-fitted grids. In contrast, adaptive Cartesian grid method has the advantages of automation and high quality. In this paper, the adaptive Cartesian grid technology is developed, and the numerical simulation of fly-wing configuration with low aspect ratio is carried out. Firstly, combining the improved method of determining the grid cell type with the adaptive method based on the geometric characteristics and flow field solution characteristics, a highly efficient, robust and high-quality three-dimensional adaptive Cartesian mesh generation technology is developed by using the fully threaded tree Cartesian mesh data structure and optimizing the near wall mesh through the virtual layer technology. For the processing of non-body-fitted wall boundary, the basic method is developed based on the ghost cell reconstruction technique of immersed boundary method, and the high fidelity boundary conditions of non-body-fitted Cartesian grids are constructed. For viscous flow control equations, the numerical discretization method in the framework of Cartesian grids is developed, and the numerical solver of Navier-Stokes equations suitable for adaptive Cartesian grids is established. Based on the above work, the application of adaptive Cartesian grid technique is carried out. The application research of fly-wing configuration with low aspect ratio in low-speed flow problem proves the reliability of the technical method developed in this paper, and deeply explores the influence of adaptive technology on flow field characteristics and aerodynamic characteristics.

Key words: fly-wing, Cartesian mesh, immersed boundary method, non-body-fitted, adaptive techniques

中图分类号:

V211.3

陈浩, 华如豪, 袁先旭, 唐志共, 毕林. 基于自适应笛卡尔网格的飞翼布局流动模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 125674.

CHEN Hao, HUA Ruhao, YUAN Xianxu, TANG Zhigong, BI Lin. Simulation of flow around fly-wing configuration based on adaptive Cartesian grid[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(8): 125674.

参考文献

[1] ANDERSON D A, TANNEHILL J C, PLETCHER R H. Computational fluid mechanics and heat transfer[M]. New York: Homisphere Publishing Corporation, 1984: 10-15.
[2] NAKAHASHI K. Aeronautical CFD in the age of petaflops-scale computing: From unstructured to Cartesian meshes[J]. European Journal of Mechanics-B/Fluids, 2013, 40: 75-86.
[3] FREMAUX M C, HALL R M. COMSAC: Computational methods for stability and control: NASA/CP-2004-213028/PT1[R]. Washington, D.C.: NASA, 2004.
[4] COTTRELL J A, HUGHES T J R, BAZILEVS Y. Isogeometric analysis: toward integration of CAD and FEA[M]. Hoboken:Wiley Publishing, 2009: 55-58.
[5] THOMPSON J F, THAMES F C, MASTIN C W. Automatic numerical generation of body-fitted curvilinear coordinate system for field containing any number of arbitrary two-dimensional bodies[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1974, 15(3): 299-319.
[6] LEE K. 3-D transonic flow computations using grid systems with block structure[C]//5th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference. Reston: AIAA, 1981.
[7] SAWADA K, TAKANASHI S. A numerical investigation on wing/nacelle interferences of USB configuration[C]//25th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting. Reston: AIAA, 1987.
[8] 常兴华, 马戎, 张来平. 并行化非结构重叠网格隐式装配技术[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(6): 121780. CHANG X H, MA R, ZHANG L P. Parallel implicit hole-cutting method for unstructured overset grid[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2018, 39(6): 121780 (in Chinese).
[9] NAKAHASHI K, ITO Y, TOGASHI F. Some challenges of realistic flow simulations by unstructured grid CFD[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2003, 43(6-7): 769-783.
[10] CLARKE D K, SALAS M D, HASSAN H A. Euler calculations for multielement airfoils using Cartesian grids[J]. AIAA Journal, 1986, 24(3): 353-358.
[11] 方宝瑞. 飞机气动布局设计[M]. 北京:航空工业出版社, 1997. FANG B R. Aircraft aerodynamic layout design[M]. Beijing: Aviation Industry Press, 1997 (in Chinese).
[12] WALKER L A. Flight testing the X-36-the test polit’s perspective: NASA CR-198058[R]. Washington, D.C.: NASA, 1997.
[13] 陈浩, 袁先旭, 华如豪, 等. 基于全线程树数据结构的笛卡尔网格高效生成技术[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(12): 125170. CHEN H, YUAN X X, HUA R H, et al. Cartesian grid efficient generation method based on fully threaded tree structure[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2021, 42(12): 125170 (in Chinese).
[14] MITCHELTREE R A, SALAS M D, HASSAN H A. Grid embedding technique using Cartesian grids for Euler solutions[J]. AIAA Journal, 1988, 26(6): 754-756.
[15] MORINISHI K. A finite difference solution of the Euler equations on non-body-fitted Cartesian grids[J]. Computers & Fluids, 1992, 21(3): 331-344.
[16] DE ZEEUW D L. A quadtree-based adaptively-refined Cartesian-grid algorithm for solution of the Euler equations[D]. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 1993.
[17] KHOKHLOV A M. Fully threaded tree algorithms for adaptive refinement fluid dynamics simulations[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1998, 143(2): 519-543.
[18] AFTOSMIS M J. Aspects of Cartesian grid methods for aerodynamic flows with complex geometries[M]//28th Lecture Series in Advanced Computational Fluid Dynamics, 1997.
[19] DADONE A, GROSSMAN B. An immersed body methodology for inviscid flows on Cartesian grids[C]//40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit. Reston: AIAA, 2002.
[20] LEE J D, RUFFIN S. Development of a turbulent wall-function based viscous Cartesian-grid methodology[C]//45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston: AIAA, 2007.
[21] KIDRON Y, MORYOSSEF Y, LEVY Y. Turbulent flow predictions using a Cartesian flow solver[C]//19th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics. Reston: AIAA, 2009.
[22] PAILLERE H, POWELL K, DARREN D. A wave-model-based refinement criterion for adaptive-grid computation of compressible flows[C]//30th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston: AIAA, 1992.
[23] FORRER H, JELTSCH R. A higher-order boundary treatment for Cartesian-grid methods[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1998, 140(2): 259-277.
[24] 张涵信. 无波动、无自由参数的耗散差分格式[J]. 空气动力学学报, 1988, 6(2): 143-165. ZHANG H X. Non-oscillatory and non-free-parameter dissipation difference scheme[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 1988, 6(2): 143-165 (in Chinese).
[25] LEER B V. Flux vector splitting for Euler equations[J]. Lecture Notes in Physics, 1982: 507-512.
[26] GUSTAFSSON B, SUNDSTRÖM A. Incompletely parabolic problems in fluid dynamics[J]. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 1978, 35(2): 343-357.
[27] 唐志共, 陈浩, 毕林, 等. 自适应笛卡尔网格超声速黏性流动数值模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(5): 121697. TANG Z G, CHEN H, BI L, et al. Numerical simulation of supersonic viscous flow based on adaptive Cartesian grid[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2018, 39(5): 121697 (in Chinese).
[28] 吴军飞, 秦永明, 黄湛, 等. 小展弦比飞翼标模纵航向气动特性低速实验研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2016, 34(1): 125-130. WU J F, QIN Y M, HUANG Z, et al. Low speed experiment on longitudinal and lateral aerodynamic characteristics of the low aspect ratio flying wing calibration model[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2016, 34(1): 125-130 (in Chinese).
[29] 张耀冰, 周乃春, 陈江涛. 小展弦比飞翼标模雷诺数影响数值模拟研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2015, 33(3): 279-288. ZHANG Y B, ZHOU N C, CHEN J T. Numerical investigation of Reynolds number effects on a low-aspect-ratio flying-wing model[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2015, 33(3): 279-288 (in Chinese).

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

基于自适应笛卡尔网格的飞翼布局流动模拟

Simulation of flow around fly-wing configuration based on adaptive Cartesian grid

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李思桐, 夏露, 周琳, 赵轲. 考虑涂敷的翼型气动高频电磁隐身一体化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(17): 529874-529874.
[2]	赵轲, 邓俊, 黄江涛, 陈树生, 高正红. 飞翼布局高低速一体化气动优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(15): 129367-129367.
[3]	石达志, 桑为民, 李世杰, 安博. 基于LBM的结冰表面水滴撞击特性数值模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(S2): 729192-729192.
[4]	王方剑, 解克, 刘金, 宋玉辉, 秦汉, 陈兰. 小展弦比飞翼标模非定常流动及自由摇滚特性[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(4): 126449-126449.
[5]	张刘, 黄勇, 陈辅政, 朱正龙, 郭天豪, 姜裕标, 周铸. 基于环量控制的无尾飞翼俯仰和滚转两轴无舵面姿态控制飞行试验[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(18): 128224-128224.
[6]	邵帅, 郭正, 贾高伟, 陈清阳, 侯中喜, 张来平. 中等展弦比飞翼布局无人机后缘射流滚转控制[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(10): 127437-127437.
[7]	陈浩, 毕林, 华如豪, 周清清, 唐志共, 袁先旭. 基于全线程树数据结构的笛卡尔网格高效生成技术[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(5): 125170-125170.
[8]	陈宪, 陈诚, 黄江涛, 陈其盛, 余龙舟, 钟世东. 腹部襟翼对飞翼布局飞行器起降气动特性的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(3): 125028-125028.
[9]	张杰, 李王斌, 王争取, 潘金柱, 卜忱. 小展弦比飞翼标模跨声速横向失稳运动[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(11): 526340-526340.
[10]	冯立好, 魏凌云, 董磊, 王晋军. 飞翼布局飞机耦合运动失稳的主动流动控制[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(10): 527353-527353.
[11]	陈浩, 袁先旭, 王田天, 周丹, 赵宁, 唐志共, 毕林. 国家数值风洞(NNW)工程中的黏性自适应笛卡尔网格方法研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(9): 625732-625732.
[12]	王延灵, 卜忱, 杨文, 沈彦杰, 冯帅. 小展弦比飞翼大迎角状态空间气动力建模[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(7): 124539-124539.
[13]	刘志涛, 蒋永, 聂博文, 岑飞, 徐圣. 弯折翼尖对飞翼布局飞机气动特性影响[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(6): 124179-124179.
[14]	雷鹏轩, 余立, 陈德华, 吕彬彬. 飞行控制律对体自由度颤振特性影响试验[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(6): 124378-124378.
[15]	周铸, 余永刚, 刘刚, 陈作斌, 何开锋. 飞翼布局组合舵面航向控制特性综合研究[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(6): 523422-523422.