转子倾斜对交错式迷宫密封动静特性的影响

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2020.23782

流体力学与飞行力学

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

转子倾斜对交错式迷宫密封动静特性的影响

王应飞¹, 张万福¹, 潘渤², 李春¹

1. 上海理工大学能源与动力工程学院, 上海 200093;
2. 西安热工研究院有限公司, 西安 710054

收稿日期:2019-12-30 修回日期:2020-01-14 出版日期:2020-11-15 发布日期:2020-02-21
通讯作者: 张万福 E-mail:wfzhang@usst.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（51875361）；中国华能集团公司科学技术项目（HNKJ17-H34）

Effect of shaft misalignment on dynamic and static characteristics of interlocking labyrinth seals

WANG Yingfei¹, ZHANG Wanfu¹, PAN Bo², LI Chun¹

1. School of Energy and Power Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China;
2. Xi'an Thermal Power Research Institute Co., LTD, Xi'an 710054, China

Received:2019-12-30 Revised:2020-01-14 Online:2020-11-15 Published:2020-02-21
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (51875361); Science and Technology Project of China Huaneng Group Corporation (HNKJ17-H34)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 建立了交错式迷宫密封数值分析模型，并通过基于微元理论的密封动力特性系数理论识别方法研究了转子倾斜对密封动静特性的影响。结果表明：转子倾斜可降低交错式迷宫密封泄漏量，倾斜角为0.6°时泄漏量降低约2.5%，且进出口压比越大，效果越显著；转子倾斜带来的交错式密封腔室几何形状与齿径向间隙变化使得腔室在周向存在压力分布不均，且随倾斜角增加而增大；密封各腔室对系统稳定性影响规律不同，与交错式迷宫密封腔室的几何特性有关，密封腔室进口靠近转子、出口远离转子的腔室局部出现逆转动方向的速度场，能提高密封系统稳定性，而密封腔室进口远离转子、出口靠近转子的腔室则降低系统稳定性；整个密封段的有效阻尼随倾斜角增大而增大，转子在密封段中心倾斜不会降低交错式迷宫系统的稳定性。

关键词: 交错式迷宫密封, 计算流体力学, 动力特性, 泄漏特性, 转子倾斜

Abstract: A numerical analysis model of the Interlocking Labyrinth Seal (ILS) is established to study the effect of shaft misalignment on the rotordynamic performance of the ILS. The rotordynamic identification method based on infinitesimal theory and computational fluid dynamics method are employed to obtain the static and dynamic characteristics. Results show that the shaft misalignment could reduce the leakage of the ILS, for instance, by approximately 2.5% at the misalignment angle of 0.6°, and that higher-pressure ratios lead to more significant effect. The geometric deformation of the ILS chambers caused by shaft misalignment and the radial clearance changes of the teeth result in uneven distribution of the chamber pressure at the circumferential direction, and the pressure also increases with the growing tilt angle. The effect of each chamber in the ILS on the stability of the system is different, which is related to the cavity geometry of the ILS. The cavity with the inlet close to and the outlet away from the rotor improves the system stability since its locally existing flow field is opposite to the direction of rotation. Otherwise, the stability will be reduced. The effective damping of the entire ILS increases as the misalignment angle increases. Shaft misalignment at the center of the seal section appears not to reduce the stability of the ILS.

Key words: interlocking labyrinth seal, computational fluid dynamics, dynamic characteristics, leakage characteristics, shaft misalignment

中图分类号:

V232.9

王应飞, 张万福, 潘渤, 李春. 转子倾斜对交错式迷宫密封动静特性的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(11): 123782-123782.

WANG Yingfei, ZHANG Wanfu, PAN Bo, LI Chun. Effect of shaft misalignment on dynamic and static characteristics of interlocking labyrinth seals[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(11): 123782-123782.

参考文献 32

[1]	CHILDS D W. Rotordynamic models for annular gas seals[M]//Turbomachinery rotordynamics:Phenomena, modeling, and analysis. New York:John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1993:173-185.
[2]	CHILDS D W, VANCE J M. Annular gas seals and rotordynamics of compressors and turbines[C]//Proceedings of the 26th Turbomachinery Symposium. College Station:Texas A & M University, 1997:201-220.
[3]	王衍,胡琼,肖业祥,等. 超高速干气密封扰流效应及抑扰机制[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(10):123072. WANG Y, HU Q, XIAO Y X, et al. Turbulence effect and suppression mechanism of dry gas seal at ultra-high speeds[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2019, 40(10):123072(in Chinese).
[4]	CHEN Y, LI Z, LI J, et al. Effects of tooth bending damage on the leakage performance and rotordynamic coefficients of labyrinth seals[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2020, 33(4):1206-1217.
[5]	孙丹,杜宸宇,刘永泉,等.刷式密封刷丝变形与振动特性实验[J].航空学报, 2020, 41(10):123364. SUN D, DU C Y, LIU Y Q, et al. Experiment on bristle deflection and oscillation characteristics of brush seals[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2020, 41(10):123364(in Chinese).
[6]	FRENE J, ARGHIR M. Forces and moments due to misalignment vibrations in annular liquid seals using the averaged Navier-Stokes equations[J]. Journal of Tribology, 1997, 119(2):279-290.
[7]	SAN ANDRÉS L. Effect of shaft misalignment on the dynamic force response of annular pressure seals[J]. Tribology Transactions, 1993, 36(2):173-182.
[8]	ZHANG W, ZHANG Y, YANG J, et al. Influence of tilting rotor on characteristics of fluid-induced vibration for labyrinth seals[J]. Journal of Vibroengineering, 2016, 18(8):5416-5431.
[9]	BENCKERT H, WACHTER J. Flow induced spring coefficients of labyrinth seals for application in rotor dynamics:NASA-CP-2133[R]. Washington, D.C.:NASA, 1980.
[10]	LEONG Y M M S, BROWN R D. Circumferential pressure distributions in a model labyrinth seal[R]. Edinburgh:Heriot-Watt University, 1982.
[11]	CHILDS D W. Dynamic analysis of turbulent annular seals based on Hirs Lubrication equation[J]. Journal of Lubrication Technology, 1983, 105(3):429-436.
[12]	CHILDS D W, SCHARRER J K. An Iwatsubo-based solution for labyrinth seals:Comparison to experimental results[J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 1986, 108(2):325-331.
[13]	THIELEKE G, STETTER H. Experimental investigations of exciting forces caused by flow in labytinth seals[C]//Workshop on Rotordynamic Instability Problems in High-Performance Turbomachinery. Washington, D.C.:NASA, 1990:109-134.
[14]	KIRK R G. Evaluation of aerodynamic instability mechanisms for centrifugal compressors-Part II:Advanced analysis[J]. Journal of Vibration Acoustics Stress and Reliability in Design, 1988, 110(2):207-212.
[15]	KIRK R G, GUO Z. Influence of leak path friction on labyrinth seal inlet swirl[J]. Tribology Transactions, 2009, 52(2):139-145.
[16]	CHILDS D W, ELROD D A, HALE K. Rotordynamic coefficient and leakage test results for interlock and tooth-on-stator labyrinth seals:88-GT-87[R]. New York:ASME, 1988.
[17]	GAO R, KIRK G. CFD study on stepped and drum balance labyrinth seal[J]. Tribology Transactions, 2013, 56(4):663-671.
[18]	ELROD D A, PELLETTI J M, CHILDS D W. Theory versus experiment for the rotordynamic coefficients of an interlocking labyrinth gas seal:95-GT-432[R]. New York:ASME, 1995.
[19]	潘晓弘,郑水英. 交错式迷宫密封的动力特性分析[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2000, 21(1):62-65. PAN X H, ZHENG S Y. Evaluation of rotordynamic coefficients of interlocking labyrinth seals[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2000, 21(1):62-65(in Chinese).
[20]	WANG W, YING Z, JIANG P. Numerical analysis of leakage flow through two labyrinth seals[J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2007, 19(1):107-112.
[21]	LIU Y, WANG W, CHEN H, et al. Influence of leakage flow through labyrinth seals on rotordynamics:Numerical calculations and experimental measurements[J]. Archive of Applied Mechanics, 2007, 77(8):599-612.
[22]	王炜哲,邬文睿,刘应征,等. 数值分析交错齿密封结构对密封性能的影响[C]//中国工程热物理学会2008年流体机械学术会议论文集, 2008. WANG W Z, WU W R, LIU Y Z, et al. Numerical analysis of the influence of interlocking structure on seal[C]//Proceedings of Academic Conference on Fluid Machinery in 2008 of Chinese Society of Engineering Thermophysics, 2008(in Chinese).
[23]	张旭,杨建刚. 转子轴向偏移对交错齿迷宫密封动力特性的影响[J]. 动力工程, 2009, 29(1):36-39. ZHANG X, YANG J G. Influence of rotor axial shifting on dynamic characteristics in staggered labyrinth gland[J]. Journal of Power Engineering, 2009, 29(1):36-39(in Chinese).
[24]	张晓旭,李雪松,王路遥,等. 直通齿和交错齿迷宫密封流场与动特性的比较[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2014, 35(6):1083-1086. ZHANG X X, LI X S, WANG L Y, et al. The comparison of flow field and staggered labyrinth seal[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2014, 35(6):1083-1086(in Chinese).
[25]	RAMIREZ M, CHILDS D, GARY K. Development and validation of test rig for measurements of leakage and rotordynamic performance of interlocking labyrinth seals:GT2018-77131[R]. New York:ASME, 2018.
[26]	GARY K. Measurements of the leakage and rotordynamic performance of interlocking labyrinth seals[D]. College Station:Texas A&M University, 2017:1-61.
[27]	WU T, SAN ANDRÉS L. Leakage and dynamic force coefficients for two labyrinth gas seals:Teeth-on-stator and interlocking teeth configurations. A computational fluid dynamics approach to their performance[J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2019, 141(4):042501.
[28]	ZHANG W, GU Q, YANG J, et al. Application of a novel rotordynamic identification method for annular seals with arbitrary elliptical orbits and eccentricities[J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2019, 141(9):091016.
[29]	IWATSUBO T, ISHIMARU H. Consideration of whirl frequency ratio and effective damping coefficient of seal[J]. Journal of System Design and Dynamics, 2010, 4(1):177-188.
[30]	ERTAS B H, DELGADO A, VANNINI G. Rotordynamic force coefficients for three types of annular gas seals with inlet preswirl and high differential pressure ratio[J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2012, 134(4):042503.
[31]	孙丹,王双,艾延廷,等. 阻旋栅对密封静力与动力特性影响的数值分析与实验研究[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(9):3002-3011. SUN D, WANG S, AI Y T, et al. Numerical and experimental research on performance of swirl brakes for the static and dynamic characteristics of seals[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(9):3002-3011(in Chinese).
[32]	CHILDS D W, MCLEAN J E, ZHANG M, et al. Rotordynamic performance of a negative-swirl brake for a tooth-on-stator labyrinth seal:GT2014-25577[R]. New York:ASME, 2014.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

转子倾斜对交错式迷宫密封动静特性的影响

Effect of shaft misalignment on dynamic and static characteristics of interlocking labyrinth seals

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 32

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	刘琦, 史勇杰, 胡志远, 徐国华. 共轴刚性旋翼气动及噪声特性的参数影响分析[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 528856-528856.
[2]	陆凤霞, 韦坤, 王春雷, 鲍和云, 朱如鹏. 直升机中减三相流金属屑末可达性[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(1): 128524-128524.
[3]	任炯, 王刚, 胡国栋, 石晓露. 自适应Walsh函数有限体积方法[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(8): 127444-127444.
[4]	左彦飞, 吴易柳, 王杰, 冯坤, 江志农. 温致材料属性变化对发动机双转子系统动力特性的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(7): 226993-226993.
[5]	曹文博, 刘溢浪, 张伟伟. 基于降阶模型和梯度优化的流场加速收敛方法[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(6): 127090-127090.
[6]	刘思华, 王占莹, 李利剑, 张敏弟. 头型对射弹高速入水稳定性的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(21): 528437-528437.
[7]	樊宇翔, 赵瑞, 左政玄, 杨光, 李宇. 气体引射效应对壁面热流和摩擦阻力的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(21): 528587-528587.
[8]	乔建领, 韩忠华, 丁玉临, 宋文萍, 宋笔锋. 分层大气湍流场对远场声爆传播的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(2): 626350-626350.
[9]	王圣业, 邓小刚, 董义道, 王东方, 蔡佳鸿. 面向工程湍流的高精度数值方法[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(15): 528728-528728.
[10]	傅杨奥骁, 丁明松, 刘庆宗, 江涛, 石润, 董维中, 高铁锁. 轨控系统热喷干扰效应数值模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 125941-125941.
[11]	夏侯唐凡, 陈江涛, 邵志栋, 吴晓军, 刘宇. 随机和认知不确定性框架下的CFD模型确认度量综述[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 25716-025716.
[12]	罗佳杰, 宋文滨. 层流机翼及其增升装置嵌套协同优化方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 125377-125377.
[13]	陈广强, 豆国辉, 魏昊功, 邹昕, 李齐, 刘周, 周伟江. 火星探测器大气数据测量方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(3): 626619-626619.
[14]	奕建苗, 邓枫, 覃宁, 刘学强. 快速预测跨声速流场的深度学习方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(11): 526747-526747.
[15]	杨体浩, 白俊强, 段卓毅, 史亚云, 邓一菊, 周铸. 喷气式客机层流翼气动设计综述[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(11): 527016-527016.