基于DES方法的高超声速激波/边界层干扰的双微楔控制数值研究

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2016.0016

流动控制

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

基于DES方法的高超声速激波/边界层干扰的双微楔控制数值研究

董祥瑞, 陈耀慧, 董刚, 刘怡昕

南京理工大学瞬态物理重点实验室, 南京 210094

收稿日期:2015-12-11 修回日期:2016-01-11 出版日期:2016-06-15 发布日期:2016-01-12
通讯作者: 陈耀慧男,博士,讲师。主要研究方向:流动控制。Tel:025-84303236 E-mail:cyh873@163.com E-mail:cyh873@163.com
作者简介:董祥瑞女,博士研究生。主要研究方向:超声速流动分离及其控制。E-mail:dongxr1154@126.com;董刚男,博士,研究员,博士生导师。主要研究方向:计算流体力学。E-mail:dgvehicle@yahoo.com;刘怡昕男,中国工程院院士,博士生导师。主要研究方向:武器系统及运用。E-mail:liuyixi@cae.cn
基金资助:
总装预研基金(9140C300206150C30143);江苏省普通高校研究生创新计划(KYZZ15_0134)

DES numerical study of shock wave/boundary layer interactions in hypersonic flows controlled by double micro-ramps

DONG Xiangrui, CHEN Yaohui, DONG Gang, LIU Yixin

National Key Laboratory of Transient Physics, Nanjing University of Science & Technology, Nanjing 210094, China

Received:2015-12-11 Revised:2016-01-11 Online:2016-06-15 Published:2016-01-12
Supported by:
General Armament Department Pre-Research Foundation of China (9140C300206150C30143);Innovation Funding of Scientific Research of Jiangsu Province for Graduate Students of Universities (KYZZ15_0134)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

高超声速飞行器在流场中通常会伴随激波/边界层干扰(SWBLI),其引发的流动分离将导致进气道性能下降。采用湍流离散涡模拟(DES)方法、结合有限体积离散方法与自适应网格加密(AMR)技术对来流马赫数为7.0的流场中SWBLI诱导的流动分离进行数值模拟,并分别采用单、双微楔对其进行控制。针对流场结构、近壁面流向速度、压力梯度及总压损失等参数,分析讨论了不同双微楔流向安装位置对SWBLI的控制效果。研究结果表明:双微楔产生的流向涡对与涡对之间的相互诱导促进了各自流向涡对之间的卷吸作用,使得双微楔对分离气泡的消除效果优于单只微楔;流动总压损失系数随着微楔后缘与分离气泡中心的距离的减小呈先减小后增加的趋势;综合讨论流向涡强度与形状阻力的影响,得到了双微楔最佳流向安装位置。

关键词: 高超声速, 激波/边界层干扰, 分离气泡, 双微楔, 流向涡

Abstract:

Shock wave/boundary layer interaction (SWBLI) is a ubiquitous phenomenon encountered in hypersonic flow field, which can induce flow separation and lead to performance degradation of hypersonic inlet. Detached-eddy simulation (DES) and finite volume method have been used with the adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) technology to simulate the flow separation induced by SWBLIs in hypersonic flow at Ma_∞=7.0, which have been respectively controlled by single and double micro-ramps. The control effects of micro-ramps with different streamwise installation positions on flow separation have been discussed based on the flow structure, near-wall streamwise velocity, pressure gradient and total pressure loss. The numerical results show that the reciprocal induction among the vortices pairs generated by these two micro-ramps shows the promoting effects on vortices entrainment generated by each micro-ramp, consequently the performance of double micro-ramps in eliminating the separation bubble is better than the single. As the distance between micro-ramp the trailing edge and the center of separation bubble decreases, the total pressure loss shows a trend of first decrease and then increase. Discussing the effects of both streamwise vortex intensity and its additional resistance synthetically, the optimal streamwise installation position of double micro-ramps is obtained.

Key words: hypersonic flow, shock wave/boundary layer interaction, separation bubble, double micro-ramps, streamwise vortices

中图分类号:

V211.1⁺4

董祥瑞, 陈耀慧, 董刚, 刘怡昕. 基于DES方法的高超声速激波/边界层干扰的双微楔控制数值研究[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(6): 1771-1780.

DONG Xiangrui, CHEN Yaohui, DONG Gang, LIU Yixin. DES numerical study of shock wave/boundary layer interactions in hypersonic flows controlled by double micro-ramps[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2016, 37(6): 1771-1780.

参考文献

[1] FERRI A, ATTI D G. Experimental results with airfoils tested in the high speed tunnel at Guidonia:NACA TM 946[R]. Washington, D.C.:National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1939.
[2] MACCORMACK R W. Numerical solution of the interaction of a shock wave with a laminar boundary layer[C]//Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Numerical Methods in Fluid Dynamics. Berlin:Springer Heidelberg, 1971:151-163.
[3] KNIGHT D, YAN H, PANARAS A G, et al. Advances in CFD prediction of shock wave turbulent boundary layer interactions[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2003, 39(2-3):121-184.
[4] DONOVAN J F. Control of shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interactions using tangential injection[C]//Proceedings of the 34th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston:AIAA, 1996.
[5] 段会申, 刘沛清, 何雨薇, 等. 二维翼型微吸吹气减阻控制新技术数值研究[J]. 航空学报, 2009, 30(7):1219-1226. DUAN H S, LIU P Q, HE Y W, et al. Numerical investigation of drag-reduction control by micro-suction-blowing on airfoil[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2009, 30(7):1219-1226(in Chinese).
[6] GEFROH D, LOTH E, DUTTON C, et al. Aeroelastically deflecting flaps for shock/boundary-layer interaction control[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2003, 17(7):1001-1016.
[7] CARABALLO E, WEBB N, LITTLE J, et al. Supersonic inlet flow control using plasma actuators[C]//Proceedings of the 47th Aerospace Sciences Meeting. Reston:AIAA, 2009.
[8] 吴云, 李应红. 等离子体流动控制研究进展与展望[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(2):381-405. WU Y, LI Y H. Progress and outlook of plasma flow control[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(2):381-405(in Chinese).
[9] FORD C W P, BABINSKY H. Micro-ramp control for oblique shock wave/boundary layer interactions:AIAA-2007-4115[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2007.
[10] BABINSKY H, OGAWA H. SBLI control for wings and inlets[J]. Shock Waves, 2008, 18(2):89-96.
[11] ANDERSON B H, TINAPPLE J, SURBER L. Optimal control of shock wave turbulent boundary layer interactions using micro-array actuation[C]//Proceedings of the 3rd AIAA Flow Control Conference. Reston:AIAA, 2006.
[12] LEE S, LOTH E, WANG C. LES of supersonic turbulent boundary layers with[mu] VG's[C]//Proceedings of the 25th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. Reston:AIAA, 2007.
[13] TITCHENER N, BABIBSKY H, LOTH E. The effects of various vortex generator configurations on a normal shock wave/boundary layer interaction[C]//Proceedings of the 51st Aerospace Sciences Meeting. Reston:AIAA, 2013.
[14] SHARMA P, GHOSH S. A novel vortex generator for mitigation of shock-induced separation[C]//Proceedings of the 52nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting. Reston:AIAA, 2014.
[15] YAN Y, CHEN C, LU P, et al. Study on shock wave-vortex ring interaction by the micro vortex generator controlled ramp flow with turbulent inflow[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2013, 30(1):226-231.
[16] YAN Y, LIU C. Study on the ring-like vortical structure in MVG controlled supersonic ramp flow with different inflow conditions[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2014, 35(1):106-115.
[17] SUN Z, SCARANO F, OUDHEUSDEN B, et al. Numerical and experimental investigation of the flow behind a supersonic micro-ramp[C]//Proceedings of the 51st Aerospace Sciences Meeting. Reston:AIAA, 2013.
[18] 张瑜, 李静美, 秦俭. 跨声速激波边界层相互作用的被动控制[J]. 力学学报, 1995, 27(5):523-535. ZHANG Y, LI J M, QIN J. Passive control of interaction between shock wave and boundary layer in transonic flow[J]. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 1995, 27(5):523-535(in Chinese).
[19] 刘刚, 刘伟, 牟斌, 等. 涡流发生器数值计算方法研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2007, 25(2):241-244. LIU G, LIU W, MU B, et al. CFD numerical simulation investigation of vortex generators[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2007, 25(2):241-244(in Chinese).
[20] 薛大文, 陈志华, 孙晓辉, 等. 微型三角楔超声速绕流特性的研究[J]. 工程力学, 2013, 30(4):455-460. XUE D W, CHEN Z H, SUN X H, et al. Investigations on the flow characteristics of supersonic flow past a micro-ramp[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2013, 30(4):455-460(in Chinese).
[21] 薛大文, 陈志华, 孙晓辉, 等. 翼型绕流分离的微楔控制[J]. 工程力学, 2014, 31(8):217-222. XUE D W, CHEN Z H, SUN X H, et al. Micro-ramp control of the boundary separation induced by the flow past an airfoil[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2014, 31(8):217-222(in Chinese).
[22] 褚胡冰, 陈迎春, 张彬乾, 等. 增升装置微型涡流发生器数值模拟方法研究[J]. 航空学报, 2012, 33(1):11-21. CHU H B, CHEN Y C, ZHANG B Q, et al. Investigation of numerical simulation technique for micro vortex generators applied to high fift system[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2012, 33(1):11-21(in Chinese).
[23] 刘学强, 伍贻兆, 程克明. 用基于M-SST模型的DES数值模拟喷流流场[J]. 力学学报, 2004, 36(4):401-406. LIU X Q, WU Y Z, CHENG K M. Computation of lateral turbulent jets using M-SST DES model[J]. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 2004, 36(4):401-406(in Chinese).
[24] CANEPA E, LENGANI D, SATTA F, et al. Boundary layer separation control on a flat plate with adverse pressure gradients using vortex generators[C]//Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2006:Power for Land, Sea, and Air. New York:AMSE, 2006:1211-1220.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

基于DES方法的高超声速激波/边界层干扰的双微楔控制数值研究

DES numerical study of shock wave/boundary layer interactions in hypersonic flows controlled by double micro-ramps

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	郑建成, 曲智国, 谭贤四, 李志淮, 朱刚, 李陆军, 刘伟. 基于责任区划分的雷达网探测高超声速目标资源管理[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(8): 329022-329022.
[2]	戴今钊, 陈海昕. 流场波系引导的三维消波翼优化设计方法[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(6): 628942-628942.
[3]	刘小勇, 王明福, 刘建文, 任鑫, 张轩. 超燃冲压发动机研究回顾与展望[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(5): 529878-529878.
[4]	杨博, 于贺, 樊子辰. 微观能量分析气动光学效应时变误差的方法[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(4): 128703-128703.
[5]	李学良, 李创创, 苏伟, 吴杰. 分布式粗糙元对高超声速边界层不稳定性的影响试验[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(2): 128627-128627.
[6]	赖江, 范召林, 王乾, 董思卫, 童福林, 袁先旭. 高超声速有攻角锥裙直接数值模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(2): 128610-128610.
[7]	熊有德, 李创创, 张振辉, 吴杰. 高超声速风洞自由来流扰动热线测量技术[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(10): 129042-129042.
[8]	倪炜霖, 王永海, 徐聪, 赤丰华, 梁海朝. 基于强化学习的高超飞行器协同博弈制导方法[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(S2): 729400-729400.
[9]	于哲峰, 梁世昌, 石卫波, 田得阳, 石安华, 廖东骏, 杨鹰. 类HTV⁃2飞行器光电特性的分析评估技术[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(S2): 729465-729465.
[10]	马平, 张宁, 石安华, 于哲峰, 梁世昌, 黄洁. 典型微波波段信号在模拟等离子体中的传输特性[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(S2): 729476-729476.
[11]	陈浩宇, 王彬文, 宋巧治, 李晓东. 热颤振地面模拟试验技术[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(8): 227295-227295.
[12]	常思源, 肖尧, 李广利, 田中伟, 张凯凯, 崔凯. 翼反角对高压捕获翼构型高超气动特性的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(8): 127349-127349.
[13]	杨国涛, 岳振江, 刘莉. 基于自适应采样的高超声速飞行器气动热全局快速预示[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(6): 127391-127391.
[14]	刘宏康, 陈坚强, 向星皓, 赵雅甜. 改进k-ω-γ转捩模式对不同雷诺数下HIAD的转捩预测[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(6): 126868-126868.
[15]	刘为佳, 李映坤, 陈雄, 李春雷. 基于流固耦合的激波/边界层干扰作用下壁板颤振特性[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(6): 127085-127085.