耦合几何与材料误差的柔性装配偏差统计分析

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2014.0306

材料工程与机械制造

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

耦合几何与材料误差的柔性装配偏差统计分析

陈晖, 谭昌柏, 王志国

南京航空航天大学机电学院, 南京 210016

收稿日期:2014-09-11 修回日期:2014-10-31 出版日期:2015-09-15 发布日期:2014-11-18
通讯作者: 谭昌柏男, 博士, 副教授, 硕士生导师。主要研究方向: 飞机装配准确度与容差设计、计算机辅助设计与制造。 Tel: 025-84891678 E-mail: tcbnuaa@nuaa.edu.cn E-mail:tcbnuaa@nuaa.edu.cn
作者简介:陈晖男, 硕士研究生。主要研究方向: 柔性件装配偏差建模与分析。 Tel: 025-84891678 E-mail: chenhuinuaa@163.com;王志国男, 博士, 副教授, 硕士生导师。主要研究方向: 基于关键特性的产品装配质量管理、计算机辅助设计与制造。 Tel: 025-84891678 E-mail: wzgnuaa@nuaa.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金 (51275236); 航空科学基金 (2012ZE66016)

Statistical variation analysis of compliant assembly coupling geometrical and material error

CHEN Hui, TAN Changbai, WANG Zhiguo

College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China

Received:2014-09-11 Revised:2014-10-31 Online:2015-09-15 Published:2014-11-18
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (51275236); Aeronautical Science Foundation of China (2012ZE66016)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

飞机结构中包含大量的弱刚性柔性零件,柔性零件在装配中的受力变形,是影响飞机尺寸质量的重要因素。针对仅考虑零件几何误差进行装配偏差建模的不足,结合一阶摄动理论和有限元方法,提出了耦合柔性零件几何和材料误差的装配偏差统计分析(SVA_G&M)方法。该方法运用影响系数法建立零件几何、弹性模量和泊松比误差与装配偏差的关系,在此基础上利用泰勒公式推导了装配偏差的均值和协方差方程。结合薄板、某飞机平尾前缘组件两个装配实例,将该方法与基于ANSYS的有限元装配过程仿真法进行了实验对比。结果表明,两种方法计算得到的装配偏差均值和标准差非常吻合,但在计算时间上前者只用了30 s,而后者用了250 min,前者算法效率远高于后者。实验还表明材料误差对装配偏差具有明显影响,其中弹性模量的影响大于泊松比,与仅考虑几何误差的装配偏差分析方法相比,该方法对装配偏差的预测更加真实准确。

关键词: 柔性装配, 材料参数, 装配偏差, 统计分析, 有限元方法

Abstract:

Compliant part is widely used in aircraft structure. Its deformation subjected to assembly forces is an important issue in assembly dimensional management for aircraft. To compensate for the deficiencies of assembly variation model concerning merely geometrical error of part, a method of statistical variation analysis for compliant assembly coupling the geometrical and material error (SVA_G&M) is proposed based on the first-order perturbation theory and the finite element method. In the SVA_G&M method, the method of influence coefficients is adopted to deduce the assembly variation regarding the source errors of part geometrical shape, material elastic modulus and Poisson's ratio, and the mean and standard deviation equations of assembly variation are formulated. Two experiments, simple sheet metals assembly and leading edge assembly of aircraft horizontal tail, are illustrated to verify the proposed method, and it is compared to the assembly process simulation of ANSYS finite element method (FEM). The result shows that the mean and standard by the SVA_G&M method has a good agreement with the FEM simulation. Meanwhile, the computing time is 30 s and 250 min respectively, which indicates that the SVA_G&M method is much more efficient than the FEM simulation. The experiments also show that material error has a considerable effect on assembly variation, in which elastic modulus plays a more important role than Poisson's ratio. Compared to assembly variation model concerning merely geometrical error, the SVA_G&M method can make more accurate and practical variation prediction of compliant assembly.

Key words: compliant assembly, material parameter, assembly variation, statistical analysis, finite element method

中图分类号:

V262.4
TH391

陈晖, 谭昌柏, 王志国. 耦合几何与材料误差的柔性装配偏差统计分析[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(9): 3176-3186.

CHEN Hui, TAN Changbai, WANG Zhiguo. Statistical variation analysis of compliant assembly coupling geometrical and material error[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2015, 36(9): 3176-3186.

参考文献

[1] Liu S C, Hu S J, Woo T C. Tolerance analysis for sheet metal assemblies[J]. Journal of Mechanical Design, 1996, 118(1): 62-76.
[2] Hu S J, Koren Y. Stream-of-variation theory for automotive body assembly[J]. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 1997, 46(1): 1-6.
[3] Liu S C, Hu S J. Variation simulation for deformable sheet metal assemblies using finite element methods[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 1997, 119(3): 368-374.
[4] Merkley K G, Chase K W, Perry E. An introduction to tolerance analysis of flexible systems[C]//MSC World Users' Conference. Newport Beach, CA: MSC Software Corp, 1996.
[5] Merkley K G. Tolerance analysis of compliant assemblies[D]. Provo: Brigham Young University, 1998.
[6] Bihlmaier B F. Tolerance analysis of flexible assemblies using finite element and spectral analysis[D]. Provo: Brigham Young University, 1999.
[7] Tonks M R, Chase K W. Covariance modeling method for use in compliant assembly tolerance analysis[C]//Proceedings of ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference. Salt Lake City: ASME, 2004: 1-7.
[8] Tonks M R, Chase K W, Smith C C. Predicting deformation of compliant assemblies using covariant statistical tolerance analysis[J]. Models for Computer Aided Tolerancing in Design and Manufacturing, 2007: 321-330.
[9] Mortensen A J. An integrated methodology for statistical tolerance analysis of flexible assemblies[D]. Provo: Brigham Young University, 2000.
[10] Stewart M L. Variation simulation of fixtured assembly processes for compliant structures using piecewise-linear analysis[D]. Provo: Brigham Young University, 2004.
[11] Xing Y F, Zhao X Y, Wu W W. Assembly variation analysis model based on fixture configurations for sheet metal parts[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2010, 16(2): 280-286 (in Chinese). 邢彦锋, 赵晓昱, 吴伟蔚. 基于夹具配置的薄板件装配偏差分析模型[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2010, 16(2): 280-286.
[12] Cheng H, Li Y, Zhang K F, et al. Efficient method of positioning error analysis for aeronautical thin-walled structures multi-state riveting[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2011, 55: 217-233.
[13] Chen Z H, Du F Z, Tang X Q. Research on uncertainty in measurement assisted alignment in aircraft assembly[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2013, 26(6): 1568-1576.
[14] Tian W, Zhou W X, Zhou W, et al. Auto-normalization algorithm for robotic precision drilling system in aircraft component assembly[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2013, 26(2): 495-500.
[15] Chen Z H, Du F Z, Tang X Q. Key measurement characteristics based inspection data modeling for aircraft assembly[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2012, 33(11): 2143-2152 (in Chinese). 陈哲涵, 杜福洲, 唐晓青. 基于关键测量特性的飞机装配检测数据建模研究[J]. 航空学报, 2012, 33(11): 2143-2152.
[16] Ni J, Tang W C, Xing Y. Three-dimensional precision analysis with rigid and compliant motions for sheet metal assembly[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2014, 73(5-8): 805-819.
[17] Lin J, Jin S, Zheng C, et al. Compliant assembly variation analysis of aeronautical panels using unified substructures with consideration of identical parts[J]. Computer-Aided Design, 2014, 57: 29-40.
[18] Yu K G, Yang Z H. Tolerance design of automotive body sheet metal parts based on a compliant assembly variation model[J]. Journal of Shandong University: Engineering Science, 2014, 44(3): 69-74 (in Chinese). 于奎刚, 杨志宏. 基于柔性装配偏差模型的汽车车身薄板零件公差设计[J]. 山东大学学报: 工学版, 2014, 44(3): 69-74.
[19] Yu K G, Jin S, Lai X M, et al. Modeling and analysis of compliant sheet metal assembly variation[J]. Assembly Automation, 2008, 28(3): 225-234.
[20] Wang S F, Zhao H L. Reliablity analysis of railway vehicle structure based on stochastic finite element[J]. Journal of Tongji University: Natural Science, 2010, 38(11): 1631-1634 (in Chinese). 王社峰, 赵洪伦. 基于随机有限元的车辆结构可靠度分析研究[J]. 同济大学学报: 自然科学版, 2010, 38(11): 1631-1634.
[21] Chen Q, Liu X B. Stochastic finite element method and its engineering application[M]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University Press, 1993: 79-104 (in Chinese). 陈虬, 刘先斌. 随机有限元法及其工程应用[M]. 成都: 西南交通大学出版社, 1993: 79-104.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

耦合几何与材料误差的柔性装配偏差统计分析

Statistical variation analysis of compliant assembly coupling geometrical and material error

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	麻震宇, 邓小龙, 杨希祥, 朱炳杰. 平流层飞艇驻空过程热结构耦合特性[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(19): 228337-228337.
[2]	路来骁, 徐长官, 刘建华, 秦美镇, 吕英波, 阎玉芹. 初始应力状态对薄壁件双侧滚压影响规律[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(10): 427415-427415.
[3]	吴志渊, 闫寒, 吴林潮, 马辉, 瞿叶高, 张文明. 旋转裂纹叶片-弹性轮盘耦合系统振动特性[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 625442-625442.
[4]	万傲霜, 王振名, 李顶河. 基于三阶剪切计算连续性方法的编织复合材料板三尺度分析模型[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(12): 226614-226614.
[5]	沈鹏飞, 刘朋欣, 孙东, 袁先旭. 马赫6柱-裙构型激波/湍流边界层干扰摩阻统计特性[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(1): 626005-626005.
[6]	朱鸿绪, 刘燕斌, 曹瑞, 陆宇平, 汤佳骏, 衣春轮. 高超声速飞行器底层性能评价指标的可行性分析[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(3): 323259-323259.
[7]	石文泽, 陈巍巍, 卢超, 程进杰, 陈尧. 高温铝合金电磁超声检测回波特性及因素分析[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(12): 423854-423854.
[8]	刘鹏, 郭亚洲, 赵振强, 邢军, 张超. 二维三轴编织复合材料压缩失效行为的细观有限元模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(7): 222865-222865.
[9]	田硕, 尚建勤, 盖鹏涛, 陈福龙, 曾元松. 带筋整体壁板预应力喷丸成形数值模拟及变形预测[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(10): 422847-422847.
[10]	崔志卓, 杜福洲, 熊涛. 基于有向点集的多面多孔式装配偏差分析与协调[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(7): 421899-421899.
[11]	张玮, 王志国, 谭昌柏, 刘霞. 基于夹具主动定位补偿的飞机柔性件装配偏差优化方法[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(6): 420862-420862.
[12]	路来骁, 孙杰, 韩雄, 熊青春, 宋戈. 基于能量理论的航空整体结构件滚压变形校正载荷预测方法[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(12): 421326-421326.
[13]	刘碧颖, 李恒, 李龙, 杨合, 谷瑞杰. 引入材料参数的弯管中性层偏移解析模型[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(3): 1074-1082.
[14]	梁珩, 曾建江, 易礼毅, 童明波. 高超声速飞行器多层次结构强度分析方法[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(2): 588-596.
[15]	余雄庆, 欧阳星, 邢宇, 王宇. 机翼结构重量预测的多学科分析优化方法[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(1): 235-243.