从空战制胜机理演变看未来战斗机发展趋势

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2021.25826

观点

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

从空战制胜机理演变看未来战斗机发展趋势

孙聪

中国航空研究院, 北京 100029

收稿日期:2021-04-15 修回日期:2021-05-21 发布日期:2021-05-21
通讯作者: 孙聪 E-mail:npuzhoujian2003@163.com

Development trend of future fighter: A review of evolution of winning mechanism in air combat

SUN Cong

Chinese Aeronautical Establishment, Beijing 100029, China

Received:2021-04-15 Revised:2021-05-21 Published:2021-05-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 制空权是当代战争一切空中行动的前提条件，而承担空中优势重任的战斗机的研发工作长期以来为各军事大国所重视。数十年来，美军在空战理论、战斗机研发和空战实践等方面具有领先优势，已率先完成由能量机动制胜向信息机动制胜的空战能力转变。随着自主、人工智能、无人、通信、计算等技术的快速进步，美军正在塑造以下一代战斗机为核心，以复杂空战系统为基本空战单元的新空战形态，认知机动制胜将是未来空中对抗的制胜机理。本文将系统梳理空战制胜机理的演变历程，结合当前技术发展与布局，研判未来战斗机发展趋势。

关键词: 空战系统, 空中优势, 能量机动, 信息机动, 认知机动, 下一代战斗机, 制胜机理

Abstract: Air superiority is the prerequisite of all air operations in modern wars, and the research and development of fighters have long been attached great importance to by all military powers. The U.S. has been leading in air combat theory, fighter research and development, and air combat practice for decades, and has already completed the air combat capability transition from energy maneuverability to information maneuverability. As the technologies of autonomy, artificial intelligence, UAV, communication, and computing are rapidly progressing, the U.S. is now shaping the new air combat form by speeding up the development of the complex air combat system, in which the next generation fighter is the core node. Cognitive maneuverability will then be the winning mechanism in the future air combat. In this paper, a systemic review of evolution of the winning mechanism in air combat is conducted, and the development trend of future fighter is given based on an analysis of the current technological layout.

Key words: air combat system, air superiority, energy maneuverability, information maneuverability, cognitive maneuverability, next generation fighter, winning mechanism

中图分类号:

V271

孙聪. 从空战制胜机理演变看未来战斗机发展趋势[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(8): 525826-525826.

SUN Cong. Development trend of future fighter: A review of evolution of winning mechanism in air combat[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(8): 525826-525826.

参考文献

[1] TIRPAK J A. Roper reveals NGAD has flown, but doesn't share details[EB/OL].(2020-09-15)[2021-04-18]. https://airforcemag.com/roper-reveals-ngad-has-flown-but-doesn-share-details/.
[2] SHELBOURNE M. Navy quietly starts development of next-generation carrier fighter; plans call for manned, long-range aircraft.[EB/OL]. (2020-08-19)[2021-04-18]. https://news.usni/2020/08/18/navy-quietly-starts-development-of-next-generation-carrier-fighter-plans-call-for-manned-long-range-Aircraft.
[3] MATTIS J. Summary of the 2018 national defense strategy of the United States of America:sharpening the American Military's competitive edge[R]. 2018.
[4] GUNZINGER M, REHBERG C, JACOB C. An air force for an era of great power competition[R]. Washington, D.C.:Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, 2019.
[5] CLARK B, LEMON A, HAYNES P. Regainning the high ground at sea:transforming the U.S. Navy's carrier air wing for great power competition[R]. Washington, D.C.:Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, 2018.
[6] 杨伟. 关于未来战斗机发展的若干讨论[J]. 航空学报,2020,41(6):524377. YANG W. Development of future fighters[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2020, 41(6):524377(in Chinese).
[7] GRYNKEWICH A. The Future of air superiority, Part Ⅰ:The imperative[EB/OL]. (2017-05-23)[2021-04-18]. https://warontherocks.com/2017/01/the-future-of-air-superiority-part-i-the-imperative/.
[8] GRYNKEWICH A. The future of air superiority, Part Ⅱ:The 2030 problem[EB/OL]. (2017-05-23)[2021-04-18].https://warontherocks.com/2017/01/the-future-of-air-superiority-part-ii-the-2030-problem/.
[9] GRYNKEWICH A. The future of air superiority, Part Ⅲ:Defeating A2/AD[EB/OL]. (2017-05-23)[2021-04-18].https://warontherocks.com/2017/01/the-future-of-air-superiority-part-iii-defeating-a2ad/.
[10] GRYNKEWICH A. The future of air superiority, Part Ⅳ:Autonomy,survivability, and getting to 2030[EB/OL]. (2017-05-23)[2021-04-18].https://warontherocks.com/2017/01/the-future-of-air-superiority-part-iv-the-autonomy-survivability-and-getting-to-2030/.
[11] STILLION J. Trends in air-to-air combat implications for future air superiority[R]. Washington, D.C.:Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, 2015.
[12] BENNETT L. Gunning for the red baron[M]. Texas:Texas A&M University Press, 2006:22-46.
[13] 纪德东. 航炮作战效能对比研究[J]. 飞机设计,2019, 39(3):69-74 JI D D. Comparative Study on combat effectiveness of air cannon[J]. Aircraft Design, 2019, 39(3):69-74(in Chinese).
[14] 肖邦振. 张积慧:击落戴维斯[J]. 环球飞行, 2008(10):70-77. XIAO B Z,ZHANG Jihui:Shot down Davis[J]. World Flight, 2008(10):70-77(in Chinese).
[15] MARSHALL L, MICHEL III. CLASHES:Air combat over North Vietnam[M]. Annapolis:Naval Institute Press,1997:150.
[16] DAVIES P. USAF F-4 Phantom II MiG Killers 1965-68.[M]. Oxford:Osprey Publishing, 2004:19.
[17] CRAIG C H. Striving for air superiority:The tactical air command in Vietnam[M]. Texas:Texas A & M University Press, 2002:95.
[18] MOMYER W W. Airpower in three wars[M]. Washington, D.C.:U.S. Government Printing Office, 1978:156.
[19] FINO S A. All missiles work:Technological dislocations and military innovation[D]. Alabama:Air University Press,2015:76.
[20] HOLLWAY D. Fox two![EB/OL]. (2013-03)[2020-04-16].http://www.donhollway.com/foxtwo/.
[21] KAPLAN F. General credits air force with Iraqi army's defeat[N]. Boston Globe,1991-03-16.
[22] SCHMITT E. Stealth technology:Elusive in more ways than one[N]. New York Times, 1991-10-13.
[23] 高劲松,陈哨东. 国外隐身战斗机超视距空战问题[J]. 电光与控制, 2011, 18(8):17-20. GAO J S, CHEN S D. Beyond-visual-range air combat of foreign stealth fighters[J]. Electronics Optics & Control, 2011, 18(8):17-20(in Chinese).
[24] TAMRAT B F. The X-31:A post-stall technology (PST) fighter close-in-combat results assessment, and a look at new CIC performance evaluation metrics:AIAA-2004-5173[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2004.
[25] 张曙光, 高浩.X-31A飞机的设计特点和试飞情况[J]. 飞行力学, 1996, 14(3):9-13. ZHANG S G, GAO H. On Design characteristics and flight test achievements of the X-31A aircraft[J]. Flight Dynamics, 1996, 14(3):9-13(in Chinese).
[26] KISH B A, MITTLESTEADT D R, WUNDERLICH G, et al. Practical limits of supermaneuverability and full envelope agility:AIAA-1996-3493-CP[R]. Reston:AIAA, 1996.
[27] FRANCIS M S. The role of unmanned air vehicles in advancing system-of-systems (SoS) technologies and capabilities:AIAA-2003-2739[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2003.
[28] United States Air Force. Air superiority 2030(AS 2030) enterprise capability collaboration team (ECCT). Air Superiority 2030 Flight Plan[R]. 2016.
[29] U.S. Department of Defense. DARPA-BAA-14-40, Systems of systems integration technology and experimentation (SoSITE)[EB/OL]. (2014-04-30)[2021-04-18]. https://beta.sam.gov/opp/1a9dd72e75d33f1122c924163b15210e/view.
[30] U.S. Department of Defense. Autonomy for loyal wingman[EB/OL]. (2015-06-15)[2021-04-18].https://beta.sam.gov/opp/fa87323841777b53ba42c2fcc51b/view.
[31] U.S. Department of Defense. LongShot[EB/OL]. (2021-02-12)[2021-04-18]. https://beta.sam.gov/opp/59f9642f1b4f48d0af2d0096261a50fb/view.
[32] U.S. Department of Defense. Collaborative operations in denied environment (CODE)[EB/OL]. (2015-01-21)[2021-04-18]. https://beta.sam.gov/opp/0db5a2ebace9cdac0c6c12d56dab686d/view.
[33] U.S. Department of Defense. DARPA-BAA-14-17, Distributed battle management program[EB/OL]. (2014-02-21)[2021-04-18]. https://beta.sam.gov/opp/3639054acc4cb20f5e979c11106075807/view.
[34] U.S. Department of Defense. Defense experimentation using the commercial space internet[EB/OL]. (2018-09-13)[2021-04-18]. https://beta.sam.gov/opp/0e77b27e97a534ad45dfa4679720b673/view.
[35] U.S. Department of Defense. Dynamic network adaptation for mission optimization (DyNAMO).[EB/OL]. (2015-10-14)[2021-04-18]. https://beta.sam.gov/opp/f0f64964cb4c89f86f9c596948ce21fb/view.
[36] U.S. Department of Defense. Resilient networked distributed mosaic communications (RN DMC)[EB/OL]. (2020-06-05)[2021-04-18]. https://beta.sam.gov/opp/4a71282a1e0b44c59c57544365371438/view.
[37] TINGLEY B. The Navy's secretive and revolutionary program to project false fleets from drone swarms[EB/OL]. (2019-11-07)[2021-04-18]. https://www.com/roper-reveals-ngad-has-flown-but-doesn-share-details/.
[38] U.S. Department of Defense. Air combat evolution (ACE)[EB/OL]. (2020-05-26)[2021-04-18]. https://beta.sam.gov/opp/dabab43869ac46b2aa7ce66c22d0f748/view.
[39] HITCHENS T. DARPA's mosaic warfare-multi domain ops, but faster[EB/OL]. (2019-09-10)[2021-04-18]. https://breakingdefense.com/2019/09/darpas-mosaic-warfare-multi-domain-ops-but-faster/.
[40] U.S. Department of Defense. Broad agency announcement for advanced battle management systems (ABMS)[EB/OL]. (2021-01-07)[2021-04-18]. https://beta.sam.gov/opp/7e9 d89aa78a4431fac20e5178ce03480/view.
[41] DEPTULA D A, PENNEY H R, STUTZRIEM L A. Restoring America's military competitiveness:mosaic warfare[R]. Arlington:The Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies, 2019.
[42] GUNZINGER M, REHBERG C, AUTENRIED L. Five priorities for the air force's future combat air force[R]. Washington, D.C.:Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, 2020.
[43] GUNZINGER M, AUTENRIED L. Understanding the promise of Skyborg and low-cost attritable unmanned aerial vehicles[R]. Arlington:The Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies, 2020.
[44] HAMILTON T, OCHMANEK D. Operating low-cost, reusable unmanned aerial vehicles in contested environments:preliminary evaluation of operational concepts[R]. Santa Monica:RAND Corporation, 2020.
[45] Fisher D A. An emergent perspective on interoperation in systems of systems[R]. Pittsburgh:Software Engineering Institute, 2006.
[46] TRAN H T, DOMERCANT J C, MARVIS D N. A system-of-systems approach for assessing the resilience of reconfigurable command and control networks:AIAA-2015-0640[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2015.
[47] SINDIY O V. Model-based system-of-systems engineering for space-based command, control, communication, and information architecture design[D]. West Lafayette:Purdue University, 2010.
[48] MITCHELL W M. Complexity:The emerging science at the edge of order and chaos[M]. New York:Simon & Schuster Paperbacks,1992, 22-35.
[49] RAZ A K,KENLEY C R, DELAURENTIS D A. A system-of-systems perspective for information fusion system design and evaluation[J]. Information Fusion, 2016, 35:148-165.
[50] THURNER S, HANEL R and KLIMEK P. Introduction to the theory of complex systems[M]. New York:Oxford University Press, 2018.
[51] REINBURG J H. Air-to-air combat in world war II:A quantitative history[R]. Arlington:Institute for Defense Analyses, Economic and Political Studies Division, 1966.
[52] LOCKE J W. Air superiority at red flag:Mass, technology, and winning the next war[D]. Alabama:Air University Press, 2009:55-57.
[53] HEGINBOTHAM E, NIXON M, MORGAN F E, et al. The U.S.-China military scorecard:Forces, geography, and the evolving balance of power 1996-2017[R]. 2015.
[54] U.S. Government. Advantage at sea:Prevailing with integrated all-domain naval power[R]. 2020.
[55] U.S. Department of Defense. The department of defense announces its digital engineering strategy[EB/OL]. (2018-07-05)[2021-04-18]. https://www.dfense.gov/Newsroom/Releases/Release/Article/1567723/the-department-of-defense-announces-its-digital-engineering-strategy/.
[56] TIRPAK J A. Air force creates new PEO for NGAD, applying "Digital Century Series" idea[EB/OL]. (2019-10-14)[2021-04-16]. http://airforcemag.com/Features/Pages/2019/October%202019/Air-Force-Creates-New-PEO-for-NGAD-Applying-Digital-Century-Series-Idea.aspx.
[57] PIETRUCHA M. Finding the way (Again):Building the air force's new century series[EB/OL]. (2019-06-11)[2021-04-16]. http://www.warontherocks.com//2019/06/finding-the-way-again-building-the-air-forces-new-cen-tury-series/.
[58] TEGLER E. This is not a T-A RedHawk. It's now the eT-7A RedHawk. It's a digital thing, air force says[EB/OL]. (2020-09-15)[2021-04-16]. http://www.forbes.com/sites/erictegler/2020/09/15/this-is-not-a-t-7a-redhawk-its-now-the-et-7a-redhawk-its-a-digital-thing-the-air-force-says/?sh=3b0b633f632c.
[59] U.S. Department of Defense. DoD Instruction 5000.02[EB/OL] (2020-01-23)[2021-04-18]. https://acqnotes.com/acqnote/acquisitions/dodi-5000.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

从空战制胜机理演变看未来战斗机发展趋势

Development trend of future fighter: A review of evolution of winning mechanism in air combat

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	陈勇, 钟科林, 罗悦, 王淼. 支线客机关键技术与发展方向[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(2): 26697-026697.
[2]	刘小川张欣玥惠旭龙闫亚斌麻军太. 结构修理对民机机身耐撞性的影响研究[J]. 航空学报, 0, (): 0-0.
[3]	白春玉, 郭亚周, 刘小川, 王亚锋, 王计真, 秦庆华. 民用轻小型无人机碰撞安全特性研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(6): 526832-526832.
[4]	李凯翔, 代承霖, 张飞, 白春玉, 牟让科. 大型客机驾驶舱/客舱振动舒适性评估[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(6): 525945-525945.
[5]	张欣玥, 惠旭龙, 刘小川, 白春玉. 典型金属民机机身结构坠撞特性试验[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(6): 526234-526234.
[6]	蔡志勇石含玥赵红军李天琦王希宇周尧明. 水陆两栖飞机灭火飞行仿真系统构建与仿真[J]. 航空学报, 0, (): 0-0.
[7]	杨伟. 关于未来战斗机发展的若干讨论[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(6): 524377-524377.
[8]	胡文刚, 林长亮, 王刚, 门坤发. 多欧拉域耦合法在平尾鸟撞中的应用[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(1): 222860-222860.
[9]	刘洁, 韩维, 徐卫国, 刘纯, 袁培龙, 陈志刚, 彭海军. 基于滚动时域的舰载机甲板运动轨迹跟踪最优控制[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(8): 322842-322842.
[10]	刘毓迪, 孙学德, 张存, 南国鹏. 民用飞机个人通风送风温度对人体舒适性的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(2): 522363-522363.
[11]	王莉, 戴泽华, 杨善水, 毛玲, 严仰光. 电气化飞机电力系统智能化设计研究综述[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(2): 522405-522405.
[12]	张瑶佳, 王莉, 尹振东, 高杨, 王帮亭. 基于HHT的航空直流串行电弧特征提取方法[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(1): 522404-522404.
[13]	黄淼, 褚林塘, 李成华, 蒋荣, 唐彬彬, 吴彬. 大型水陆两栖飞机抗浪能力研究[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(1): 522335-522335.
[14]	黄领才, 雍明培. 水陆两栖飞机的关键技术和产业应用前景[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(1): 522708-522708.
[15]	段旭鹏, 孙卫平, 魏猛, 杨永. 基于OpenFOAM的水陆两栖飞机水面高速滑行研究[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(1): 522330-522330.