关于未来战斗机发展的若干讨论

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2020.24377

观点

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 |

关于未来战斗机发展的若干讨论

杨伟

中国航空工业集团有限公司, 北京 100028

收稿日期:2020-06-02 修回日期:2020-06-05 出版日期:2020-06-15 发布日期:2020-06-12
通讯作者: 杨伟 E-mail:wei___yang@126.com

Development of future fighters

YANG Wei

Aviation Industry Corporation of China, Ltd., Beijing 100028, China

Received:2020-06-02 Revised:2020-06-05 Online:2020-06-15 Published:2020-06-12

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 近年来，在第四代战斗机陆续批量服役和大国竞争的背景下，关于战争形态演变以及四代后战斗机如何发展的讨论络绎不绝。本文回顾了战斗机"代"的起源和跨代发展的驱动因素，概述了空战观察（Observe）、判断（Orient）、决策（Decision）、行动（Act）（OODA）环的演进历程，并提出了OODA 3.0的内涵。阐述了机械化、信息化、智能化发展的依托与跃升关系，就自主性、有人、无人，强平台、体系、分布式作战运用的辩证关系，以及敏捷高效的研发模式等进行了讨论。

关键词: 战斗机, 跨代, 空战, OODA, 智能化

Abstract: Recent years have witnessed extensive discussions on the change of warfare forms and the development of post-4th generation fighters against the background of great power competition and batches of 4th generation fighters entering service. This paper reviews the origin of fighter generation classification and the driving elements behind each generational leap, outlining the evolution of Observe, Orient, Decision, Act (OODA) loops for air combat and proposing the essence of OODA 3.0. After a summary of the supportive and progressive relations among mechanization, informatization and intelligentization, it explores the dialectical relationship among autonomy and manned/unmanned, as well as that among platform, system of systems, and distributed operation, followed finally by a discussion of an agile and efficient development approach of future fighters.

Key words: fighters, generations, air combat, OODA, intelligentization

中图分类号:

V271

杨伟. 关于未来战斗机发展的若干讨论[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(6): 524377-524377.

YANG Wei. Development of future fighters[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(6): 524377-524377.

参考文献 45

[1]	TIRPAK J A. Air force creates new PEO for NGAD, applying "Digital Century Series" idea[EB/OL]. (2019-10-14)[2020-06-02]. http://airforcemag.com/Features/Pages/2019/October%202019/Air-Force-Creates-New-PEO-for-NGAD-Applying-Digital-Century-Series-Idea.aspx.
[2]	Department of the Air Force. Department of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2021 budget estimates air force jus-tification book Volume 2 of 3 Research, development, test & evaluation[EB/OL]. (2020-02-12)[2020-06-02]. https://www.saffm.hq.af.mil/Portals/84/documents/FY21/RDTE_/FY21%20Air%20Force%20Research%20Development%20Test%20and%20Evaluation%20Vol%20II.pdf?ver=2020-02-12-145218-377.
[3]	GUNZINGER M, REHBERG C, JACOB C. An air force for an era of great power competition[R]. Washington, D.C.:Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, 2019.
[4]	GUNZINGER M, REHBERG C, AUTENRIED L. Five priorities for the air force's future combat air force[R]. Washington, D.C.:Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, 2020.
[5]	Air Power. The@usairforce plans to spend MYM11+ Bn, b/w FY 2019 and FY2025, to develop and mature tech-nologies related to the Next Generation Air Dominance and Next Generation Adaptive Propulsion solutions[EB/OL]. (2020-02-29)[2020-04-17].https://twitter.com/MIL_STD/status/1233561215974232066/photo/1.
[6]	GRYNKEWICH B G A. An operational imperative:the future of air superiority[R]. Mitchell:Mitchell Institute, 2017.
[7]	吴鸿遥,钟玲燕. 变后掠机翼的最近发展[J]. 现代航空, 1963, 11:1. WU H Y,ZHONG L Y. Recent development of varia-ble-sweep wings[J]. Modern Aviation, 1963, 11:1(in Chinese).
[8]	GARWIN R, AMLIE T, GREENE T E, et al. Fighter aircraft report of the defense science board task force Volume II:basic report:050868FAD1[R]. Washington, D.C.:Office of the Director of Defense Research and Engineering, 1968.
[9]	HIDMA A. Fighter requirements and developments:A74-38793[R]. Netherland:Netherlands Association of Aeronautical Engineers, 1974.
[10]	GRASSET P. Dogfighting makes a comeback[J]. Interavia, 1974, 12:1188-1191.
[11]	刘真. 幻影-2000[J]. 航空知识, 1979(2):18-19. LIU Z. Mirage-2000[J]. Aerospace Knowledge, 1979(2):18-19(in Chinese).
[12]	TAYLOR J. Future combat aircraft conference pro-ceedings[M]. London:Jane's Publishing Company Limited, 1987.
[13]	BOYNE W. Generation gap[J]. Code One, 2005(4).
[14]	MOTT W H. F-15A versus F/A-22 initial operational capability:A Case for transformation:MP-36[R]. Alabama:Air University Press, 2005.
[15]	Committee on Armed Services. Hearings Before the Committee on Armed Services United States Senate One Hundred Ninth Congress Second Session on S. 2766 to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2007 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department Of Energy, to prescribe personnel strengths for such fiscal year for the Armed Forces, and for other purposes, PART 4:AIRLAND:S.HRG. 109-827[R]. Washington, D.C.:Committee on Armed Services, 2006.
[16]	STILLION J, PERDUE S. Air combat past, present and future[EB/OL]. (2008-12-10)[2020-04-17]. https://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/files/2008_RAND_Pacific_View_Air_Combat_Briefing.pdf.
[17]	BENITEZ M. F-15EX:The strategic blind spot in the air force's fighter debate[EB/OL]. (2019-10-07)[2020-06-02]. https://warontherocks.com/2019/06/F-15ex-the-strategic-blind-spot-in-the-air-forces-fighter-debate/.
[18]	USAF. Next Generation Tactical Aircarft (Next Gen TACAIR) Capability Request for Information (CRFI) version 1.01[EB/OL]. (2010-11-11)[2020-06-07]. https://www.fbo.gov/Next_Gen_TACAIR_CRFI_(V1_0)_10-18-2010.doc.
[19]	Air Superiority 2030(AS 2030) Enterprise Capability Collaboration Team (ECCT). Air superiority 2030 flight plan[R]. USAF, 2016.
[20]	BOYD J R. The essence of winning and losing[EB/OL]. (2016-03-13)[2020-06-07]. https://danford.net/boyd/essence.htm.
[21]	SCHUCK T. OODA loop 2.0 information, not agility, is life[J]. Alumni Magazine, 2017(8):55-58.
[22]	PINNEY C. Avionics architecture definition version 1.0:94J280/574[R]. Arlington:Joint Advanced Strike Technology Program, 1994.
[23]	BLASCH E, HANSELMAN P. Information fusion for information superiority[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE 2000 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference. Piscataway:IEEE Press, 2000:290-297.
[24]	SHEILA B, CARL S. Lizza pilot's associate "a cooperative, knowledge-based system application"[R]. Washington, D.C.:Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, 1991.
[25]	ERNEST N, CARROLL D. Genetic fuzzy based artificial intelligence for unmanned combat aerial vehicle control in simulated air combat missions[J]. Journal of Defense Management, 2016(6):1.
[26]	RUTH D, PAUL N. Summer study on autonomy[R]. Washington, D.C.:Defense Science Board, 2016
[27]	KALLBERG J. Supremacy by accelerated warfare through the comprehension barrier and beyond:Reaching the zero domain and cyberspace singularity[EB/OL]. (2018-12-18)[2020-02-25]. https://cyberdefensereview.army.mil/Portals/6/Documents/CDR%20Journal%20Articles/Fall%202018/KALLBERG_CDR_V3N3.pdf?ver=2018-12-18-101631-953.
[28]	CARTER A B. Autonomy in weapon systems:DOD directive 3000.09[S]. Washington, D.C.:Department of Defense, 2012.
[29]	CLOUGH B T. Metrics, schmetrics! How the heck do you determine a uav's autonomy anyway?"[C]//Proceedings of the Performance Metrics for Intelligent Systems Workshop, 2002.
[30]	ILACHINSKI A. AI, robots, and swarms (issues, questions, and recommended studies)[R]. Center for Naval Analyses (CAN), 2017.
[31]	2019 The United States Air Force artificial intelligence annex to the department of defense artificial intelli-gence strategy[R]. Washington D.C.:Department of the Air Force, 2019.
[32]	ZACHARIAS G L. Autonomous horizons:The way forward[R]. Washington D.C.:Office of the USAF Chief Scientist, 2019.
[33]	JAMES D L, WELSH M A. Air force future operating concept-A view of the air force in 2035[R]. 2015.
[34]	GRANT R. U.S. air dominance in a fiscally-constrained environment:Defining paths to the future tactical aircraft and the preservation of U.S. air dominance[R]. Arlington:Lexington Institute, 2013.
[35]	TIRPAK J A. Saving air superiority[J/OL]. Air Force Magazine, 2017, 100(4). https://www.airforcemag.com/article/saving-air-superiority/.
[36]	Director, Systems and Software Engineering. Systems engineering guide for systems of systems, Version 1.0[M]. Washington, D.C.:Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology, Systems and Software Engineering, 2008:3-6.
[37]	GRAYSON T. Mosaic warfare[EB/OL]. (2018-07-27)[2020-04-16]. https://www.darpa.mil/attachments/STO-Mosaic-Distro-A.pdf.
[38]	DEPTULA D A, PENNEY H R, STUTZRIEM L A. Restoring America's military competitiveness:Mosaic warfare[M]. Arlington:The Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies, 2019:34-36.
[39]	CURTIS E. Lemay center for doctrine development and education. Reachback and distributed operations[EB/OL]. (2018-01-28)[2020-04-17].http://www.doctrine.af.mil/Portals/61/documents/Annex_3-30/3-30-D09-C2-Distributed-vs-Split-Ops.pdf.
[40]	张文宇. 分布式作战与其中的航空装备[EB/OL]. (2018-09-20)[2020-04-17]. http://www.cannews.com.cn/2018/0907/181844.shtml. ZHANG W Y. Distributed operations and aviation equipment[EB/OL]. (2018-09-20)[2020-04-17].http://www.cannews.com.cn/2018/0907/181844.shtml. (in Chinese)
[41]	SMITH N. Munitions directorate overview to industry:10-AFRL_RW_BFI-PACA-2015[R]. Wright-Patterson AFB OH:Air Force Research Laboratory, 2015.
[42]	GPO. National defense authorization act for fiscal year 2016:PUBLIC LAW 114-92-NOV. 25[S]. Washington, D.C.:GPO, 2015:882-885.
[43]	INSINNA V. The US Air Force's radical plan for a future fighter could field a jet in 5 years[EB/OL]. (2019-09-16)[2020-04-17]. https://www.defensenews.com/digital-show-dailies/2019/09/16/the-us-air-forces-radical-plan-for-a-future-fighter-could-field-a-jet-in-5-years/.
[44]	LORD E M. Operation of the middle tier of acquisition (Mta):DOD instruction 5000.80[S]. Washington, D.C.:Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, 2019:3-4.
[45]	MITRE Acquisition Disrupter (MAD) Team. Middle Tier of Acquisition (MTA)[EB/OL]. (2019-07-23)[2020-03-26].https://aida.mitre.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Middle-Tier-oF-Acquisition-23-Jul-19.pdf.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

关于未来战斗机发展的若干讨论

Development of future fighters

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 45

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张鸿林, 罗建军, 马卫华. 基于机器学习的航天器规避目标威胁博弈决策[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(8): 329136-329136.
[2]	刘钟琦, 胡旭阳, 罗海宁, 王晓明, 董素君. 战斗机驾驶舱环境热舒适性仿真与优化[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(7): 128919-128919.
[3]	司瑞, 陈勇. 民用飞机增材制造技术应用发展趋势[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(5): 529677-529677.
[4]	王海峰. 高性能战斗机与发动机协同设计关键技术[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(5): 529978-529978.
[5]	单圣哲, 张伟伟. 基于自博弈深度强化学习的空战智能决策方法[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(4): 328723-328723.
[6]	马金毅, 王灿, 薛涛, 艾剑良, 董一群. 空战格斗飞行机动数据库建立及应用[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(S1): 727538-727538.
[7]	李忠智, 马金毅, 艾剑良, 董一群. 拟VGG16网络的航空传感器故障检测分类[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(S1): 727615-727615.
[8]	张百川, 毕文豪, 张安, 毛泽铭, 杨咪. 基于Transformer模型的空战飞行器轨迹预测误差补偿方法[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(9): 327413-327413.
[9]	周攀, 黄江涛, 章胜, 刘刚, 舒博文, 唐骥罡. 基于深度强化学习的智能空战决策与仿真[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(4): 126731-126731.
[10]	张旭辉, 解春雷, 刘思佳, 闫溟, 邢思远. 智能变形飞行器发展需求及难点分析[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(21): 529302-529302.
[11]	刘育玮, 程玉强, 吴建军. 航天推进系统中的智能控制方法研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(15): 528505-528505.
[12]	陈跃良, 吴省均, 卞贵学, 张勇, 张柱柱. 基于DFR的战斗机疲劳关键部位日历寿命设计方法[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(10): 227614-227614.
[13]	章胜, 周攀, 何扬, 黄江涛, 刘刚, 唐骥罡, 贾怀智, 杜昕. 基于深度强化学习的空战机动决策试验[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(10): 128094-128094.
[14]	文谦, 杨家伟, 武泽平, 杨希祥, 赵海龙, 王志祥. 快速交叉验证改进的运载火箭近似建模方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 225967-225967.
[15]	徐家进, 高镇同. 疲劳统计学智能化的进一步研究[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 225138-225138.