物理化学模型对流场电磁散射特性的影响

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2022.27707

Abstract

Abstract:

Based on the hypersonic plasma flow field data calculated by different chemical reaction kinetics models and turbulence models， a 3D time-varying Piecewise Linear JE Recursive Convolution Finite-Difference Time-Domain （PLJERC-FDTD） method is applied to explore the interaction between electromagnetic wave and plasma flow field of a typical hypersonic vehicle. The electromagnetic scattering characteristics of hypersonic vehicle plasma flow field under different chemical reaction dynamics models， different turbulence models and different electromagnetic wave frequencies were compared and analyzed. For different chemical reaction dynamic models， the backward Radar Cross-Section （RCS） of plasma flow field calculated by Park model and Gupta model are close to each other， and are both smaller than the backward RCS of plasma flow field calculated by D&K model. The electromagnetic scattering characteristics considering turbulence effects are more complex than those of laminar flow field. The backward RCS fluctuates more sharply along with frequency varying， and the influence of turbulence effect on electromagnetic scattering gradually decreases with the increase of altitude.

Key words: electromagnetic scattering, plasma, finite-difference time-domain method, chemical reaction kinetics models, turbulence models, radar cross-section

CLC Number:

V211

Weifang CHEN, Jinghua SUN, Deyang TIAN, Yesi CHEN. Influence of physical and chemical models on electromagnetic scattering characteristics of flow field[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(12): 127707-127707.

Figures/Tables 13

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig. 3

Table 1

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Fig.8

Table 2

Fig.9

Fig.10

Fig.11

References 27

1	STARKEY R， LEWIS R， JONES C. Plasma telemetry in hypersonic flight［C］∥International Telemetering Conference， 2002： 2-15.
2	HARTUNIAN R， STEWART G， FERGASON S，et al. Causes and mitigation of Radio Frequency （RF） blackout during reentry of reusable launch vehicles： ATR-2007（5309）-1［R］. El Segundo： Aerospace Corporation， 2007.
3	RUSCH W， YEH C. Scattering by an infinite cylinder coated with an inhomogeneous and anisotropic plasma sheath［J］. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation， 1967， 15（3）： 452-457.
4	SWIFT C T， BECK F B， THOMSON J， et al. RAM C-Ⅲ S-band diagnostic experiment： N71-21101［R］. Washington， D.C.： NASA， 1971.
5	LAROUSSI M， ROTH J R. Numerical calculation of the reflection， absorption， and transmission of microwaves by a nonuniform plasma slab［J］. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science， 1993， 21（4）： 366-372.
6	USUI H， MATSUMOTO H， YAMASHITA F， et al. Computer experiments on radio blackout of a reentry vehicle［C］∥6th Spacecraft Charging Technology， 1998： 107-110.
7	LUEBBERS R， STEICH D， KUNZ K. FDTD calculation of scattering from frequency-dependent materials［J］. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation， 1993， 41（9）： 1249-1257.
8	SOTNIKOV V I， PARASCHIV I， MAKHIN V， et al. Linear analysis of sheared flow stabilization of global magnetohydrodynamic instabilities based on the Hall fluid model［J］. Physics of Plasmas， 2002， 9（3）： 913-922.
9	SCHULER K， BECKER D， WIESBECK W. Extraction of virtual scattering centers of vehicles by ray-tracing simulations［J］. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation， 2008， 56（11）： 3543-3551.
10	于哲峰，刘佳琪，刘连元，等. 临近空间高超声速飞行器RCS特性研究［J］. 宇航学报， 2014， 35（6）： 713-719.
	YU Z F， LIU J Q， LIU L Y， et al. Research on the RCS characteristics of hypersonic near space vehicle［J］. Journal of Astronautics， 2014， 35（6）： 713-719 （in Chinese）.
11	于哲峰，梁世昌，部绍清，等. 超高速目标及其绕流场雷达散射模拟与分析［J］. 电波科学学报， 2013， 28（6）： 1076-1081.
	YU Z F， LIANG S C， BU S Q， et al. Simulation and analysis on the radar scattering of hypervelocity object and its flow field［J］. Chinese Journal of Radio Science， 2013， 28（6）： 1076-1081 （in Chinese）.
12	于哲峰，孙良奎，马平，等. 气动电磁学概念探讨及若干研究进展介绍［J］. 空气动力学学报， 2018， 36（5）： 729-735.
	YU Z F， SUN L K， MA P， et al. Discussion about the concept of aero-electromagnetics and introduction of typical research progress［J］. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica， 2018， 36（5）： 729-735 （in Chinese）.
13	马平，石安华，杨益兼，等. 高超声速球模型及流场光辐射和电磁散射特性测量［J］. 兵工学报， 2017， 38（6）： 1223-1230.
	MA P， SHI A H， YANG Y J， et al. Measurement of ray radiation and electromagnetic scattering from hypersonic sphere models and their flow fields in ballistic range［J］. Acta Armamentarii， 2017， 38（6）： 1223-1230 （in Chinese）.
14	马平，石安华，杨益兼，等. 高速模型尾迹流场及其电磁散射特性相似性实验研究［J］. 物理学报， 2017， 66（10）： 102401.
	MA P， SHI A H， YANG Y J， et al. Experiment on similarity between wake flow field and electromagnetic scattering characteristic of the hypersonic model［J］. Acta Physica Sinica， 2017， 66（10）： 102401 （in Chinese）.
15	马平，韩一平，张宁，等. 高超声速类HTV2模型全目标电磁散射特性实验研究［J］. 物理学报， 2022， 71（8）： 084101.
	MA P， HAN Y P， ZHANG N， et al. Experimental investigation on all-target electromagnetic scattering characteristics of hypervelocity HTV2-like flight model［J］. Acta Physica Sinica， 2022， 71（8）： 084101 （in Chinese）.
16	吴明兴，田得阳，唐璞，等. 高超声速模型尾迹电子密度二维分布反演方法［J］. 物理学报， 2022， 71（11）： 115202.
	WU M X， TIAN D Y， TANG P， et al. Inversion method of two-dimensional distribution of electron density in hypersonic model wake［J］. Acta Physica Sinica， 2022， 71（11）： 115202 （in Chinese）.
17	聂亮，陈伟芳，夏陈超，等. 高超声速飞行器绕流流场电磁散射特性分析［J］. 电波科学学报， 2014， 29（5）： 874-879， 956.
	NIE L， CHEN W F， XIA C C， et al. Analysis of scattering for the flow field of a hypersonic flight vehicle［J］. Chinese Journal of Radio Science， 2014， 29（5）： 874-879， 956 （in Chinese）.
18	莫锦军. 隐身目标低频宽带电磁散射特性研究［D］. 长沙：国防科技大学， 2004： 70-134.
	MO J J. Study on wideband electromagnetic characteristics of stealth targets in low frequency［D］. Changsha： National University of Defense Technology， 2004： 70-134 （in Chinese）.
19	周超，张小宽，张晨新，等. 再入段等离子体对弹头RCS的影响研究［J］. 现代雷达， 2014， 36（3）： 83-86.
	ZHOU C， ZHANG X K， ZHANG C X， et al. A study on the influence on warhead RCS of plasma parameters in the reentry phase［J］. Modern Radar， 2014， 36（3）： 83-86 （in Chinese）.
20	梁世昌，于哲峰，张志成，等. 开槽钝锥体及等离子体鞘套的RCS特性研究［J］. 实验流体力学， 2013， 27（2）： 19-23.
	LIANG S C， YU Z F， ZHANG Z C， et al. Research on the RCS characteristics of blunt-cone with slots and plasma sheath［J］. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics， 2013， 27（2）： 19-23 （in Chinese）.
21	孟贵平. 再入体的电磁散射特性分析及算法研究［D］. 南京：南京大学， 2019： 22-58.
	MENG G P. Re-entry body electromagnetic scattering characteristics analysis and algorithm research［D］. Nanjing： Nanjing University， 2019： 22-58 （in Chinese）.
22	赵泽康. 高超声速目标在等离子体湍流中电磁散射特性研究［D］. 西安：西安电子科技大学， 2020： 43-62.
	ZHAO Z K. Electromagnetic scattering characteristics of hypersonic target in plasma turbulence［D］. Xi’an： Xidian University， 2020： 43-62 （in Chinese）.
23	牛戈钊，刘彦明，高澜，等．等离子鞘套包覆钝锥的双站极化散射特性［J］．航空学报， 2022， 43（S2）： 727722．
	NIU G Z， LIU Y M， GAO L， et al. Bistatic polarization scattering characteristic of plasma-sheath-covered blunt cone［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2022， 43（S2）： 727722 （in Chinese）.
24	YEE K E. Numerical solution of initial boundary value problems involving maxwell’s equations in isotropic media［J］. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation， 1966， 14（3）： 302-307.
25	杨阳. 电磁场时域有限差分数值方法的研究［D］. 南京：南京理工大学， 2005： 1-2.
	YANG Y. The research on the finite difference time domain methods in the electromagnetic fields［D］. Nanjing： Nanjing University of Science and Technology， 2005： 1-2 （in Chinese）.
26	常雨. 超声速/高超声速等离子体流场数值模拟及其电磁特性研究［D］. 长沙：国防科技大学， 2009： 74-93.
	CHANG Y. Numerical simulation of supersonic/hypersonic plasma flow field and electromagnetic characteristics［D］. Changsha： National University of Defense Technology， 2009： 74-93 （in Chinese）.
27	YANG L X. 3D FDTD implementation for scattering of electric anisotropic dispersive medium using recursive convolution method［J］. International Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves， 2007， 28（7）： 557-565.

高度H/km	马赫数Ma	攻角α/（°）	化学反应动力学模型	空气多组元模型
30	15	0	D&K/Gupta/Park	7
40	15	0	D&K/Gupta/Park	7
50	20	0/10	Gupta	7/11

[1]	Xiong YANG, Xiaokang LI, Dawei GUO, Mousen CHENG, Fan ZHANG, Bixuan CHE, Qingyun LEI. Research status and prospect of high⁃power wave⁃heating magnetoplasma thruster [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(7): 28761-028761.
[2]	Zhiting GAO, Zhuang MA, Yanbo LIU. Effect of CVD-SiC array structure on ablation resistance of ZrB₂/SiC coatings [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(3): 428842-428842.
[3]	Ting LIU, Qi LIN, Zhen LIU, Xiaoguang WANG, Huisong WU, Yonggang XU. Reconfigurable wire⁃driven parallel support mechanism for electromagnetic scattering test [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(2): 328658-328658.
[4]	Shiqi GAO, Bo DING, Xuzhen XIE, Zheng LI, Lin CHEN, Shouyuan QIAN, Zihan JIAO, Guanghui BAI. Drag reduction mechanism using plasma synthetic jet in high⁃speed flow [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(S2): 729373-729373.
[5]	Ping MA, Ning ZHANG, Anhua SHI, Zhefeng YU, Shichang LIANG, Jie HUANG. Transmission characteristics of typical band microwave in experiment⁃simulated plasma [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(S2): 729476-729476.
[6]	Xiaoping LI, Min YANG, Bo YAO, Yanming LIU, Lei SHI, Haoyan LIU, Chengguang LI. Reliable communication technologies of reusable launch vehicles in cooperation with satellite during re-entry [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(23): 628906-628906.
[7]	Rubing LIU, Zefan CHEN, Ruixin LIN, Qi LIN. Active control of flow-induced vibration of blades in a plane cascade by a plasma synthetic jet [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(20): 128430-128430.
[8]	Zhenbing LUO, Wei XIE, Xuzhen XIE, Yan ZHOU, Qiang LIU. Research progress of active flow control of shock wave and its interaction [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(15): 529002-529002.
[9]	Xinlei CHEN, Lichang LU, Honghu JI, Changqing GU, Fan GAO, Xiaojuan SHI. Accurate and efficient simulation method and experimental verification of monostatic RCS for aeroengine exhaust systems [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(12): 327676-327676.
[10]	Bo DING, Zhenli CHEN, Zihan JIAO, Jincheng WANG, Zheng LI, Guanghui BAI. Unsteady control mechanisms of hypersonic compression corner using pulsed surface arc discharge [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(12): 127744-127744.
[11]	Like XIE, Hua LIANG, Yun WU, Yulin FANG, Biao WEI, Zhi SU, Xuecheng LIU, Borui ZHENG. Comparison of anti-icing performance between plasma actuation and electric heating [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(1): 627971-627971.
[12]	Tingkun ZHANG, Zheng LI, Xudong WEN, Yiqing HONG, Bowen BAI. Long-term energy focusing method for target covered by plasma sheath [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 67-75.
[13]	Zhikun SUN, Zhiwei SHI, Weilin ZHANG, Zheng LI, Qijie SUN. Effect of plasma actuator on lift-drag characteristics of high-speed airfoil [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 23-39.
[14]	Weizhuo HUA, Ling GAO, Ge CHEN, Yiwen LI, Geng GONG, Yantao WANG, Biao WEI. Experimental magneto-hydrodynamic system based on plasma torch [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 1-7.
[15]	Kai LUO, Yonghai WANG, Qiu WANG, Jiwei LI, Zheng LI, Chunsheng NIE, Zheng LI. Plasma-actuated flow control test in high enthalpy shock tunnel [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 89-96.

Influence of physical and chemical models on electromagnetic scattering characteristics of flow field

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 13

References 27

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments