脉冲表面电弧放电对高超声速压缩拐角的非定常控制机理

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2022.27744

Abstract

Abstract:

A large number of experimental results indicate that the pulsed surface arc discharge plasma has a good ability to control the shock position and Shock Wave/Boundary Layer Interaction （SWBLI） in the hypersonic flows. Because of the short discharge time， strong electromagnetic interference and limited discharge area， it is difficult to obtain quantitative experimental data. In most experiments only qualitative Schlieren images were obtained. To reveal the unsteady control mechanism of pulsed surface arc discharge plasma， it is necessary to establish a numerical simulation method for the interactions between the surface arc discharge plasma and the hypersonic flows. In present work， the unsteady control mechanism of pulsed surface arc discharge plasma on hypersonic compression corner flow is studied by using numerical and experimental methods. Based on the theoretical analysis and experimental results， a three-dimensional phenomenological model of the pulsed surface arc discharge is established. Joule-heating generated by arc discharge is added to the energy equation as a spatial power density source term to simulate the interaction between the surface arc discharge plasma and the hypersonic compression corner flow. The numerical Schlieren images at different time were well predicted compared with that of experiment， which verifies the correctness of the phenomenological model. The unsteady numerical results reveal the interaction mechanism between the arc discharge plasma and the double wedge hypersonic flow. The local Joule-heating generated by the surface arc discharge induces the formation of the near-wall separation zone， leading to the increase of the local displacement thickness and the formation of the unsteady virtual wedge moving along the wall. The moving virtual wedge generates an oblique shock wave with varying strength， which was reflected by the front wedge shock wave forming an unsteady shock/shock interaction. The thermal gas bulb generated by arc discharge can effectively regulate the oblique shock wave. In a single pulse discharge， the maximum drag reduction is around 2%， and the maximum pitch moment change is around 3%.

Key words: surface arc discharge, plasma flow control, hypersonic flow, phenomenological model, unsteady control

CLC Number:

V411

Bo DING, Zhenli CHEN, Zihan JIAO, Jincheng WANG, Zheng LI, Guanghui BAI. Unsteady control mechanisms of hypersonic compression corner using pulsed surface arc discharge[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(12): 127744-127744.

Figures/Tables 22

Table 1

Fig.1

Table 2

Fig.2

Table 3

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Fig.8

Fig.9

Fig.10

Fig.11

Fig.12

Fig. 13

Fig.14

Fig.15

Fig.16

Fig.17

Fig.18

Fig.19

References 47

1	吴云，李应红. 等离子体流动控制研究进展与展望［J］. 航空学报， 2015， 36（2）： 381-405.
	WU Y， LI Y H. Progress and outlook of plasma flow control［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2015， 36（2）： 381-405 （in Chinese）.
2	MOREAU E， TOUCHARD G. Enhancing the mechanical efficiency of electric wind in corona discharges［J］. Journal of Electrostatics， 2008， 66（1-2）： 39-44.
3	MESTIRI R， HADAJI R， NASRALLAH S BEN. An experimental study of a plasma actuator in absence of free airflow： Ionic wind velocity profile［J］. Physics of Plasmas， 2010， 17（8）： 083503.
4	COLAS D F， FERRET A， PAI D Z， et al. Ionic wind generation by a wire-cylinder-plate corona discharge in air at atmospheric pressure［J］. Journal of Applied Physics， 2010， 108（10）： 103306.
5	BENARD N， MOREAU E. Electrical and mechanical characteristics of surface AC dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuators applied to airflow control［J］. Experiments in Fluids， 2014， 55（11）： 1-43.
6	LEONOV S B， ADAMOVICH I V， SOLOVIEV V R. Dynamics of near-surface electric discharges and mechanisms of their interaction with the airflow［J］. Plasma Sources Science and Technology， 2016， 25（6）： 063001.
7	THOMAS F O， CORKE T C， DUONG A， et al. Turbulent drag reduction using pulsed-DC plasma actuation［J］. Journal of Physics D： Applied Physics， 2019， 52（43）： 434001.
8	MHITARYAN A M， LABINOV S D， FRIDLAND V. Some problem of aerodynamics and electro-hydrodynamics［J］. Kievs Institute of Civil Aviation Engineers， 1964， 1（1）：221-234.
9	MACHERET S O， SHNEIDER M N， MILES R B. Magnetohydrodynamic and electrohydrodynamic control of hypersonic flows of weakly ionized plasmas［J］. AIAA Journal， 2004， 42（7）： 1378-1387.
10	SHIN J， NARAYANASWAMY V， RAJA L， et al. Generation of plasma induced flow actuation by DC glow-like discharge in a supersonic flow［C］∥44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. 2006： 169.
11	ANDERSON K， KNIGHT D D. Interaction of heated filaments with a blunt cylinder in supersonic flow［J］. Shock Waves， 2011， 21（2）： 149-161.
12	CHIATTO M， DE LUCA L. Numerical and experimental frequency response of plasma synthetic jet actuators［C］∥55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting. 2017： 1884.
13	ZONG H， KOTSONIS M. Formation， evolution and scaling of plasma synthetic jets［J］. Journal of Fluid Mechanics， 2018， 837： 147-181.
14	陈加政，胡国暾，樊国超，等. 等离子体合成射流对钝头激波的控制与减阻［J］. 航空学报， 2021， 42（7）： 124773.
	CHEN J Z， HU G T， FAN G C， et al. Bow shock wave control and drag reduction by plasma synthetic jet［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2021， 42（7）： 124773 （in Chinese）.
15	周岩，罗振兵，王林，等. 等离子体合成射流激励器及其流动控制技术研究进展［J］. 航空学报， 2022， 43（3）： 025027.
	ZHOU Y， LUO Z B， WANG L， et al. Plasma synthetic jet actuator for flow control： Review［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2022， 43（3）： 025027 （in Chinese）.
16	SAMIMY M， ADAMOVICH I， WEBB B， et al. Development and characterization of plasma actuators for high-speed jet control［J］. Experiments in Fluids， 2004， 37（4）： 577-588.
17	UTKIN Y G， KESHAV S， KIM J H， et al. Development and use of localized arc filament plasma actuators for high-speed flow control［J］. Journal of Physics D： Applied Physics， 2006， 40（3）： 685-694.
18	SAMIMY M， KIM J H， KASTNER J， et al. Active control of high-speed and high-Reynolds-number jets using plasma actuators［J］. Journal of Fluid Mechanics， 2007， 578： 305-330.
19	SAMIMY M， KIM J H， KEARNEY-FISCHER M， et al. Acoustic and flow fields of an excited high Reynolds number axisymmetric supersonic jet［J］. Journal of Fluid Mechanics， 2010， 656： 507-529.
20	WEBB N， CLIFFORD C， SAMIMY M. Control of oblique shock wave/boundary layer interactions using plasma actuators［J］. Experiments in fluids， 2013， 54（6）： 1-13.
21	YUGULIS K， HANSFORD S， GREGORY J W， et al. Control of high subsonic cavity flow using plasma actuators［J］. AIAA Journal， 2014， 52（7）： 1542-1554.
22	WEBB N， SAMIMY M. Control of supersonic cavity flow using plasma actuators［J］. AIAA Journal， 2017， 55（10）： 3346-3355.
23	LEONOV S B， YARANTSEV D A. Near-surface electrical discharge in supersonic airflow： properties and flow control［J］. Journal of Propulsion and Power， 2008， 24（6）： 1168-1181.
24	RAIZER Y P， ALLEN J E. Gas discharge physics［M］. Berlin： Springer， 1991.
25	LEONOV S B， HOUPT A， HEDLUND B， et al. Controllable shock wave generation by near-surface electrical discharge［C］∥47th AIAA Plasmadynamics and Lasers Conference. 2016： 4306.
26	FALEMPIN F， FIRSOV A A， YARANTSEV D A， et al. Plasma control of shock wave configuration in off-design mode of M= 2 inlet［J］. Experiments in Fluids， 2015， 56（3）： 1-10.
27	WATANABE Y， HOUPT A， LEONOV S B. Plasma-assisted control of supersonic flow over a compression ramp［J］. Aerospace， 2019， 6（35）： 1-13.
28	WATANABE Y， ELLIOTT S， HOUPT A W， et al. Q-DC plasma actuation for Mach-4 supersonic flow control over compression ramp［C］∥AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum. 2020： 1889.
29	WATANABE Y， LEONOV S B， HOUPT A W. Plasma-based control of Mach-2 supersonic flow over compression ramp［C］∥AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum. 2019： 1348.
30	WATANABE Y， ELLIOTT S， FIRSOV A， et al. Rapid control of force/momentum on a model ramp by quasi-DC plasma［J］. Journal of Physics D： Applied Physics， 2019， 52（44）： 444003.
31	GAN T， WU Y， SUN Z， et al. Shock wave boundary layer interaction controlled by surface arc plasma actuators［J］. Physics of Fluids， 2018， 30（5）： 055107.
32	王宏宇，杨彦广，胡伟波，等. 高频微秒脉冲放电控制激波/边界层干扰非定常性的试验研究［J］. 航空学报， 2022， 43（1）：625905.
	WANG H Y， YANG Y G， HU W B， et al. Experimental study on unsteadiness characterizations of shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction controlled by high-frequency microsecond pulse discharge［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2022， 43（1）： 625905 （in Chinese）.
33	TANG M， WU Y， GUO S， et al. Effect of the streamwise pulsed arc discharge array on shock wave/boundary layer interaction control［J］. Physics of Fluids， 2020， 32（7）： 076104.
34	TANG M， WU Y， GUO S， et al. Compression ramp shock wave/boundary layer interaction control with high-frequency streamwise pulsed spark discharge array［J］. Physics of Fluids， 2020， 32（12）： 121704.
35	TIAN G， QIONG W. Mechanisms of SWBLI control by using a surface arc plasma actuator array［J］. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science， 2021， 128： 110428.
36	LEONOV S， YARANTSEV D， GROMOV V， et al. Mechanisms of flow control by near-surface electrical discharge generation［C］∥43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. 2005： 780.
37	LEONOV S B， YARANTSEV D A. Control of separation phenomena in a high-speed flow by means of the surface electric discharge［J］. Fluid Dynamics， 2008， 43（6）： 945-953.
38	LEONOV S， FIRSOV A， YARANTSEV D， et al. Plasma effect on shocks configuration in compression ramp［C］∥17th AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference. 2011： 2362.
39	DESHPANDE A S， POGGIE J. Flow control of swept shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction using plasma actuators［J］. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets， 2018， 55（5）： 1198-1207.
40	SUN Q， CHENG B， YU Y， et al. A study of variation patterns of shock wave control by different plasma aerodynamic actuations［J］. Plasma Science and Technology， 2010， 12（6）： 708-714.
41	SUN Q， LI Y， CHENG B， et al. The characteristics of surface arc plasma and its control effect on supersonic flow［J］. Physics Letters A， 2014， 378（36）： 2672-2682.
42	PARK C. Assessment of two-temperature kinetic model for ionizing air［J］. Journal of thermophysics and Heat Transfer， 1989， 3（3）： 233-244.
43	GUPTA R N， YOS J M， THOMPSON R A. A review of reaction rates and thermodynamic and transport properties for the 11-species air model for chemical and thermal nonequilibrium calculations to 30000 K： NASA-TM-101528 ［R］. 1989.
44	WATANABE Y， SUZUKI K. Investigation of arc plasma discharge in hypersonic flow over compression and expansion corner［C］∥44th AIAA Plasmadynamics and Lasers Conference. 2013： 3130.
45	BISEK N J， BOYD I D， POGGIE J. Numerical study of plasma-assisted aerodynamic control for hypersonic vehicles［J］. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets， 2009， 46（3）： 568-576.
46	MACLEAN M， HOLDEN M S， DUFRENE A. Measurements of real gas effects on regions of laminar shock wave/boundary layer interaction in hypervelocity flows［C］∥AIAA Aviation. 2014.
47	HOUPT A， HEDLUND B， LEONOV S， et al. Quasi-DC electrical discharge characterization in a supersonic flow［J］. Experiments in Fluids， 2017， 58（4）： 1-17.

参数	x方向力/ kg	y方向力/ kg	z方向力/ kg	x方向力矩/ （kg∙m）	y方向力矩/ （kg∙m）	z方向力矩/ （kg∙m）
载荷	8	25	12.5	0.6	0.8	1.5
误差	0.1	0.1	0.1	0.14	0.19	0.1

[1]	Chongli MA, Jingyuan LIU. Effect of grid strategy on numerical simulation results of aerothermal heating loads over hypersonic blunt bodies [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(5): 126710-126710.
[2]	Yifeng HUANG, Shuhua ZENG, Zhongzheng JIANG, Weifang CHEN. Numerical study on high-altitude lateral jet based on nonlinear coupled constitutive relation [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 8-22.
[3]	WANG Hongyu, YANG Yanguang, HU Weibo, CHEN Zhi, FENG Liming, ZHOU Youtian. Experimental study on unsteadiness characteristics of shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction controlled by high-frequency microsecond pulse discharge [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(1): 625905-625905.
[4]	LIU Pengxin, YUAN Xianxu, SUN Dong, FU Yalu, LI Chen. Direct numerical simulation of high-temperature turbulent boundary layer with chemical nonequilibrium [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(1): 124877-124877.
[5]	REN Weijie, XIE Wenjia, TIAN Zhengyu, ZHANG Ye, YU Hang. Grid dependence of hypersonic numerical shock instability [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(S1): 726376-726376.
[6]	XIANG Xinghao, ZHANG Yifeng, YUAN Xianxu, TU Guohua, WAN Bingbing, CHEN Jianqiang. C-γ-Re_θ model for hypersonic three-dimensional boundary layer transition prediction [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(9): 625711-625711.
[7]	WU Han, WANG Jianhong, HUANG Wei, DU Zhaobo, YAN Li. Research progress on shock wave/boundary layer interactions and flow controls induced by micro vortex generators [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(6): 25371-025371.
[8]	LI Jin, GENG Xiangren, CHEN Jianqiang, JIANG Dingwu, LI Hongzhe. Numerical simulation on DSMC quantum kinetic chemical reaction model [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2019, 40(4): 122176-122176.
[9]	PENG Jun, ZHANG Zijian, ZHOU Kai, HU Zongmin, JIANG Zonglin. Effects of vibration excitation on shock reflections [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2017, 38(8): 121055-121055.
[10]	DONG Xiangrui, CHEN Yaohui, DONG Gang, LIU Yixin. DES numerical study of shock wave/boundary layer interactions in hypersonic flows controlled by double micro-ramps [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2016, 37(6): 1771-1780.
[11]	YAN Zhenguo, LIU Huayong, MAO Meiliang, MA Yankai, ZHU Huajun. Development of 3rd-order HWCNS and its application in hypersonic flow [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2015, 36(5): 1460-1470.
[12]	WU Yun, LI Yinghong. Progress and outlook of plasma flow control [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2015, 36(2): 381-405.
[13]	LI Haiyan, TANG Zhigong, YANG Yanguang, SHI Anhua, LUO Wanqing. Problems of numerical simulation of high-temperature gas flow fields for hypersonic vehicles [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2015, 36(1): 176-191.
[14]	GAO Wenzhi, LI Zhufei, YANG Jiming. Flow characteristics experiments of a hypersonic axisymmetric inlet with nose bluntness [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2015, 36(1): 302-310.
[15]	TANG Zhigong, ZHANG Yirong, CHEN Jianqiang, MAO Meiliang, ZHANG Yifeng, LIU Huayong. More fidelity, more accurate, more efficient—progress on numerical simulations for hypersonic flow [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2015, 36(1): 120-134.

Unsteady control mechanisms of hypersonic compression corner using pulsed surface arc discharge

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 22

References 47

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments