叶片式涡流发生器对压缩拐角流动分离的控制

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2018.22049

Abstract

Abstract: The Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equation method based on the k-ω turbulence model is used to study the control of the boundary layer separation at 24° compression ramp for Ma_∞=2.9 via the vane Vortex Generator (VG). The calculation results show that the streamwise vortex generated by the vortex generator is the main factor that controls the separation of the boundary layer, and the greater the intensity of the streamwise vortex is, the better the control effect will be. The streamwise vortex increases the momentum transport of the mainstream and the boundary layer. The velocity profile along the wall normal is fuller and the two-dimensional separation at the corner is transformed into three-dimensional separation. The structure of the shock wave-boundary layer interaction is changed, with the total length of the separation zone decreasing by 39.68%. Compared with the counter-rotating VG, the co-rotating VG is more beneficial in improving the wall pressure distribution at the corner. The co-rotating VG can reduce a similar amount of total length of the separation zone to the counter-rotating VG, but can result in shorter length between the separation point and turning point and smaller increment of system drag than the counter-rotating VG. In the case of a counter-rotating VG, as the height of the trailing edge increases, the total length of the separation zone decreases and the increment of system drag decreases first and then increases slightly. The larger the distance between the counter-rotating blades is, the smaller the total length of the separation zone will be, the bigger the increment of system drag will be. The larger the distance between the co-rotating blades is, the larger the total length of the separation zone will be, and the smaller the increment of system drag will be. The height of the blade has a main influence on the streamwise vortex induced by the vane VG, and the influence of the space between the blades is negligible.

Key words: vortex generator, compression ramp, streamwise vortex, boundary layer separation, shock wave-boundary layer interaction

CLC Number:

V211.3

HU Wanlin, YU Jian, LIU Hongkang, ZHAO Yuan, YAN Chao. Control of compression ramp flow separation via vane vortex generator[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2018, 39(7): 122049-122049.

References

[1] 张庆虎. 超声速流动分离及其控制的试验研究[D]. 长沙:国防科技大学, 2013:1-141. ZHANG Q H. Experimental investigation of supersonic flow separation and its micro-ramp control[D]. Changsha:National University of Defense Technology, 2013:1-141(in Chinese).
[2] DUPONT P, HADDAD C, DEBIÈVE J F. Space and time organization in a shock-induced separated boundary layer[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2006, 559:255-277.
[3] BABINSKY H, HARVEY J K. 激波边界层干扰[M]. 白菡尘, 译. 北京:国防工业出版社, 2015:12. BABINSKY H, HARVEY J K. Shock wave-boundary-layer interactions[M]. BAI H C, translated. Beijing:National Defense Industry Press, 2015:12(in Chinese).
[4] LIN J C. Review of research on low-profile vortex generators to control boundary-layer separation[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2002, 38(4):389-420.
[5] TAYLOR H D. The elimination of diffuser separation by vortex generators:R-4012-3[R]. Moscow:United Aircraft Corporation, 1947.
[6] SCHUBAUER G B, SPANGENBER W G. Forced mixing in boundary layers[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2006, 8:10-32.
[7] BRAGG M B, GREGOREK G M. Experimental study of airfoil performance with vortex generators[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1987, 24(5):305-309.
[8] PEARCEY H H. Introduction to shock induced separation and its prevention by design and boundary layer control[M]//Boundary Layer and Flow Control. 1961:1166-1344.
[9] JENKINS L, GORTON S A, ANDERS S. Flow control device evaluation for an internal flow with an adverse pressure gradient:AIAA-2002-0266[R]. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2002.
[10] GAO L Y, ZHANG H, LIU Y Q. Effects of vortex generators on a blunt trailing-edge airfoil for wind turbines[J]. Renewable Energy, 2015, 76:303-311.
[11] CALARESE W, CRISLER W P, GUSTSFSON G L. Afterbody drag reduction by vortex generators:AIAA-1985-0354[R]. Reston, VA:AIAA, 1985.
[12] BROWN A C, NAWROCKI H F, PALEY P N. Subsonic diffusers designed integrally with vortex generators[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1968, 5(3):221-229.
[13] KUETHE A M. Effect of streamwise vortices on wake properties associated with sound generation[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1972, 9(10):715-719.
[14] ASHILL P R, FULKER J L, HACKETT K C. Research at DERA on sub boundary layer vortex generators:AIAA-2001-0877[R]. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2001.
[15] ANDERSON B H, TINAPPLE J A, SURBER L E. Optimal control of shock wave turbulent boundary layer interactions using micro-array actuation:AIAA-2006-3197[R]. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2006.
[16] SCHREYER A M, BERMEJO-MORENO I, KIM J, et al. Separation control in a hypersonic compression ramp interaction[R]. Stanford, CA:Center for Turbulence Research of Stanford University, 2016.
[17] YAN Y, CHEN L, LI Q, et al. Numerical study of micro-ramp vortex generator for supersonic ramp flow control at Mach 2.5[J]. Shock Waves, 2016, 27(1):1-18.
[18] 褚胡冰, 陈迎春, 张彬乾, 等. 增升装置微型涡流发生器数值模拟方法研究[J]. 航空学报, 2012, 33(1):11-21. CHU H B, CHEN Y C, ZHANG B Q, et al. Investigation of numerical simulation technique for micro vortex generators applied to high lift system[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica, 2012, 33(1):11-21(in Chinese).
[19] 赵瑞, 阎超. 超声速复杂流动中湍流模型的性能评估[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2011, 37(2):202-215. ZHAO R, YAN C. Evaluation of engineering turbulence models for complex supersonic flows[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2011, 37(2):202-215(in Chinese).
[20] SETTLES G S, FITZPATRICK T J, BOGDONOFF S M. Detailed study of attached and separated compression corner flowfields in high Reynolds number supersonic flow[J]. AIAA Journal, 1979, 17(6):579-585.
[21] ASHILL P R, FULKER J L, HACKETT K C. Studies of flows induced by sub boundary layer vortex generators (SBVGs):AIAA-2002-0968[R]. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2002.
[22] HUNT J C R, WRAY A A, MOIN P. Eddies stream and convergence zones in turbulent flow:N89-24555[R]. Washington, D.C.:NASA, 1988.

Control of compression ramp flow separation via vane vortex generator

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Xiaogang XU, Yang ZHANG, Tianbo WANG, Xudong MA, Gang CHEN. Mixing enhancement effect of multi-size water droplet spray [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(S2): 729130-729130.
[2]	Mengge WANG, Xiaoming HE, Juanjuan WANG, Yue ZHANG, Kun WANG, Huijun TAN, Liugang LI. Shock wave/boundary layer interaction control method based on oscillating vortex generator [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(20): 128503-128503.
[3]	SHI Xiaotian, LYU Meng, ZHAO Yuan, TAO Shancong, HAO Le, YUAN Xiangjiang. Flow control technique for shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interactions [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(1): 625929-625929.
[4]	CHEN Jianqiang, TU Guohua, WAN Bingbing, YUAN Xianxu, YANG Qiang, ZHUANG Yu, XIANG Xinghao. Characteristics of flow field and boundary-layer stability of HyTRV [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(6): 124317-124317.
[5]	WU Han, WANG Jianhong, HUANG Wei, DU Zhaobo, YAN Li. Research progress on shock wave/boundary layer interactions and flow controls induced by micro vortex generators [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(6): 25371-025371.
[6]	TONG Fulin, LI Xinliang, DUAN Yanhui. Dynamic mode decomposition of shock wave and supersonic boundary layer interactions in a compression ramp [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2017, 38(12): 121376-121376.
[7]	LI Yiming, LI Zhufei, YANG Jiming, WU Yingchuan, YU Anyuan. Flow visualization of a typical hypersonic inward-turning inlet using laser scattering [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2017, 38(12): 121414-121414.
[8]	ZHAO Xiaohui, DENG Xiaobing, MAO Meiliang, YANG Wei, ZHAO Huiyong. Large eddy simulation for forced transition flow at hypersonic inlet [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2016, 37(8): 2445-2453.
[9]	XU Xiangnan, ZHANG Hua, HU Bo. Numerical study of DBD vortex generator and application in junction flow control [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2016, 37(6): 1743-1752.
[10]	WANG Weixing, GUO Rongwei. Flow characteristics of an inward turning inlet with circular outlet [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2016, 37(2): 533-544.
[11]	TONG Fulin, TANG Zhigong, LI Xinliang, WU Xiaojun, ZHU Xingkun. Numerical study of shock wave and bypass transitional boundary layer interaction in a supersonic compression ramp [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2016, 37(12): 3588-3604.
[12]	TONG Fulin, LI Xinliang, TANG Zhigong, ZHU Xingkun, HUANG Jiangtao. Transition effect on separation bubble of shock wave/boundary layer interaction in a compression ramp [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2016, 37(10): 2909-2921.
[13]	TU Guohua, YAN Zhenguo, ZHAO Xiaohui, MA Yankai, MAO Meiliang. SA and SST turbulence models for hypersonic forced boundary layer transition [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2015, 36(5): 1471-1479.
[14]	BAO Feng, ZHU Rui, LIU Zhirong, HE Yi. Four-vortex system reconstruction and experimental study of its wake features [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2015, 36(5): 1491-1499.
[15]	ZHANG Lin, ZHANG Kunyuan, JIN Zhiguang, NAN Xiangjun, WANG Lei. Numerical Simulation of a Variable Geometry Hypersonic 2D Inlet Designed with Compressible Ramp Movable [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2012, 33(10): 1800-1808.