转捩对压缩拐角激波/边界层干扰分离泡的影响

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2015.0355

Abstract

Abstract:

Direct numerical simulations (DNS) of shock wave and transitional boundary layer interaction for a 24°compression corner at Mach number 2.9 are performed to study the effect of transition on the separation bubble at the ramp corner. At upstream, the flat-plate transition is triggered by the periodic blow and suction disturbance. The interaction of shock wave and transitional boundary layer is then simulated by setting the length of upstream flat-plate. The extent of separation agrees well with those of the experimental and direct numerical simulation data, which validate the results. Transition effect on the separation bubble in the interaction region is researched and the turbulent kinetic energy budget in the bubble is analyzed. Results indicate that the coherent structures at the early stage of transition have a serious influence on the separation bubble, in which the turbulent spots are formed by the hairpin vortices. Then the scale of separation bubble is the smallest and the shape is spike-type in the spanwise direction. With the evolution of transition, the turbulent production and dissipation term in the separation bubble gradually reduce by four times, while the turbulent transport term contributes to the balance of the turbulent production and dissipation.

Key words: transition, compression ramp, shock wave/boundary layer interaction, separation bubble, direct numerical simulation

CLC Number:

TONG Fulin, LI Xinliang, TANG Zhigong, ZHU Xingkun, HUANG Jiangtao. Transition effect on separation bubble of shock wave/boundary layer interaction in a compression ramp[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2016, 37(10): 2909-2921.

References

[1] PLOTKIN K J. Shock wave oscillation driven by turbulent boundary layer fluctuations[J]. AIAA Journal, 1975, 13(8):1036-1040.
[2] POGGIE J, SMITS A J. Experimental evidence for plotkin model of shock unsteadiness in separated flow[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2005, 17(1):018107.
[3] TOUBER E, SANDHAM N D. Low order stochastic modeling of low-frequency motions in reflected shock-wave boundary layer interactions[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2011, 671(3):417-465.
[4] DOLLING D S, MURPHY M T. Unsteadiness of the separation shock wave structure in a supersonic compression ramp flowfield[J]. AIAA Journal, 1983, 21(12):628-634.
[5] ADAMS N A. Direct simulation of the turbulent boundary layer along a compression ramp at M=3 and Re_θ=1685[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2000, 420(3):47-83.
[6] LOGINOV M S, ADAMS N A, ZHELTOVODOV A A. Large eddy simulation of shock wave and turbulent boundary layer interaction[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2006, 565(1):135-169.
[7] DOLLING D S. Fifty years of shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction research:what next?[J]. AIAA Journal, 2001, 39(8):1517-1530.
[8] CHAPMAN D R, KUEHN D M, LARRSON H K. Investigation of separated flows in supersonic and subsonic streams with emphasis on the effect of transitions:NACA Report 1356[R]. Washington, D.C.:NASA, 1958.
[9] MURPHREE Z R, YUCEIL K B, CLEMENS N T, et al. Experimental studies of transitional boundary layer shock wave interactions:AIAA-2007-1139[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2007.
[10] VANSTONE L, SAMPER D E, HILLIER R. Shock-induced separation of transitional hypersonic boundary layers:AIAA-2015-2736[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2015.
[11] GIEPMAN R H M, SCHRIJER F F J, OUDHEUSDEN B W V. High-resolution PIV measurements of a transitional shock wave-boundary layer interaction[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2015, 56(6):1-20.
[12] POLIVANOV P A, SIDORENKO A A, MASLOV A A. Transition effect on shock wave/boundary layer interaction at M=1.47:AIAA-2015-1974[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2015.
[13] PRIEBE S, MARTIN M P. Low frequency unsteadiness in shock wave-turbulent boundary layer interaction[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2012, 699(5):1-49.
[14] LI X L, FU D X, MA Y W, et al. Direct numerical simulation of shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction in a supersonic compression ramp[J]. Science China:Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy, 2010, 53(9):1651-1658.
[15] GAO H, FU D X, MA Y W, et al. Direct numerical simulation of supersonic turbulent boundary layer flow[J]. Chinese Physics Letters, 2005, 22(7):1709-1712.
[16] LI X L, FU D X, MA Y W, et al, Acoustic calculation for supersonic turbulent boundary flow[J]. Chinese Physics Letters, 2009, 26(9):094701.
[17] RINGUETTE M J, BOOKEY P, WYCKHAM C, et al. Experimental study of a mach 3 compression ramp interaction at Re_θ=2400[J]. AIAA Journal, 2009, 47(2):373-385.
[18] BOOKEY P, WYCKHAM C. SMITS A J, et al. New experimental data of STBLI at DNS/LES accessible Reynolds numbers:AIAA-2005-0309[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2005.
[19] WU M, MARTIN M P. Direct numerical simulation of supersonic turbulent boundary layer over a compression ramp[J]. AIAA Journal, 2007, 45(4):879-889.
[20] MARTIN M P, TAYLOR E M, WU M, et al. A bandwidth-optimized WENO scheme for the effective direct numerical simulation of compressible turbulence[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2006, 220(1):270-289.
[21] PIROZZOLI S, GRASSO F, GATSKI T B. Direct numerical simulation and analysis of a spatially evolving supersonic turbulent boundary layer at M=2.25[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2004, 16(3):530-545.
[22] PIROZZOLI S, BERNARDINI M. Direct numerical simulation database for impinging shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction[J]. AIAA Journal, 2011, 49(6):1307-1312.
[23] JEONG J, HUSSAIN F. On the identification of a vortex[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1995, 285(1):69-94.
[24] HEAD M R, BANDYOPADHYAY P R. New aspects of turbulent boundary layer structure[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1981, 107:297-338.
[25] LEE C B, WU J Z. Transition in wall-bounded flows[J]. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 2008, 61(3):0802.
[26] LEE C B. Possible universal transitional scenario in a flat plate boundary layer:measurement and visualization[J]. Physical Review E, 2000, 62(3):297-338.

Transition effect on separation bubble of shock wave/boundary layer interaction in a compression ramp

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Yuqing QIU, Yan LI, Jinxi LANG, Yuxian LIU, Zhong WANG. Robust adaptive attitude control of high-speed helicopters in transition mode [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(9): 529927-529927.
[2]	Heyong SI, Yaoli WANG, Lihua CAO, Dongchao CHEN. Dynamic behavior of seal-rotor system in a supercritical carbon dioxide turbine during acceleration transition [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(2): 228652-228652.
[3]	Jiang LAI, Zhaolin FAN, Qian WANG, Siwei DONG, Fulin TONG, Xianxu YUAN. Direct numerical simulation of hypersonic cone-flare model at angle of attack [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(2): 128610-128610.
[4]	Xueliang LI, Chuangchuang LI, Wei SU, Jie WU. Experiment of influence of distributed roughness elements on hypersonic boundary layer instability [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(2): 128627-128627.
[5]	Hai LI, Yongjun LI, Yuanhao LIU, Weihu ZHAO, Xin LI, Shanghong ZHAO. ESWO⁃based task⁃scheduling algorithm for agile earth observation satellites [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(10): 329370-329370.
[6]	Yalu FU, Xianxu YUAN, Pengxin LIU, Ming YU. Statistical properties of thermodynamic fluctuations in compressible wall⁃bounded turbulence [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(9): 127217-127217.
[7]	Yu ZENG, Hongbo WANG, Mingbo SUN, Chao WANG, Xu LIU. SST turbulence model improvements: Review [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(9): 27411-027411.
[8]	Weijia LIU, Yingkun LI, Xiong CHEN, Chunlei LI. Panel flutter characteristics on shock wave/boundary layer interaction based on fluid⁃structure coupling [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(6): 127085-127085.
[9]	Hongkang LIU, Jianqiang CHEN, Xinghao XIANG, Yatian ZHAO. Transition prediction for HIAD with different Reynolds numbers by improved k-ω-γtransition model [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(6): 126868-126868.
[10]	Zhanfeng MENG, Shan GAO, Ruiqing SHENG. Lunar orbit rendezvous phasing design for Chang’e-5 Mission [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(5): 326584-326584.
[11]	Guoyuan ZHANG, Xukang LI, Weigang ZHAO, Yangyang ZHAO, Junqian WANG. Theoretical and experimental on two-phase flow mechanism of low-temperature high-speed hydrodynamic mechanical seal [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(23): 628229-628229.
[12]	Yutian WANG, Jianxin LIU, Xiaokun WANG, Xiaoming LI. Effects of porous wall on secondary instability of optimal growth streaks in high speed boundary layers [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(22): 128519-128519.
[13]	Mengge WANG, Xiaoming HE, Juanjuan WANG, Yue ZHANG, Kun WANG, Huijun TAN, Liugang LI. Shock wave/boundary layer interaction control method based on oscillating vortex generator [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(20): 128503-128503.
[14]	Yang ZHANG, Jiaqi LUO, Xian ZENG. Elliptic flow noise by improved ghost⁃cell immersed boundary method [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(19): 128418-128418.
[15]	Shanshan TIAN, Liang JIN, Zhaobo DU, Xiangyu ZHONG, Wei HUANG, Yuanyang LIU. Research progress of shock wave/boundary layer interaction controls induced by bump [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(18): 28411-028411.